Is It Okay to Read A Bible OTHER Than the KJV?

Summary

Pastor Scott Ingram addresses the question of whether it's acceptable to read Bible translations other than the King James Version (KJV). He discusses his personal journey and the importance of trusting the translation one reads. The sermon delves into the history of the Bible, the difference between original writings, copies, and translations, and the significance of preserving God's word accurately. He distinguishes between heretical, paraphrased, and critical text Bibles, advocating for the KJV's accuracy and trustworthiness while encouraging personal study and discernment.

Takeaways

• 📜 The speaker, Pastor Scott Ingram, addresses the question of whether it's acceptable to read Bibles other than the King James Version (KJV), a question frequently asked by his online ministry audience.
• 🤔 He shares his personal journey of studying various Bible translations, including the KJV, NKJV, NIV, ESV, and others, to determine which he could trust.
• 🛐 Pastor Ingram emphasizes the importance of being able to trust the translation of the Bible being read, as the Bible is considered the authority on what God has said.
• 🚫 The script discusses the potential for confusion and misinterpretation of God's word, referencing the first sin in the Bible as an example of the consequences of misunderstanding divine instruction.
• 📖 The pastor explains the difference between the 'original writings,' 'copies,' and 'translations,' and how they relate to the Bible's authenticity and trustworthiness.
• 🔍 He highlights the King James Version as the most used and exact translation of the Hebrew and Greek texts that were believed to be the Bible's text for centuries.
• 🆚 However, he also acknowledges that there are newer translations that some believe to be more accurate, based on more recently discovered manuscripts.
• 🕊️ The sermon touches on the concept of God's promise to preserve His word for every generation, despite variations in copies over time.
• 🌐 The script contrasts the historical use of the Latin Vulgate and Greek texts in the Western and Eastern churches, respectively, and how this influenced the perception of the Bible's authority.
• 📚 Pastor Ingram critiques paraphrased Bibles and those based on the critical text, noting that they may not be as authoritative as the KJV, which he believes to be more faithful to the original texts.
• 📝 He encourages individuals to study the Bible for themselves, comparing different translations to understand the original meanings and to establish their own trust in the translation they choose to read.

Q & A

What is the main concern expressed in the script about reading Bible translations other than the King James Version (KJV)?

The main concern is the trustworthiness of various Bible translations and the fear that some translations might not be as accurate or authoritative as the KJV, potentially leading to misunderstandings of God's word.

Why did Pastor Scott Ingram's father trust the KJV and not other translations?

Pastor Scott Ingram's father trusted the KJV because he had always used it, but he didn't claim to know if all translations were the same since he hadn't read them all. He encouraged his son to determine which translation he trusted.

What is the significance of the KJV being the most used and exact translation according to Pastor Scott Ingram?

The significance is that the KJV is believed to be the closest in translation to the original Hebrew and Greek texts, which were accepted as the biblical text for centuries, thus making it a reliable source of God's word.

Why does the script mention the importance of understanding the Bible's authority on what God has said?

The script emphasizes the importance because the Bible is considered the ultimate authority on God's word, and any misinterpretation or deviation from its original meaning could have serious spiritual implications.

What is the script's stance on paraphrases of the Bible?

The script suggests that while paraphrases can be read, they should not be considered the authoritative word of God, as they represent a single author's interpretation rather than a direct translation.

What does the script suggest about the process of translation and its impact on the accuracy of the Bible?

The script suggests that translations can never be as exact as the original language and that different translations may vary in their accuracy and faithfulness to the original texts.

Why does Pastor Scott Ingram believe the KJV is the most exact English translation of the Bible?

Pastor Scott Ingram believes the KJV is the most exact because it is based on the traditional Hebrew and Greek texts that he believes have been supernaturally preserved and are the most faithful to the original writings.

What is the difference between the KJV and the New King James Version (NKJV) according to the script?

The KJV is more exact to the original languages but can be less understandable to modern readers, while the NKJV aims to be more understandable without sacrificing too much accuracy.

