AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Review, Price to Performance Champ!

Summary

In this video, the host reviews AMD's Ryzen 5 3600, a 6-core, 12-thread CPU with impressive benchmarks. The Ryzen 5 3600 is tested against Intel's i5-9600K, showing strong multi-core performance and efficiency in productivity tasks while maintaining competitive gaming results. The included Wraith Stealth cooler performs well, making it a great value at its $200 price point. The reviewer highlights the Ryzen 3600's power efficiency and performance gains over previous generations, making it a solid choice for builders seeking a budget-friendly, high-performance processor.

Takeaways

• 🔧 The Ryzen 5 3600 is a 6-core, 12-thread CPU with clock speeds ranging from 3.6 GHz to 4.2 GHz.
• 💡 It comes with a 32MB L3 cache, 65W TDP, and includes the Wraith Stealth cooler, all for an MSRP of $200.
• 🆚 The Ryzen 5 3600 competes with Intel's Core i5-9600K, which costs $255 but doesn't include a cooler, making AMD's offering better value.
• ⚙️ The CPU was tested on an MSI X570 motherboard with DDR4 3200 CL14 memory, providing consistent results with other Ryzen processors.
• 🎮 In terms of gaming, the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers performance similar to the Intel Core i5-9600K in many games, but with better 1% low frame rates.
• 🔥 The Ryzen 5 3600 delivers a 45% performance boost over the Ryzen 5 1600 in productivity tasks like Cinebench and WinRAR.
• 💻 Power efficiency is impressive, as the 3600 consumes a similar amount of power as older Intel CPUs but delivers significantly better performance.
• 🧊 Overclocking potential is limited, with minor gains using the stock cooler. The PBO feature provides small improvements but increases heat.
• 🎯 In most benchmarks, the Ryzen 5 3600 is competitive with Intel's 8700K and 9600K, especially in multi-core workloads and productivity tasks.
• 💰 The Ryzen 5 3600 offers exceptional value for both gaming and productivity, making it a solid choice for budget and mid-range builds.

Q & A

What CPU is being reviewed in the video?

The CPU being reviewed is the AMD Ryzen 5 3600.

How many cores and threads does the Ryzen 5 3600 have?

The Ryzen 5 3600 has 6 cores and 12 threads.

What is the clock speed range of the Ryzen 5 3600?

The Ryzen 5 3600 clocks between 3.6 GHz and 4.2 GHz.

What is the MSRP of the Ryzen 5 3600?

The MSRP of the Ryzen 5 3600 is $200.

How does the Ryzen 5 3600 compare to the Intel Core i5-9600K in terms of pricing?

The Ryzen 5 3600 is priced lower at $200 compared to the Intel Core i5-9600K, which costs $255.

What motherboard was used to test the Ryzen 5 3600?

The Ryzen 5 3600 was tested on the MSI X570 Creation motherboard.

Which cooler was used for the Ryzen 5 3600 during the review?

The included Wraith Stealth cooler was used for the Ryzen 5 3600 during the review.

What benchmark software was used to test the multi-core performance of the Ryzen 5 3600?

Cinebench R20 was used to test the multi-core performance of the Ryzen 5 3600.

How much faster is the Ryzen 5 3600 compared to its predecessor, the Ryzen 5 2600, in the Cinebench R20 multi-core test?

The Ryzen 5 3600 is 28% faster than the Ryzen 5 2600 in the Cinebench R20 multi-core test.

What is the power consumption of the Ryzen 5 3600 compared to the Intel Core i7-7700K during the Blender benchmark?

The Ryzen 5 3600 consumed the same amount of power as the quad-core Intel Core i7-7700K during the Blender benchmark.

Outlines

00:00

🔧 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Unboxing and Introduction

The video opens with the host introducing the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 processor, made possible by the support of their Patreon community. This 6-core, 12-thread CPU features a base clock of 3.6GHz and a boost clock of 4.2GHz. It comes with a Wraith Stealth cooler and a $200 price tag, similar to the Ryzen 5 2600. The Ryzen 5 3600’s primary competition is Intel’s Core i5-9600K, which is more expensive and lacks a cooler. The host explains that they are using an MSI X570 motherboard for testing, although more budget-friendly B450 boards would suffice.

05:01

⚡ Benchmark Performance Comparison

In this section, the host presents benchmark results. In Cinebench R20 multi-core tests, the Ryzen 5 3600 matches the Ryzen 7 1800X, outperforming its predecessor, the Ryzen 5 2600, by 28%. The single-core performance is also strong, with the Ryzen 5 3600 trailing the Ryzen 7 3700X by only 4%. Additional tests, including WinRAR and 7-Zip, reveal the Ryzen 5 3600 surpasses older Intel and AMD processors, showcasing impressive gains in both compression and decompression tasks.

