Starmer and Sunak Clash in ITV Debate
Summary
TLDR昨夜のITV議論会から重要な瞬間を振り返って、2人の男性が私たちに何を提供するのか、彼らは誰で、なぜ彼らが私たちの投票を得るべきかを検討します。彼らは税金を増やすと主張し、経済的に苦しんでいる人々にとってなぜそれが難しいのか。議論会では、過去と未来の議論が交錯し、労働党は税金を増やすと誓い、彼らのDNAにその傾向があると語りました。一方、税金の引き下げについて説明を求められた際には、彼らは過去の高水準からの引き下げを主張しました。さらに、移民問題や国民保健サービスの待機リストの短縮など、様々な政策課題が議論されましたが、最も大きな話題は税金でした。議論会は、2つの異なる政党の見解を舞台に、選挙戦における戦略とメッセージを明確にしました。
Takeaways
- 🗳️ イエティビー(ITV)の討論では、選挙での主張や政権の見解が対立しました。
- 💼 ライバル政党は、税金の問題を中心に論戦を繰り広げました。
- 📉 労働党は、彼らのDNAとして税金の引き上げを主張していると反対政党は非難しています。
- 📈 経済成長率が低下するリスクがあると予算責任オフィスが示唆していますが、討論からは除外されています。
- 🏥 国民保健サービス(NHS)の待ち時間の問題が、討論の核心となりました。
- 🤝 スターマーは、NHS待ち時間の問題に関する反論で効果的でしたが、数字の誤解を解消するのに時間がかかりすぎました。
- 💬 サナクは、反対政党の主張を無視し、自分の主張を押し付けるスタイルで話しました。
- 👥 討論の中で、選挙戦における安全保障の問題も触れられました。
- 🎯 スターマーは、安全保障に関する質問に対して、過去の経験を引き合いに出し、強い回答をしました。
- 🤔 選挙戦における重要なテーマである税金、経済、健康保障、安全保障についての議論が、国民の関心を集めていることがわかります。
Q & A
ITVでの討論会で何が議論されましたか?
-ITVでの討論会では、税金の問題や医療制度、移民問題、経済政策などが議論されました。
ラボール党と_conservative党はどのように選ばれますか?
-選挙において、人々が彼らに投票することで選ばれます。彼らが提供する政策や将来の展望に基づいて選出されます。
税金が上がった回数について何が言及されましたか?
-保守党によると、彼らの政権において26回税金が上がったと主張されましたが、実際の数字については議論がされました。
選挙での主な議論ポイントは何でしたか?
-選挙での主な議論ポイントは、将来に焦点を当てた政策、税金、医療、移民、経済に関する問題でした。
ラボール党は税金をどうする予定ですか?
-ラボール党は彼らのDNAとして税金を上げるとされており、選挙戦でその点が繰り返し議論されました。
移民問題について何が言及されましたか?
-移民問題では、犯罪組織の打倒や移民管理に関する議論がされましたが、詳細な対策は明確にされていませんでした。
討論会での2人の態度はどのように評価されていますか?
-討論会ではスターマーが比較的冷静で礼儀正しく、一方スナクは他人の話を遮ることが多く、時には相手の話を無視する姿勢が批判されました。
NHSの待ち時間について何が言及されましたか?
-NHSの待ち時間が依然として高く、スナクが待ち時間を短縮するとの約束を果たしていないと指摘されました。
選挙戦におけるブリークスジットの影響はどの程度ですか?
-ブリークスジットは経済に大きな影響を与えており、選挙戦ではその影響が議論されることが予想されますが、討論会では触れられていませんでした。
討論会での主な批判ポイントは何でしたか?
-主な批判ポイントは、税金の増加、医療制度の問題、移民管理の無効性、経済政策の失敗などでした。
選挙戦での重要なメッセージは何ですか?
-選挙戦での重要なメッセージは、将来に向けた政策の提唱、国民の生活の向上、経済の安定化などです。
討論会での主な議論はどのようにまとめられますか?
