El Leon Fiscalizador: Pierde Demanda ante Pablo Colon
Summary
TLDRIn a significant legal victory, attorney Pablo Colón Santiago has won a defamation lawsuit against Lorenzo Delgado Torres, also known as 'El León Fiscalizador,' and other co-defendants in Puerto Rico. The case, which began in 2020, revolved around false and defamatory publications made by Delgado Torres on his digital platform. The court ordered the defendants to pay $50,000 for damage to Colón Santiago's reputation and $5,000 for emotional distress. This ruling highlights the importance of respecting the right to one's image and protection against defamation in Puerto Rico. Colón Santiago reaffirms his commitment to justice and integrity, emphasizing that defamation has no place in society.
Takeaways
- 📢 The case involves Pablo Colón Santiago, who won a significant legal victory against Lorenzo Delgado Torres, also known as 'El León Fiscalizador', and other co-defendants for defamation, libel, and slander.
- ⏳ The legal dispute began in 2020 and revolved around false and defamatory publications made by Delgado Torres on his digital platform, 'El León Fiscalizador', from August 7th to 18th, 2020.
- 📝 The defamation case was based on Article 1802 of the Puerto Rico Civil Code, the 1902 Law on Liberty and Slander, and the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
- 🎖 Pablo Colón Santiago was awarded $50,000 for damages to his reputation and $5,000 for emotional distress caused by the defendants' actions.
- 👨💼 Pablo Colón Santiago is a licensed professional who was aspiring for the mayoralty of Ponce under the New Progressive Party at the time of the defamation.
- 📅 The court's decision was announced on March 13, 2024, marking the end of a four-year-long legal battle.
- 🗣️ The verdict emphasizes the importance of respecting the right to one's image and protection against defamation in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
- 📌 El León Fiscalizador publicly acknowledged the outcome of the case on his Facebook page, showing a level of acceptance and readiness to move forward.
- 💡 The case serves as a reminder that justice prevails and that defamation and libel have no place in society.
- 🗣️ Pablo Colón Santiago expressed satisfaction with the verdict and reaffirmed his commitment to justice, integrity, both personal and professional.
- 🤔 The outcome of the case invites public reflection on the issue of defamation and the power of the legal system to uphold individual rights.
Q & A
Who is the main subject of the legal case mentioned in the transcript?
-The main subject of the legal case is the licenciado Pablo Colón Santiago, who was involved in a defamation lawsuit against Lorenzo Delgado Torres, also known as Enzo Torres or the 'león fiscalizador'.
What was Pablo Colón aspiring to at the time of the lawsuit?
-At the time of the lawsuit, Pablo Colón was aspiring to the mayoral office of Ponce for the Nuevo Progresista Party.
When was the defamation case initiated?
-The defamation case was initiated on August 18, 2020.
What were the legal bases for the defamation lawsuit?
-The legal bases for the defamation lawsuit were Article 1802 of the Puerto Rico Civil Code, the 1902 Law on Libel and Slander, and the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
What were the damages caused by the defamatory publications?
-The defamatory publications caused harm to the honor, reputation, and emotional well-being of licenciado Pablo Colón Santiago.
What was the outcome of the legal case?
-The tribunal ruled in favor of licenciado Pablo Colón Santiago, ordering the defendants to pay $50,000 for damages to reputation and $5,000 for emotional distress.
How did Pablo Colón Santiago react to the verdict?
-Pablo Colón Santiago expressed satisfaction with the verdict and reaffirmed his commitment to justice, integrity, and personal and professional ethics.
What did the 'león fiscalizador' write on his Facebook page regarding the case?
-The 'león fiscalizador' wrote that he was the only one with the courage to confront the 'monster' (referring to Pablo Colón), and he was not intimidated, asserting that time would prove him right.
How long did the legal case last before reaching a conclusion?
-The legal case lasted for approximately four years before reaching a conclusion.
What is the significance of the verdict in this case?
-The verdict highlights the importance of respecting the right to one's own image and the protection against defamation in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
What was the public's reaction to the case and its outcome?
-The case garnered public attention and interest from the Puerto Rican legal community, and the public was invited to share their opinions in the comments section of the transcript's source.
Outlines
Esta sección está disponible solo para usuarios con suscripción. Por favor, mejora tu plan para acceder a esta parte.
Mejorar ahoraMindmap
Esta sección está disponible solo para usuarios con suscripción. Por favor, mejora tu plan para acceder a esta parte.
Mejorar ahoraKeywords
Esta sección está disponible solo para usuarios con suscripción. Por favor, mejora tu plan para acceder a esta parte.
Mejorar ahoraHighlights
Esta sección está disponible solo para usuarios con suscripción. Por favor, mejora tu plan para acceder a esta parte.
Mejorar ahoraTranscripts
Esta sección está disponible solo para usuarios con suscripción. Por favor, mejora tu plan para acceder a esta parte.
Mejorar ahoraVer Más Videos Relacionados
Alyssa Mercante And Sweet Baby CEO CAUGHT SCRUBBING Twitter Accounts As SmashJT Lawsuit Backfires
DEMANDA DE BAD BUNNY ES MAS SERIA DE LO QUE PARECE - Si es cierto lo que dice es escandaloso
Logan Paul Has Lost His Mind
ASESINAN A POLICÍA EN RESIDENCIAL DE CAROLINA
Curtis Publishing Co v Butts (Landmark Court Decisions in America)💬🏛️✅
[FULL] Blak-blakan! Baim Wong Ungkap Alasan Gugat Cerai Paula Verhoeven
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)