10:02

🖥️ Power Efficiency and Gaming Performance

The Ryzen 5 3600 demonstrates excellent power efficiency during Blender benchmarks, consuming similar power as Intel’s Core i7-7700K but offering 40% more performance. In gaming tests, the Ryzen 5 3600 provides a smooth experience, often matching or surpassing Intel’s Core i5-9600K in titles like Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, and Division 2. Although the Ryzen 5 3600 struggles slightly in Far Cry New Dawn and World War Z, it remains competitive, especially when considering the price.

15:04

🎮 Gaming at Higher Resolutions

Gaming performance continues with titles tested at 1440p, where Ryzen 5 3600 holds its own against the more expensive Intel CPUs, particularly in terms of 1% low frame rates. In Total War: Three Kingdoms, the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers similar performance to Intel’s 9600K and AMD’s Ryzen 7 and 9 chips. The Ryzen 5 3600 shows it’s a powerful processor capable of delivering smooth gameplay at high resolutions while being more affordable than competing Intel processors.

💡 Overclocking and Thermal Performance

The Ryzen 5 3600 offers limited overclocking potential, with an all-core overclock reaching just 4.2GHz. The host suggests using AMD’s Precision Boost Overdrive (PBO) for a slight performance boost without extra heat. The included Wraith Stealth cooler is quiet and effective, keeping temperatures around 80°C during stress tests. With better cooling solutions, like an AIO liquid cooler, temperatures drop significantly, allowing for small gains in performance, though the overclocking benefits are minimal.

📊 Cost-Performance Analysis

This segment highlights the cost-per-frame value of the Ryzen 5 3600 compared to Intel’s Core i5-9600K. With a price tag of $200, the Ryzen 5 3600 provides better value, delivering strong performance in both gaming and productivity applications. Factoring in the cost of additional cooling for the Intel CPUs, the Ryzen 5 3600 outshines the 9600K in terms of value for gamers and creators, making it a superior option for those seeking a budget-friendly yet powerful CPU.

🛠️ Future-Proofing and AM4 Platform

The video concludes by emphasizing the longevity of AMD's AM4 platform, which allows users to upgrade to newer Ryzen CPUs without needing to change their motherboard. This is a significant advantage for consumers who purchased earlier Ryzen CPUs, as they can now upgrade to the Ryzen 5 3600 for a substantial performance boost. The host expresses confidence in AMD’s future product offerings, noting that even budget builders using B450 motherboards can achieve excellent results with the Ryzen 5 3600.

👍 Final Thoughts and Thanks to Supporters

The host wraps up the video by reiterating the Ryzen 5 3600’s value, performance, and efficiency. They encourage viewers to subscribe for more content and to consider supporting the channel through Patreon, where patrons can access exclusive content like live streams and a Discord community. The video ends with a thank you to supporters and a promise of more hardware reviews, specifically testing third-gen Ryzen processors on entry-level B350 motherboards.

Keywords

💡Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is a 6-core, 12-thread CPU from AMD that operates between 3.6 GHz and 4.2 GHz, with a 32 MB L3 cache and a 65W TDP. It is the focal product being reviewed in the video, noted for its price-to-performance ratio. The video compares its performance to competing Intel processors, emphasizing its high efficiency and excellent gaming and productivity results, especially considering its $200 price point.

💡Intel Core i5 9600K

The Intel Core i5 9600K is a competing 6-core processor from Intel, often compared to the Ryzen 5 3600 in this video. The processor is priced higher than the Ryzen 5 3600, does not include a stock cooler, and consumes more power, but offers slightly better gaming performance in some titles. The video highlights the Ryzen 5 3600's superior overall value when factoring in total cost, including cooling.

💡Cinebench R20

Cinebench R20 is a benchmarking tool used in the video to measure multi-core and single-core performance of CPUs. In this video, the Ryzen 5 3600 is shown to deliver exceptional performance, matching the Ryzen 7 1800X and outperforming the Intel Core i5 9600K in multi-core performance, making it an important metric for evaluating the CPU's efficiency.

💡Wraith Stealth cooler

The Wraith Stealth cooler is the stock cooler included with the Ryzen 5 3600. In the video, it is noted that this cooler performs well enough for the CPU under most conditions, keeping temperatures reasonable during stress tests like Blender. The inclusion of this cooler also makes the Ryzen 5 3600 more cost-effective compared to Intel's i5 9600K, which requires an aftermarket cooler.

