Elizabeth Holmes exposed: The $9 billion medical ‘miracle’ that never existed | 60 Minutes Australia

60 Minutes Australia
8 Aug 202127:11

Summary

TLDRElizabeth Holmes prometió una revolución médica con su empresa Theranos,声称发明了一台小型机器,只需一滴血就能检测健康并预防严重疾病。 Atractiva e influyente, Holmes consiguió inversiones de alto perfil y se convirtió en la primera mujer millonaria autodidacta de Silicon Valley. Sin embargo, su invento resultó ser un fraude que puso en riesgo la vida de las personas y ahora enfrenta un juicio por delitos que podrían llevarla a prisión por 20 años.

Takeaways

  • 🚀 Elizabeth Holmes prometió una revolución médica al mundo con una máquina miniaturizada que analizaba la salud con una sola gota de sangre.
  • 💡 A los 19 años, Holmes afirmó que podía prevenir enfermedades graves como el cáncer antes de que ocurrieran.
  • 💸 Inversores de alto perfil invirtieron grandes sumas en su empresa, Theranos, convirtiéndola en la primera mujer millonaria autodidacta de Silicon Valley.
  • 🚫 Sin embargo, su invento resultó ser un fraude que no funcionó y puso en riesgo la vida de las personas.
  • 🗣️ Holmes fue descrita como una estafadora que, si es condenada, podría enfrentar hasta 20 años de cárcel.
  • 👚 Holmes se inspiró en Steve Jobs, vistiendo cuellos negros y vendiendo su visión a los inversores y la opinión pública.
  • 🔍 El periodista John Carreyrou fue quien primero investigó y expuso el fraude de Theranos en el Wall Street Journal.
  • 🛑 Los resultados de los análisis de sangre de Theranos eran inexactos y engañosos, lo que representaba un riesgo significativo para la salud pública.
  • 🏥 Theranos se asoció con cadenas de farmacias como Walgreens para ofrecer pruebas de sangre, pero los resultados eran inaceptables.
  • 🛠️ La tecnología de Theranos se basaba en diluuir las muestras de sangre para adaptarlas a analizadores tradicionales, lo que invalidaba los resultados.
  • 🚨 La empresa fue cerrada por las autoridades监管机构, y Holmes y su ex-novio Sunny Balwani enfrentan un juicio criminal por estafa.

Q & A

  • ¿Quién es Elizabeth Holmes y qué promesa hizo a los inversores?

    -Elizabeth Holmes es la fundadora de la empresa Theranos, la cual prometió una revolución médica con una máquina miniaturizada que podría realizar análisis de sangre con solo una gota de sangre, lo que permitiría prevenir enfermedades graves como el cáncer.

  • ¿Cómo se convirtió Elizabeth Holmes en la primera mujer millonaria autodidacta de Silicon Valley?

    -Holmes se convirtió en la primera mujer millonaria autodidacta de Silicon Valley gracias a la inversión de altos perfil en su compañía Theranos, que creían en su invento y en su potencial para revolucionar la medicina.

  • ¿Cuál fue el problema principal con la máquina de Theranos?

    -La máquina de Theranos no funcionaba como se prometió. No podía realizar los análisis de sangre de manera precisa y confiable, lo que ponía en riesgo la salud de las personas.

  • ¿Qué consecuencias enfrenta Elizabeth Holmes si es condenada por sus acciones en Theranos?

    -Si Elizabeth Holmes es condenada, podría enfrentar hasta 20 años de cárcel por defraudar a inversores, pacientes y médicos.

  • ¿Cómo reaccionaron los inversores al escándalo de Theranos?

    -Los inversores, que habían invertido casi un billón de dólares en Theranos, perdieron su inversión cuando se descubrió la fraude, y la empresa quedó valorada en cero.

  • ¿Qué papel jugaron los periodistas en la exposición de la fraude de Theranos?

    -El periodista John Carreyrou del Wall Street Journal fue fundamental en exponer la fraude de Theranos, escribiendo un artículo que desencadenó la investigación y la eventual caída de la empresa.

  • ¿Por qué consideran a Elizabeth Holmes una figura controvertida en el ámbito de la tecnología y la medicina?

    -Elizabeth Holmes es considerada controvertida porque, a pesar de haber prometido una innovación revolucionaria en la medicina, se demostró que su tecnología era un fraude que ponía en riesgo la salud pública y defraudaba a sus inversores.

  • ¿Cómo se describe el ambiente en Silicon Valley durante el auge de Theranos?

    -Durante el auge de Theranos, Silicon Valley estaba sumida en un ambiente de exageración y hipérbole, donde los jóvenes empresarios eran animados a promover sus ideas sin siempre respaldarlas con evidencia sólida.

  • ¿Qué papel jugó el equipo de dirección de Theranos en la perpetuación de la fraude?

