The Truth about Benchmarks

Summary

In this video, Teal Gamer calls out the tech community for spreading misinformation about the AMD Ryzen 9800X3D, particularly regarding its gaming performance. He argues that gaming benchmarks often miss crucial details, such as the fact that games are written on Nvidia and Intel architectures, not AMD. He explains that AMD processors can’t fully utilize game architectures designed for Intel and Nvidia, leading to misleading performance claims. Teal emphasizes that for optimal gaming performance, an Intel processor paired with an Nvidia card is essential, and warns that people are being misled by tech channels pushing new products without considering real-world applications.

Takeaways

• 😀 AMD Ryzen 9800X3D is not the fastest gaming CPU, and the term 'gaming CPU' is just a marketing gimmick.
• 😀 Games are written using Intel processors and Nvidia GPUs, which means AMD cannot fully utilize the game architecture.
• 😀 AMD processors cannot run games at their best performance because they do not support Nvidia's technologies like Ray Tracing, DLSS, and PhysX.
• 😀 Benchmark results showing AMD outperforming Intel in gaming are misleading since AMD skips certain key game architectures.
• 😀 To get accurate performance results, tests must pair Intel processors with Nvidia GPUs, not AMD processors.
• 😀 The 40 series Nvidia GPUs are overrated, and the 30 series (such as the 3090 Ti) still provides excellent performance.
• 😀 Not everyone has access to high-end 40 series GPUs, so tests that focus only on these are not representative of what most users experience.
• 😀 Tech channels pushing expensive 40 series cards are contributing to unrealistic expectations and ignoring the needs of everyday users.
• 😀 The 30 series GPUs and Intel 13th Gen processors are more than sufficient for the next several years, future-proofing systems for long-term use.
• 😀 The tech industry’s rapid release cycle, introducing the 50 series cards before the 40 series cards are fully utilized, is harmful to consumers.
• 😀 There is no current software or game that can fully max out the power of high-end hardware like the 3090 Ti or the 40 series GPUs.

Q & A

What is the main argument presented by the speaker regarding the AMD Ryzen 9800 X3D?

The speaker argues that the AMD Ryzen 9800 X3D is not the fastest gaming CPU, and that the term 'gaming CPU' is a marketing gimmick. They emphasize that the performance boost associated with this CPU is due to it not running specific gaming architectures created for Intel and Nvidia processors.

Why does the speaker claim that AMD processors cannot run games as efficiently as Intel processors?

According to the speaker, games are written on Intel processors and Nvidia graphics cards, which provide the necessary architecture for game performance. AMD processors, on the other hand, do not support the same game-specific architectures like Fizz X, Ray Tracing, or DLSS, leading to less efficient performance in gaming.

How does the speaker criticize the benchmarks for AMD Ryzen 9800 X3D performance?

The speaker criticizes the benchmarks by saying that they are misleading. He argues that the higher frame rates seen in AMD Ryzen 9800 X3D tests are due to the fact that AMD is not processing certain game-specific architectures, leading to a less accurate representation of its true gaming performance.

What is the speaker’s opinion about pairing AMD CPUs with Nvidia GPUs?

The speaker believes that pairing AMD CPUs with Nvidia GPUs results in suboptimal performance, as the game-specific architectures like Ray Tracing and Fizz X are designed specifically for Intel processors and Nvidia GPUs. This leads to inaccurate benchmarks and performance assessments.

What does the speaker suggest for users who want to future-proof their gaming systems?

The speaker suggests building a system with a 13th gen Intel i7 processor, a 30 series Nvidia graphics card, and DDR5 RAM. He claims that this combination will effectively future-proof the system for the next 6 to 8 years, as current technology is not yet capable of utilizing the full power of these components.

Why does the speaker criticize tech channels and reviewers in the video?

The speaker criticizes tech channels and reviewers for spreading misinformation, especially when testing AMD processors with Nvidia GPUs. He claims these reviewers do not understand the architecture behind the games, and their benchmarks are not accurate or reflective of real-world gaming performance.

What is the speaker’s stance on the release of the 40 and 50 series Nvidia graphics cards?

The speaker argues that the 40 series Nvidia cards are not even fully utilized by existing software, and the introduction of 50 series cards is premature. He believes that unless the software can fully leverage the power of these new cards, the high price tags are unjustifiable.

How does the speaker explain the relationship between Nvidia, Intel, and game development?

The speaker explains that Nvidia provides the architecture for game development, and games are programmed on Intel processors. This relationship ensures that Nvidia and Intel are the primary players in the gaming performance space, while AMD processors do not support these crucial game architectures.

What is the speaker’s perspective on the pricing of the 40 and 50 series Nvidia graphics cards?

The speaker believes that the prices of the 40 and 50 series Nvidia graphics cards are unreasonable, as current software is not capable of fully utilizing their power. He argues that this pricing strategy is unfair to consumers, especially when the performance potential of the 30 series cards has not been fully exploited.

What does the speaker believe is the root cause of the confusion around gaming CPUs and hardware?

The speaker believes the confusion stems from the marketing terms like 'gaming CPU' and the lack of understanding about how games are actually developed and optimized for specific hardware. He emphasizes that the gaming performance of a CPU or GPU is largely determined by its compatibility with the game’s underlying architecture, not just raw specifications.