I Took HGH For 6 Months and This Happened...

Summary

The video discusses the creator's personal experience with human growth hormone (HGH) over six months, debunking common myths. They took a therapeutic dosage of 2 IU daily, noting HGH's mild effects compared to anabolic steroids and SARMs. The creator experienced significant water retention, questioning HGH's fat-burning claims. They found no anti-aging benefits, contrary to popular belief. However, they praised HGH's joint protection and recovery enhancement, beneficial for athletes and those recovering from injuries. The creator concludes that HGH is best for recovery and injury prevention, not muscle building or anti-aging.

Takeaways

• 🚫 The speaker emphasizes not blindly following common beliefs about HGH and instead shares personal research and experiences.
• ⚖️ A therapeutic dosage of 2 IU of HGH for six months was used, which is different from higher doses often associated with bodybuilding.
• ⚠️ High doses of HGH without insulin can lead to chronically high blood sugar, which is dangerous and harmful to the body.
• 🕒 The speaker took HGH for six months to observe long-term effects, as HGH is known to work slowly and requires a minimum duration for full benefits.
• 💪 The general public often overestimates HGH's effects, and the speaker clarifies that it's not as potent as anabolic steroids or SARMs.
• 💧 The most noticeable side effect for the speaker was significant water retention, which was a persistent issue despite diet and sodium intake.
• 🔥 The speaker did not personally experience the fat-burning or 'getting shredded' effects that HGH is often claimed to provide.
• 🏋️‍♂️ One positive effect was the prevention of joint pain, allowing for consistent heavy training without injury.
• 💤 Improved sleep quality was another benefit noticed during the HGH usage period.
• 🏥 The speaker believes in HGH's effectiveness for recovery and injury prevention, which is also why many professional athletes use it.
• ❌ The speaker is skeptical about HGH's claims for muscle building and anti-aging, and suggests it's not a 'superhuman' compound as some believe.

Q & A

What was the purpose of the speaker's experiment with HGH?

The speaker conducted an experiment with HGH to understand the changes it brings, to see what the hype was about, and to experience its effects firsthand without relying solely on second-hand information or common misconceptions.

What dosage of HGH did the speaker take during the experiment?

The speaker took a therapeutic dosage of 2 IU (International Units) of HGH for six months straight.

Why is insulin necessary when taking high doses of HGH?

Insulin is necessary when taking high doses of HGH because HGH competes with insulin, and without it, one could experience chronically high blood sugar levels, which is dangerous and harmful to the body.

What is the minimum duration one should take HGH to see full benefits, according to the speaker?

According to the speaker, one should take HGH for a minimum of six months to see the full benefits, as it is a slow-acting compound.

Why does the speaker believe HGH is not the best investment for someone on a budget?

The speaker believes HGH is not the best investment for someone on a budget because it requires a significant financial commitment for a minimum of six months to see benefits, and its effects are subtle and slow to manifest.

What was the speaker's experience with water retention while taking HGH?

The speaker experienced significant water retention while taking HGH, which resulted in a permanent moon face and a bloated feeling, regardless of diet or sodium intake.

How does the speaker compare the effects of HGH to anabolic steroids and SARMs?

The speaker states that both anabolic steroids and SARMs are more potent than HGH, and that HGH is a mild compound in comparison, which is not as effective on a daily basis as these other substances.

What are the two main benefits the speaker noticed from taking HGH?

The speaker noticed two main benefits from taking HGH: improved joint health, allowing for consistent heavy training without joint pain, and enhanced sleep quality.

Why does the speaker believe HGH is popular despite its high cost and mild effects?

The speaker finds it surprising that HGH is popular given its high cost and mild effects, suggesting that it might be due to its reputation and the desire for a 'superhuman' effect that it does not actually deliver.

What is the speaker's stance on the anti-aging claims of HGH?

The speaker is skeptical about the anti-aging claims of HGH, pointing out that many bodybuilders who use HGH still show signs of premature aging and there is no scientific evidence to support HGH's anti-aging effects.

What does the speaker suggest as the primary benefits of HGH for athletes?

The speaker suggests that the primary benefits of HGH for athletes are its ability to aid in recovery from injuries and to protect joints from inflammation and pain.