-討論会での主な議論は、税金、医療、移民、経済政策などの分野で行われ、両党の立場や政策に対する批判が交わされました。
Outlines
🗣️ ITVでの政論対決
ITVでの討論では、2人の男性が私たちに何を提供するのか、彼らは誰で、なぜ私たちに投票をもらうべきかが議論されました。経済的苦境に立つ人々に対して、彼らはなぜ税金を増やすと言い張るのか。首相は、税金を26回上げた政府の一部として関わっており、選挙では過去を振り返ることになるだろうと主張しましたが、これは未来に焦点を当てている選挙であると強調しました。労働党は税金を増やすと彼らのDNAに書かれていると主張しました。彼らが税金をどう減らすか説明してほしいと要求されましたが、彼らは税金が高かった時代から減少していると主張しました。財政破綻を引き起こすために民間医療を使うべきかどうかについて、Rishi Sunakは肯定的な姿勢を示しました。彼らは人種交易を操るギャングを叩き潰すことが重要だと述べ、反論は信頼できないと主張しました。議論は熱くなり、声を抑えるよう要求されました。議論は子供たちのけんかのように描かれ、Starmerは秩序を保つために注意を払う必要があると述べました。SunakはStarmerの言葉を無視し、話すことに集中しました。Starmerは最初は落ち着いていましたが、注意を払う必要がありました。Sunakは税金2,000ポンドの主張を繰り返しましたが、Starmerはそれに迅速に対応しませんでした。これはStarmerのミスであり、Sunakはその主張を打ち破るべきでした。
👥 選挙戦における印象と戦略
選挙戦では、Starmerは最初は落ち着いていて時間通りに話していたとされ、注意を払う必要があると言った後、彼は控えめに話しました。SunakはStarmerの言葉を無視し、話すことに集中しました。StarmerはSunakが主張する税金2,000ポンドについて迅速に対応しなかったため、その主張が広まりました。これはStarmerのミスであり、Sunakはその主張を打ち破るべきでした。選挙戦では、Sunakはすべての質問に対して攻撃的でしたが、Starmerは防御的でした。Starmerは2,000ポンドの税金の主張について適切に防御しなかったため、その主張がメディアに残りました。選挙戦では、Sunakは自分の実績を誇示し、Starmerは税金を増やすと警告しましたが、Starmerは迅速に対応しなかったため、その主張が印象に残りました。選挙戦では、StarmerはLiz Trussを3回言及しましたが、拍手は得られませんでした。また、Brexitという言葉も話題にならなかったことに触れられました。SunakはStarmerに対して個人攻撃をせず、党対党の攻撃に留まりました。Starmerは安全保障に関する質問に対して、経済的繁栄を阻害していた時期にテロリストを起訴していた経験から、Britainの安全保障に貢献する意志を示しました。
🚨 選挙戦における安全保障と民主主義
選挙戦において、政治家が安全に選挙活動を行うことができることが重要であると語られました。Nigel Farageに対する脅威が話題になりました。彼は昔はミルクシェイクを投げかけられたと冗談を言っていましたが、実際には危険な物が投げかけられた可能性があると指摘されました。政治家が選挙期間中に安全に活動できることが重要であり、Milshake攻撃は許容されるものではありませんと述べられました。Shadow Home Secretaryは、これは政党を問わず受け入れられない行為であり、警察に感謝の意を示しました。政治家は選挙期間中に安全に活動できることが重要であり、選挙戦においては、政治家が選挙活動に参加する際に脅迫や攻撃を受けることは許されないと強調されました。
Mindmap
Keywords
💡ITVデベート
💡税金
💡将来
💡労働党
💡経済ブラックホール
💡国民保健サービス(NHS)
💡移民
💡選挙
💡デベート
💡メディア
Highlights
The debate begins with a focus on what the two candidates offer to voters.
Discussion on handling the cost of living crisis and its impact on voters.
Rishi Sunak's claim of reduced taxes being challenged by Keir Starmer.
Debate on the use of private healthcare with differing views from Sunak and Starmer.
Accusations and defense regarding the handling of immigration and trust issues.
Keir Starmer's proposal for a proactive government contrasted with Sunak's approach.
