Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 vs. ASICS GT-2000 12 | Which Should You Choose?
Summary
TLDRIn this video, Matt from Doc Running compares the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 and the ASICS GT-2000 10, two moderate stability running shoes. Despite their similarities, they diverge in execution and evolution. The Adrenaline offers a higher heel drop and firmer heel cushioning, making it ideal for runners needing heel support. The GT-2000 10, with a lower drop and softer forefoot, provides a smoother ride and is versatile for varied paces. Both shoes are highly rated, but their differences make them suitable for different preferences, with the GT-2000 being lighter and more versatile.
Takeaways
- 👟 The video compares the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 and the ASICS GT-2000 8, two popular moderate stability running shoes.
- 🔍 Both shoes have been staples in the running industry for a long time, with the Adrenaline in its 23rd version and the GT-2000 in its 8th.
- ⚖️ The Adrenaline has a 4mm heel drop with a weight of 10.1 oz for men size 9, while the GT-2000 has an 8mm heel drop and weighs 9.5 oz for the same size.
- 📏 The Adrenaline offers a slightly shorter fit with more room in the length, whereas the GT-2000 is more snug throughout.
- 👣 Both shoes have great midfoot holds and stiff heel counters, with the GT-2000 providing a bit more padding for sensitive runners.
- 👣 The Adrenaline's upper is firmer, while the GT-2000's upper has more stretch, making it more accommodating.
- 👣 The Adrenaline uses DNA Loft V2 cushioning, which is firmer, especially in the forefoot, while the GT-2000 features FlyteFoam Blast Plus, which is softer and more cushioned.
- 🏃♂️ The GT-2000's 3D guidance system provides a more balanced stability, focusing on the midfoot and heel, whereas the Adrenaline's guide rails offer more heel-focused stability.
- 🏃♀️ The GT-2000 is lighter and more versatile, suitable for a variety of paces, while the Adrenaline is a reliable daily trainer with a higher heel drop.
- 💡 The video suggests that having multiple pairs of shoes, like these two, can reduce injury risk by providing different levels of support and cushioning.
Q & A
What is the main purpose of the video?
-The main purpose of the video is to compare and review the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 and the ASICS GT2000 12 to help viewers decide which shoe might be better for their needs, specifically for those looking for a moderate stability running shoe.
How many versions have the Brooks Adrenaline and ASICS GT2000 models been through?
-The Brooks Adrenaline is in its 23rd version, while the ASICS GT2000 is in its 12th version.
What are the heel-to-toe drop measurements for both shoes?
-The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 has a 4mm heel-to-toe drop, with a 24mm heel and 20mm forefoot for men's size 9. The ASICS GT2000 12 has an 8mm heel-to-toe drop, with a 24mm heel and 16mm forefoot for men's size 9.
How do the shoes differ in terms of cushioning materials?
-The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 uses DNA Loft V2 cushioning, which is firmer, while the ASICS GT2000 12 uses FlyteFoam Blast Plus, which is softer and more cushioned.
What is the difference in fit between the two shoes?
-The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 fits slightly shorter with more room throughout the length, while the ASICS GT2000 12 feels more snug. Both shoes fit true to size and have great midfoot holds and stiff heel counters.
Which shoe is considered to have a higher level of heel stability?
-The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 is considered to have a higher level of heel stability due to its stiffer and more rigid heel design.
What is the difference in stability systems between the two shoes?
-The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 uses guide rails for stability, while the ASICS GT2000 12 uses a 3D guidance system with internal geometric parts of the midsole to provide stability.
Which shoe is lighter and why might it be more versatile?
-The ASICS GT2000 12 is lighter and is considered more versatile due to its lighter weight, snappier feel, and bouncier ride.
What is the recommendation for runners who need a higher heel drop and stable heel shoe?
-For runners who need a higher heel drop and stable heel shoe, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 is recommended.
Why might someone consider having both shoes in their rotation?
-Having both shoes in rotation can reduce injury risk by providing different loading on tissues, firmnesses, and stability levels, offering variety in training.
What is the host's personal preference between the two shoes and why?
-The host personally prefers the ASICS GT2000 12 because it is more versatile, lighter, and has a more balanced ride with the newer cushioning materials.
Outlines
Esta sección está disponible solo para usuarios con suscripción. Por favor, mejora tu plan para acceder a esta parte.
Mejorar ahoraMindmap
Esta sección está disponible solo para usuarios con suscripción. Por favor, mejora tu plan para acceder a esta parte.
Mejorar ahoraKeywords
Esta sección está disponible solo para usuarios con suscripción. Por favor, mejora tu plan para acceder a esta parte.
Mejorar ahoraHighlights
Esta sección está disponible solo para usuarios con suscripción. Por favor, mejora tu plan para acceder a esta parte.
Mejorar ahoraTranscripts
Esta sección está disponible solo para usuarios con suscripción. Por favor, mejora tu plan para acceder a esta parte.
Mejorar ahoraVer Más Videos Relacionados
Saucony Endorphin SPEED 4 vs. Adidas Boston 12: Which to Choose?
BATTLE OF THICK BOYS | NEW BALANCE MORE v4 VS HOKA BONDI 8
Asics Kayano 30 vs. Hoka Gaviota 5 | Best Max Cushion Stability Shoes
Asics Novablast 4 vs Asics Gel-Nimbus 26: Which Asics shoe is best for you?
Top 5 BEST Running Shoes in (2024)
Best Asics Shoes For Plantar Fasciitis by a Foot Specialist
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)