Intel Raptor Lake Ring Bus Flaw Leak: Bartlett Lake is Affected, and there’s no Instability Fix!

Summary

The video discusses Intel's Bartlett Lake rumors, suggesting it's not a budget platform as rumored but more for networking and high-frequency trading. It highlights potential issues with Intel's Raptor Lake, including high voltage causing failures and a possible ring bus flaw. The video also speculates on the impact of these issues on Intel's reputation and compares Intel's transparency with AMD's approach.

Takeaways

• 🤔 Intel's Bartlett Lake is rumored to be a Zen3 AM4 competitor, but sources suggest it might not be as interesting to consumers as expected.
• 💬 The first source indicates that Bartlett Lake was never intended for client use and Intel's 10nm process is expensive, making it uncompetitive for budget users.
• 🔌 Bartlett Lake is reportedly aimed at networking and edge applications, as well as high-frequency trading, rather than general consumers.
• 🕰 If microcode updates for Raptor Lake are insufficient, Intel might need to reduce clock speeds on Bartlett Lake, affecting its competitiveness with AMD's 2025 products.
• 🚫 Bartlett Lake is said to have the same hardware flaw as Raptor Lake, which could impact its reliability and performance.
• 🔥 The leading theory within Intel is that the ring bus in Raptor Lake is overheating due to high voltage requirements, potentially affecting Bartlett Lake as well.
• 🌡️ Raptor Lake's design was rushed, and there were concerns about the ring bus being damaged if voltage was pushed too high, indicating potential issues with yield and reliability.
• 🏭 An oxidation issue at Intel's Arizona Fab in 2023 is suspected to have affected Raptor Lake and possibly Sapphire Rapids, but not Meteor Lake or Emerald Rapids.
• 🛠️ The microcode update for Raptor Lake expected in August is anticipated to improve chip longevity but may still result in some performance loss and is not a complete fix.
• 💔 Intel's handling of the Raptor Lake situation is seen as a PR and financial disaster, with potential long-term impacts on consumer trust and brand reputation.

Q & A

What is the main topic of discussion in the video?

The main topic of discussion in the video is the rumored Intel Bartlett Lake product, its potential as a competitor to Zen3 AM4, and the issues surrounding Intel's Raptor Lake chips.

Why might Bartlett Lake not be as interesting to consumers as initially thought?

Bartlett Lake might not be as interesting to consumers because it was never intended for client use, and Intel's 10nm process is expensive, making it uncompetitive as a budget platform.

What are the alternative uses for Bartlett Lake mentioned in the video?

The video suggests that Bartlett Lake could be used for networking, edge computing, and possibly high-frequency trading, rather than general consumer products.

What potential issue with Raptor Lake is discussed in the video?

The video discusses a potential hardware flaw in Raptor Lake, specifically with the ring bus getting 'cooked' due to high voltages required for the P and E cores.

How does the ring bus issue in Raptor Lake affect Bartlett Lake?

The ring bus issue in Raptor Lake could also affect Bartlett Lake if it is overvolted similarly, suggesting an inherent flaw that would be present in both products.

What is the significance of the microcode update for Raptor Lake?

The microcode update for Raptor Lake is expected to mitigate some of the issues with the ring bus and potentially improve the longevity of the chips, though it may not be a complete fix.

What is the potential impact of the Raptor Lake issues on Intel's reputation and market position?

The Raptor Lake issues could lead to a public relations and financial disaster for Intel, with potential negative impacts on consumer trust and competition with AMD.

How does the video suggest AMD is capitalizing on Intel's situation?

The video suggests that AMD is delaying the launch of Zen 5 to appear more transparent and honest, potentially positioning themselves as a more reliable alternative to Intel.

What is the role of the Intel Arizona Fab in the Raptor Lake issues?

The Intel Arizona Fab is mentioned as a location where Raptor Lake was rushed through production, and where an oxidation issue was identified, potentially contributing to chip failures.

