Algorithms Lesson 6: Big O, Big Omega, and Big Theta Notation
Summary
TLDRThis lesson delves into algorithm efficiency through Big O, Big Omega, and Big Theta notations, focusing on scalability and speed relative to input size. It explains these mathematical bounds using real functions and their graphical representations, illustrating how they can limit the growth of more complex functions. The discussion transitions to their application in algorithms, particularly with integer inputs like array sizes in sorting. The lesson aims to provide a visual understanding of these bounds, with practical algorithmic examples to follow.
Takeaways
- 🔍 The lesson focuses on analyzing the efficiency of algorithms, specifically their scalability and speed, in relation to input size.
- 📏 It introduces the use of the letter 'N' to represent an unknown input size, which is a common practice in algorithm analysis.
- 📊 Three types of bounds are discussed to formalize the growth of an algorithm's operations relative to input size: Big O, Big Omega, and Big Theta.
- 📈 Big O notation is used to describe an upper bound on the growth of a function, indicating that f(x) is less than or equal to C * g(x) for some constant C and for all x greater than x0.
- 📉 Big Omega notation is used for a lower bound, where f(x) is greater than or equal to C * g(x) for some constant C and for all x greater than or equal to x0.
- 🔗 Big Theta notation is used when a function is bounded both from above and below by the same function g(x), suggesting that f(x) grows at the same rate as g(x).
- 📋 The lesson provides a visual representation of these bounds using graphs to help understand how they apply to real functions and algorithms.
- 💡 The concept of bounding is crucial for understanding the scalability of algorithms when applied to large datasets.
- 🔢 The script emphasizes that these notations are used for functions defined on positive integers, which is typical for algorithm analysis where the input size is a positive integer like the size of an array.
- 📚 The lesson concludes with a promise of upcoming lessons that will provide concrete examples of these notations applied to specific algorithms.
Q & A
What is the main focus of the lesson six on algorithm efficiency?
-The main focus of lesson six is to understand an algorithm's scalability, particularly its speed, in terms of the growth in the number of operations relative to the input size.
What is the input size typically referred to in the context of algorithm analysis?
-In the context of algorithm analysis, the input size typically refers to the number of elements that an algorithm is processing, such as the number of elements in an array for a sorting algorithm.
What do the letters N and n commonly represent in algorithm analysis?
-In algorithm analysis, the letter N is used to represent an unknown input size, while n is used to signify an integer variable, often representing the size of an array or a similar discrete structure.
What are the three types of bounds used to formalize the growth of functions in algorithm analysis?
-The three types of bounds used to formalize the growth of functions in algorithm analysis are Big O (O), Big Omega (Ω), and Big Theta (Θ).
What does it mean for a function f(x) to be in Big O of G(x)?
-A function f(x) is said to be in Big O of G(x) if there exist positive constants C and x0 such that f(x) is less than or equal to C * G(x) for all x greater than x0.
How is Big Omega notation used to describe the growth of a function relative to another?
-Big Omega notation is used to describe the growth of a function f(x) from below relative to another function G(x), where there exist positive constants C and x0 such that f(x) is greater than or equal to C * G(x) for all x greater than or equal to x0.
What is the condition for a function f(x) to be in Big Theta of G(x)?
-A function f(x) is in Big Theta of G(x) if there exist positive constants C1, C2, and x0 such that C1 * G(x) is greater than or equal to f(x) which is greater than or equal to C2 * G(x) for all x greater than or equal to x0.
Why are constants C1 and C2 different in the definition of Big Theta?
-Constants C1 and C2 are different in the definition of Big Theta to indicate that the function f(x) can be bounded by G(x) from both above and below by different multiples, ensuring that f(x) grows at a rate that is asymptotically equal to G(x).
How does the concept of Big O notation help in understanding algorithm efficiency?
-Big O notation helps in understanding algorithm efficiency by providing an upper bound on the growth rate of an algorithm's running time or space requirements, allowing us to classify and compare the scalability of different algorithms.
What is the significance of the white region in the graphs shown during the lesson?
-The white region in the graphs represents the area where the function f(x) is bounded by the function G(x) multiplied by a constant, indicating the growth rate of f(x) relative to G(x) from a certain point onward.