How does the script address the issue of heretical Bibles?

The script warns against heretical Bibles, such as the New World Translation, which change the meaning of scripture to align with the beliefs of a particular group or cult, and should not be trusted as authoritative.

What is the script's advice on how to approach different Bible translations?

The script advises readers to study and compare different translations to understand their differences and to form their own conclusions about which translation they trust as the most accurate representation of God's word.

Outlines

00:00

📖 Trust in Bible Translations

Pastor Scott Ingram introduces the topic of Bible translation trustworthiness, specifically questioning the use of translations other than the King James Version (KJV). He recounts his personal journey of studying various translations, including the NIV, ESV, and others, and the recurring question of which Bible translation to trust. The importance of accurate biblical translation is underscored by its role as God's authoritative word and the potential for misunderstanding and sin due to misinterpretation, as illustrated by the biblical account in Genesis 3.

05:01

📚 The Authority of the Bible and Translations

The speaker discusses the authority of the Bible in comparison to other perceived authorities such as church traditions and popes. He emphasizes the significance of using the King James Version (KJV) in his preaching and teaching due to its historical accuracy and alignment with the Hebrew and Greek texts traditionally considered the scriptural text. The concept of 'original writings,' 'copies,' and 'translations' is introduced to differentiate between the Bible's original form, the copies that have been passed down through generations, and the various translations that attempt to convey the original meaning in different languages.

10:02

🌍 Historical Shifts in Biblical Translations and Authority

This paragraph delves into the historical context of Bible translations, highlighting the shift from the original languages to Latin with the Vulgate in the Western church and the use of Greek in the East. It discusses how the church's authority gradually moved from the written word to the Pope or church traditions, and how the Devil has attempted to obscure God's word throughout history. The paragraph also touches on the Reformation era, when people sought to return to the original languages of the Bible, leading to the creation of the King James Version and the Received Text.

15:04

🔍 Critical Text and Modern Translations

The discussion turns to the critical text, a compilation of Greek texts that deviated from the traditional Received Text, leading to modern translations that have removed or reinterpreted parts of the scriptures. The paragraph describes the historical context of these changes, the influence of liberal scholars, and the impact on English translations like the Revised Version and its successors. It emphasizes the continuous evolution of the critical text and the resulting differences in modern Bible translations.

20:06

📜 Understanding the Nature of the Bible

The speaker clarifies what constitutes the Bible, distinguishing between the original inspired writings, the copies that have been preserved, and the various translations made over time. He presents his belief in the divine preservation of the Masoretic Text for the Old Testament and the Received Text for the New Testament, and how this belief shapes his view on the authority of different English translations, including the KJV and those based on the critical text.

25:07

🛑 The Dangers of Inaccurate Translations

This paragraph warns against heretical Bibles and paraphrases that deviate from the original meaning and authority of the scriptures. It differentiates between accurate translations based on the Received Text, such as the KJV and NKJV, and those based on the critical text, which have made significant changes to the original text. The speaker encourages individuals to study and compare different translations to understand the nuances and potential inaccuracies in modern translations.

🙏 Encouraging Personal Study and Trust in Scripture

In the concluding paragraph, Pastor Ingram encourages personal study of the Bible and its translations, advocating for a discerning approach to understanding God's word. He emphasizes the importance of establishing trust in the translation one chooses to follow and invites viewers to engage with his church for further study and discussion. The paragraph ends with an invitation to visit Omega Baptist Church and a call to embrace the life-changing Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Keywords

💡KJV

The 'KJV', or King James Version, refers to a highly regarded English translation of the Bible completed in 1611. It is central to the video's theme as the speaker discusses its accuracy and trustworthiness compared to other translations. The KJV is presented as the most exact and trusted English translation by the speaker, who uses it as the standard for his teachings.

💡Bible Translations

Bible Translations refer to the various versions of the Bible in different languages, each aiming to convey the original meaning of the sacred texts. In the video, the concept is explored in depth as the speaker examines the reliability and differences among translations, emphasizing the importance of understanding which translation one trusts.