What advice does the video give to consumers who currently have a Raptor Lake chip?

The video advises consumers to wait for the microcode update in August, which may improve chip longevity, but also warns that the chips may still eventually fail due to inherent design flaws.

What is the broader implication of the issues discussed in the video for the tech industry?

The broader implication is that transparency and honesty in product development and communication are crucial for maintaining consumer trust and avoiding damaging PR crises, as seen with Intel's situation.

Outlines

00:00

🤔 Bartlett Lake: A Misunderstood Intel Product

The first paragraph discusses the rumors surrounding Intel's Bartlett Lake, which is often portrayed as a budget Zen3 AM4 competitor. However, multiple sources from Intel suggest that this perception might be misguided. The first source indicates that Bartlett Lake was never intended for the client market but could potentially appear in OEM products. Intel's 10nm process is expensive, making it an unlikely choice for a budget platform. The second source reveals that Bartlett Lake is more suited for networking and high-frequency trading rather than general consumer use. Additionally, there are concerns that if the microcode update for Raptor Lake is insufficient, Intel might need to lower the clocks on Bartlett Lake, further reducing its competitiveness with AMD's products in 2025. The paragraph also hints at a hardware flaw in Bartlett Lake, similar to that of Raptor Lake, which could affect its performance and reliability.

05:00

💡 Understanding Raptor Lake's Issues and Expectations

The second paragraph delves into the complexities of Raptor Lake's problems, suggesting that there are multiple factors at play. The speaker believes that Intel is over-binning chips and pushing them beyond their limits, leading to potential failures. Raptor Lake was hastily developed, adding more cores and increasing voltages, which might have resulted in a less robust architecture. The speaker also speculates that Intel is pushing more i7 chips to become i9s to meet demand, possibly leading to more failures. A second issue is an inherent flaw in Raptor Lake's design, where the ring bus and the power and efficiency cores are on the same rail, causing voltage drops that could lead to chip failures. The third issue is related to Intel's Arizona Fab, where there might be an oxidation issue affecting the chips. The speaker also discusses the upcoming microcode update in August, suggesting that it might only provide a partial fix with a minimal performance hit but not completely resolving the longevity issues.

10:01

🔍 Investigating Intel's Manufacturing and PR Challenges

The third paragraph continues the discussion on Raptor Lake's issues, focusing on the manufacturing process and potential problems at Intel's Arizona Fab. The speaker calls for fellow tech enthusiasts to investigate batch numbers to determine if oxidation is a significant factor in Raptor Lake failures. The speaker also addresses the upcoming microcode update, suggesting that it might not be enough to save Intel from the public relations and financial disaster they are facing. Concerns are raised about the chaotic rollout of these updates and the potential for further failures. The speaker also mentions AMD's strategy, delaying Zen 5 to appear more transparent and capitalize on Intel's issues, positioning themselves as more honest and reliable.

15:02

📢 The Need for Transparency and Intel's Leadership Crisis

In the final paragraph, the speaker emphasizes the importance of transparency in Intel's communication about their products. The speaker criticizes Intel for not being upfront about the issues with Raptor Lake, leading to tech channels having to perform investigative journalism to uncover the truth. The speaker also highlights the chaos within Intel, with even employees reaching out for information about their own company's products. The speaker suggests that this situation reflects poorly on Intel's leadership and calls for a change in how they handle such crises. The paragraph concludes with a call to action for viewers to share the video to help other tech channels in their investigations and a reminder of the importance of community support through Patreon.

Keywords

💡Bartlett Lake

Bartlett Lake is a rumored Intel product that has been a topic of speculation in the tech community. It is often characterized as a potential budget-friendly competitor to AMD's Zen 3 processors. However, according to the script, sources from Intel suggest that Bartlett Lake may not be as consumer-focused as initially thought, possibly being more relevant to niche markets like networking or high-frequency trading. The script also hints at potential issues with this product, suggesting it may not be as competitive as expected.