Outlines
📚 Introduction to Algorithmic Complexity Notations
This paragraph introduces the concept of algorithmic efficiency and scalability, focusing on the speed of algorithms in relation to input size. It explains the use of the letter 'N' to represent unknown input size and discusses the growth in terms of 'n'. The paragraph introduces three types of bounds used to formalize growth: Big O, Big Omega, and Big Theta. These notations are mathematically defined to compare the growth of one function relative to another simpler one. The concept is illustrated with graphs of two real functions, 'f(x)' and 'g(x)', where 'f(x)' is more complex, and its growth is measured in terms of 'g(x)'. The paragraph explains Big O notation as a way to bound 'f(x)' from above by a constant multiple of 'g(x)' from some point onward, and Big Omega as bounding 'f(x)' from below. Big Theta is used when 'f(x)' is bounded both from above and below by constant multiples of 'g(x)'. The explanation is geared towards understanding how these notations apply to algorithms, particularly in terms of their operation count relative to input size.
🔍 Deep Dive into Big O, Big Omega, and Big Theta Notations
The second paragraph delves deeper into the definitions of Big O, Big Omega, and Big Theta notations, specifically in the context of algorithms and integer inputs. It clarifies that for algorithms, the input size is typically a positive integer, such as the size of an array for a sorting algorithm. The paragraph uses the notation 'F(n)' and 'G(n)' to represent functions on positive integers, which is a shift from the real variable 'x' used in mathematics. The definitions of Big O, Big Omega, and Big Theta are reiterated with examples that illustrate how a constant multiple of 'G(n)' can bound 'F(n)' from above or below from a certain point 'n0' onward. The paragraph emphasizes the visual representation of these bounds with graphs of 'F(n)' and 'G(n)' on integer values. It concludes by stating that the purpose of this explanation is to provide a visual and definitional understanding of these bounds, with the intention of applying these concepts to specific algorithms in future lessons.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Algorithm Efficiency
💡Scalability
💡Input Size
💡Big O Notation
💡Big Omega Notation
💡Big Theta Notation
💡Growth Rate
💡Constants
💡Positive Integers
💡Function Graphs
💡Concrete Examples
Highlights
Introduction to algorithm efficiency and scalability in terms of speed and memory requirements.
Definition of algorithm speed in terms of the growth in the number of operations relative to input size.
Use of the letter 'N' to represent an unknown input size in algorithm analysis.
Explanation of Big O, Big Omega, and Big Theta notations as mathematical bounds to relate the growth of functions.
Graphical representation of functions f(x) and g(x) to illustrate the concept of bounding.
Formal definition of Big O notation, indicating an upper bound for a function's growth.
Formal definition of Big Omega notation, indicating a lower bound for a function's growth.
Formal definition of Big Theta notation, indicating both upper and lower bounds for a function's growth.
Discussion on the selection of constants and input size (x0) for bounding functions.
Transition from real functions to functions on positive integers for algorithm analysis.
Use of Hungarian notation and the variable 'n' to represent integer variables in algorithms.
Graphical representation of functions F(n) and G(n) on integer values.
Explanation of how to determine if a function F(n) is in Big O of G(n) using graphical analysis.
Explanation of how to determine if a function F(n) is in Big Omega of G(n) using graphical analysis.
Explanation of how to determine if a function F(n) is in Big Theta of G(n) using graphical analysis.
Purpose of the lesson to provide a visual impression and exact definition of the bounds.
Anticipation of upcoming lessons with concrete examples applying these concepts to specific algorithms.
