Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Explains How The Ukraine Russia War Started

Howie Mandel Does Stuff Clips
17 Jan 202410:05

Summary

TLDRThe script discusses the complex lead-up to the Ukraine war, challenging the narrative that Putin's intentions were to reestablish the Soviet Empire. It delves into historical events, including NATO's expansion and the 1992 promise to Gorbachev not to move eastward. The speaker critiques U.S. foreign policy, highlighting the 2014 Ukrainian government overthrow and the subsequent civil unrest. The Minsk Accords are mentioned as a peace attempt, with the U.S. allegedly pressuring Ukraine to reject them. The summary suggests that the U.S., not Russia, desired conflict, leading to the current situation.

Takeaways

  • 🗣️ The speaker suggests that the narrative around the Ukraine war is similar to past conflicts, implying a pattern of misinformation.
  • 🌍 The script references historical events, such as the fall of the Berlin Wall and the promise not to expand NATO eastward, as context for current geopolitical tensions.
  • 🤔 The speaker questions the motives behind NATO's expansion, suggesting economic and military-industrial interests may be driving factors.
  • 🔄 The script discusses the role of key U.S. diplomats and their opposition to NATO's eastward movement, indicating internal disagreements on foreign policy.
  • 🚫 The speaker highlights the U.S.'s departure from nuclear treaties with Russia and the installation of missile systems in Romania and Poland as provocations.
  • 🇺🇦 The script describes the U.S.'s involvement in the 2014 Ukrainian revolution, suggesting a push for a pro-U.S. government over a neutral stance.
  • 🏆 The speaker mentions Zelensky's election and his initial commitment to peace, which was later undermined by external influences.
  • 🤝 The script outlines attempts at peace negotiations, including the Minsk Accords, and the involvement of other countries in these efforts.
  • ⛔️ The speaker alleges that the U.S., through figures like Tony Blair, undermined peace efforts and encouraged a continuation of the conflict.
  • 🏰 The script concludes with a discussion of Russia's actions in Crimea and the broader context of its historical and strategic interests.

Q & A

  • What was the initial promise made to Gorbachev regarding NATO expansion?

    -James Baker, the then Secretary of State, promised Gorbachev that NATO would not move one inch to the east.

  • Who proposed moving NATO to the Russian borders and why was this controversial?

    -Zbigniew Brzezinski, a neoconservative, proposed moving NATO to the Russian borders. This was controversial because it was seen as provocative and against the initial promise made to Gorbachev, potentially escalating tensions.

  • What was George Kennan's stance on expanding NATO towards Russia?

    -George Kennan, the architect of the containment policy during the Cold War, opposed the expansion, arguing it was insane and would force a violent military response from Russia.

  • Why did the US push for NATO expansion into new countries?

    -NATO expansion into new countries was driven by the requirement for these countries to conform their weapons purchases to NATO specifications, which often meant buying weapons from US military contractors.

  • What was the significance of the US withdrawing from nuclear weapons treaties with Russia?

    -The withdrawal from nuclear weapons treaties with Russia was seen as destabilizing Europe and increased tensions, as it removed agreements that were in place to prevent missile attacks on Russia.

  • How did the US involvement in Ukraine lead to the 2014 coup?

    -The US, through USAID, which is often considered a front for the CIA, spent $5 billion to instigate a revolution known as the Maidan Rebellion, leading to the overthrow of the elected, neutral government of Ukraine.

  • What was the Minsk Accords and why was it significant?

    -The Minsk Accords were a peace agreement signed by Germany, France, England, and Russia to resolve the conflict in Ukraine. It was significant because it was an attempt to end the violence and establish peace.

  • Why did Putin annex Crimea and what was the reaction of the people there?

    -Putin annexed Crimea to protect ethnic Russians and because the people of Crimea wanted to rejoin Russia. The annexation was done without firing a shot and without killing anyone.

  • What was the role of the US in the peace negotiations between Russia and Ukraine in 2022?

    -The US, through figures like Tony Blair, influenced Ukraine's President Zelensky to reject a peace agreement that had been negotiated, leading to a continuation of the conflict.

  • What is the claim about the US's intentions regarding the conflict in Ukraine?

