OSHO: Marriage and Children

Summary

The speaker passionately opposes marriage, viewing it as a restriction on personal freedom. They advocate for a society where love is free and without legal bonds, suggesting that marriage leads to psychological issues and societal problems. The speaker proposes that communal living, rather than family units, should be responsible for raising children to prevent the transmission of familial dysfunction and to enrich their experiences.

Takeaways

• 🏃‍♂️ The speaker is fundamentally against marriage, viewing it as a restriction on personal freedom.
• 🤔 The speaker believes that marriage can lead to loveless, duty-bound relationships that are detrimental to mental health.
• 👥 The speaker suggests that without marriage, other societal issues like prostitution and the need for priests and therapists would diminish.
• 👪 The speaker argues that children should be communally raised, not by individual families, to prevent the transmission of family issues and to enrich their experiences.
• 👶 The family unit, according to the speaker, can impose significant psychological burdens on children, including superstitions and rigid ideologies.
• 🌐 The speaker envisions a society where individuals are free to love and part ways without the legal bonds of marriage.
• 🤝 The speaker values the freedom to engage in relationships without the constraints of marriage, promoting a more fluid and natural approach to love.
• 👁️ The speaker criticizes religious narratives, such as the conception of Jesus, as examples of hypocrisy and control within religious institutions.
• 👥 The speaker sees the family as an outdated institution that stifles individuality and should be replaced by a more open and communal system.
• 🌱 The speaker believes that communal upbringing can lead to a more diverse and fulfilling life for children, as opposed to the limited exposure provided by traditional family structures.

Q & A

What is the speaker's stance on marriage?

The speaker is strongly against marriage, viewing it as a restriction on personal freedom.

Why does the speaker believe marriage should be abolished?

The speaker argues that marriage creates psychological perversions, repressions, and guilt, and that it leads to an increase in the workload of therapists, psychiatrists, and priests.

What alternative does the speaker propose to marriage?

The speaker suggests that people should meet and love each other occasionally without the legal binding of marriage.

How does the speaker view the concept of family responsibilities towards children?

The speaker believes that children should be the responsibility of the commune, not the family, as the family creates problems and enforces sickness, superstitions, and religious ideologies on children.

What does the speaker think about the role of the family in shaping a child's personality?

The speaker contends that children often become carbon copies of their parents, repeating their behaviors and attitudes, which can be detrimental to their development.

What is the speaker's opinion on the story of Jesus' birth?

The speaker questions the story, suggesting it was invented to cover up the fact that Jesus might be a 'bastard' and implying that the concept of God as a trinity is used to justify the Virgin Mary's pregnancy.

How does the speaker describe the ideal societal structure for raising children?

The speaker envisions a commune-based system where children have many 'uncles' and 'aunts', providing them with a rich variety of human contacts and experiences.

What does the speaker mean by 'walking on the razor's edge'?

The speaker uses this phrase to describe living life without conforming to societal norms such as marriage or celibacy, instead choosing a path of freedom and personal choice.

Why does the speaker think that the family is an outdated institution?

The speaker believes the family is outdated because it creates a restrictive environment that hinders the development of a 'new man' and should be replaced by a more communal approach to child-rearing.

What is the speaker's view on the role of love in relationships?

The speaker advocates for honesty in love, suggesting that if a couple no longer loves each other, they should part ways amicably rather than continue in a loveless relationship out of duty.

How does the speaker perceive the impact of family on an individual's psychology?

The speaker sees the family as a source of psychological issues, suggesting that it creates perversions, repressions, and guilt in individuals.