Keir Starmer's criticism of Sunak for ignoring debate moderator's instructions.
Sunak's repeated attacks on Labour's tax plans, impacting the debate's tone.
Starmer's delayed response to Sunak's tax allegations seen as a critical mistake.
Analysis of Sunak's debating style, often interrupting opponents to make points.
Debate on NHS waiting lists and the accuracy of Sunak's claims about reductions.
Sunak's self-congratulatory stance on handling economic issues criticized.
Lack of discussion on Brexit despite its significant economic impact.
Both candidates avoiding personal attacks, focusing on party policies instead.
Concerns about political violence highlighted by recent threats against Nigel Farage.
Transcripts
let's have a look at some of the key
moments from last night's ITV debate
what are these two men going to offer us
who are they and why should they earn
our vote if people are struggling with
their bills why do you want to make it
harder for them this is the prime
minister who's been part of a government
that has put up tax 26 times we going to
hear a lot about the past in this
election but this election is about the
future mark my words labor will raise
your taxes it's in their DNA 10.2
million then .5 million I'd like you to
explain how they're coming down because
they were coming down from where they
were when they were higher and they're
now on the way down would you if you
felt that that was the only way forward
to use private healthc care rishy sunak
yes kiss Dharma no we need to smash the
gangs that are running this file trade
making a huge amount of money your track
record says something completely
different and you can't be trusted to
tackle immigration please gentlemen we
will lower our voices the arsenic
handed back the
matches now imagine turning the page
with a labor government that rolls up
its sleeves and gets on with the job
this £22,000 he keeps saying it's going
to cost his absolute garbage we won't go
into the details of
it Andrew Kevin and Julie reminded me of
a mum at a tea time ru between two boys
do you think we're going to use our
inside voices stopping them talk he
started it no it was him me pinched my
ball no he did it what did you think won
we we are quite calm and collected and
polite in comparison I think next time
she does it I've seen her do it before I
think she needs a taser and if some
speaks so I just and do it or switch off
their microphone s off their mics
perhaps saf yeah I know taser would be
more fun made a bit squid game at least
a buzzer where when your time's up yeah
because what I think everybody noticed
was that um starma was quite well
behaved at the beginning kind of kept to
time and when she told him off he kind
of went back in his box Rishi sunak just
basically ignored anything she said and
carried on talking over him and that is
why starma then had to do it otherwise
you get drowned out and I know we
misbehave and get carried away um
sometimes and we we can do it but then
you always know you got to respect uh
you or whoever is with you and sometimes
it's a glare sometimes it's a finger
I've noticed sometimes it's an eye roll
yeah and sometimes it's a very sharp
word we've be we've been there but of
course that's that's that's what
happened Andrew did it play well for
suak because what happened was he spoke
over everybody but it meant he landed at
least the initial blows I think it's job
done for sunet because the
overwhelming impression was that labor
will raise your taxes by 2,000 it took
starma virtually till three or qu away
in the program to not challenge it and
he kept Landing that blow again and it
was like he was Punch Drunk on the ropes
if it's a boxing anality he kept saying
again and it did he get a text halfway
through the program say no no You' got
to say something it took him too long to
challenge it so that was for starma
that's why he won that that was that was
uh starmer's mistake the first time he
said it said let people know the truth
about you you've put taxes up to record
levels so don't lie about us that's what
you should have said straight away cuz
those figures are totally dodgy now he
did didn't do that but if you're sunak
you're way behind in the mega poles not
the little poles the mega poles you need
to land The Knockout blow which he
didn't starma would have been more
defensive because playing for an
effective draw is a win for him and
after he's being carrying that Ming vase
over a polished floor for two years he's
not going to start juggling it and risk
dropping it and smashing it I remember
the first time I did question time I
spoke to a few politicians about how do
you play this what came back from all of
them is you must choose on your
questions whether it's a sword question
or a shield question are you going to go
for it or are you going to do a quick
defensive answer and get out of it and
what it seemed to me watching last night