    -El equipo de dirección de Theranos, incluyendo a Elizabeth Holmes y su exnovio Ramesh 'Sunny' Balwani, desempeñó un papel crucial al ocultar la verdadera naturaleza de la tecnología y presionar a empleados para mantener la ficción de que la máquina funcionaba.

  • ¿Cómo se describe el papel de los denunciantes dentro de Theranos?

    -Los denunciantes dentro de Theranos son vistos como héroes por su coraje en exponer la verdad a pesar del miedo a represalias, lo que eventualmente llevó a la caída de la empresa y la exposición de la fraude.

Outlines

00:00

🔬 La Promesa y el Fracaso de Elizabeth Holmes

Elizabeth Holmes prometió una revolución médica con una máquina miniaturizada que analizaba la salud con una sola gota de sangre. Atractiva para pacientes y inversionistas, su empresa, Theranos, la convirtió en la primera mujer millonaria autodidacta de Silicon Valley. Sin embargo, su invento resultó ser un fraude que puso en riesgo la vida de las personas y la enfrentó a un juicio que podría condenarla a 20 años de cárcel.

05:01

📈 El Auge y la Burbuja de la Startup Unicorn

En 2015, la 'unicorn boom' en Silicon Valley vio a inversionistas ansiosos por no perder la próxima gran oportunidad como Facebook. Elizabeth Holmes y su empresa Theranos se convirtieron en el proveedor de esa ilusión. Sin embargo, la realidad detrás de las promesas era muy diferente, con una máquina que no funcionaba y resultados de pruebas sanguíneas falsos o engañosos, ocultos al público.

10:01

🏛️ El Engaño de la Junta Directiva de Theranos

El consejo de administración de Theranos, lleno de figuras prominentes y sin conocimientos médicos, fue engañado por Elizabeth Holmes. Inversionistas como Eileen Lepro y Rupert Murdoch invirtieron grandes sumas de dinero, cayendo en la trampa de una startup sin fundamentos sólidos y con resultados de pruebas de sangre inaceptables.

15:04

📉 El Desplome de la Promesa Médica de Theranos

El 'mini lab' de Elizabeth Holmes, que prometía realizar cientos de pruebas sanguíneas con una sola gota de sangre, resultó ser un intento ambicioso pero irrealizable. Dr. Darren Saunders y Dr. Phyllis Gardner, expertos en el campo, expresaron su escepticismo desde el principio, viendo a Holmes como una persona que sobrestimaba sus capacidades sin pruebas sólidas de su tecnología.

20:07

🚨 La Exposición del Fraude y las Consecuencias

El fraude de Theranos y Elizabeth Holmes fue expuesto por periodistas y ex empleados valientes como Erica Chung y John Kararu, lo que llevó a la cerratura de los laboratorios de Theranos y a una valoración de cero para una empresa que antes estaba valorada en nueve mil millones de dólares. Holmes y su ex compañero, Sunny Balwani, enfrentan un juicio criminal por estafa a inversionistas, pacientes y médicos.

25:07

🤰 La Estrategia de Elizabeth Holmes y el Futuro del Juicio

El juicio de Elizabeth Holmes se ha retrasado varias veces, incluida una por su reciente maternidad. Personas cercanas a la historia de Theranos, como la inversora Eileen Lepro, creen que Holmes debería enfrentar las consecuencias legales más severas por su fraude, que no solo afectó el dinero de los inversionistas sino también la salud de los pacientes.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Revolution

La revolución se refiere a un cambio radical y transformador en un campo o sociedad. En el guion, Elizabeth Holmes prometió una revolución médica con su invento, lo que implicaba un cambio significativo en la forma de realizar pruebas de sangre y prevenir enfermedades. El término se utiliza para describir la transformación que Holmes alegaba haber creado en la medicina preventiva.

💡Miniaturizado

Miniaturizado hace referencia a la reducción del tamaño de un dispositivo o máquina. En el contexto del video, Holmes afirmó haber inventado una máquina miniaturizada que podía realizar análisis de sangre con solo una gota, lo que representaría una innovación en la tecnología médica y una facilidad de uso sin precedentes.

💡Fraudulento

El término 'fraudulento' se refiere a algo que es engañoso o falso. En el guion, se revela que la máquina de Holmes no funcionaba como prometía, lo que la convierte en un fraude. Esto es central en la narrativa, ya que la supuesta revolución se basa en un invento que no cumple con sus promesas.

💡Silicon Valley

Silicon Valley es una región conocida por ser el epicentro de la industria de la tecnología en California. En el guion, se menciona a Silicon Valley como el lugar donde Holmes se convirtió en la primera mujer millonaria autodidacta, lo que destaca la conexión entre la innovación tecnológica y el éxito empresarial en la región.

💡Inversores de alto perfil

Los inversores de alto perfil son personas o entidades con gran influencia y recursos que invierten en empresas emergentes. En el video, estos inversores confiaron en la promesa de Holmes y colocaron sus fondos en Theranos, lo que demuestra la confianza y el impacto que puede tener un proyecto presentado con convicción.

