Redução da maioridade penal | Coluna #25
Summary
TLDRThe script discusses the Brazilian bill proposing to raise the age of criminal responsibility from 16 to 18 years old. Critics argue that a 3-year stay at Fundação Casa for minors who commit crimes is insufficient, fearing they may join criminal factions for protection in prison. The conversation shifts to an unexpected guest, a tattoo artist named Miro Dantas, who discusses the correlation between tattooing and oncology patients, hinting at a unique perspective on body art in relation to health.
Takeaways
- 📜 The script discusses a bill being voted on in the Chamber of Deputies and Senate regarding the criminal age of majority, which is currently set at 16 years old.
- 🚫 Individuals under 18 who commit crimes are sent to the 'Fundação Casa' where they can stay for a maximum of 3 years, a duration that some argue is too short for serious crimes.
- 🔪 There is a concern that a 17-year-old who commits murder will only serve 3 years in 'Fundação Casa', which is seen as an insufficient punishment.
- 🏢 The idea of sending young offenders to regular prisons is criticized as it could lead to them joining criminal factions for protection, which might compromise their future.
- 👨👩👧👦 The family of an incarcerated individual might receive basic food baskets paid for by criminal factions, and the mother might be provided transportation to visit her child.
- 💼 Upon release, the individual is likely to be deeply involved in criminal activities with no chance of leaving that life, even if they wish to.
- 🔑 The script suggests that public safety issues are often resolved based on emotion, which can lead to counterproductive outcomes.
- 🤔 There is a debate on whether incarcerating young offenders with professional criminals is a good idea, as it might not be effective in preventing future crimes.
- 👨⚕️ The script transitions to a discussion about an unexpected professional area of interest, linking tattooing to oncology and patients with cancer.
- 🎨 The conversation will include an interview with Miro Dantas, a professional tattoo artist, exploring the connection between tattooing and cancer patients.
Q & A
What is the current legal age for criminal responsibility in the script's context?
-The current legal age for criminal responsibility is 18 years old, as mentioned in the script.
What is the proposed change to the legal age for criminal responsibility discussed in the script?
-The script discusses a proposal to lower the legal age for criminal responsibility to 16 years old.
What is the term used for the institution where minors are sent after committing a crime in the script?
-The term used is 'Fundação Casa,' where minors are sent to serve a maximum of 3 years.
What is the concern raised about the duration of the sentence for minors in the 'Fundação Casa'?
-The concern is that a 3-year sentence for a serious crime like murder is too short and does not provide adequate punishment or rehabilitation.
Why is sending a 17-year-old to a regular prison considered a bad idea in the script?
-Sending a 17-year-old to a regular prison is considered bad because they might feel abandoned and scared, potentially leading them to join criminal factions for protection, which could compromise their future.
What are the potential consequences of mixing young offenders with professional criminals, as mentioned in the script?
-Mixing young offenders with professional criminals could lead to the young offenders becoming more deeply involved in crime and having no chance of leaving that life, even if they wish to.
How does the script describe the role of emotion in public safety decisions?
-The script suggests that decisions about public safety are often made based on emotion, which can be a poor advisor, sometimes leading to outcomes that worsen the security situation.
What unexpected profession is discussed in relation to oncology in the script?
-The profession discussed is tattoo artist, which is unexpected in the context of oncology.
Who is the professional being interviewed in the script, and what is their profession?
-The professional being interviewed is Miro Dantas, who is a tattoo artist.
What is the connection between tattooing and cancer patients as discussed in the script?
-The script implies there is a connection between tattooing and cancer patients, which is to be explained by the professional being interviewed, suggesting it might be related to the body art covering scars or changes due to cancer treatment.
What is the main argument against the proposed change to the legal age for criminal responsibility in the script?
-The main argument is that lowering the age to 16 and sending young offenders to regular prisons could lead to them becoming more entrenched in criminal behavior and losing any chance of reintegration into society.
Outlines
📜 Debate on Juvenile Crime Punishment
The script discusses a legislative proposal to lower the age of criminal responsibility from 18 to 16 years old, which is currently the law. It highlights the public's emotional reaction to the idea that a 17-year-old who commits murder might only serve three years in a rehabilitation center. Critics argue that such a short sentence is insufficient and that sending young offenders to adult prisons could lead to them becoming more deeply involved in crime, as they might join prison gangs for protection. The script also touches on the unintended consequences of emotional-driven legislation, suggesting that it can sometimes make public safety worse rather than better.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Penalidade
💡Fundação Casa
💡Menoridade Penal
💡Sistema Socioeducativo
💡Reeducação e Ressocialização
💡Crimes Gravos
💡Pena de Longa Duração
💡Emoção na Lei
💡Profissional em Oncologia e Tatuagem
Highlights
The discussion revolves around the voting on the age of criminal responsibility in the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate, proposing 16 years old as the new threshold.