💡Original Texts

Original texts, in the context of the video, denote the first writings of the Bible in Hebrew for the Old Testament and Greek for the New Testament. The speaker discusses the significance of these original languages in preserving the true meaning of the scriptures and how different translations may deviate from these originals.

💡Textus Receptus

The 'Textus Receptus' is a term used to describe the Greek text of the New Testament that underlies the KJV. It is mentioned in the video as the compilation of Greek copies that the speaker believes to be the most faithful representation of the original New Testament writings.

💡Masoretic Text

The 'Masoretic Text' is the authoritative Hebrew text of the Old Testament used in the KJV. It is highlighted in the video as the speaker discusses the importance of the original language texts in ensuring the accuracy of Bible translations.

💡Critical Text

The 'Critical Text' is a compilation of Greek texts of the New Testament that differs from the Textus Receptus, often used in more modern translations. The speaker in the video contrasts this with the Textus Receptus, expressing concerns about its changes and deletions over time.

💡Hermeneutics

Hermeneutics, while not explicitly stated, is the method and theory of interpretation, especially of biblical texts. The video indirectly addresses hermeneutics when discussing how different translations can affect the understanding of scripture and the importance of knowing the original meanings.

💡Paraphrasing

Paraphrasing in the context of the video refers to the method of restating the Bible's content in contemporary language by a single author, which may add a layer of interpretation. The speaker distinguishes paraphrases from direct translations, noting that they offer personal interpretations rather than authoritative scripture.

💡Reliability

Reliability, in terms of the video's discussion, pertains to the trustworthiness of different Bible translations. The speaker emphasizes the importance of a reliable translation that accurately conveys the original message of the scriptures, with the KJV being presented as the most reliable in his view.

💡Authority

Authority in the video is associated with the perceived validity and divine inspiration of the Bible's message. The speaker discusses how different translations can affect the perceived authority of scripture, with the KJV being upheld as the standard of authority for many.

💡Preservation

Preservation here refers to the belief in the supernatural conservation of the Bible's original words and message over time. The speaker mentions this concept as he discusses the trustworthiness of the KJV and the belief that God has preserved His word for every generation.

Highlights

Pastor Scott Ingram discusses the question of whether it's acceptable to read a Bible other than the King James Version (KJV).

The importance of being able to trust the translation of the Bible being read in one's own language is emphasized.

The historical context of the KJV and its significance in English-speaking Christianity is outlined.

The concept of 'original writings,' 'copies,' and 'translations' of the Bible is introduced to understand the Bible's textual history.

The role of the KJV as a translation that is most exact to the original Hebrew and Greek texts is asserted.

Misunderstanding of God's word and its consequences, as illustrated by the story of Genesis 3, is discussed.

Different attitudes towards the authority of the Bible in modern times are examined, including reliance on church traditions or the Pope.

The process of how the Bible has been translated over time and the implications for its accuracy is explained.

The discovery of older copies of the Bible in the 1800s and their impact on modern translations is detailed.

The distinction between the 'Received Text' and 'Critical Text' as bases for modern Bible translations is clarified.

The emergence of various English translations and their relation to the original texts is critiqued.

The concept of 'paraphrases' of the Bible and their difference from direct translations is introduced.

The reliability and trustworthiness of different Bible translations are evaluated based on their adherence to original texts.

The New King James Version (NKJV) is presented as a complement to the KJV for modern understanding without sacrificing accuracy.

Examples of differences in translation between the KJV and NKJV are given to illustrate their respective approaches.

A call to action for individuals to study and discern the accuracy of Bible translations for themselves is made.

The importance of understanding the historical and textual background of Bible translations is underscored for informed reading.

An invitation to join Omega Baptist Church in White Pine, Tennessee, for further exploration of the Bible and its teachings is extended.