💡Preventivo

El término 'preventivo' se refiere a algo que se realiza para evitar algo en el futuro. En el guion, la promesa de Holmes era ofrecer pruebas de sangre que pudieran prevenir enfermedades antes de que ocurran, lo que resalta la importancia de la prevención en la medicina y la salud.

💡Falsificar datos

Falsificar datos implica alterar o inventar información de manera intencional para engañar. En el contexto del video, se sugiere que se pidió a los empleados de Theranos falsificar o destruir datos para ocultar la incapacidad de la máquina para realizar análisis de sangre de manera precisa, lo que es un elemento clave en la historia del fraude.

💡Whistleblowers

Los 'whistleblowers' son personas que revelan información sobre prácticas ilegales o inmorales en una organización. En el guion, los whistleblowers de Theranos jugaron un papel crucial al exponer la realidad detrás de las promesas de Holmes, lo que llevó a la desarticulación de la empresa y a la exposición del fraude.

💡Investigación periodística

La investigación periodística es el proceso de recopilar y verificar información para informar al público sobre hechos relevantes. En el video, se menciona al periodista John Carreyrou, quien, tras recibir una pista, investigó y expuso el fraude de Theranos, lo que demuestra el papel fundamental del periodismo en la lucha contra la corrupción y la desinformación.

💡Prueba de sangre

Una prueba de sangre es un análisis médico que se realiza para diagnosticar condiciones médicas. En el guion, el invento de Holmes se centraba en realizar pruebas de sangre con una sola gota, lo que sugiere una simplificación y accesibilidad en la medicina diagnostica, aunque en este caso, estas promesas resultaron ser falsas.

Highlights

Elizabeth Holmes prometió una revolución médica con una máquina miniaturizada que analizaba la salud con una sola gota de sangre.

Holmes afirmó que su invento podría prevenir enfermedades graves como el cáncer antes de que ocurrieran.

Inversores de alto perfil invirtieron grandes sumas en Theranos, la empresa de Holmes, convirtiéndola en la primera mujer millonaria autodidacta de Silicon Valley.

Se descubre que la máquina inventada por Holmes no funcionaba y se cuestiona su visión como visionaria.

Holmes enfrenta un juicio por delitos de fraude que podrían condenarla a 20 años de cárcel.

La promesa de Holmes era salvar vidas a través de un dispositivo de prueba de sangre revolucionario.

El dispositivo de Theranos se suponía que proporcionaba resultados más rápidos y confiables con una sola gota de sangre.

Whistleblowers expusieron que la revolución de Holmes era en realidad un fraude que ponía en riesgo la vida de las personas.

El periodista John Carreyrou del Wall Street Journal fue el primero en investigar y exponer las prácticas cuestionables de Theranos.

La realidad era que la máquina no existía y los resultados de las pruebas eran falsos o engañosos.

El caso de Theranos muestra la cultura de Silicon Valley, donde la exageración y el hype son comunes.

Investigadores y científicos crítican la falta de evidencia y la falta de pruebas científicas detrás de las afirmaciones de Holmes.

La tecnología de Theranos se reveló ser una farsa, utilizando equipos de análisis de sangre tradicionales y adulterando los resultados.

El caso Theranos ejemplifica los riesgos de la falta de escrutinio y la presión por alcanzar el estatus de 'unicornio' en Silicon Valley.

Los whistleblowers, como Erica Chung, arriesgaron su carrera para exponer la verdad y proteger a los pacientes.

El juicio de Holmes se pospuso varias veces, incluyendo por la reciente maternidad de Holmes, lo que generó críticas sobre su responsabilidad.

Los inversores y la comunidad médica exigen que Holmes enfrente las consecuencias legales de su fraude, que afectó no solo el dinero sino también la salud de las personas.

Transcripts

play00:00

elizabeth holmes promised the world a

play00:02

medical revolution

play00:04

at 19 she claimed to have invented a

play00:06

miniaturized machine that with a single

play00:09

drop of blood could map our health

play00:12

her boast was serious diseases like

play00:14

cancer would be prevented before they

play00:16

happened

play00:17

and it was not only a wow moment for

play00:20

patients

play00:21

high-profile investors poured a fortune

play00:24

into elizabeth holmes company theranos

play00:27

their money guaranteed she became

play00:29

silicon valley's first self-made female

play00:33

billionaire

play00:34

but her invention was an invention it

play00:37

didn't work

play00:38

elizabeth holmes is no visionary she's a

play00:41

fraudster who's risked people's lives

play00:44

and if convicted faces 20 years

play00:48

it's finding what you're born to do

play00:50

when you really give everything to that

play00:54

then you can realize great things

play00:57

holmes was making the greatest promise

play00:59

of all that she could save lives through

play01:02

a revolutionary blood testing device she

play01:04

had created

play01:06

and which she would make available to

play01:08

all through supermarkets and pharmacies

play01:12

theranose

play01:13

means being able to see

play01:16

the onset of disease

play01:18

in time to be able to do something about

play01:21

it

play01:22

i'd like to welcome elizabeth holmes the

play01:24

real treat the incredible elizabeth

play01:27

holmes

play01:29

[Music]