💡Power efficiency

Power efficiency refers to the ratio of performance to power consumption. The Ryzen 5 3600 is praised in the video for its excellent power efficiency, particularly when compared to Intel's competing CPUs. Despite consuming a similar or lower amount of power, the Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Intel processors in several tests, making it highly efficient for both gaming and productivity tasks.

💡Assassin's Creed Odyssey

Assassin's Creed Odyssey is one of the games used in the video for benchmarking gaming performance. The Ryzen 5 3600 performs nearly on par with the Intel Core i7 8700K in this game, providing similar 1% low frame rates, which are important for smooth gameplay. This illustrates that the Ryzen 5 3600 is competitive in gaming even with higher-end Intel processors.

💡1440p resolution

1440p resolution, also known as Quad HD, is the resolution used for some of the gaming benchmarks in the video. The results show that the Ryzen 5 3600 performs competitively with Intel processors at this resolution. In games like Battlefield 5 and Shadow of the Tomb Raider, the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers smooth performance, narrowing the performance gap with Intel CPUs as the resolution increases.

💡Productivity workloads

Productivity workloads refer to tasks like content creation, video rendering, and compression, which are more CPU-intensive than gaming. The Ryzen 5 3600 excels in these areas, as highlighted in the video, often outperforming Intel's Core i5 9600K by significant margins in tasks like Blender and 7-Zip. This makes the Ryzen 5 3600 a great option for users who need a CPU for both gaming and productivity.

💡Price-to-performance ratio

The price-to-performance ratio is a key theme in the video, referring to how much performance a user gets for the price paid. The Ryzen 5 3600 offers an excellent ratio, delivering performance on par with or exceeding more expensive Intel CPUs while being priced at just $200. The video emphasizes how this makes the Ryzen 5 3600 a standout choice in its price range, especially when factoring in the included cooler and power efficiency.

💡BIOS update

A BIOS update refers to the process of updating the firmware on a motherboard to support newer hardware. In the video, the reviewer mentions that older motherboards, such as those with the B350 chipset, can support the Ryzen 5 3600 if they receive a BIOS update. This highlights AMD's commitment to backward compatibility, which allows users to upgrade their CPUs without having to invest in new motherboards.

Highlights

The Ryzen 5 3600 is a 6-core, 12-thread CPU that clocks between 3.6GHz and 4.2GHz, featuring a 32MB L3 cache and a 65W TDP.

AMD has set the MSRP for the Ryzen 5 3600 at $200, the same launch price as its predecessor, the Ryzen 5 2600.

The primary competition for the Ryzen 5 3600 is the Intel Core i5 9600K, priced at $255 but without an included cooler, making AMD's cooler-included offer more cost-effective.

The Ryzen 5 3600 performs impressively in Cinebench R20 multi-core, matching the Ryzen 7 1800X, with a 45% performance improvement over the Ryzen 5 1600.

In single-core performance, the Ryzen 5 3600 is just 4% slower than the Ryzen 7 3700X and matches the Intel Core i5 9600K, demonstrating excellent performance for its price.

In WinRAR, the Ryzen 5 3600 is 45% faster than the Core i7 7700K and only 4% slower than the Intel Core i7 8700K.

The Ryzen 5 3600 beats the Ryzen 7 2700X in 7-Zip compression tests, showcasing strong performance in content creation tasks.

Power efficiency is a standout feature, with the Ryzen 5 3600 consuming the same amount of power as the Intel Core i7 7700K while delivering significantly faster performance.

In gaming benchmarks like Assassin's Creed Odyssey, the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers similar performance to the Intel Core i7 8700K, offering smooth gameplay even at 1440p.

The 3600 surpasses the Core i5 9600K in 1% low performance in games like Battlefield V, ensuring smoother and more consistent gameplay.

Despite some minor gaming performance drops in specific titles like Far Cry New Dawn and World War Z, the Ryzen 5 3600 still provides over 100 FPS in most scenarios, making it a solid choice for gamers.

Overclocking on the Ryzen 5 3600 provides minimal gains, with just a 4% boost in multi-core performance, making it less worthwhile unless using a better cooling solution.

Thermal performance of the included Wraith Stealth cooler is excellent, maintaining a peak temperature of 80°C in stress tests, making additional cooling unnecessary for most users.