💡LGA 1700

LGA 1700 refers to the socket type used for certain Intel processors. It is part of Intel's product line and is mentioned in the script as a platform that Bartlett Lake might have been intended to complement, aiming to make it a budget-friendly option. However, the script indicates that this might not be the case, as Intel's 10-nanometer process is expensive and may not fit the budget platform narrative.

💡Zen 4

Zen 4 is the codename for a series of microprocessors developed by AMD, representing their next-generation architecture. In the script, Zen 4 is used as a benchmark for competitive performance, with Intel's products, including Bartlett Lake and Raptor Lake, being compared against it in terms of clock speeds and voltage requirements.

💡Raptor Lake

Raptor Lake is another Intel product mentioned in the script, which is facing issues with its design and manufacturing process. It is suggested that Raptor Lake has a hardware flaw related to high voltage requirements and the ring bus design, which might lead to product failures. The script discusses the potential impact of these issues on Intel's reputation and market position.

💡Ring Bus

The ring bus is a design element in CPU architecture that allows different parts of the processor to communicate with each other. In the script, it is suggested that the ring bus in Raptor Lake and potentially Bartlett Lake is under strain due to high voltage requirements for the performance cores (P-cores) and efficiency cores (E-cores), possibly leading to overheating and product failure.

💡Microcode Update

A microcode update refers to changes made to the low-level code that controls a processor's operation. The script discusses an upcoming microcode update for Raptor Lake that is intended to mitigate the issues caused by the hardware flaw. However, it is suggested that this update may only provide a partial fix and could result in a performance hit.

💡Overvolting

Overvolting is the practice of increasing the voltage supplied to a component, such as a CPU, beyond its default settings to achieve higher performance. In the context of the script, overvolting is implied to be a factor contributing to the issues with Raptor Lake, as the high voltages required for competitive performance may be causing the ring bus to overheat.

💡Binning

Binning in the context of semiconductor manufacturing refers to the process of categorizing chips based on their performance characteristics. The script suggests that Intel may be 'binning' too many chips, pushing more i7 chips to become i9s to meet demand, which could be exacerbating the issues with Raptor Lake.

💡Oxidation Issue

Oxidation issue refers to a chemical process where a material reacts with oxygen, potentially leading to degradation or failure. The script mentions an oxidation issue at Intel's Arizona fabrication facility, which may have affected the quality of Raptor Lake chips produced there, contributing to the overall failure rate.

💡Sapphire Rapids

Sapphire Rapids is another Intel product line mentioned in the script. It is suggested that Sapphire Rapids might not be significantly affected by the issues that are plaguing Raptor Lake, indicating that different product lines within Intel may have different levels of risk associated with their design and manufacturing processes.

💡PR Disaster

PR Disaster refers to a public relations crisis, where a company's reputation is severely damaged due to negative publicity or a lack of transparency. The script describes the situation with Intel's Raptor Lake as a PR disaster, due to the product's issues and Intel's perceived lack of communication about them, which is causing concern among consumers and tech enthusiasts.

Highlights

Intel Bartlet Lake rumors suggest it is not as interesting to consumers as initially thought.

Bartlet Lake was never intended for client use, according to an Intel source.

Intel's 10 nanometer process is expensive, affecting the budget appeal of Bartlet Lake.

Bartlet Lake is more suited for networking and high-frequency trading, not general consumers.

Potential need to drop clocks on Bartlet Lake due to microcode update issues with Raptor Lake.

Bartlet Lake is rumored to have the same hardware flaw as Raptor Lake.

Intel's ring bus might be getting damaged due to high voltage requirements.

Raptor Lake's design and validation process was rushed, possibly leading to overlooked issues.

Oxidation issues at Intel's Arizona Fab could be contributing to Raptor Lake failures.

Sapphire Rapids might also be affected by the same issues as Raptor Lake.