    -The claim is that the US did not want the war to end and was more interested in maintaining a conflict with Russia, rather than seeking a peaceful resolution.

Outlines

00:00

🌍 Geopolitical Context of the Ukraine War

The speaker challenges the narrative that Putin's actions in Ukraine are an attempt to reestablish the Soviet Empire. They argue that the public was misled, drawing parallels to the Iraq War and the false claims about Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction. The speaker then delves into history, starting from 1992 when the Berlin Wall fell, and Mikhail Gorbachev's decision to withdraw Russian troops from East Germany and allow reunification under NATO. They recount the promise made by James Baker to Gorbachev that NATO would not expand eastward, which was later broken with the inclusion of 14 new countries into NATO. The speaker criticizes the move as provocative and against the advice of seasoned diplomats like George Kennan and Bill Perry, who warned of the potential for a violent Russian response. The narrative continues with the U.S.'s withdrawal from nuclear treaties and the installation of missile systems in Romania and Poland, actions that further strained relations with Russia. The paragraph concludes with a discussion of the U.S.'s role in the 2014 Ukrainian revolution, which led to the overthrow of the elected government and the installation of a pro-U.S. government, setting the stage for the ongoing conflict.

05:03

🏰 The 2014 Ukrainian Coup and Its Aftermath

The speaker details the events leading up to the 2014 coup in Ukraine, where the U.S. allegedly played a significant role in orchestrating the overthrow of the then-government. They mention Victoria Nuland, a high-ranking U.S. State Department official, who was recorded discussing the selection of a new Ukrainian cabinet prior to the coup, indicating foreknowledge of the event. The new government, once in power, began actions against Russian-speaking populations in Eastern Ukraine, leading to a civil war and the deaths of thousands. The Minsk Accords, a peace agreement, were eventually signed by Germany, France, England, and Russia, but not by Ukraine's President Zelensky, who initially campaigned on a peace platform. The speaker alleges that external pressures, including from the U.S., influenced Zelensky's decision not to honor the accords. The narrative then shifts to Putin's actions, including the annexation of Crimea and the deployment of troops to Eastern Ukraine, which the speaker frames as a response to the U.S.'s influence in Ukraine and the threat to Russia's strategic interests. The paragraph concludes with the claim that the U.S., through figures like Tony Blair, actively undermined peace negotiations and encouraged the continuation of the conflict.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Ukraine War

The Ukraine War refers to the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine that began in 2014 and escalated in 2022. The video discusses the leadup to the war, suggesting that the narrative of an aggressive Russia is a misrepresentation. The war is central to the video's theme, as it serves as the backdrop for discussing geopolitical strategies and historical events.

💡NATO

NATO, or the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, is a military alliance between North American and European countries. The script mentions NATO's expansion eastward as a contentious issue, with Russia viewing it as a threat. The video argues that NATO's movement towards Russia's borders has been a significant factor in the tensions leading up to the Ukraine War.

💡Saddam Hussein

Saddam Hussein was the former President of Iraq. The video draws a parallel between the narratives used to justify the Iraq War and the Ukraine War, suggesting that similar tactics of misinformation were used to build a case for military intervention. The mention of Hussein serves to highlight perceived patterns in the justification of wars.

💡Minsk Accords

The Minsk Accords refer to a series of agreements aimed at resolving the conflict in Eastern Ukraine. The video discusses how these accords were a point of negotiation between Russia and Ukraine, and how they were undermined by external influences. The Minsk Accords are integral to understanding the peace efforts and the complexities of the conflict.

💡Neocons

Neoconservatives, or neocons, are a political movement that advocates for aggressive U.S. foreign policy, often including military intervention. The video implicates neocons in the push for NATO expansion, suggesting their influence as a driving force behind tensions with Russia.

💡Victoria Nuland

Victoria Nuland is a U.S. diplomat mentioned in the video as a key figure in U.S. foreign policy decisions regarding Ukraine. The script alleges that she was involved in orchestrating regime change in Ukraine, which is a significant claim within the video's narrative of U.S. involvement in the region.

💡Crimea

Crimea is a peninsula that was annexed by Russia from Ukraine in 2014. The video discusses Crimea's annexation as a response to the political turmoil in Ukraine and the perceived threat to Russia's strategic interests. Crimea's status is central to understanding the broader conflict dynamics.

