Hukuman Harvey Moeis Diperberat jadi 20 Tahun dan Denda Rp 420 M [Metro This Week]

METRO TV
16 Feb 202506:12

Summary

TLDRThe corruption cases of PT Tima Business involving Harvey Muis and Helena Lim have reached new milestones after the Jakarta High Court increased their sentences. Harvey Muis, previously sentenced to six years, now faces 20 years in prison and a hefty fine of IDR 420 billion due to corruption and money laundering. Helena Lim, involved in the same case, saw her sentence rise to 10 years along with a fine and additional penalties. Both rulings have triggered reactions from various parties, including President Prabowo Subianto, while the Attorney General's Office respects the court's decision on legal justice.

Takeaways

  • 😀 Harvey Muis, the husband of artist Sandra Dewi, was sentenced to 20 years in prison for his involvement in the PT Tima Business corruption case.
  • 😀 The Jakarta High Court increased Muis' sentence after the appeal process, highlighting the severity of his actions in the corruption and money laundering case.
  • 😀 In addition to the 20-year prison term, Muis was also fined IDR 420 billion, with a subsidiary sentence of 10 years in prison if the fine is not paid.
  • 😀 The court considered Muis' actions as detrimental to the government's corruption eradication program, especially during difficult economic conditions.
  • 😀 Helena Lim, another defendant in the case, had her sentence increased to 10 years in prison, along with a fine and additional penalties.
  • 😀 The Jakarta High Court increased Helena's fine to IDR 1 billion, with the provision of a 6-month prison sentence if the fine is not paid.
  • 😀 Helena Lim was found guilty of committing corruption and money laundering, which resulted in state losses of IDR 300 trillion.
  • 😀 Both Muis and Lim filed appeals after their sentences, reflecting the ongoing legal battle and public interest in the case.
  • 😀 The legal decision has drawn mixed reactions, including from President Prabowo Subianto, who raised concerns about the severity of the penalties.
  • 😀 The case serves as a significant example of the Indonesian legal system holding individuals accountable for large-scale corruption involving state funds.

Q & A

  • What was the result of the Jakarta High Court’s decision in the corruption case involving Harvey Muis?

    -The Jakarta High Court sentenced Harvey Muis to 20 years in prison, along with a replacement fine of 420 billion IDR, with a subsidiary sentence of 10 years if the fine is not paid.

  • What were the charges against Harvey Muis?

    -Harvey Muis was found guilty of committing corruption and money laundering, as regulated in the first and second indictments.

  • What impact did Harvey Muis' actions have, according to the court's decision?

    -The court noted that Harvey Muis' actions did not support the government’s anti-corruption efforts and caused significant harm to the public, especially during difficult economic conditions.

  • How did the Attorney General's Office respond to the Jakarta High Court's decision?

    -The Attorney General's Office respected the decision, acknowledging the aspects of legal justice and the dynamics in society that were considered by the judges in their ruling.

  • What sentence was imposed on Helena Lim in the corruption case of PT Tima Business?

    -Helena Lim was sentenced to 10 years in prison by the Jakarta High Court, with a fine of 420 billion IDR, and a replacement prison sentence of 6 months if the fine is not paid.

  • What did the Jakarta High Court decide regarding Helena Lim’s fine and additional penalties?

    -The court increased Helena Lim’s fine and imposed a replacement sentence of 6 months in prison if the fine is not paid, along with an additional sentence of paying compensation of 900 million IDR.

  • What were the main allegations against Helena Lim in the corruption case?

    -Helena Lim was found guilty of corruption and money laundering, with the case causing state financial losses amounting to 300 trillion IDR.

  • What reactions were triggered by the earlier decision of the Central Jakarta Corruption Court?

    -The earlier verdict of 6 years in prison for Harvey Muis triggered reactions, including from President Prabowo Subianto, leading both the public prosecutor and Muis' legal team to file an appeal.

  • What were the differences between the sentences imposed by the Central Jakarta Corruption Court and the Jakarta High Court?

    -The Jakarta High Court increased both the prison sentences and fines for Harvey Muis and Helena Lim, contrasting with the lighter sentences imposed by the Central Jakarta Corruption Court.

  • How does the sentence of 20 years for Harvey Muis align with corruption law in Indonesia?

    -The 20-year prison sentence for Harvey Muis is the maximum penalty stipulated under Indonesia’s corruption law, reflecting the severity of his crimes.

Outlines

plate

Esta sección está disponible solo para usuarios con suscripción. Por favor, mejora tu plan para acceder a esta parte.

Mejorar ahora

Mindmap

plate

Esta sección está disponible solo para usuarios con suscripción. Por favor, mejora tu plan para acceder a esta parte.

Mejorar ahora

Keywords

plate

Esta sección está disponible solo para usuarios con suscripción. Por favor, mejora tu plan para acceder a esta parte.

Mejorar ahora

Highlights

plate

Esta sección está disponible solo para usuarios con suscripción. Por favor, mejora tu plan para acceder a esta parte.

Mejorar ahora

Transcripts

plate

Esta sección está disponible solo para usuarios con suscripción. Por favor, mejora tu plan para acceder a esta parte.

Mejorar ahora
Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Etiquetas Relacionadas
Corruption CaseHarvey MuisHelena LimMoney LaunderingCourt VerdictJakarta High CourtLegal JusticeSentencingPublic ReactionIndonesia Politics
¿Necesitas un resumen en inglés?