play01:31

california's silicon valley and some of

play01:33

the richest people in the world bought

play01:35

the dream there are people in this world

play01:38

who revolutionize our lives coco chanel

play01:40

steve jobs bill gates walt disney and

play01:42

elizabeth holmes mark my words

play01:45

turning theranos into a staggering 9

play01:48

billion juggernaut and making homes the

play01:51

tech valley's first self-made female

play01:54

billionaire

play01:55

you founded this company 12 years ago

play01:57

right tell them how old you were i was

play02:00

19.

play02:03

celebrity commentators and cashed up

play02:05

investors couldn't get enough of this

play02:08

new kid on the block in silicon valley

play02:11

she was the new darling and a lot of

play02:13

that was because she was a woman

play02:15

entrepreneur which is a very popular

play02:17

thing it's been a man's world you know

play02:19

for so long

play02:22

she would wear black turtlenecks like

play02:24

steve jobs

play02:26

and sold her little tail

play02:29

and everybody bought it for a while

play02:34

the revolution promised by elizabeth

play02:37

holmes was to put preventative health

play02:39

care at our fingertips quite literally

play02:43

all it would take would be one tiny drop

play02:45

of blood from a finger prick

play02:47

from which to run hundreds of blood

play02:49

tests using a groundbreaking

play02:51

miniaturized testing device which would

play02:54

deliver more reliable faster and cheaper

play02:56

results

play02:58

people don't like big needles being

play03:00

stuck into their arm yeah

play03:02

part of it you're one of those people

play03:03

right deeply so

play03:07

elizabeth's machine would wipe out the

play03:09

traditional way of doing things

play03:11

larger volumes of blood drawn from the

play03:14

arm by big needles and costly and

play03:16

time-consuming lab analysis

play03:20

the mission was to enable everyone to

play03:22

get blood tests as frequently as once a

play03:25

month to build a personal health profile

play03:28

and to catch diseases like cancer at

play03:30

their earliest people don't even know

play03:34

that they have

play03:36

a basic human right to be able to get

play03:38

access to

play03:40

information about themselves

play03:42

and their own bodies that can

play03:45

change their lives

play03:47

but as whistleblowers would expose the

play03:50

elizabeth holmes revolution turned out

play03:52

to be an extraordinary fraud

play03:55

a lie that put lives in jeopardy were

play03:58

you ever asked to falsify data or

play04:00

destroy data oh just just get rid of

play04:03

these tests that you've run wiped out

play04:06

nearly a billion dollars of investors

play04:08

money there was no money to be had it

play04:10

all just evaporated any comment at all

play04:13

to the investors and may well end with

play04:15

homes behind bars for up to 20 years

play04:19

come her fraud trial later this month

play04:22

as far as please raise your right hand

play04:24

do you swear to tell the truth the whole

play04:25

truth and nothing but the truth i do how

play04:28

would you describe the rise and rise and

play04:31

then the fall of elizabeth holmes well i

play04:33

think it is a commentary on silicon

play04:35

valley's culture there's so much hyping

play04:37

so much exaggerating in this culture

play04:40

that you know young entrepreneurs

play04:42

are

play04:44

basically bred to to behave this way

play04:47

and as investigative journalist john

play04:49

carraroo found there were plenty of

play04:52

people in the room willing to drink the

play04:54

kool-aid all hoping to crack the unicorn

play04:57

club the billion dollar startups

play05:00

emerging in silicon valley at the time

play05:03

this was the unicorn boom

play05:05

and this was 2015 and

play05:08

things were getting really frothy in

play05:10

silicon valley and uh people didn't want

play05:13

to miss the next facebook and a lot of

play05:16

people wanted it to get on board this

play05:18

next rocket to uh to riches when

play05:21

she first interviewed me i have to say i

play05:23

was a bit starstruck

play05:25

science graduate erica chung was not out

play05:28

to get rich she just wanted a job

play05:31

and theranos with ernest elizabeth

play05:34

holmes at the helm was the dream pick

play05:37

i was really enthusiastic as sort of a

play05:39

young scientist to

play05:41

to work for a company that seemed to

play05:43

have a compelling vision and

play05:45

a strong leader who seemed to back it as

play05:47

well

play05:48

[Music]