Intel's over-binning and high voltage strategies might be causing chip failures.

An inherent flaw in Raptor Lake's architecture could be causing voltage drops and chip failures.

Intel's Arizona Fab might have a specific issue affecting the quality of Raptor Lake chips.

The upcoming microcode update in August is expected to improve Raptor Lake's longevity but not completely fix the issues.

Intel's PR and financial disaster due to Raptor Lake issues could impact consumer trust and future sales.

AMD is capitalizing on Intel's issues by delaying Zen 5 with transparency.

Intel's lack of transparency is forcing tech channels to do investigative journalism to uncover product issues.

Transcripts

[Music]

for a couple weeks now there's been much

ad do about Intel Bartlet Lake rumors

with most articles characterizing this

product as some sort of zen3 am4

competitor meant to turn LGA 1700 into a

proper budget platform below LGA 1851

long term but here's the thing according

to multiple sources at Intel that I

spoke with I'm hearing that we really

shouldn't be sure Bartlett Lake is all

that interesting to Consumers the First

Source that I spoke to at Intel said

that as far as they are aware Bar Lake

was never intended for client and well

they guess they could see some CPUs hit

de yourself in OEM it won't be because

it's budget at all Intel 10 nanometer is

very expensive and this is just a public

fact now we've seen an ifs earnings

reports that it is woefully

uncompetitive in pricing compared to

tsmc's current nodes and so if the idea

was to keep using this well really drawn

out an expensive node for as long as

possible I do not think that's Intel's

plan at all at least not for Budget

users now the Second Source I spoke to

at Intel said that barlet lake is for

networking an edge maybe also for high

frequency trading but not for general

consumers furthermore if the micro code

update for Raptor Lake isn't effective

enough they might even need to drop the

clocks on Bartlet lake so they won't

break and if that happens it's not going

to be competitive with amd's products in

2025 at all so yeah look Bartlet Lake it

exists but it isn't on a lot of people's

radar because it really shouldn't be if

you're someone who wants to buy this for

a gaming rig or something it is coming

out so late as well rumored to be coming

like a year from now that I just don't

think it'll be competitive with anything

AMD has out at the time so yeah I don't

think it's that interesting to talk

about except well you know you probably

noticed from the title and thumbnail of

this video that there is something worth

talking about and Bartlet and that's

that it seems to have the same Hardware

flaw in it that Raptor lake has now of

course when that source source number

two from the slide told me that it had

basically the same flaw as Raptor Lake I

of course immediately followed up and

then we had a long conversation about

what is probably making Raptor Lake

products break and so now if I put these

quotes on screen Source number one here

with Source number two on the other

Slide the person told me that the

leading theory inside Intel right now is

that the ring bus is getting cooked

because it's fed by the same rail as the

p and the E cores remember they even

double the amount of EES and Raptor Lake

required incredibly High voltages to hit

the clocks required to be competitive

with Zen 4 and it seems like it was just

pushed too hard that the ring bust is

getting cooked by these high voltages

that are connected to making the PE

cores clock incredibly high that this is

an inherent flaw that would also be in

Bartlet Lake if Bartlet lake is

overvolted as much as Raptor Lake now

the good news is that this person tells

me that meteor Lake isn't affected and

that Emerald Rapids is unlikely to be

affected materially as well so then I

took this information I reached out to

one of my longest running sources at

inel someone who's been instrumental in

so many leaks and I said is this true

does this make sense to you as an

explanation and the person said that

they never directly worked on Raptor

Lake but that they did have exposure to

Alder Lake and they can confirm that the

team working on Alder Lake was very

concerned about the ring bus getting

damaged if the voltage was pushed too

high and this person also confirmed that

R Lake was rush through their design and

validation process really quickly so

perhaps they just didn't catch this is a

problem in many of the yields now a

third Source I reached out to I called

up this person works at Intel foundaries

and they did confirm again that Raptor

Lake was rushed through their Fab in

Arizona in record time but it is

produced other Fab it's not just

produced in this Fab in Arizona however

this location is notable though because

they can confirm that there was an

oxidation issue caused by some failures

in the HV system at this plant between

