THIS Is How Zepto & Blinkit Will Be Profitable | Explaining Quick Commerce
Summary
TLDRThe transcript discusses the rapid growth of quick commerce in India, with platforms like Blinkit and Zepto aiming to surpass traditional e-commerce giants. Quick commerce, which began as a COVID trend, has continued to thrive, threatening established players like Flipkart and Amazon. The business model revolves around 'dark stores' for rapid delivery, but profitability remains a challenge. Companies are tackling this by increasing order values, expanding store density, and leveraging advertising revenue. Zepto, with its strategic store placement and focus on operational efficiency, is positioned to lead the race towards profitability in the quick commerce sector.
Takeaways
- 🦈 Deepinder Goyal, founder of Zomato, predicts that its quick-commerce brand Blinkit will surpass Zomato in size within a year.
- 🚀 Aadit Palicha, the 22-year-old founder of Zepto, aims to scale the company to Dmart's level within the next 2 to 3 years.
- 🔥 Quick commerce, which started as a COVID fad, is proving to be a lasting trend, even threatening established giants like Flipkart and Amazon.
- 🌍 Quick commerce penetration in India is notably high, at 13% compared to 3% in Europe and 7% in China.
- 📈 Zepto has seen a significant increase in Monthly Active Users, growing from 1.8 million in 2022 to 4 million in 2023.
- 💰 Both Blinkit and Zepto have reached over 1 billion dollars in gross annual sales runrate.
- 🛒 Quick commerce platforms contribute significantly to e-commerce sales of FMCG companies, with some like KRBL witnessing a 1500% growth in sales on these platforms.
- 🏪 The business model of quick commerce revolves around 'dark stores'—small, employee-only stores located in convenient areas to enable fast delivery.
- 📦 Dark stores are stocked with around 1500 SKUs to meet most daily customer needs and are strategically placed to serve a 2 to 4 km radius.
- 🛵 Quick commerce delivery agents operate from these dark stores, ensuring fast delivery within minutes of an order being placed.
- 💼 Despite the rapid growth, quick commerce companies face profitability challenges due to high delivery costs and low margins on certain products.
Q & A
What is the current market share of Blinkit in the Quick Commerce segment?
-Blinkit currently has a market share of 35% in the Quick Commerce segment.
How has Zepto grown its Monthly Active Users from 2022 to 2023?
-Zepto has increased its Monthly Active Users from 1.8 Million in 2022 to 4 Million in 2023, adding 2.2 Million users in a single year.
What is the significance of the term 'dark stores' in the context of Quick Commerce?
-Dark stores are mini stores, roughly 3000 sq ft in size, accessible only to store employees, strategically placed to minimize the distance between them and customers for quick delivery.
Why are giants like Flipkart and Reliance interested in the Quick Commerce segment?
-Giants like Flipkart and Reliance are interested in Quick Commerce because it is a growing market that offers speed and convenience, threatening their traditional e-commerce models.
What is the average profit margin for groceries and FMCG products in Quick Commerce?
-Groceries have a higher profit margin of 18% to 40%, while FMCG products like oil or rice have a margin of 4% to 15%.
How do Quick Commerce platforms plan to increase their profitability?
-Quick Commerce platforms plan to increase profitability by increasing the Average Order Value, improving store density, and generating advertising revenue.
What is the role of Average Order Value (AOV) in the profitability of Quick Commerce companies?
-Increasing the Average Order Value can significantly improve profitability. For example, if the order value is increased from Rs. 300 to Rs. 700, the profit margin becomes Rs. 140, which is much higher than the initial profit.
How does store density impact the profitability and efficiency of Quick Commerce platforms?
-Higher store density, such as having more stores per city, can decrease delivery times and increase the number of deliveries per hour, which contributes to profitability.
What is the potential of advertising revenue for Quick Commerce platforms?
-Advertising revenue can be a significant source of income for Quick Commerce platforms, as they can charge companies to advertise on their apps, which results in almost pure profit.
How does Zepto's expansion strategy differ from its competitors?
-Zepto focuses on having a higher store density in fewer cities, which allows for faster delivery times and improved profitability compared to competitors with a broader but less dense presence.
What are the current market shares of the top Quick Commerce players in India?
-Blinkit leads with a 35% market share, followed by Swiggy’s Instamart with 28%, and Zepto with 25%.