Transcripts

hello I'm Pastor Scott Ingram of Omega

Baptist Church in White Pine Tennessee

and uh today I want to answer a question

that comes to our online Ministry

repeatedly I have heard this question

and that question is is it okay to read

a Bible other than the KJV well I asked

this question of my dad years ago when I

was frustrated trying to understand the

older words of the KJV and my dad had

always used the KJV and he didn't say

well just uh study out the one that's

easier for you he didn't pretend uh to

know if they were all the same because

he hadn't read all these different

translations he didn't trust handing

that over to me he just more or less

said well I trust the KJV and you know I

had to ask myself well which one do I

trust do I trust these others or do I

trust the KJV well over the years I

bought several different translations

and I I studied through them all

including the nkjv the NIV the ESV the

NLT the hcsb the nasb the me the

kj21 and through all of these different

Bibles the question kept coming up to me

again which one do I trust and I think

that's why this question is asked so

often to our online Ministry it is so

important that we can trust the

translation of the Bible which we are

reading in our own

[Music]

[Applause]

language uh the question is it okay to

read a Bible other than the KJV is asked

because the Bible isn't just some other

book the Bible is the authority on what

God has said right right so if Satan

wanted to mess us up or of course he he

would want to confuse us on what God has

said and the very first sin in the Bible

occurred because someone

misunderstood what God had said and that

caused them to mistrust God and all of

the human race fell into sin right so

it's a pretty big deal isn't it pretty

big deal indeed so turn your Bibles just

for a moment to Genesis 3 uh 1-5 I want

to read that here as we begin now listen

to these words now the serpent was more

subtle than any beast of the field which

the Lord God had made and he said to the

woman yay hath God said ye shall not eat

of every tree of the garden and the

woman said to the serpent we may eat of

the fruit of the Trees of the garden but

of the fruit of the tree which is in the

midst of the garden God has said ye

shall not eat of it neither shall ye

touch it lest she die and the serpent

said unto the woman ye shall not surely

die for God does know that in the day ye

eat thereof then your eyes shall be open

and ye shall be as Gods knowing good and

evil so what happened here what happened

well the devil the Devil Himself

appeared here in the form of a snake

questioning what God had told her

questioning God's word and she didn't

know what God had said very well herself

she just quoted something similar it

wasn't exact she added that you weren to

touch it God didn't say that we read

that in the earlier part of the book it

was something God had never said then

Satan said that God was holding out on

her and there was a hidden knowledge

that God was keeping from her and her

husband from having and then she ate and

he ate and all of creation grown today

because of that right Jesus had to come

and save them and us because they didn't

take seriously what God had said so this

is a wise fear that this person has who

has asked this question they want to

know exactly what God has said not just

some general idea of what he said they

want to be able to say confidently Psalm

11 1911 Thy word have i hidden my heart

that I may not sin against thee Thy word

have I hid in my heart and they know

that there's a real danger in basing

their eternal life on a different

wording than that which was passed down

to them as evidence clear CLE and how

all mankind fell into sin at the Garden

of Eden in the very beginning of History

so now others others I'm sure will think

this question just silly it's

ridiculous and those types of people

they don't consider this book as

seriously as the person who asked the

question they don't really see the Bible

as an authority matter of fact people

look for authority on God in many places

in our day and age don't they there are

some who look to church Traditions that

that's where the authority is some look

to a pope they say that's

where act right if it doesn't seem like

sin to them well it probably isn't sin

it doesn't matter if it's black and

white in the book we can find another

way to interpret it to get that out of

the way if they don't want to be a part

of Church well they ignore Hebrews 10:25

that says not to forsake the Gathering

of ourselves together right they just go

about their lives in their Lone Ranger

Christianity and Sunday's just another

day to go out on the lake and fish right

and that's the idea and even if they

feel something is a sin many will just

change their attitude about it when it

might cause them trouble on keeping that

trust that that is a sin right most of

our world's like this today right Church

most of our world and as you all know I

use the KJV in my preaching and teaching

here at the church I didn't always do

that when I started preaching but I do

that for a reason now and the reason

isn't just sentimentalism or tradition

or anything like that it's simple facts