Transcripts
[Music]
lesson six big O big Omega and big Theta
notation when we speak of an algorithm's
efficiency we want to determine its
scalability that is we want to know that
when the algorithm is applied to a large
data set that it will finish relatively
quickly we can also talk about how much
memory and algorithm requires but for
now we will focus on
speed we measure an algorithm speed in
terms of the growth in the number of
operations relative to the input size
for the linear and binary search
algorithms for example the input size is
the number of elements that we are
searching typically we will use the
letter N to represent an unknown input
size and we will talk about the growth
in terms of
n to formalize our ideas of growth there
are three types of bounds that we will
address here big O big Omega and big
Theta the definitions that we will use
come from mathematics and are used to
relate the growth in one function
relative to another simpler
one here we have the graphs of two real
functions f ofx and g ofx given by the
gray and dashed arrows which we Ed to
indicate that the functions continue
indefinitely the function f ofx is more
complex and we want to measure its
growth in terms of the simpler function
G ofx more specific specifically we want
to find a constant such that when we
multiply it by the function G ofx it
will bound the function f ofx above from
some point
onward assuming that the graph of f ofx
does not intersect the graph of C * G
ofx after the point x0 we know that the
graph of f ofx remains in this white
region for all x to the right of
x0 in this case we say that f ofx is in
Big O of G ofx formally we say that f
ofx is in Big O of G ofx if there exist
positive constants C and x0 such that f
ofx is less than or equal to C * G ofx
for all X greater than
x0 on the other hand we could bound the
function f ofx From Below like this if
such a constant exists such that c * G
ofx bounce F ofx below from some point
onward then we say that f ofx is in big
Omega of G ofx formally f ofx is in big
Omega of G ofx if there exist positive
constants C and x0 such that f ofx is
greater than or equal to C * G ofx for
all X greater than or equal to
x0 if there are constants such that g
ofx bounds the function f ofx both from
below and above then we say that f ofx
is in big Theta of G ofx X of course the
constants in this case are different so
we have labeled them C1 and C2 to
clarify that the x0 that we choose can
be any value that is far enough out that
F ofx doesn't intersect either C1 * G of
X or C2 * G ofx anymore and remains in
this white area forly we say that f ofx
is in big Theta of G ofx if there exist
positive constants C1 C2 and x0 such as
that C1 * G ofx is greater than or equal
to F ofx which is greater than or equal
to C2 * G ofx for all X greater than or
equal to
x0 so far we have shown what the
situation looks like for General real
functions for algorithms the input size
is generally a positive integer like the
size of an array for a sorting algorithm
in this case we can think of our f and g
as functions on the positive
integers in mathematics X is used to
signify a real variable while n is used
to signify an integer variable like
Hungarian notation and programming this
notation allows us to see more
immediately what is going on so we will
use
it using this notation here we see the
graphs of two example functions F of N
and G of n given by the solid gray and
Hollow black dots respectively notice
that the graphs are made up of single
dots instead of Curves this is because
the functions are are defined on Integer
values just as we had for the real
functions we can have constants such
that when we multiply G of n by them we
bound F of n from some point onward and
the definitions are
analogous here we have a constant
multiple of G of n such that its graph
is above the graph of f of n from some
point onward the last value that puts
the graph below the graph of f ofn is
2 so we can set n0 to 3 and we have F
ofn in the white areas below the graph
of C * G of n from 3 onward this is how
we Define Big O of G of n forly we say
that f ofn is in Big O of G of n if
there exists a positive real number c
and a positive integer n0 such that F of
n is less than or equal to C * G of n
for all integers n greater than or equal
to
n0 likewise we might have a constant
multiple of a function G of n such that
c * G of n bounds F of n below from some
point n0 onward in this case f ofn is
said to be in big Omega of G of n
formally we say that f ofn is in big
Omega of G of n if there exists a
positive constant c and a positive
integer n0 such that F of n is greater
than or equal to C * G of n for all n
greater than or equal to
n0 additionally we can have two constant
multiples of G of of n that bound the
function f of n on both sides from some
point n0 onward here again we say that F
of n is in big Theta of G of n formally
we see that F of n is in big Theta of G
of n if there exist positive constants
C1 and C2 and a positive integer n0 such
that C1 * G of n is greater than or
equal to F ofn which is greater than or
equal to C2 * G of n for all n greater
than or equal to n0
our purpose at this point is simply to
give a visual impression of these bounds
along with an exact definition in the
coming lessons we will give concrete
examples of how they apply to specific
algorithms so that these ideas become
clear this concludes the lesson
Ver Más Videos Relacionados
L-1.3: Asymptotic Notations | Big O | Big Omega | Theta Notations | Most Imp Topic Of Algorithm
Asymptotic Notation | Big O Notation | Omega Notation | Big Theta Notation | Most Imp. in Algorithm
Projeto e Análise de Algoritmos - Aula 09 - Limite inferior para o problema de ordenação
Time Complexity and Big O Notation (with notes)
2 1 The Gist 14 min
#32 Array of Objects in Java
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)