Morons Fall For TikTok's 'Free Money Glitch', Lose Everything...
Summary
TLDRIn this video, the host discusses a recent viral scam where people attempted to exploit a supposed 'glitch' at Chase Bank ATMs to withdraw large sums of money using fake checks. The video highlights the absurdity of the situation, pointing out the obvious legal and logical flaws in the scheme. It also touches on the social media phenomenon of 'clout chasers' who pretended to be part of the scam for attention. The host emphasizes the importance of critical thinking and the consequences of such actions, including potential felony charges and the impact on future job opportunities.
Takeaways
- 📺 The video discusses a recent viral trend where people attempted to exploit a supposed 'glitch' at Chase Bank to get free money.
- 🚨 The scheme involved depositing a fake check into a Chase ATM and quickly withdrawing the funds before the bank could flag the check as fraudulent.
- 🤔 Many individuals were enticed by the promise of easy money, despite the obvious legal and ethical implications.
- 📉 The video highlights the consequences of this action, with many participants finding their bank accounts frozen and balances adjusted to reflect the fraudulent transactions.
- 📱 The trend was heavily circulated on social media platforms like TikTok and Twitter, which led to a large number of people attempting the scheme.
- 🚨 The video emphasizes the severe legal risks involved, as check fraud is a felony with potential for significant penalties.
- 😳 The speaker expresses disbelief at the lack of common sense displayed by those who participated, noting the ease with which such crimes can be traced back to individuals.
- 📹 Many participants documented their actions on social media, further incriminating themselves and providing evidence for potential legal action.
- 🤷♂️ The video questions the societal trend of seeking quick riches through dishonest means, rather than pursuing legitimate work.
- 👮♂️ The speaker speculates on the potential legal consequences for those involved, including criminal charges and long-term damage to their financial and professional reputations.
Q & A
What is the main topic of the video?
-The main topic of the video is the so-called 'Chase free money bank glitch' that went viral on social media platforms like TikTok and Twitter, where people were attempting to fraudulently obtain money from Chase Bank ATMs.
What was the nature of the 'glitch' that people were exploiting?
-The 'glitch' involved people depositing fake checks into Chase Bank ATMs, hoping to withdraw the funds before the bank's system recognized the checks as fraudulent.
How did the scheme of depositing fake checks work?
-The scheme involved depositing a fake check, usually for a large amount, into an ATM and quickly withdrawing the displayed balance before the bank's system could detect the check as bad.
What were the consequences for those who tried to exploit the 'glitch'?
-The consequences included having their bank accounts frozen and balances adjusted to reflect the bounced checks, leading to negative balances and potential legal actions.
Why did the video creator believe this scheme was not a good idea?
-The video creator believed the scheme was not a good idea because it involved committing a felony, was easily traceable, and was based on a false belief that one could scam large financial institutions.
What is the video creator's view on the people who participated in the scheme?
-The video creator views the participants as lacking common sense and being easily swayed by social media trends, which led them to commit a crime that was both traceable and punishable.
What other schemes did the video creator mention as being similar to the Chase Bank glitch?
-The video creator mentioned a previous scheme involving a 'free DoorDash glitch' where people tried to obtain free food through the app, which later resulted in them owing large amounts of money.
How does the video creator describe the social media phenomenon of people sharing their negative bank balances?
-The video creator describes it as a bizarre phenomenon where people are seeking attention by sharing their negative bank balances and the consequences of their actions, almost boasting about their participation in the scheme.
What advice does the video creator offer regarding schemes that seem 'too good to be true'?
-The video creator advises that if something seems too outlandish and too good to be true, it probably is, and one should not blindly follow such schemes without considering the potential consequences.
What is the video creator's opinion on the people who are pretending to have participated in the scheme for attention?
-The video creator finds it even more bizarre that some people are pretending to have participated in the scheme to gain social media attention, which he describes as voluntarily making themselves seem moronic.
Outlines
Esta sección está disponible solo para usuarios con suscripción. Por favor, mejora tu plan para acceder a esta parte.
Mejorar ahoraMindmap
Esta sección está disponible solo para usuarios con suscripción. Por favor, mejora tu plan para acceder a esta parte.
Mejorar ahoraKeywords
Esta sección está disponible solo para usuarios con suscripción. Por favor, mejora tu plan para acceder a esta parte.
Mejorar ahoraHighlights
Esta sección está disponible solo para usuarios con suscripción. Por favor, mejora tu plan para acceder a esta parte.
Mejorar ahoraTranscripts
Esta sección está disponible solo para usuarios con suscripción. Por favor, mejora tu plan para acceder a esta parte.
Mejorar ahoraVer Más Videos Relacionados
Chase Bank Glitch: How To Get "Infinite Money" (DON'T DO THIS)
Chase Bank aware of customers attempted to game ATMs with viral ‘glitch’
ALINE ENGADADA PELO DIEGO DÓREA TRADER: PERDEU 22 MIL EUROS COM DÓREA TRADER POUSANDO EM SUA CASA!!!
Lets Expose the Scam and Scammers Trying to Ruin Futures PropFirms
BAB 3. PART 1 BERPIKIR KRITIS DAN DAMPAK SOSIAL INFORMATIKA. PENGANTAR BERPIKIR KRITIS. FASE F SMA.
Punchmade Dev - Wire Fraud Tutorial (Official Music Video) *REUPLOAD*
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)