Outlines
🚀 Quick Commerce's Rapid Growth and Market Penetration
The script introduces the burgeoning Quick Commerce sector in India, highlighting the ambitions of Deepinder Goyal, founder of Zomato and Blinkit, and Aadit Palicha, founder of Zepto. It discusses the unexpected resilience and growth of Quick Commerce post-COVID, contrary to initial predictions. The script details the market penetration statistics, showing India's significant lead with a 13% penetration rate compared to Europe's 3% and China's 7%. It also mentions the impressive growth of Zepto's Monthly Active Users and the substantial sales run rate achieved by Blinkit and Zepto. The impact of Quick Commerce on FMCG companies is underscored, with platforms like Zepto and Blinkit contributing significantly to their e-commerce sales. The script sets the stage for an exploration of the business model behind Quick Commerce's success.
🏪 Understanding the Dark Store Model of Quick Commerce
This paragraph delves into the operational aspect of Quick Commerce, focusing on the concept of 'dark stores.' Dark stores are described as small, employee-only warehouses strategically located to serve a 2 to 4 km radius, enabling ultra-fast delivery times. The script explains the rationale behind dark stores, their size, product range, and location advantages. It contrasts the Quick Commerce model with traditional e-commerce giants like Amazon and Flipkart, which rely on large fulfillment centers serving vast areas. The unit economics of Quick Commerce are simplified, with a focus on the profitability of individual dark stores. The script outlines the costs, margins, and the challenges faced in making the Quick Commerce model profitable, including the high cost of delivery relative to order value.
📈 Strategies for Increasing Profitability in Quick Commerce
The script discusses three main strategies that Quick Commerce companies are employing to increase profitability. The first strategy is to increase the Average Order Value (AOV), which can be achieved by introducing low-cart fees for small orders and expanding product categories. The second strategy involves increasing the density of dark stores to reduce delivery times and increase the number of deliveries per agent per hour. The third strategy is to generate advertising revenue by leveraging the large customer base on their platforms. The script provides examples of how companies like Zepto and Blinkit are implementing these strategies, with a focus on expanding their SKUs and introducing their own brand labels to increase profit margins.
🏁 The Race for Quick Commerce Dominance and Future Prospects
The final paragraph examines the competitive landscape of the Quick Commerce sector, highlighting the market shares and growth strategies of the top players, including Blinkit, Instamart, and Zepto. It emphasizes Zepto's rapid growth and its focus on operational efficiencies and strategic expansion. The script points out Zepto's higher store density in the cities it operates in, which contributes to faster delivery times and potentially higher profitability. It also mentions the company's plans to increase its dark store count and the expected timeline for achieving profitability. The paragraph concludes with a look at the future of Quick Commerce, with predictions of market growth and the potential for these companies to reshape the online grocery market.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Quick Commerce
💡Blinkit
💡Zepto
💡Dark Stores
💡SKU (Stock Keeping Unit)
💡FMCG (Fast-Moving Consumer Goods)
💡Gross Annual Sales Runrate
💡Average Order Value (AOV)
💡Store Density
💡Advertising Revenue
💡Operational Profitability
Highlights
Deepinder Goyal, founder of Zomato, predicts that its quick-commerce brand Blinkit will surpass Zomato in size within a year.
Aadit Palicha, the 22-year-old founder of Zepto, aims for his company to reach Dmart scale within 2 to 3 years.
Flipkart is considering entering the quick commerce segment due to the strong FOMO in the market.
Quick commerce started as a COVID fad but has continued to grow, threatening giants like Flipkart and Amazon.
India has one of the highest quick commerce penetration rates in the world, at 13% compared to 3% in Europe and 7% in China.
Zepto increased its Monthly Active Users from 1.8 Million in 2022 to 4 Million in 2023, adding 2.2 Million users in a single year.
Blinkit and Zepto have both achieved over 1 billion dollars in gross annual sales runrate.
Quick Commerce platforms contribute between 30 to 50% of the e-commerce sales of FMCG companies.
KRBL, the brand selling India Gate rice, experiences 1500% annualized growth in sales on quick commerce platforms.
The business model of Quick Commerce revolves around dark stores, which are mini stores only accessible to employees.
Dark stores are strategically placed to serve a 2 to 4 km radius, ensuring quick delivery to customers.
The profitability of Quick Commerce companies depends on making individual dark stores profitable.
Increasing the Average Order Value is a key strategy for Quick Commerce platforms to improve profitability.
Quick Commerce companies are expanding their product categories to increase the average order value and customer base.
Zepto, Blinkit, and Instamart are planning to increase their dark store count to improve delivery times and profitability.
Advertising revenue is a significant profit driver for Quick Commerce companies, offering a high margin of profit.
Zepto is expected to become profitable in 2024, while Blinkit aims for operational profitability by early 2025.
Zepto has been growing its daily active users rapidly and is on track to achieve profitability earlier than its competitors.