💡Donbas

Donbas is a region in Eastern Ukraine where a significant portion of the population is ethnically Russian. The video describes the conflict in Donbas as a civil war, with Russia defending the rights of Russian-speaking Ukrainians. The situation in Donbas is a key element of the Ukraine War narrative presented in the video.

💡Nuclear Weapons Treaties

The video references the U.S. withdrawal from nuclear weapons treaties with Russia, suggesting this has contributed to the destabilization of Europe. The mention of these treaties underscores the broader security concerns and the potential for escalation in the conflict.

💡Zelensky

Volodymyr Zelensky is the President of Ukraine, mentioned in the video as a figure who campaigned on a peace platform but has been influenced by external pressures. The video discusses Zelensky's actions in the context of the Ukraine War, highlighting the complexities of leadership during times of conflict.

💡Peace Negotiations

Peace negotiations are discussed in the video as a series of diplomatic efforts to resolve the Ukraine War. The script suggests that these negotiations have been undermined by external actors, which is a significant claim in the video's argument about the role of international politics in the conflict.

Highlights

The speaker argues that the narrative of Putin as an aggressor aiming to take over Europe is a lie, similar to the false claims about Saddam Hussein.

The speaker discusses the historical context of the fall of the Berlin Wall and Gorbachev's decision to remove Russian troops from East Germany.

James Baker's promise to Gorbachev that NATO would not expand eastward is mentioned, contrasting with later actions.

The speaker criticizes the decision to move NATO closer to Russian borders, against the advice of key diplomats like George Kennan.

The economic motivations behind NATO expansion are highlighted, linking it to military contracts with US companies.

The speaker details the US's involvement in the 2014 Ukrainian revolution, including the role of USAID and Victoria Nuland.

The consequences of the 2014 Ukrainian revolution, including the rise of a pro-US government and the suppression of Russian-speaking populations, are discussed.

The Minsk Accords, a peace agreement, are introduced as a response to the conflict in Eastern Ukraine.

The speaker describes the election of Zelensky and his initial commitment to the Minsk Accords.

The alleged US pressure on Zelensky to abandon the Minsk Accords is mentioned, with claims of a peace agreement being torn up.

The speaker discusses Putin's actions in Crimea and the subsequent referendum to join Russia, emphasizing the lack of violence.

The speaker argues that Putin's primary goal was not to conquer Ukraine but to bring the US back to the negotiating table.

The involvement of Israel and Turkey in peace negotiations is noted, along with the alleged US interference in the process.

The speaker concludes by emphasizing that while Russia's actions were illegal, the US has played a significant role in perpetuating the conflict.