When factoring in the cost of a cooler, the Ryzen 5 3600 offers significantly better value than the Intel Core i5 9600K, with a cost-per-frame figure of $1.53 compared to Intel’s $2.18.

The Ryzen 5 3600 is a great option for both new builds and upgrades, offering a 35-45% performance boost over the Ryzen 5 1600 and making it a compelling choice in terms of value.

Transcripts

[Music]

welcome back to harbor unbox today we're

going to take a look at the risin v 3600

and thanks to our patreon community we

were able to purchase this processor for

a reasonably early review and we can do

that rather than waiting for AMD to

provide them at a later date not quite

sure when AMD is providing these CPUs

but rather wait we've gone out and

bought one so a big thank you to

everyone who supports us directly so

there isin 5 3600 is a 6 chord 12 thread

CPU that clocks between 3.6 Q Hertz and

4.2 gigahertz it features a 32 megabyte

l3 cache and a 65 watt TDP included in

the package is the Wraith stealth cooler

and AMD has set the MSRP at just $200 so

it's the same launch price as the r5

2600 which was $20 less than the

original v 1600 the primary competition

for the r5 3600 comes from the Intel

Core i5 9600 the non K model which costs

two hundred and thirteen dollars u.s.

but since we don't have that part and it

doesn't appear to be on sale the more

expensive 9600 K will have to do it

costs two hundred fifty-five dollars

u.s. and it doesn't include a box cooler

therefore in terms of pricing Intel's

already on the back foot so it'll be

interesting to see how they stack up

when it comes to the benchmarks speaking

of which the MSI x5 70 creation was used

for testing I know it's an overkill

motherboard it's certainly not necessary

a B 450 board will work just fine but I

want to use the same test setup that I

did for the other rise and processors so

this means the rise in fire for 3,600

was tested on the same x5 70 board and

it's been configured with the same ddr4

3200 cell 14 memory and I used the

included box cooler for the review of

the CPU as well then the eighth and

ninth gen Intel Core processors were

benchmarked on the gigabyte is at 390 or

ultra using the same ddr4 3200 cell 14

memory but they were cooled using the

corsair hydro series h 115 i RGB

platinum 200 millimeter all-in-one

liquid cooler please note the intel cpus

are not TDP restricted as that's not the

out of the box experience so we're

showing the absolute best case scenario

out-of-the-box performance with the

Intel processors but please note I'll

also be factoring in the cost of an

aftermarket cooler for the Intel CPUs in

the cost analysis at the end of this

video and it works out to be in AMD's

favored to use the Box cooler as using

an aftermarket solution really only

boost gaming performance by one to two

percent

please note I have removed the higher

and more expensive CPU such as the 3900

X 9700 k91 RK for a group of 29 20x and

core i7 7900 X as they aren't really

relevant we're looking at a $200 CPU but

you can cross-reference the results from

our earlier third gen rising review if

you like finally the graphics card of

choice is the MSI trio GeForce artex

2080 ti okay I think that covers

everything let's get into the benchmark

results as usual we'll start off with

the Cinebench our twenty multi-core test

and right away I'm pretty blown away by

the 3600 s performance here it matched

the Rison seven 1800 X with just over

3,600 points yep the 3600 scored roughly

3,600 points amazing but let's move on

this made at four percent faster than

the 8700 K almost twenty percent faster

in the 2600 X and 28% faster than the

model it's replacing the 2600 then when

compared to the r5 1600 the new 3600 is

45% faster that's pretty insane

in two years AMD has increased

performance at the $200 price point by

almost 50% the single core performance

is equally impressive here the 3600 was

just 4% slower than the 3700 X and that

meant it was able to match the core i5

9600 K and just edged out the 8700 K

moving on to WinRAR and here we see the

r5 3600 looks very good falling just

short of the 8700 K by a mere 4% margin

that made at 45% faster than the core i7

77 or okay and rise in 720 700 X so some

pretty incredible gains here for the

third gen Rison part again this time

when testing with 7-zip

we see the 3,600 beating the 2700 X the

compression performance really is

nothing short of amazing and met the

3600 was 14%

the 8700 K it did fall behind the older

eight Corazon processes in the

decompression test but even so it was

still 16 percent faster than the 8700 K

for budding content creators the r5 3600

will be a godsend for just $200 it

completed our 4k workload four percent

faster than the 8700 K and while that's

far from a significant margin

remember the 8700 K is a 360 US dollar

processor interestingly the 3600 does

come up short again against the ad700 K

in the latest version of the VRA

benchmark here it was 6% slower but

again given the difference in price

that's hardly a bad result for AMD still

when compared to the r5 2600 it was 17%

faster and a whopping 32% faster than