matter of fact no one can deny these two

facts that I'm about to share with you

here tonight no one can deny these two

facts number one the KJV is the most

used and most exact translation of the

Hebrew and Greek text that was believed

to be the text of the Bible for

centuries and two the KJV is not the

most exact translation of the Hebrew and

Greek text that many have begun to

believe to be the text of the Bible over

the last few decades now now as evidence

of those two facts that nobody can deny

to officially answer is it okay to read

another Bible you have to be able to

Define what is the Bible anymore right

what is the Bible and to understand that

I want you to remember three words three

words as we go through this number one

original writings original writings

number two copies copies and number

three

translations first original writings now

the Bible let's let's describe this uh

the Bible is a closed collection of

ancient books written over a period

about 1500 years it began to be written

almost 4,000 years ago with Moses who

who generally wrote the first five books

then all the other books are written by

different Jewish people and compiled

into a grouping called the Old Testament

that's the old Testament well later on

the New Testament is written about 2,000

years ago over a period of less than a

hundred years and it's a collection of

histories and letters that were written

by Jesus's followers right Matthew wrote

the Gospel of Matthew John wrote the

Gospel of John 1 2 third John and

Revelation Paul wrote a series of

letters to the different churches right

all of these different things some of

these authors have portions that they

didn't write for example I know without

a fact Moses didn't write down at the

end end of the the Torah that he died I

mean it's supernatural it could happen

but I don't think Moses wrote that down

I think somebody else wrote that down

yet we we ascribe uh to Moses that he

wrote that down the Old Testament books

uh these original writings are mainly

written in Hebrew and the New Testament

books were mainly written in Greek

number two

copies we don't have these original

writings we don't have have the letter

that Paul wrote to this that and the

other one we don't have the the exact uh

whether he wrote on a stone or whether

he wrote on a paper whatever Moses had

he wrote on we do not have that today we

don't have those original writings we

have copies that are written down over

centuries that lead up to today as you

would imagine every copy has small

irregularities with some copies having

large differences but some of the copies

may have been copied by people who were

false teachers Desiring to leave things

out uh the good news though is God

promised to supernaturally preserve his

word to every generation it says that in

the scripture and even when some copies

over the centuries might not include all

the text or be slightly different

remarkably the majority of the copies

are in vast agreement together on what

you have within your Bible number three

translations translations what is that

well then we have translations

translations are books that take one

language and make it fit into another

language and they can be very exact but

never as exact as the original language

itself this is just how translations

work and translations done long ago had

access to more or less or different

copies than we have today and at

different times in history so over time

um the Bible has went through different

levels where people looked at it as a

different type of authority

and translations uh sometimes would

taken Authority uh over time uh in the

western part of the world most people

started using a translation instead of

the original Hebrew and Greek words

around the year 300 uh they use a Latin

translation called The Vulgate and up

until that point that Latin became a

dead language that no one spoke later on

so nobody could read the Bible in their

hand or whatever they would get a hold

of because they couldn't speak Latin

they didn't even speak it anymore so

over this time the church in the western

part of the world they chose to make the

pope more of an authority than the

written word of God I suppose because no

one could read that Latin Bible anymore

right they didn't know what he was

saying was true or not right they

couldn't check their Bible now in the

eastern part of the world they continued

using Greek in the New Testament and a

translation of the Old Testament into

Greek uh used which was in uh was was

used during New Testament times called

the septu agent in the East most of the

churches started making their Traditions

more of an authority than the written

word though as most of the congregates

over time they couldn't read and they

were taught the Bible through icons and

that's pictures that were hung up in the

churches and those churches uh produced

those to tell the stories of the Bible

and over time those churches taught

unbiblical things and that you could go

and kiss and pray to that picture of

Jesus and you were going through that

icon to speak to Jesus or if you went up

and you kissed and prayed over an icon

of the Apostle Paul you were showing him

honor through that image I don't know