Transcripts

play00:00

let me just tell you kind of the leadup

play00:01

what happened in the leadup of Ukraine

play00:04

war it the Ukraine war we were lied to

play00:07

because we're told oh yeah this evil

play00:09

Putin trying to take over Europe and

play00:12

this is his first step to reestablishing

play00:14

the the Soviet Empire and that you know

play00:17

it's the same comic is that a lie yeah

play00:19

it's the same comic book description we

play00:21

were given of Saddam Hussein in Iraq

play00:24

which we were just lied into a war and

play00:27

yeah it was a slam dunk that he hit

play00:29

weapons Mass destruction of course he

play00:31

didn't and he had nothing to do with

play00:32

terrorism and he was running the most

play00:36

Progressive um nation in the midd East

play00:38

it was a secularized nation it wasn't a

play00:41

a theocracy he wouldn't let

play00:44

people um you know say I will agree that

play00:47

you know maybe in hindsight that was

play00:49

that was a mistake but all then let me

play00:51

let me tell you what happened the real

play00:53

story behind what happened in

play00:56

Ukraine and and let me go back to 1992

play00:59

because 1992 the walls come down the

play01:02

Berlin Wall comes down and gorbachov

play01:06

does something very courageous he goes

play01:08

to Tony Blair and George Bush and he

play01:12

says I'm gonna allow you to do something

play01:14

that nobody in the right mind would do

play01:16

which is I'm going to remove

play01:19

450,000 Russian troops from East Germany

play01:23

and I'm going to allow you to unify East

play01:26

Germany under NATO which is a hostile

play01:28

Army but I want one commitment to you

play01:32

from you you will never move NATO

play01:35

further to the east James Baker who was

play01:38

then Secretary of State famously said to

play01:40

him we will not move Nato one inch to

play01:43

the

play01:43

east so then five years later in 1997 Z

play01:47

big new brazinski who's the first of the

play01:50

neocons comes along and proposes let's

play01:53

move

play01:55

NATO to right up to the Russian borders

play01:58

we're into 15 ations okay and at that

play02:03

time the the most important diplomats in

play02:06

American history at that time were

play02:07

George Cannon who was the architect of

play02:10

the containment policy during the Cold

play02:13

War he said if you do that you're going

play02:15

to force you're this is crazy it's

play02:18

insane Russia just lost the Cold War we

play02:21

should be giving them a marshal plan and

play02:23

integrating them into the the civilized

play02:26

society the Western Society don't make

play02:28

them an enemy don't treat them like

play02:30

they're still an enemy it's going to

play02:32

this is going to force a a a violent

play02:35

military response from Russia if you do

play02:37

that Bill Pierce who was then the

play02:40

Secretary of of Defense threatened

play02:44

Clinton that he would resign if they

play02:46

went ahead with this plan because it was

play02:47

so reckless and Bill Perry and Bill

play02:51

Pierce is now the head of the CIA Bill

play02:53

Perry who was the US ambassador Russia

play02:56

at the time said the same thing why are

play02:58

you doing this this is crazy so between

play03:00

now and then we move NATO into 14

play03:04

countries why do we move nato in because

play03:07

when they when you move them into a new

play03:09

country they have to sign a contract

play03:12

that conforms all their weapons

play03:15

purchases to Nato specifications which

play03:17

means you have to buy the weapons from

play03:19

North grman you know from our these big

play03:21

US military contractors who profit from

play03:24

war we move it that in the meantime we

play03:28

walk away unil Lally from two nuclear

play03:32

weapons treaties with Russia Russia

play03:34

wants those treaties they're

play03:36

intermediate range missile systems that

play03:38

you know so that which destabilizes

play03:40

Europe when we when we remove our

play03:43

agreement not to fire missiles on Russia

play03:46

then we put agis missile systems which

play03:48

are nuclear capable in Romania and

play03:51

Poland so the broad listen you know the

play03:55

details and these details are but and

play03:58

and and I'm not taking a side on this

play04:00

but if there was any which a lot of

play04:04

people aren't really Advocates of but

play04:06

Trump if anything kind of and whether he

play04:09

was a puppet or not whatever you believe

play04:11

he kind of normalized the Russian

play04:13

relationship kind of right by becoming

play04:16

somewhat of a a friend of Putin's so

play04:19

between that time and the time that

play04:23

Putin there was no NATO movement between

play04:25

the time after the Trump Administration

play04:28

yeah well what we did is and we

play04:30

overthrew the government of

play04:32

Ukraine no he he came into Ukraine

play04:34

before we threw overthrew the government

play04:37

in 2014 usaid which is spent $5 billion

play04:42

which is a front for the

play04:44

CIA which everybody acknowledges went in

play04:48

there and started a revolution called

play04:50

the it's called the maid on Rebellion

play04:52

where there was these protests that

play04:53

ended with the overthrow of the elected

play04:57

government of Ukraine that wanted to

play04:59

keep Ukraine neutral yakovich wanted to