play05:49

but erica was shocked to find the

play05:51

theranos dream was in fact a fairy tale

play05:55

peddled by holmes and chief operating

play05:57

officer ramesh sunny balwani elizabeth's

play06:01

boyfriend at the time

play06:04

for all the excitement the little black

play06:06

box simply did not work

play06:09

it could not do what the pair claimed

play06:14

the reality of working at theranos was

play06:17

that

play06:19

a lot of the things that were being said

play06:21

about the company were not actually what

play06:23

was going on behind closed doors this

play06:26

new revolutionary device it wasn't

play06:29

actually

play06:30

in existence it hadn't quite been built

play06:32

yet worse they were using a jerry-rigged

play06:36

version of the machine to run patients

play06:38

blood tests

play06:40

the results were often false or

play06:42

misleading but this too was hidden from

play06:44

an unsuspecting public despite the

play06:46

significant health risks

play06:49

i just wanted people to know that they

play06:51

were leveraging this faulty device to

play06:53

test on patients and that needed to be

play06:55

stopped

play06:58

rumors of theranos bad practice were

play07:00

circulating

play07:03

but it was journalist john kariu from

play07:05

the wall street journal who would be the

play07:07

first to start investigating after a

play07:10

tip-off from a skeptical pathologist

play07:13

things you know began to come into focus

play07:15

for me and and i realized that you know

play07:18

this was not just a a

play07:20

business fraud and a corporate fraud but

play07:23

potentially a fraud that had big

play07:25

implications for the public health and

play07:26

so i thought well

play07:28

this is a big story for all the hope and

play07:31

hype elizabeth holmes was now accused of

play07:33

being a fake but as it would become

play07:36

clear the consequences of her fraud were

play07:39

real and dangerous

play07:41

this is inexcusable now and forever

play07:52

the remarkable story of healthcare

play07:54

startup company theranos and its founder

play07:57

elizabeth holmes starts at stanford

play08:00

university in 2003.

play08:03

this used to be my advisor's office

play08:06

we got in

play08:06

[Music]

play08:08

at just 19 and after just two semesters

play08:11

studying chemical engineering

play08:13

holmes dropped out of university to

play08:15

become a medical technology entrepreneur

play08:18

another few

play08:20

classes

play08:21

in chemical engineering was not

play08:23

necessary for what i wanted to do

play08:26

one of the first to hear her future

play08:28

business plans was stanford university

play08:31

professor of medicine dr phyllis gardner

play08:34

unlike most who encountered homes dr

play08:37

gardner was not impressed

play08:41

did elizabeth holmes always have big

play08:42

dreams in your opinion

play08:45

absolutely

play08:46

her ambition was over the top

play08:49

and unfortunately the person who twice

play08:51

introduced her to me said she's just

play08:54

brilliant and she's brilliant and when

play08:56

you're surrounded by nobel laureates you

play08:58

take that with a grain of salt

play09:00

a boulder of salt

play09:03

she had no knowledge of medicine and a

play09:06

rudimentary knowledge of engineering and

play09:08

she was 19.