about you but that sounds an awful lot

like idolatry to me right well in all of

this in all of this we see that the

devil tried to hide the Bible again just

like he did in the beginning right he

tried to hide what God had said why

because we don't hide the Pope's words

in our our hearts that we might not sin

against God do we we don't hide Church

traditions in our hearts that we might

not sin against God what do we hide we

hide God's word in our hearts that we

might not sin against God and if you

don't have God's word how you going to

hide it in your heart how will you know

what the authority on what God has said

is so when the church members in the

western part of the world began

realizing that the churches were not

giving them the whole truth about the

Bible in the 1500s they set out to make

translations uh that people could

understand understand using the original

languages that the Bible was written in

they didn't use the Greek Old Testament

like the Eastern Orthodox Churches had

they used the Hebrew compiled together

by a group called The mazarites Who were

Jews it was called the mastic text they

didn't use the Latin New Testament that

nobody read anymore uh like the Western

Catholic churches use they used the

Greek New Testament that was preserved

in the East now what would the devil do

now here we have a translation of the

Bible where people can read the Bible

right they can take it in matter of fact

there's great there's these great

revivals that take place as the word of

God comes back in right as we see within

the Reformation different things if the

Devil Couldn't hide the word in a dead

language or hide it from the illiterate

he would hide it by making the source of

our translations into our language

confusing and different and that's where

we get these two different New Testament

Bibles the evangelicals or reformers as

they were called then used the copies of

the Hebrew and the Greek text they had

only a few copies then but they were

representative of many more found later

which are in close agreement with each

other right the compilation of these

Greek copies was called the received

text or the texus receptus uh the Hebrew

was called the mesaric text and during

that time a few English translations

were produced but the KJV of 1611 arose

above all the others and became the

trusted standard for the majority of

English speaking speak speaking people

for over four centuries now it was

slightly updated from 1611 until 1769

the one you have in your hands tonight

it's probably from 1769 everybody says I

I use a 1611 KJV Bible no you use a 1769

KJV Bible if that's what you're using

but in the late 1800s there were some

older copies that were found that caused

quite the stir uh one was found in a

trash can in an Eastern Church Monastery

near Mount SII and the monks were going

to burn it because they didn't consider

it very important and it turns out that

was one of the oldest Bibles there were

it was called caticus another was found

in the Pope's library in in the Vatican

and it's called vaticanus and they

didn't agree with one another nor did

they agree with many of the other copies

that were around or found yet because

they were older the scholars of the time

who were very liberal meaning they

denied the supernatural in the Bible and

even that that Jesus was God took these

copies I to be on a higher authority

because they were older they and and

you'll hear sometimes Bible teachers say

well from the better manuscripts well no

that's from them things they were going

to burn in trash can this happened back

in the 1800s uh they created a system of

weighed out what they believe to be the

true ancient words of the Bible based on

a couple of understands the older they

said is more likely to be what the bible

really was and the belief and this was

their other belief the only reason there

was so much agreement in later copies

was because someone must have fixed it

later to make all the other copies agree

so they actually allowed for um problems

to be within the text of the scripture

so their philosophy of preservation of

the supernatural text created a

compilation of Greek copies that remove

the equivalent of first and second Peter

from the New Testament if you take all

the little words and little things they

took out I'm not willing to cut first

and second Peter out of the New

Testament and it's inching every more to

remove more of that they called their

Greek the the compilation the critical

text and they made an English

translation from their copies in the

late 1800s that most churches rejected

called the revised version and U it's it

failed miserably when it come out uh but

but the intellectuals kept pushing that

idea and they continued to make English

translations where they would add what

was being left out in in footnotes or or

brackets and different things of this

nature uh today they've cut out most of

them verses though and passages from the

main text and just put them down in

footnotes so today you might say they're

able to sell the English Bible that the

churches originally rejected in the

1800s under several different names so

taking in all that information uh what