the r5 1600 they're moving along once

again AMD's new six core CPU trailed the

87 ROK by a small margin in the corona

benchmark so given the difference in

price this is still a very good result

for the 3600 it did manage to pull ahead

for the blender test here it was just a

single percent faster than the 87 ok so

basically the same result but that is

still clearly a very good result for

AMD's new $200 desktop processor but

perhaps more impressive are the total

system power consumption figures we

recorded when running the blender

benchmark as you can see the r5 3600

consume the same amount of power as the

quad core Core i7 77 okay and only

slightly more than the 9600 K now you

might think consuming slightly more

power the 9600 K isn't that impressive

but remember the 3600 was almost 40%

faster than the Core i5 processor in

this test so in terms of power

efficiency it's extremely impressive

okay time for gaming and first up we

have Assassin's Creed Odyssey and here

the 3600 slightly edged out the 8700 K

is one percent low result despite being

a few frames slower on average still you

can very much cool what we're seeing

here 8700 K light performance for the

new horizon 5 3600 so again that is a

big win for AMD as far as I'm concerned

like what we saw with the 3900 X and

3700 X review the third gen rise and

processors do slip a little in this

title at 1440p

and this is

also true for the r5 3600 here at 6%

smile nearly 700 K not a massive margin

but normally you'd expect things to

close up at 1440p the battlefield 5

results are again a little disappointing

though I have to remind myself the 3600

isn't competing with the 8700 K its

target is the 9600 K and here it

improves 1% low performance by 23% so an

easy win for the new risin 5 processor

even at 1440p despite the 9600 K

appearing quicker when looking at the

average framerate the 1% low performance

of the 3600 was actually 18% higher and

this allowed it to deliver a smoother

and more consistent gaming experience

next up we have shut off the Tomb Raider

and here's a 3600 matched the 9600 K

which is a very solid result given the

9600 K costs more and requires you to

purchase a cooler separately the 1440p

results were much the same the 9600 K

did creep ahead by a few frames but

overall performance was competitive and

the 1% low performance of the 3600 was a

good bit faster than any of these 2nd

gen rising parts moving on to the

division 2 and here at 1080p the 3600

edged out the 9600 K and made a

significant step forward from not just

the 2600 X but also the 2700 X

interestingly though this time at 1440p

the 3600 was able to pull further ahead

of the 9600 K namely when looking at the

1% low performance in fact the 3600

matched the 3700 X and that man it was a

good bit faster in the 2,700 X and 8700

K as we've come to expect from horizon

the performance in Far Cry new dawn was

a bit disappointing at least relative to

the competing Intel processors and

overall performance was still very good

and the game plate was incredibly smooth

even at 1440p the 3600 is still well

down on the 9600 okay

particularly when looking at the 1% low

results performance in World War Z was

also low relative to the Intel CPUs but

of course with well over 100 FPS at all

times it probably doesn't matter too

much in this instance interestingly the

rice and CPUs create some kind of

performance bottleneck in this title and

we see what looks to be a 135 FPS Kappa

1440p it's very odd that considering the

Intel CPUs pushed up to

and 50 FPS Verizon 5 3,600 was solid

enrage to averaging 100 60 FPS and this

meant it wasn't a great deal slower than

the 9600 K moreover the 3600 was fast

enough to find the limits of the r-tx

2082 at 1440p though this was true of

almost all the CPUs tested this time

when testing with hitman 2 we see the

3600 was 7% slower than 92,000 ok when

looking at the average framerate not a

massive difference but again this isn't

a great title for the rise in CPUs we

find similar results at 1440p though

here the 3600 basically matched the 1%

low performance of the 96 and ok

I don't over all the gaming experience

was indistinguishable between these 2

CPUs finishing up the gaming benchmarks

we have Total War three kingdoms and he

the 3600 offered stronger 1% low

performance than the 96 on our K but it

did also provide slightly lower average

frame rates but once again the jump to

1440p with the RT x 20 80 TI we see the

performance margins are neutralized and

here the 9600 K and 3600 enabled the

same level of performance as was the

case with the 3700 X and 3900 X there's

very little overclocking Headroom to

speak of with the 3600 the best I could

do with an all-in-one liquid cooler was

a 4.2 gigahertz or Core overclock so

again you're best off enabling PBO plus

the order OC feature in the rise and

master software this boosted the

Cinebench r20 multi-core score by a mere

4% here we say that the PBA plus order

OC overclock improved the single core

score by just one and a half percent so

I suspect most won't bother with

overclocking as it's not really worth