Zepto's strategy of having a high store density in top cities contributes to its fast delivery times and customer satisfaction.
Transcripts
Deepinder Goyal, the famous shark from Shark Tank
and founder of Zomato, recently declared that its
quick-commerce brand Blinkit will be bigger than
Zomato in one year. And Aadit Palicha -
the 22-year-old founder of Zepto, recently suggested
that they could be a Dmart scale company within the
next 2 to 3 years. And the FOMO is so strong right
now that Flipkart is also looking at entering into this
Quick Commerce segment.
Quick commerce and 10-minute delivery actually started out as a fad during COVID,
and experts believed that it would fade away once
things opened up, similar to what happened to the
Ed Tech sector. But they were wrong -
Quick commerce is going nowhere but upwards,
and it is now even threatening giants like Flipkart
and Amazon. In fact, quick commerce penetration in
India was already among one of the highest in the
world by 2022 - While its just 3% in Europe, 7% in China,
India was way ahead at 13%. Zepto alone has
increased its Monthly Active Users from 1.8 Million in 2022,
to 4 Million in 2023 - adding 2.2 Million users in a single year,
and both Blinkit and Zepto have hit over 1 billion dollars
in gross annual sales run rate. In fact, the impact has
been so monumental that Quick Commerce platforms
like Zepto, Blilnkit, and Instamart, are now contributing
between 30 to 50% of the e-commerce sales of
FMCG companies. The head of the domestic market of KRBL,
the brand that sells India Gate rice, says that they are
witnessing an annualized growth of 1500% in sales
on these quick commerce platforms, while in Kirana stores
it it just 10%. Now you might be wondering, how are
these companies able to deliver goods to your home
in just 10 minutes, how are they ever going to make a
profit with a business model that seems inherently flawed,
and why are giants like Flipkart and Reliance so eager to
get onto the Quick Commerce train? To understand this,
you first have to understand how the business model of
Quick Commerce really works. The arena is currently
dominated by 3 major players - The 3rd biggest player
with a 25% market share is
Zepto - the poster boy of Quick Commerce in India.
Founded by 2 teenagers who dropped out from Stanford,
Zepto has left behind strong players like Dunzo and BigBasket,
even though it began operations much later than them in April 2021.
On the 2nd number is Swiggy’s Instamart - as the name
suggests, it was launched by Swiggy in August 2020,
and it has been able to capture 28% of the market so far
by tapping into Swiggy’s existing customer base.
And finally, the leader of the table is Blinkit.
Blinkit initially started in 2013 as Grofers and had a
business model similar to Big Basket -
They provided slotted deliveries, within a few hours
or on the next day. But in 2021, Grofers made a pivot
to under 15 minutes delivery, and rebranded itself to Blinkit.
Then in 2022, it was acquired by Zomato for almost
4500 crore rupees in an all-stock deal.
Blinkit has a market share of 35%.
At the bottom of the table is BBNow, which was
bought by Tata, which has a market share of 9%.
Until recently, there was also Reliance-backed Dunzo
but it has been struggling and scaling back recently.
Now, all of these Quick commerce companies work on
a similar business model which centers around dark stores.
See, the only way to deliver items within 10 minutes of you
placing an order is by having those items stored very close to you.
And this is where dark stores come in. These are mini stores
that are roughly 3000 sq ft in size, and they are accessible
only to the employees of the store - not even to their delivery
agents. 90 to 95% of a customer’s daily needs basket
consists of the same 1500 SKUs. SKU is short for
Stock Keeping Unit, or simply the number of products
in layman's language. These stores are densely stacked
to ensure they can store all these 1500 SKUs and more -
So they have everything that a person might need at their home.
And since they do not need to be in front of customers,
the stores are usually located in back allies or basements.
So think of dark stores as your regular departmental stores,
except that only employees can access them and they are
way less spacious and optimized for maximum space usage.
These dark stores are strategically placed in different
localities to minimize the difference between them
and the customers, and each dark store usually
serves a radius of about 2 to 4 kms around it.
So when you select your location on the Zepto app,
it automatically selects the dark store that is nearest
to your location and shows you the products available
in that store. When you place an order, it is sent to
that particular dark store. Each dark store has a
fleet of delivery agents that are waiting in the store.
So when the dark store receives the order,
it is packed as quickly as possible,
picked up by a delivery agent right there,
who immediately leaves for your house and
arrives as soon as possible.
Since the distance between the dark store and
your home is so small, the driver is able to easily
make it within a few minutes even if he drives at a
modest speed of 15 to 20 kms per hour.
So this is the business model of quick commerce –
Speed and convenience for items that are in high
demand and have high rotation frequency.