is the Bible is it the original writings

the copies the

translations well the original writings

are absolutely the Bible of course they

are that's what they originally wrote

down under the inspiration of the Holy

Ghost post right unfortunately we don't

have those original writings what we

have is copies and from the majority of

the copies and if you believe that God

preserved his word to every generation

as was agreed up until the late 1800s

you see the KJV as the English

translation that is the most exact to

the original writings uh which use the

Texas receptus for its New Testament but

if you agree with the deletion of the

equivalent of first and second Peter

from the New Testament as occurred in

the 1800s and moved forward to today

into Academia uh you don't see the KJV

is the most exact and find translations

that use the critical text to be the

most exact even though the critical text

changes over the decades as I've already

discussed uh with more deletions and

so-called Corrections taking place over

time I personally believe that the

mestic Hebrew text and the Greek texus

receptus are the supernaturally

preserved text passed down through the

centuries and that governs my decision

on what the Bible is based on that

knowledge now we can answer our question

is it okay to read a Bible other than

the KJV answer you can read any book you

want to read but one should understand

that some of the books calling

themselves Bibles aren't as exact as

others and some might not be uh holy

Bibles at all

let's look at those which claim the

description Bible here for a few moments

first of all let's look at heretical

Bibles uh the the New World Translation

is a heretical Bible uh that comes from

a cult that doesn't believe Jesus Is God

and changes John in first John in the

Gospel of John to say that the word was

a god instead of God saying Jesus was a

god instead of the god uh there are

other heretical English Bible out there

too but this one here it's probably the

most infamous of all and you're free to

read it if you want to read it but I

certainly wouldn't trust it with any

Authority okay next there are

paraphrases of the Bible there's the

children's story book Bible the picture

story book Bible uh the message the

living Bible the passion translation the

good news translation and a paraphrase

is just something that's been put

together by a single author author who

interprets the Bible in his own words

and some of these say their translations

but they're not they are just giving you

a person's view of what's being said uh

you can read them but you must

understand this is the this is not the

authoritative word of God this is

another person's interpretation of what

the word of God says and you need to

remember that then there are

translations that use the critical text

I've already spoke about the Bibles that

use the critical text for their new

testament here you can see them lined

out uh from the closest to the critical

text to the farthest away and closer to

a paraphrase starting out with those

closer to a paraphrase the New Living

Translation then the NIV then the csb

Christian Standard Bible The nasb New

American Standard Bible and the ESV the

English Standard Version they remove and

are continuing to remove and reinterpret

much of the scriptures and have done so

for the last several decades I've read

several of these in their entirety

myself uh the the NIV the HCB hcsb which

is the precursor the csb and the ESV

there's nothing wrong with reading these

texts as long as you understand what

they are they aren't just an easier

reading of the Bible they are a

different text of the New Testament

being translated for you that changes

every few decades and I simply cannot

consider that to be the authoritative

text from God that I would be willing to

study over my lifetime and pass on to my

children and grandchildren as a forever

reflection of what God has

said finally this there are the Bibles

that use the Texas receptus uh those are

the most well-known English translations

today here that use the Texas receptus

from the least exact to the most exact

there are others such as the me and the

kj21 and various attempts to update the

KJV by different groups but many of them

fall down the Wayside of History over

time and aren't seen anymore and the KJ

is painstakingly exact to the original

languages but it isn't always instantly

understandable to folks while the nkjv

seeks to be more instantly

understandable to the modern reader but

forsake some of that extreme accuracy to

achieve it they complement one another I

believe in that you can compare the two

to better understand what the original

Hebrew or Greek word was conveying for

example you know how we started out

tonight talking about how the serpent

was more sub sub than any beast of the

field subtle you probably don't

understand subtle but you'll understand

what the nkjv says when it says it was

cunning right now now the word in the

Hebrew uh it's used 11 times in the Old

Testament eight times it's used as

prudent two times it's used as crafty

and once here as subtle in the KJV and

subtle is absolutely correct and and and

may be a more direct and detailed