is sunak was soord on every question
because he had to be he did and starma
was shielded on every question but he
didn't defend himself well enough on the
2,000 there is no 2,000 tax and this is
actually talking about economic black
holes and therefore saying you're going
to pay for it and sunak seems to have
said well you're going to pay for it
through taxation but what what starma
needed to do at that point was saying no
we're not and that's a misunder but he
didn't come back and so so he let him
through the and it's why the headlines
stay the times Telegraph all saying
under pressure on tax because I just
couldn't believe I thought is he going
to challenge this V or not so you mean
the if that was the say you only watched
half the debate and a lot of people
they' have gone to bed thinking no
debate here because he's not denied it
that that 2,000 figure is as credible as
the 350 million a week on the side of
the ear I don't no but it was a failing
I'm I'm saying but we know how soon I
debates because we saw him against Liz
trust two years ago he was accused then
of sexism for talking over every time 20
times in 12 minutes I remember in 2019
he went up against and it was a big
panel Richard Bergen who is is a labor
MP or standing again and he kept talking
over him you know how he he debat and I
think he sometimes got to fight fire
meant to be a clever lawyer which is
again I was surprised that at times I
thought he seemed pous you have a judge
yes of course it's different rules of
engagement yeah but but but nevertheless
he's used to the gladiatorial uh Arena
that's where he's honed his MP I was
going to say there'll be a lot of people
in the audience because he had them
laughing at sunak particularly over NHS
waiting lists coming down when they're
still higher than sunak said he'd bring
them down yeah I think watching at home
other people will think look he's cool
he's calm he's collected he's serious
serious he's not a spoiled child a
spoiled brat and so came across I wonder
if we've we've got that moment about
waiting lists because a lot of people
won't watch the debate sure but they
will know or be in a waiting list for
treatment on the NHS and this was where
starma was effective let's have a look
but we are now making progress the
waiting lists are coming down but what K
sta didn't mention to you which you did
Julie 7.2 million they're now 7.5
million he says they're coming down and
this is the guy he good at
math Andrew I mean how can if waiting
lists are up from the point where you
said you'd bring them down how can you
possibly say they're coming down he he
was caught out and the other thing is
people's lived reality is what matters
to them you can say they might have come
down somewhere elsewhere in the country
or as average you know they're com if
you are waiting 18 months for a
treatment they're not coming down and
his defense was Well it's worse in Wales
because which is labor run that's not
what people want to hear I I don't think
uh so that was his weakest moment I
thought in the evening and st's best
moment but I still think the takeaway is
tax well it it might be for you Kevin
what was the take away for you oh I
think the first question the woman who
can't afford to put on our oven
uh because you so you just hadn't got
enough money and then suak was self-
congratulatory about everything
everything he's done for her and I'm
thinking you're just not getting it and
it in the end elections are hearts and
heads and people in there in their
hearts and their heads know they are
worse off and there are some people who
are very worse off and that's a after
you've been in power for 14 years it's a
record you can't shake off yeah um I
thought was also interesting within a
minute starm had mentioned Liz truss you
mentioned it three times but you you
didn't get a single Round of Applause
and I thought it was interesting star
and I thought is soon act going to
mention Corbin terrible Jeremy Corbin
Who start because that's been a line of
his attack for years and years about the
fact starma was in his shadow he didn't
and I thought that was quite interesting
quite interesting you the word I didn't
hear was the b word I didn't hear brexit
didn't mention now
given posing sides I think it's a it's a
hundred billion plus hit on the economy
if growth is going to be 4% lower over
the period office of budget
responsibility not mentioned one bit I
think it's because there's two two
generals not wanting to fight an old war
whichever side you were on it the other
one that I thought was an interesting
way of answering was there was a
question about is the country safe with
under Kia starma and when it was
answered sunak didn't do the personal
attack on Kama he turned it into a party
versus his party attack he seemed to
back off and back away from doing the
personal attack on that one which I
thought he was given the opening by the