March and June of 2023 it was so bad

that Kavon esfarjani had to fly in to

make a decision about which Wafers

needed to be thrown away which is a

really big decision because each wafer I

told costs as much as a model X and to

be clear though this person doesn't know

what the decision was like which parts

were thrown away uh which at what stage

in the manufacturing process they said

hey anything but before this we have to

throw away this person doesn't know that

it's above their pay grade but they do

know that this happened and a decision

like that was made and also that this

this would have affected Sapphire Rapids

so if oxidation were to be the main

issue for Raptor Lake failures you

should expect to see that in Sapphire

Rapids products as well now oxidation

probably is a contributing factor to all

the failures we're seeing but it doesn't

sound like it's the main one although I

do have to say it's really interesting

guess who just left Intel Kavon es

farani this timing is insane and so you

know after talking to all of these

people literally anyone I know at Intel

that I could get on the phone this week

I have to say that I'm fairly confident

that I know what is going on with raptor

Lake and it is not just one thing and I

want to summarize the whole situation to

you all and also tell you what I'm being

told you should expect in terms of like

how well it will work out of that micro

code update in August but first an ad

from a sponsor all Jesse wants is for

Maurice to play with her more often but

unfortunately he just does not give out

playtime or kisses for as low of a rate

as she does and I think she's just going

to have to deal with that but do you

know what you don't have to deal with

paying too much for Microsoft software

if you go to CD key offer.com this piece

of content is sponsored by cdkey

offer.com and they're back to school

sale whether it's Microsoft operating

systems Office Products or even many of

the latest games cdkey offer.com

provides PC Gamers with a product this

community deserves amongst endlessly

elevating component costs fair pricing

on Microsoft Keys is one thing that we

at least should get I think and you know

the mors law dead team has been working

with cdkey offer.com for a very long

time and that's because they're good to

me good to Dan good to about a dozen

family members of friends of mine that

have used their services and they've

been really really good most importantly

to the morla is dead community soort

support this channel by using offer code

broken silicon to save 25% off Microsoft

software or you can also use die shrink

to save 3% off everything else on the

website like games using either of those

codes really helps the channel a ton and

it helps save you money so use those

codes broken silicon and D shrink at

cdkey offer.com today all right so now

let me summarize the three not one the

three main issues that I believe are

causing failures in so many Raptor Lake

chip and the first one is that I think

Intel is just bending way too many chips

too high with an architecture that just

probably isn't as robust as Alder Lake I

mean think about it Raptor Lake was hily

thrown together in record time and its

entire stick was that we added more

cores to the same design and also upped

voltages a ton something that you rush

out there with really high voltage that

just seems like you're asking for

problems to me and I believe that in

conjunction with the fact that it's just

rushed at too high of a voltage Intel is

pushing far more i7s to become i9s in

order to meet demand than they should be

and now to be clear about what I mean by

this point what I'm saying is that

though Raptor Lake actually is better

than Alder Lake and an Apples to Apples

sort of way like you know Raptor Lake

does require less voltage for the same

clock speeds I still believe that most

of the yields cannot handle it as well

as until thought they could when they

were preparing Raptor Lake and what

gives me so much confidence in this idea

is that I've long heard since even Intel

13th gen that Intel can't make enough I9

to meet demand and so it wouldn't

surprise me if there was a lot of

pressure to push as many i7s as they can

into I9 and maybe they just

underestimated how many of them really

shouldn't be pushed that hard and in

fact that makes even more sense when you

consider the disastrous earnings you are

seeing with Intel right now and the bad

margins the products with the highest

margins are I9 and so I would guess that

intel was desperate to push as many

chips as hard as they can to keep good

margins now that's the first problem

over binning and not really testing

Raptor Lake as much as they should have

but the second problem is that there

actually is though it unrelated to that

there is actually an inherent flaw in

Raptor Lake I am told you know Raptor

Lake doubled the ecores while still