play09:10

and she really didn't want any expertise

play09:13

she thought she knew at all

play09:16

well you don't at 19 i'm sorry

play09:20

but right from the start elizabeth

play09:22

holmes knew the power of pr

play09:25

i believe

play09:27

the individual

play09:30

is the answer

play09:32

to the challenges of health care

play09:34

she didn't bother proving her so-called

play09:36

groundbreaking blood testing device

play09:39

could do all she promised through peer

play09:41

reviews or releasing extensive data

play09:44

let's take these tests and

play09:46

make them accessible

play09:48

instead she gathered a war council to

play09:51

her board reveling in their fame and

play09:54

credibility so it includes three former

play09:56

u.s cabinet secretaries two former u.s

play09:59

senators a retired navy admiral and a

play10:01

retired marine corps general including

play10:04

george schultz henry kissinger how

play10:06

did you make that happen

play10:10

the board was george schultz

play10:13

jim mattis henry kissinger and a bunch

play10:16

of four star generals and someone said

play10:19

this is like a board that's going to

play10:20

take over the world

play10:22

and uh but what does it have to do with

play10:24

medical advancements nothing

play10:27

and so

play10:28

everyone was duped silicon valley really

play10:30

had egg on its face

play10:32

over this thing

play10:34

but initially like so many small time

play10:37

investor eileen lepro was impressed

play10:40

after she was advised to sink a

play10:42

hard-earned 100 000

play10:44

into

play10:46

was there something about the nature of

play10:48

what elizabeth holmes was hoping to do

play10:51

promising to do that attracted you to

play10:53

this type of investment was there

play10:55

anything altruistic about it not for me

play10:57

i was looking to make money but i worked

play11:00

for a venture capitalist at the time and

play11:04

um

play11:05

he

play11:06

said it would be

play11:07

equivalent to apple

play11:09

and to get as many shares as i could

play11:13

no matter there was no evidence the

play11:15

money flowing into theranos was huge

play11:18

almost a billion dollars

play11:21

at one time rupert murdoch was the

play11:23

single biggest investor

play11:25

buying 125 million dollars worth of

play11:28

shares

play11:30

coincidentally as the proprietor of the

play11:32

wall street journal he was also

play11:35

investigative journalist john kararu's

play11:37

boss at the time kararu exposed holmes's

play11:40

spin as captioning not

play11:54

available and mostly he's been right uh

play11:57

as for the other investors certainly you

play12:00

know

play12:00

they should have done more due diligence

play12:02

i think it was a deliberate choice of

play12:04

elizabeth's

play12:05

to focus on uh what i would call

play12:09

uncharitably the dumb money

play12:11

the uh billionaires and their family

play12:13

offices as opposed to the

play12:15

uh sophisticated silicon valley venture

play12:17

funds who i don't think they would have

play12:19

fallen for the same lies what do you

play12:22

think of the investors who lined up to

play12:25

to give her nearly a billion dollars

play12:27

worth of money older white men

play12:30

right

play12:32

i'm telling you i've said it brains go

play12:35

on south they weren't thinking with

play12:36

their brains it's what you're saying

play12:38

uh-huh

play12:39

[Laughter]