Currently, individuals under 18 years old who commit a crime are sent to the Fundação Casa for a maximum of 3 years.
There is public outrage over the idea that a 17-year-old who commits murder could serve only a 3-year sentence at Fundação Casa.
The argument is made that a 3-year sentence for a serious crime is too short and that the punishment should be more severe.
The concern is raised that sending a young offender to a penitentiary filled with hardened criminals is not a smart measure.
It is feared that a young offender in prison will feel abandoned and afraid, potentially leading them to join prison gangs for protection.
The family of the offender might receive basic baskets paid for by the gangs, and the mother might be able to visit using resources provided by the gangs.
There is a worry that once the offender is released from prison, they will be fully committed to a life of crime with no chance of redemption.
The conversation points out that public safety issues are often resolved based on emotion, which is a poor advisor, especially in cases that cause national outrage.
The discussion suggests that measures that seem to protect society can sometimes have the opposite effect and worsen public safety.
Mixing young offenders with professional criminals is not considered a successful strategy.
The conversation is shifting to an unexpected professional area: oncology and its relation to tattooing.
Miro Dantas, a professional tattoo artist, is introduced as a guest to discuss the connection between tattooing and cancer patients.
The transcript suggests that there might be innovative methods or practical applications in the field of tattooing related to oncology.
The discussion aims to explore the theoretical contributions or impact of tattooing in the context of cancer treatment or patient care.
The conversation is expected to provide insights into how an unlikely profession like tattooing can intersect with medical fields.
Transcripts
vai ser votada na Câmara doss deputados
e no senado a lei da maioridade penal a
partir dos 16 anos como é a lei hoje na
lei hoje Quem comete um crime abaixo dos
18 anos de idade é encaminhado paraa
Fundação Casa onde vai permanecer por no
máximo 3 anos muita gente se revolta com
isso que diz pô Men 17 anos é um homem
já ele mata alguém na rua e vai cumprir
penas de 3 anos na Fundação Casa a pena
tinha que ser muito maior el Tinha Que
Ser castigado de outra forma eu também
acho que 3 anos num caso de um crime de
Ono é um período muito curto mas eu
pegar esse menino e jogá-lo numa
penitenciária no meio de bandidos de
longa carreira no crime não é uma medida
inteligente porque ele vai chegar na
cadeia garotão ainda meio daqueles
adultos vai ficar sentir desamparado com
medo medo de ser estuprado medo de
morrer nas mãos dos adversários e o que
ele vai fazer ele vai se juntar a uma
das facções que dominam os presídios aí
ele tá protegido aí a família passa a
receber uma cesta básica paga pela
facção a mãe poderá visitá-lo ir de
ônibus pro interior
transportada às custas dos recursos da
facção só que o dia que ele sair da
cadeia e ele um dia sairá ele vai sair
absolutamente comprometido com o crime e
não terá nenhuma chance de sair fora
desse mundo nem que ele queira esses
problemas que envolvem a segurança
pública costumam ser resolvidos na base
da emoção geralmente motivados por um
crime que provocou uma comoção
Nacional a emoção é uma péssima
conselheira nessas situações Às vezes o
que parece que vai proteger a sociedade
Na verdade tem um efeito oposto e vai
colocar a segurança da sociedade numa
situação muito pior do que o que estava
anteriormente misturar jovens em início
de carreira com bandidos profissionais
não vai dar certo hoje nós vamos
conversar com um profissional que é de
uma área que você nunca imaginou que
pudesse ter interesse em Oncologia a
tatuagem nós vamos conversar com o Miro
Dantas que é de profissão um tatuador o
que tem a ver a tatuagem com os doentes
com câncer
Ver Más Videos Relacionados
Pros & Cons - Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act
Tudo sobre Redução da Maioridade Penal
Iraq Proposes Bill Allowing 9-year-old Girls to be Married | Vantage with Palki Sharma
Whang-Od: The Last True Tattoo Artist | Short Film
Jack Doherty's Girlfriend Is Disgusting.
【残業規制】稼ぎたい自由が奪われる?生産性が低い?働き方改革は愚策?|アベプラ
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)