description of this using that 1611 word

rather than cunning but when you study

out the original word one gets a more

instantly understandable explanation in

the

nkjv uh another one this is kind of

funny um there are many examples that

that would cause you look closer at

these two I had a man once come to me

and tell me that the nkjv uh was

scandalous because it had King Saul uh

described as going into a cave and using

the bathroom in 1st Samuel 24 the KJV

actually read he was covering his his

feet in the nkjv it said he was

attending to his needs he said that's

scandalous why would they say such a

thing well it turns out that the phrase

covering my feet back in Hebrew actually

was a euphemism for going to the

bathroom back during Saul's time so sort

of like saying I'm going to see a b

about a dog today you ever heard that

that expression U therefore since he

didn't understand the innuendo he didn't

grasp what was originally happening both

were correct though one was given the

exact what the word said with one more

instantly understandable yet losing

accuracy and adding the supposed modern

interpretation of what that means one

more one more here uh and this this in 1

Peter 1:15-16 from The KJV but as he

which hath called you as holy so be ye

holy in all manner of conversation

because it is written be ye holy for I

am Holy but as he who called you is Holy

you also be holy in all your conduct

because it is written be holy for I am

Holy in the en KV you see the

differences first of all there's

capitalization for God in the pronoun

the nkjv U that takes away

interpretation but it might make it more

inly understandable but it's not

necessarily correct you and ye are are

are actually pronouns that describe a

group while thee and thy are in in the

KJV describe a singular person so when

he says you in the nkj you may think

it's just talking about you in actuality

it's not it's talking about a group here

when he's talking about it so you lose

the uh exactness of the KJV there also

those there's two archaic words one says

conversation what do you think about

when you think of conversation I think

about talking but that is not what it

means in the KJV in 1611 and 1769 it

means the idea of Conduct in 1982 when

the njj nkjv was put together both mean

the same thing but are different now and

neither is wrong but the point of the

message is clear in the last part of the

verse it is written that's in both of

them is it it is written Our Lives

should be different because what was

written down in God's word right that's

where the authority is it is written the

Apostle Paul once visited a group in

Berea where he explained the gospel to

them and it says in the Bible that they

searched those things out to see if they

were so I would encourage anyone to

search these things out and to see if

they're so as I've shared them here read

study it yourself right so that this is

so important that we get what God has

said correctly right right so I hope

this little study has helped some of us

and if the question comes up in your

circles maybe you'll have a little bit

of reference for what you want to talk

with them about now I read and I teach

and use the KJV because it still is the

most exact and the most trusted English

translation I believe it translates the

original words passed down to every

generation today to me the most

accurately it is also the standard in

English translations for those who trust

in the traditional text of the Bible we

need a standard but that doesn't say I

don't expect you to study these things

out for yourself or or read different

translations to come to your own

conclusions it was the Nazis in Germany

who uh took up the practice of burning

books U because they didn't want to

allow others access to them why did they

burn those books well those Nazis didn't

want to allow free thought for people to

try to understand uh what was being

conveyed uh so I say study over these

things to see if they be so I have a

good reason to trust uh the Bible

translation that I have and I would

encourage each and every one of you to

secure that trust TR for yourselves as

well I hope this has been helpful I hope

it has answered your question and if

there are any other questions please

email us at Omega Bap church atgmailcom

we answer many questions of this sort

and want to help you not just to answer

your questions but to help you to see

the God of this Bible that has brought

this authoritative word to

us

[Music]

I hope you're enjoying the sermons here

and have subscribed to my channel on

YouTube but I would love even more to

meet with you in person at the church

where I'm blessed to pastor at in White

Pine Tennessee Omega Baptist Church we

are a Bible believing church called to

love all people without bias by

proclaiming and teaching the word of God

through the power of the Holy Spirit we

are located directly off of Exit 4 off

of Interstate 81 in Tennessee you can

see us clearly from the interstate we

have worship each Sunday at 10:30 and I

hope you'll make plans to join us it's

all about Jesus my friend and we pray

that we may be able to have the

opportunity to share with you personally

the lifechanging Gospel of Jesus

[Music]

Christ