This is in contrast to how e-commerce companies
like Amazon and Flipkart work - They have giant,
multi-acre fulfillment centers that cater to several cities
in a radius of hundreds of kilometers.
While having a single, giant center brings down costs,
it obviously increases the time - The order is picked up
from the fulfillment center, then sent to a smaller hub
of your city, followed by the delivery center of your locality.
Here, it is picked up by the delivery agent along with
several other orders, and then he follows a route,
delivering all the orders one by one.
And this factor of the number of deliveries completed
by an agent per day or per hour is the single biggest
pain point of Quick Commerce. To help you understand
this better, let me simplify the unit economics of this
Quick Commerce model. The central entity in the
profit and loss equation is the dark store -
Profitability of a quick commerce company depends
on making individual dark stores profitable.
Let’s say a dark store receives an order of Rs. 300.
Depending on the contents of the order,
Zepto can have a margin of anywhere between 5% to 40%.
Groceries have a higher profit margin of 18% to 40%,
while FMCG products like oil or rice have a
margin of 4% to 15%. So let’s say that this is an
average order and the profit margin is about 20%.
That means the cost of the products is 80% of Rs. 300,
or Rs. 240. So the margin left is 60 rupees.
Now, out of this 60 rupees, you have to take out the
fixed costs for the dark store as well, like salaries,
electricity, and rent. For a dark store of Blinkit or Zepto,
rent is almost nothing, because the revenue per square foot
for dark stores is the highest for any commerce format.
Not only are these stores small in area, but recall that
they are also located in back allies or basements,
where rent is already very low. Then, on top of it,
the revenue generated every day is very high -
Zepto alone is doing 1 Billion dollars of annual sales
run rate with just 330 dark stores - That would convert
into roughly 1.8 crore rupees of revenue per dark store.
So the fixed costs for the dark stores are
less than 10% (<10%)* of the revenue, and this covers
everything including rent, electricity, and employee
salaries. So 10% of 300 or another 30 rupees goes to
fixed costs, and now the margin left is just Rs. 30.
But it does not end here - Zepto pays Rs. 50 per delivery
to the delivery agent, which means that they are
essentially losing Rs. 20 per order.
And then, there are corporate employees on their payroll,
server costs, and taxes. In other words,
the business is simply not profitable.
Blinkit lost Rs. 1,078 crores in 2023, while
Zepto lost Rs. 1,272 crore. So does this mean that
Quick Commerce will never be profitable?
Well, not exactly. You see, these companies
can be made profitable, and for that, they
have 3 levers. Number 1 is by increasing the
Average Order Value. Coming back to our example,
if the order value is increased from Rs. 300 to Rs. 700,
then the profit margin becomes Rs. 140, but the fixed
costs and the delivery cost remain the same at
Rs. 30 and Rs. 50 respectively, so the final profit per order
turns out to be Rs. 60 per order.
With 4 lakh orders a day, this can turn into 2.4 crore rupees
in profit every single day, and if you increase the
average order value even further, then the final
profit percentage increases exponentially.
This is the lever that all these platforms are
prioritizing right now - In 2022, the average order value
was Rs. 553 for Blinkit, Rs. 400 for Zepto,
and Rs. 500 for Instamart, but by 2023,
this had increased to Rs.635 for Blinkit,
about Rs. 500 for Zepto, and about Rs. 550 for Instamart.
Now, you must be wondering, how are they increasing
their average order value, right? Well, one way is by
introducing a low-cart fee and a higher delivery
fee for small orders. The driver of sales continues
to be the core categories, and to avoid the delivery-fee,
customers end up adding items from adjacent categories.
But this only goes too far - Blinkit, Zepto, and Instamart
applies this small cart fee on orders below Rs. 99 only.
So while this can uplift the minimum order value,
it can definitely not thrust the average order value
over Rs. 600 or 800. So the strategy that they are
employing instead is adding more categories to their offering -
Initially, these Quick Commerce companies relied
on the fact that 90 to 95% of a customer’s basket
consists of the same 1500 SKUs, but they have
been steadily adding more and more categories.
For example, you can now easily buy beauty and
makeup products on Blinkit and Instamart as well -
Something they were not selling earlier.
Blinkit recently started delivering Playstation 5
in under 10 minutes on their app as well.
So they have expanded their SKUs to over 6000 for now,
as they continue to add newer categories -
They are now planning to add fashion, electronics,
and apparel as well. and this increase in the
number of SKUs on the app, is driving a corresponding
increase in the average order value as well,
simply because now there are more products
that a customer buy while placing an order.
