The creators of Talking Tom are REALLY shady 2

Summary

The video script delves into the controversial practices of Outfit7, creators of Talking Tom, suggesting they may not be as innocent as perceived. It highlights the game 'Talking Roby,' which was removed due to legal issues over its character's resemblance to 'Chilik,' a mascot for a coffee machine company. The video aims to educate without animosity, acknowledging Outfit7's impact on children's entertainment, and teases more content if viewers are interested.

Takeaways

• 😶 The creators of Talking Tom, Outfit7, have a controversial history.
• 🔍 Users requested a follow-up video, which this script is for.
• 🎮 'Talking Roby' is an early game developed by Outfit7, featuring a character with a striking resemblance to 'Chilik', a mascot from a different company.
• 🤖 'Chilik' is the mascot for a company that manufactures coffee machines, which seems unrelated to the character's use in a game.
• 🚫 Outfit7 faced legal issues due to the unauthorized use of the Chilik character, leading to the game's removal.
• 👀 The video script suggests that viewers, especially those from Turkey, might recognize the Chilik character.
• 📚 The video aims to educate and does not intend to express hate towards Outfit7, acknowledging their impact on many children's experiences.
• 📹 There is more content to cover about Outfit7, hinting at potential for further videos.
• 🗣️ The script invites viewers to share their thoughts and recognition of the character in the comments section.
• 🔑 The video serves as a key to understanding the legal and ethical challenges faced by game developers when creating characters.

Q & A

Who created Talking Tom?

Talking Tom was created by Outfit7.

What was the issue with the character Talking Roby?

The character Talking Roby was not original and was found to be very similar to another character named Chilik.

What was Chilik's original purpose?

Chilik was a mascot for a company named R Chilik that made coffee machines.

Why did Outfit7 get into legal trouble?

Outfit7 got into legal trouble because they used the character Chilik without permission, which led to the game featuring the character being taken down.

What was the relationship between Talking Roby and Chilik in terms of design?

Talking Roby's design was strikingly similar to Chilik's, suggesting a lack of originality on Outfit7's part.

What is the purpose of this video according to the script?

The video is for educational purposes, aiming to inform viewers about the controversy surrounding Outfit7's character creation.

Is there a part one to this video?

Yes, the script suggests that there is a part one of the video where the issue of originality of Outfit7's characters was discussed.

What was the viewer's response to the first part of the video?

The viewers asked for a part two, indicating that they were interested in learning more about the subject.

Are there more controversies to cover about Outfit7?

Yes, the script implies that there is more to cover regarding Outfit7, suggesting that additional parts might be released.

What is the intended audience for this video?

The intended audience includes people who are familiar with Outfit7's characters and those who want to know more about the company's history and controversies.

How does the script address the viewers who are Turkish?

The script asks Turkish viewers who recognize the character Chilik to comment, indicating that the character might be more well-known in Turkey.