having the ring bust and the peores and

the E cores all on the same Rail and so

if you think about that how high they

push those voltages when I I'm told is

that a problem arises when the V drop

causes viid to exceed around 1.5 volts

and then well it Cooks itself and of

course the more p and the E cores you

have at the higher voltages in a CPU the

quicker that CPU is going to break

itself which is why you're mostly just

seeing the highest core count highest

clocked models break at least for now

and that's why occasionally disabling

eor when the instability starts to

happen can fix it but it's still likely

going to break eventually and if it's

completely broken disabling the eor

isn't going to do anything now the

reason I still think though that some

chips are never failing because a lot of

people are saying that some chips no

matter how long they run them at high

voltages they're not failing is that I

just think those chips are golden

samples it can probably handle it Intel

is bending way too many imperfect chips

into the top end with an inherently

flawed architecture and so unless you

have a golden sample a lot of them are

going to break although if you do have a

go golden sample I mean they did design

the architecture for higher voltages it

wouldn't surprise me that some of them

actually can take it now finally the

third issue yeah look I am told that

there is something wrong at Intel's

Arizona Fab and actually I would like to

put this out there i' like to request

that fellow Tech tubers or devs or

people who have access to a lot of data

look at their samples and look up the

batch number I believe if you take that

batch number and inquire to Intel where

it was manufactured they would tell you

so we can figure this out look I don't

think oxidation is is the main cause of

raptor Lake failures I do think it could

be contributing to it though and if you

want to prove it then prove it we can

take the failed products of raptor Lake

we can look at their batches and if

they're all coming from the Arizona PB

which I am told is the one with the

oxidation issue then we can prove if it

is or isn't from that but if it is from

that I would expect to see more Sapphire

Rapids failures as well especially more

Sapphire Rapids failures in the second

half of last year and then have those

failures go away that would prove some

of the oxidation stuff but I don't have

that data but I'm sure someone else out

there does but anyways what if you do

have a raptor Lake chip right now in

your system should you expect that micro

code update that's coming out in August

to actually be a good enough mitigation

for the issues to go away for you to

stop worrying well what I'm basically

being told and now keep in mind this is

coming from people within Intel we're

not really going to know until it's

tested in the wild and they're probably

biased towards this but what I'm hearing

from within Intel is that they actually

do expect that the micr code mitigation

will only have a single digits

performance hit some people think it'll

be very very very minor and that they do

genuinely themselves honestly believe

that it will massively improve the

longevity of the chips but think about

what I'm saying here you're still going

to probably get some slight performance

loss and it's improving the longevity it

isn't a complete fix it just means that

if you have an 94900 K assuming it

hasn't already been eroded enough for it

already to be a problem that once this

micro code update is out it will take

years not months for the chip to break

but that this is still probably

something that will eventually break

sooner than some battle hardened

architecture that lasts for decades like

we sometimes see when people brag about

Sly using sandybridge

and you know I've actually got to say

that even if the micr code update does

work well like there's a minimal

performance losses and the systems that

get the micro code updates well those

CPUs last for many more years I still

don't think think that's going to be

enough to really save Intel from this

mounting PR and financial disaster that

they are hurling into right now the the

oems and motherboard manufacturers that

I speak to expect the roll out of these

micro code updates to be very chaotic

and tons of people are worried about

like well maybe we'll handle it well we

hope but like what about that other

motherboard manufacturer that had a

terrible Baseline like update that like

broke bioses like how is that not going

to happen with this and frankly are we

really sure there's going to be a way to

force most Raptor Lake users to get this

micro code update like I'm sure you know

uh Enthusiast gamer watching this

channel you know you you you've got your

ear to the rail you're very involved

online and learning about all these

little updates I'm sure you'll update

your system but what about all of the