This theory is confirmed by the increase in average
order value for all these platforms from 2022 to 2023,
coinciding with them adding more and more SKUs
to their offering in the same time period -
So it is clearly working as well. This, by the way,
is also why quick commerce companies like Zepto
are directly competing with the likes of Flipkart -
Someone who earlier used to buy clothes from
Flipkart or Makeup from Nykaa, would now directly
purchase it from Zepto or Blinkit and get it in under 10 minutes
instead of 1 to 3 business days.
They can increase profits even further by introducing
their own brand labels for different items -
For example, Zepto has launched its own meat brand
by the name Relish, where they can have a 5% to 20%
higher profit margin than selling meat from
another brand like Licious. So this is how these
companies are using the first lever to increase profits,
which is by increasing the average order value.
The second lever that they can and they are utilizing
is increasing the density of these stores.
See, the time taken to deliver an order depends on
the distance between the dark store and the customer.
If the maximum distance between a dark store and
a customer is brought down to 2 kms from 4 kms,
then a delivery agent could even double the number of
deliveries that he can do per hour. Zepto, Blinkit, Instamart -
all of them are planning to increase their dark store count
by upto 40% quite soon, but these stores will be opened
in the same cities - which will result in an increase in
the density of their stores - Eventually, there might be
no area in Mumbai where a Zepto dark store would
be farther than 2 kilometers. But note here that this
lever only works in densely populated areas like metro
and tier-1 cities, because otherwise, the number of
orders per store would not be high enough,
and a dark store needs at least 1500 orders
per day to be profitable.
And the third and final lever to profitability is advertising revenue.
Getting millions of customers on their app means that
these Quick Commerce companies can now
charge companies to advertise on them.
If you are searching for chocolates on Blinkit,
then it makes sense for Cadbury to advertise there and
push Dairy Milk to you. Setting up and advertising platforms
for brands costs almost nothing on this scale,
and it results in ad revenue that is 95% to 99% pure profit -
Zepto is now clocking hundreds of crores in advertising
revenue every single year. So this is how a handful of
companies have managed to increase the value of
the online grocery market from about 10,000 crores in 2019,
to almost 1 Lakh 20 thousand crores in 2024.
While Zepto expects to become profitable this
year itself in 2024, Blinkit says it will achieve
operational profitability by early 2025.
Now the final question that you may be
asking yourself now would be - who is winning
this race? Well, I did a lot of research regarding this,
and the results were quite surprising.
As I already said earlier, Blinkit is already the market
leader with a market share of 35%, while Instamart
and Zepto are almost neck to neck at 28% and 25% respectively.
But while Blinkit certainly has more customers than Zepto,
Zepto has been growing its daily active users much,
much faster than any of its ompetitors.
After launching in mid-2021, they had managed to
capture 13% of the market share in less than a year
by March 2022, and then, in about 1 year, they
managed to almost double this share to 25%.
And what really blew my mind was how they are
actually doing this. While you definitely have to
give it to them for maximizing the operational efficiencies
to make the logistics as seamless as possible,
their expansion strategy also tells a lot.
When you look at the top 3, Zepto actually has
a lower number of stores than others. But then,
when you look at the number of cities where it is
currently present, it is also much lower than others -
They are present in just the top 10 cities of India.
So what this means is that while Blinkit has a store
density of about 17 stores per city, Instamart has
about 18 stores per city, Zepto has a store density of
33 stores per city - that is almost 2 times more than
its competitors. And recall that I explained earlier
how store density is a crucial factor in attaining profitability -
So by having more stores per city, Zepto is able to
considerably decrease its delivery times and increase
its profits. This could be a major reason why Zepto is
on track to achieve profitability much earlier than any
of its competitors. And this delivery speed has the
added benefit of increasing customer satisfaction -
A survey revealed that quick commerce users in India
perceived Zepto to be the fastest delivery option available.
So to me, it looks like Zepto is ahead of the curve,
at least for now. If you made it this far, please let me
know in the comments which is your favorite quick commerce brand.
Subscribe here and follow me on LinkedIn and Instagram,
the link is in the description below.
Until I see you in the next video, goodbye!
Ver Más Videos Relacionados
Blinkit’s Genius Strategy that stunned Amazon and Flipkart | Business Case Study
How BlinkIt is WINNING India’s ₹23,000 Crore Quick Commerce Industry | GrowthX Wireframe
Zepto Founder Aadit Palicha On E-Comerce Growth | Startup Central - The Big Interview | ET Now
Zepto, Blinkit, Swiggy Instamart: Can Quick Commerce really beat DMart, Reliance Retail?
The Decline of Dunzo!... What Happened? | Startup Case Study
Success Story of Zepto: Dropout to Billionaire? | Startup Analyst
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)