play12:41

i don't know and they believed her and

play12:43

she could be charming

play12:46

she could be i'm sure it just didn't

play12:49

charm me but she could be charming to

play12:52

older men

play12:53

giving people the right to obtain a

play12:56

laboratory test

play12:58

will by definition

play13:00

begin the process of enabling them to

play13:03

engage

play13:04

in their health it's homes you are

play13:07

magnificent

play13:08

with elizabeth's charm offensive in full

play13:11

flight results back in the lab were

play13:13

going from bad to worse according to

play13:16

former lab associate erica chung they

play13:19

were producing really

play13:21

wildly

play13:22

inaccurate and imprecise results on a

play13:25

consistent basis across many different

play13:27

types of blood tests

play13:29

you know tests like

play13:31

hepatitis c

play13:33

or your thyroid test or test that would

play13:36

be predictive of cancer it's telling us

play13:39

very clearly we need to stop testing

play13:42

patients every person should have the

play13:44

ability to get that type of test but

play13:46

elizabeth was not listening desperate

play13:48

for her technology to catch up with her

play13:51

vision your health is really important

play13:52

to us as a kid of all those taken in by

play13:55

the theranosmania

play13:56

it would be patients who had the most to

play13:59

lose because nothing is more important

play14:01

than the health of those you love

play14:03

it was just a big fraud

play14:07

and if you can perpetrate a fraud smile

play14:10

about it go to white house dinners

play14:13

that to me is just no conscience

play14:16

this notion that she was faking it until

play14:19

she could make it

play14:21

do you think that she ever believed

play14:23

herself

play14:24

in what she could do possibly

play14:28

probably i mean it's almost like in

play14:32

another

play14:33

fantasy world

play14:35

an egoism that i can't describe

play14:39

i don't have that i

play14:41

i doubt you have that

play14:44

fake it till you make it excuse me on

play14:46

patience

play14:47

i don't think so

play14:49

what is your view of that that they're

play14:50

happy to to go live

play14:53

with a system that's still being tested

play14:55

and is actually failing yeah it's

play14:57

unconscionable it's unethical

play14:59

it's immoral as you know all the words

play15:01

you can think about to describe that

play15:03

and in australia why the elizabeth

play15:06

holmes miniature black box was never

play15:08

going to work she could never do what

play15:10

she claimed she could do

play15:22

founder and ceo of startup company

play15:24

theranos elizabeth holmes was promising

play15:27

to make possible the impossible in the

play15:30

name of preventative medicine

play15:33

the issue comes that she tried to

play15:34

essentially take an entire pathology lab

play15:37

and squish it into a little black box

play15:38

and promised to be able to do all those

play15:40

tests all the time for people

play15:42

and

play15:43

it takes years and years to develop a

play15:45

single one of those tests up to the

play15:48

standard where it can be accurate so it

play15:50

was

play15:51

ambitious doesn't quite capture it but

play15:52

it was incredibly ambitious

play15:56

medical scientist dr darren saunders

play15:58

from sydney university has keenly

play16:00

followed the rise of elizabeth holmes

play16:02

and her promise that this mini lab could

play16:05

run hundreds of blood tests of just one

play16:07

drop of blood

play16:09

his expertise in the field made him

play16:12

incredulous right from the start

play16:14

over the last 11 years we've

play16:17

reinvented

play16:19

the traditional laboratory

play16:20

infrastructure it's quite a weird thing

play16:22

to watch happen because you feel like

play16:24

shouting the emperor's not wearing any

play16:25

clothes right and as a scientist it was

play16:28

i think frustrating is the word i'd use

play16:29

incredibly frustrating because you felt

play16:30

like taking these people aside and going

play16:32

look there's nothing going on here why

play16:33

are you spending so much money on

play16:35

something that there's there's no proof

play16:36

that it exists

play16:37

that was the phrase i always used it was

play16:40

exactly that the emperor has no clothes

play16:43

and

play16:45

that is the perfect

play16:46

metaphor for what it was like

play16:51

across the world dr phyllis gardner was

play16:54

equally disturbed

play16:55

as a professor at stanford university

play16:58

she knew elizabeth holmes as a student

play17:00

there up until that point the way that

play17:02

they had had to draw

play17:03

before she famously dropped out and

play17:06

acquired the steve jobs attire i'm so

play17:09

dehumanizing that

play17:11

um

play17:12

it's an incredibly emotional process so

play17:14

and before her voice changed

play17:17

well it's wonderful to be here

play17:19

i started this company because

play17:21

what about the deep voice did you have

play17:23

the deep voice when you were dealing

play17:24

with no i was shocked when i heard a

play17:26

voice

play17:27

because i didn't matter before

play17:29

i certainly that is a voice you don't

play17:32

forget

play17:33

in a woman

play17:35

oh

play17:35

[Music]