casual gamers or people that just bought

a laptop to use at home and don't pay

attention to this news like are they

really going to be fiddling in their

bios or is there really going to be a

safe way to force the micro code update

in like a Windows update in a way that

doesn't end up also causing other

problems once they try to do that I just

think there's no way around the fact

that there's going to be a mountain of

millions of Ras that Intel is going to

have to be dealing with for years now

and the pr damage I mean it's it's

already done this is just blowing up

into bigger and bigger and more

mainstream websites and even if someone

has a like a Intel laptop that is n one

of the dies that's likely to break I

can't help but think that if this keeps

getting more and more mainstream that

you could see someone just sitting at

home their laptop breaks they see the

Intel sticker and they go well there it

is I'm not using them again I mean think

about do-it-yourself Gamers like no one

that I've spoken to is excited to buy

AOL Lake right away with this problem

they're going to want to wait months or

a year to see if AOL lake has the same

problems that Raptor lake has this is

just a complete PR disaster and well I

guess I'll also say that yeah AMD is

capitalizing on this delaying Zen 5 with

tons of transparency so they can

probably both launch next to Intel's

slightly nerfed chips once they're

updated uh and so they'll look a little

worse than the benchmarks but also so

that they look like a good guy but you

know I do want to be clear about this

Zen 5 delay thing going on right here

well I have no doubt that AMD is happy

to play up the fact that they seem to be

being more honest than Intel and I'm

sure they are also very happy that Intel

may have a slight performance Nerf right

next to a Zen 5 launch that they've

delayed I don't think that they just did

it for those reasons I do believe that

AMD probably found a minor defect in a

small batch of their chips one that they

could probably just rolled the dice on

and said hey it's not a big defect the

pro most of them are probably fine I

mean we just armade the small amount

that break you know we could get away

with it I think they could have done

that but I think maybe they'd learned

from the 7900 XTX Vapor cooler defect a

completely stupid wave of unnecessary

neily bad PR that just hit them because

like 20% of one batch had defective

coolers I think amd's learned I think

that's what we should take away from

this Zen 5 delay is that AMD has learned

that even if it isn't a huge deal uh

even if you're worried that being honest

about it would create more bad PR that

being honest about it is actually what

stops all the conspiracy theories from

going around and making you look like

you're hiding something more than you

really are that is what I think is going

on with AMD Zen 5 delay right now and I

do think that this is really the thing

to close on with this video is how

absolutely ridiculous it is that

multiple Tech channels are forced to do

basically investigatory journalism to

find out what the heck is going on with

Intel's products instead of Intel being

honest and upfront about what they know

and what they don't know to the point

that even people at Intel I have new

sources by the way too who contributed

to this video are reaching out to me

because they want to know what's going

on with their own company's products

that is so chaotic and in my opinion

that shows that there's just something

wrong with the leadership at Intel right

now if they can let this go on that long

to the point that their own employees

are gossiping about the issue

and yeah that's basically all I have

left to say on this video I hope you

enjoyed it if you did please make sure

that you like it that you comment down

below for the algorithm and also that

you share it I actually think sharing

this video is more important than usual

because the findings that I have in it

could assist other Tech tubers in their

investigations like I was speaking with

Wendell offline the other day and I know

that he is continuing his work as well

you know the more we share this stuff

the more we're going to get down to the

bottom of what's going on here and then

also consider joining the morla is at

patreon as well this was a lot of work

done by multiple people that need to put

bread on the table and so I'd really

appreciate anyone who can support it

that extra $24 or whatever you can

afford a month you'll get tons of

exclusive adree content like the D

catalog a new one just came out Billy

ask us questions you can join the

Discord and talk to me right now about

what you thought about this video and

talk to thousands of other patrons as

well that are supporting the channel

cannot do this without our patrons but

you know what I will also say this if

you made it this far into the video at a

minimum thank you for watching

n

[Music]