play05:03

keep NATO neutral we wanted a pro US

play05:07

Government so we went in there in 2014

play05:10

overthrew their government and placed a

play05:14

government and by the way a month before

play05:16

the overthrow we now have tapes you can

play05:19

go on the internet and listen to a

play05:21

Victoria nulan who's the who's the head

play05:23

of the ni H now the deputy director of

play05:26

the state department uh choosing the new

play05:30

Ukrainian cabinet that will be put in

play05:33

place after the coup that was still a

play05:35

month away so she knew the coup was

play05:37

coming a month in advance and but who is

play05:38

she to us she's us she's The Head of the

play05:41

State Department she's now you know

play05:43

number three in the state

play05:45

department but she's been in the state

play05:47

department she's one one of the you know

play05:49

she's a ni she's the she runs the niacon

play05:52

uh uh program which is you know

play05:56

continual Wars so she goes she they we

play05:59

then pick a new government the new

play06:01

government comes in immediately begins

play06:05

attacking the the people of dbas and

play06:08

lugans who are Russians speaking ethnic

play06:11

Russians they banned the Russian

play06:13

language which was there was two

play06:14

languages that were two official

play06:16

languages Ukraine they ban that there

play06:19

violence immediately erupts and they

play06:21

kill 14 there's a Civil War and really

play06:25

this war started in

play06:26

2014 there's 14,000 think Russians are

play06:30

killed and and Putin kept saying you're

play06:32

killing our

play06:33

people he's trying to get a peace

play06:36

agreement they finally work out a peace

play06:38

agreement called the Minsk Accords

play06:41

Germany signs onto it France signs onto

play06:44

it England signs onto it and Russians

play06:46

sign onto

play06:48

it zalinsky runs in 2019 as president he

play06:53

runs he has one platform issue he's a

play06:55

comedian and an actor which I'm not is

play06:57

there anything wrong with that oh my

play06:59

wife is is one of those okay all right

play07:02

but he never had any political

play07:03

experience right but he wins with 70% of

play07:06

the vote why cuz he runs on a peace

play07:08

platform I'm going to sign the Minsk

play07:09

Accords as soon as he gets in there

play07:12

Victoria Newan and the and the you know

play07:14

Ultra nationalist which is a nice way of

play07:17

describing the you know the people who

play07:19

run that government

play07:21

now um tell him that he can't do it he

play07:25

can't sign it so he pivots and then um

play07:30

and then uh Putin then says okay Putin

play07:35

is now faced with this

play07:36

problem the United States government is

play07:39

now running the government of

play07:41

Ukraine and he is frightened to death

play07:44

that the US Navy is going to go into

play07:46

flat of osto which is you know the

play07:48

southern Port has been the Russian Port

play07:50

it's only warm water Port Russia has for

play07:54

347 years so he then goes right into

play07:58

Ukraine cuz he's got I mean into Crimea

play08:01

and takes Crimea without firing a shot

play08:03

doesn't kill a single person cuz the

play08:05

people of Crimea are ethnic Russian and

play08:06

want him back on him in there Dumas and

play08:10

lugans then

play08:12

vote 90 90 to one 90 to 10 to join

play08:16

Russia Putin says no I don't want you I

play08:19

want Ukraine to be a functioning state

play08:22

but let's sign the Min Accords and um

play08:25

and they won't sign it so then he sign

play08:28

he sends in

play08:30

40,000 troops I'm almost done with this

play08:32

it sends in 40,000 troops that is not

play08:36

somebody who wants to conquer Ukraine

play08:39

there it's a nation of 44 million people

play08:41

all he wanted was us back at the

play08:44

negotiating

play08:46

table um zinski we will not help zinsky

play08:50

negotiate so he goes to Israel and gets

play08:53

naali Bennett and Eran in Turkey to

play08:58

sponsor negoti ations and they go and

play09:00

they work out a peace

play09:02

agreement and pu they sign it in April

play09:05

of 2022 Putin is withdrawing his troops

play09:08

according to this peace agreement or he

play09:10

starts withdrawing

play09:11

them Biden sends over Tony Blair and

play09:15

tells zinsky to rip up the peace

play09:18

agreement now how do we know this

play09:21

because all the negotiators are now

play09:23

talking including Neftali Bennett and

play09:26

you can look it up when you're on the

play09:27

internet you say you spend a lot of time

play09:29

look at his speech where he tells you

play09:31

what happened the lead Ukrainian

play09:34

negotiator this week came clean and said

play09:36

yeah that's what happened oh you know of

play09:39

course Russ Russia's been invaded three

play09:41

times through Ukraine the last time so

play09:43

is Russia the good guy in your mind no

play09:46

no Russia it was illegal what Russia did

play09:49

but we have to understand they don't

play09:50

want this war we wanted the war so let

play09:58

me

play10:04

he

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Etiquetas Relacionadas
Ukraine WarGeopoliticsNATO ExpansionPutinCold WarUS Foreign PolicyEuropean SecurityRussian RelationsMinsk AccordsPeace Negotiations
¿Necesitas un resumen en inglés?