question and didn't come in why do you
think he didn't do it I think because it
would have looked cheap and nasty it's
rather like Rachel Reeves the shadow
Chancellor repeatedly uses the line that
sun Act is richer than the king starma
didn't do that but on that security
question I thought starmer's answer was
very good because he said when you are
out a bank at making a fortune bet
against Britain collapse in the economy
I was the director of public PR
prosecutions Prosecuting terrorists who
would have downed seven planes I
remember that it was the it was the
explosiv in in liquids uh case which led
to changes in Security check at airport
well we still you still face it you
can't take over 100 Mills in liquid and
so on um Andrew interesting talking
about security and brexit because the
biggest campaigner on brexit Nigel
farage was out yesterday was and faced a
threat to his security now you might
think you know people might think it was
just a milkshake that was thrown at him
and in fact he himself made a joke you
know sort of riffing on the lyrics of a
famous song You Know My milkshake brings
all the you know people to The Yards to
my rally the fact of the matter is
Andrew politician need to be able to go
out and meet voters safely yeah and
milkshake is not going to hurt or kill
anybody two MPS have been killed yeah
murdered uh by Fanatics and that could
have not that might have been acid
that's the point and um people think
it's funny it's not funny and uh they
they should fine if you want to Jer them
and Heckle them but actually we want our
politicians out there meeting people and
this will perhaps deter them from doing
it and I hope the person who's been
arrested who did it as a publicity stunt
I think they should be charged because
it's assault and we don't want this and
we don't want this to to politicians
engaging with us the public there's a I
Cooper Shadow Home Secretary on this
just to say that this is a cross-party
view yeah tweeted yesterday disgraceful
assault on Nigel farro today completely
unacceptable and wrong no one should
face intimidation or assault in an
election campaign thank you to the
police for responding the the person who
was a man threw a shake on farage in
2019 in Newcastle lost who got a
conviction and lost his lost his job um
it it is just completely wrong because
you do not want politicians to be
intimidated and fearing whether it's a
milkshake or a tomato or an egg or
somebody spitting on you never mind
something like a a corrosive substance
or whatever it's just it's just wrong
you can disagree with farage as I do and
I think I think
he's spreading bigotry and Division and
hatred doesn't but the same time is it's
a democracy you have to counter that
with arguments and yes Jia Heckel you're
quite right you don't have to say you're
wonderful farage there clearly a lot of
people don't think he and he's quite
capable of handling jering and heckling
he's handle himself very well but that
is unacceptable although he will
probably turn it into a political
Advantage I'm sure he will because he
likes to be the he likes to be the
underdog the outside of society the
person who has to fight it through I'm
going toight you know and so I think we
will probably turn it not that not
you're right and he's entitled to try
and do that but of course his line is
everybody loves him and you got
everybody in he doesn't say everybody
loves him he knows he knows he M you
will find that's not the case I me a lot
of those people yesterday in Clon and
that crowd weren't yeah from Clon but
how many politicians on the campaign tra
attract a crowd of that that number that
was a huge crowd and he gets it out
Boris Johnson is a similar figure I well
they say they weren't they say they wer
you're right you're right there's farage
Johnson
and uh Jeremy Corbin used to be able to
used to be able to whether he still can
or not is uh he's a hugely recognizable
figure that's for sure but we want all
our politicians to be able to go out
meet and not feel intimidated exactly
it's intimidated bit you know people say
oh why would you be intimidated by a
milkshake because you don't know what
someone's going to throw at you and you
shouldn't be he saw that that he might
have thought my God what's coming my way
I just say anyone who says why would you
be intimidated by a milkshake if they
went out and they had a milkshake thrown
on them they'd be absolutely Furious and
then they then they'd be worried
Ver más vídeos relacionados
Bipartisan condemnation of Greens' involvement in pro-Palestinian protests | ABC News
Leader Interviews - Adrian Ramsay of the Green Party | Election 2024
ジョージアはロシアと欧州どちらに向かうのか 「スパイ法」を解説
いま年1兆円増税は不要!防衛費増額の財源 玉木雄一郎が解説
【政倫審】野田元総理が質疑「総理出席に強烈な違和感」「指導力に疑問」自民“裏金”めぐり (2024年2月29日)| TBS NEWS DIG
Does the economy matter to the far right? | Business Beyond
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)