play17:36

hello

play17:38

yes

play17:40

the rate to protect

play17:43

the health

play17:44

and well-being carefully crafted or

play17:46

otherwise corporations were lining up to

play17:49

embrace elizabeth holmes

play17:51

her success was sealed when in 2013

play17:55

in a multi-million dollar deal theranos

play17:58

was launched in pharmacy chain walgreens

play18:01

we have

play18:02

an operational plan that will allow us

play18:05

to become within

play18:07

five miles of every person's home

play18:09

through the walgreens that we've opened

play18:11

and are continuing to open nationally

play18:15

it was all about access and ease

play18:18

customers could get an in-store blood

play18:20

test off a simple finger prick which

play18:22

would cost next to nothing

play18:25

they'd even get their results back

play18:26

within four hours

play18:29

that was the promise

play18:30

the truth was another matter according

play18:32

to former theranos lab associate erica

play18:35

chong

play18:36

you know this thing that was supposed to

play18:38

be five would all even all of a sudden

play18:40

show up to be 60 and then you would run

play18:42

it and it would show up to be you know

play18:44

four and it was just the degree of inner

play18:47

accuracy was just way too high

play18:49

to be acceptable to start running on on

play18:51

patients so i got my thera nose test

play18:54

done on like 29th of july and then 31st

play18:57

of july i got

play18:59

a test done by another lab

play19:01

and it was different

play19:04

unaware of the wildly unreliable results

play19:07

pallav schader himself a

play19:10

physician-turned-medical technology

play19:12

entrepreneur

play19:13

went to walgreens for a theranos blood

play19:16

test

play19:17

the results were surprisingly bad for

play19:19

this health-conscious medico

play19:22

they showed he was pre-diabetic

play19:26

luckily pallav's own doctor was

play19:28

suspicious of the diagnosis and ordered

play19:31

another blood test from another lab

play19:34

that was the moment when i felt cheated

play19:36

because i

play19:38

there was a little bit of a pride hurt

play19:39

because i'm from the industry

play19:42

if you had not got a second opinion a

play19:45

second test what course of action would

play19:47

you have taken at age

play19:50

35 i would have been

play19:53

started on anti-diabetic medication

play19:57

and

play19:58

no medication is

play20:00

it comes without side effects so

play20:03

i

play20:06

i

play20:07

i get emotional thinking about

play20:11

how

play20:11

big a deal it was for me if you followed

play20:14

the theronos

play20:16

model

play20:17

you would have been on medication for a

play20:19

disease you don't have yes

play20:22

absolutely

play20:23

this is inexcusable

play20:26

now and forever

play20:28

was it a fact that there were illnesses

play20:30

that might not have been picked up that

play20:32

the people who might have been suffering

play20:35

from

play20:35

life-threatening diseases and they just

play20:37

didn't know it because they got a false

play20:40

result yeah the devices were so

play20:43

unreliable that you really couldn't

play20:44

trust it with any test

play20:47

the groundbreaking theranos technology

play20:49

was a charade

play20:51

instead theranos was secretly using

play20:54

traditional commercially available blood

play20:56

analyzers

play20:58

because those machines require larger

play21:00

amounts of blood to run their tests

play21:03

staff were ordered to dilute the small

play21:06

blood samples collected by finger prick

play21:09

rendering those results unsafe

play21:12

they were doing the tests on standard

play21:14

equipment and they were diluting the

play21:17

blood which

play21:18

invalidates a lot of the results

play21:21

so

play21:22

i knew there was fraud going on and i

play21:26

from very early on

play21:28

but still the marketing myth continued

play21:30

and you make a decision to do something

play21:32

you do it and that's it a previously

play21:35

non-existent lab was created filled with

play21:37

as many of the black boxes the company

play21:40

could find

play21:42

then vice president joe biden was

play21:44

invited to inspect this is sort of the

play21:47

laboratory of the future unaware the

play21:49

devices didn't work and that he along

play21:52

with the world was being conned

play21:55

to learn that she created a fake lab

play21:58

to

play21:59

show joe biden i mean what an audacious

play22:02

act of deception well she was audacious

play22:05

i would grant you that

play22:07

and everything she did i do think

play22:10

there's some

play22:11

this is my opinion that there's some

play22:13

sociopathy involved

play22:16

and the ability to

play22:20

lie

play22:23

and

play22:24

without caring is not normal

play22:28

from my perspective

play22:30

as a medical doctor she was trying

play22:33

uh to uh over promise and then hope that

play22:37

her engineers and her biochemists would

play22:39

catch up

play22:40

and that when they eventually did and

play22:42

that her machine worked no one would be

play22:44

the wiser the problem is she was nowhere

play22:47

near already

play22:49

elizabeth holmes was revered as the

play22:52

superwoman scientist come to rescue and

play22:54

revolutionize the u.s health system

play22:58

but the true heroes of the theronos tale

play23:01

are the courageous whistleblowers who

play23:03

helped investigative journalist john

play23:05

kararu from the wall street journal

play23:08

exposed the sham

play23:11

of their testimonies he went on to write

play23:14

the award-winning bad blood and is

play23:16

hosting a podcast called bad blood the

play23:19

final chapter

play23:21

these are people who wanted to do good

play23:23

these are people who couldn't sleep at

play23:24

night because they were worried that

play23:26

patients were relying on on false

play23:29

results right did that strike you as

play23:31

well they couldn't in good conscience

play23:33

continue uh

play23:35

to not say anything they felt the need

play23:37

to speak up

play23:39

and they felt that lives were in danger

play23:41

and that the longer this went on

play23:43

the worse it would get

play23:45

erica chung was one such hero

play23:48

when her concerns were ignored by

play23:50

theranos she left in disgust but still

play23:53

feared for its customers

play23:55

erica alerted regulators to what was

play23:58

going on behind closed doors you were

play24:00

being extraordinarily brave yes you

play24:03

clearly felt compelled to get someone

play24:06

else's

play24:07

even though it was scary and it was

play24:08

nerve-wracking and at that time

play24:10

theranose was

play24:11

at least threatening to sue me and they

play24:13

were following me to sort of intimidate

play24:16

me and to not speak up against them

play24:20

it's just that they needed to stop doing

play24:22

this thing right they needed to stop

play24:24

testing on patients

play24:26

and that the truth needed to be

play24:28

uncovered

play24:30

this is what happens when you work to

play24:32

change things and

play24:34

first they think you're crazy then they

play24:35

fight you and then all of a sudden you

play24:37

change the world

play24:39

elizabeth holmes came out fighting but

play24:42

regulators acted against her

play24:45

closing down theranos laboratories and

play24:48

banning medical testing after they found

play24:51

massive fraud that put patients in

play24:53

serious jeopardy

play24:55

the company once valued at nine billion

play24:58

dollars was now worth zero

play25:01

and that was good right like the mission

play25:03

was finally accomplished by that point i

play25:05

was able to

play25:07

finally sleep at night and and realize

play25:09

that

play25:10

you know my my work was done

play25:14

in further legal action elizabeth and

play25:16

ex-boyfriend sunny balwani are now in

play25:19

the midst of a delayed criminal trial

play25:22

for defrauding investors patients and

play25:24

doctors and could be jailed for up to 20

play25:27

years if convicted

play25:31

holmes trial has been pushed back to the

play25:33

end of this month

play25:34

first by covert and then news she was

play25:37

expecting her first child a son who was

play25:40

born in july

play25:42

to get pregnant

play25:45

when you're

play25:46

undergoing a trial

play25:50

is the height

play25:51

of irresponsibility in my mind

play25:54

what about the baby well do you think

play25:56

this was a planned pregnancy or do you

play25:58

think it was

play26:00

an accident i definitely think it was

play26:02

i mean i was predicting it because it's

play26:04

the best way to garner sympathy

play26:07

to try to keep yourself out of prison

play26:11

i think she needs to go to prison for a

play26:12

while

play26:13

i think 25 years sounds good

play26:17

those closest to the theranos dream

play26:20

including investor eileen lipra still

play26:22

believe elizabeth holmes should face the

play26:25

harshest sanctions

play26:26

because beyond money

play26:28

so much was at stake

play26:31

everybody knows it was all a sham

play26:33

so

play26:34

why would you get a slap on the wrist

play26:36

you know if it was just money that's one

play26:38

thing but it's it's people's lives their

play26:40

medical situations

play26:43

that's not okay with anybody

play26:48

hello i'm tara brown thanks for watching

play26:51

60 minutes australia

play26:53

subscribe to our channel now for brand

play26:55

new stories and exclusive clips every

play26:58

week and don't miss out on our extra

play27:01

minutes segments and full episodes of 60

play27:03

minutes on nine now dot com dot a u and

play27:08

the nine now app

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Etiquetas Relacionadas
Innovación MédicaFraude EmpresarialSilicon ValleySalud PersonalizadaInvestigación PeriodísticaEmprendedorasEscándalo SanitarioStartup FallidaBillionaria CaídaTecnología de Sangre