the added heat speaking of which let's

check out the thermal performance of the

included Wraith stealth box cooler with

the race stealth install the 3600

maintained a 4 gigahertz clock speed out

of the box during a one-hour long

blender stress test this is an extreme

stress test so the fact that it peaked

at just 80 degrees is actually pretty

good especially given it was virtually

silent

you can enable PBO with the Box cooler

but it won't do much as you're already

near the thermal limit so basically we

gain just 25 megahertz for a 4 degree

increase in temperature that big in the

case I don't recommend using PBO with

the Box cooler

with a decent cooler installed

temperatures were dropped quite

significantly you really don't need

something as Extreme as the Corsair

hydro Series edge 115 i 280 millimeter

all-in-one liquid cooler but I did use

that for the 3,700 X and I wanted to

make these results comparable for future

content anyway with the a i/o installed

these stock temps drop to just 62

degrees and now by default the 3600 ran

at 4,000 125 megahertz so a 3% order

overclock then with PBO enabled we got

another 85 megahertz and this increased

the load temp to 68 degrees which is

obviously still very cool okay so now

that we've seen how the new risin 530

600 performs in a range of applications

and games it's time to work out just how

good it is in terms of value so let's go

do that right now

for the cost per frame data we're adding

the cost of the cooler to the Intel

systems I believe a $45 budget for the

cooler master hyper 212 Black Edition is

very reasonable with those adjustments

made the core i5 9600 K comes in at a

total cost of $295 us and that means the

cost per frame figure is two dollars and

18 cents which places it on par with the

horizon 720 700 X the horizon 530 600

comes out significantly more affordable

at just $1 53 per frame as it delivers a

similar level of performance but costs

almost $100 less this makes the 3600

better values in the 2600 X at its

current $195 asking price though it is

18 percent more costly than the vanilla

2600 even so given the improvements in

efficiency and the absolutely a

monstrous performance uplift in

productivity workloads I feel it's going

to be easy for consumers to justify that

small price premium well there you have

it as predicted the horizon 530 600

offers a tremendous amount of value and

because it just sips power it'll work on

even the most basic be 350 motherboard

providing it receives the necessary BIOS

update alternatively for new builders

you can grab my favorite be 450 board

the MSI be 450 tomahawk and you'll have

a killer combo for a smidgen over $300

u.s. and that's that's basically what

you'll pay for a 9600 K with a mid-range

cooler then in the few

your options are aplenty the horizon 730

700x the horizon 930 900 X or maybe even

the 16-core 39 50 X who knows what

secondhand deals will be available in

these parts in a few years time this is

why I've been such a big proponent of

AMD's a m4 platform those who bought in

two years ago with an affordable be 350

motherboard and say the Rison v 1600 for

example you now have the option of

slotting in the r5 3600 for up to a 35

percent performance boost in games and

at least a 45 percent boost in

applications though as we saw in WinRAR

it can be over a 100 percent boost but

as I alluded to a moment ago even for

those building a new PC from the ground

up the r5 3600 looks to be the best

option it absolutely smoked the core i5

9600 K and every single application

benchmark where you ran and worst case

it matches its single core performance

you get 12 threads opposed to two six so

it's no doubt going to age better but

this time you don't have to roll a dice

on rise ins longevity as it's faster

today and sure the 9600 K was a little

faster and a few of the games tested but

the 3600 was miles faster where you'll

absolutely notice it so this one's

pretty cut and dry for me at least Intel

cuts pricing quite heavily I really

can't see a reason to consider their

processors particularly the mid-range

offerings such as the 9600 K and that's

going to do it for this one up next I'll

have some be 350 motherboard testing to

see just how well these third gen rise

and processes work on entry-level boards

I'll be throwing probably this one

definitely the 3700 X and 39 of X at

those boards obviously if they work this

little guy will as well baby way keep an

eye out for that should be pretty good

and of course if you enjoyed this video

feel free to the like button for us and

you can subscribe for more content and

if you appreciate the work we do or her

are boxed and you want to make sure we

can test things like this by buying them

then you can jump over to our patreon

page and get access to all the good

stuff we do over there like exclusive

discord server that's really cool we

have a monthly live stream with Tim and

myself that's also a lot of fun we'll be

doing that probably the next week or two

for this month anyway

enough from me thank you for watching I

am your host Steve and I'll see you

again next time

[Music]

you

[Music]