[NEKAT] Bahas Kontroversi Panji Gumilang tentang Al-Qur'an | Kajian Ilmu Kalam

Summary

The video discusses a controversial statement by Panji Gumilang, who claimed that the Quran is not the word of God, sparking a sensitive debate. The speaker explains that this topic has been deeply examined in Islamic theology (Ilmu Kalam), which is less popular but significant. The video delves into various theological views on whether the Quran is created or eternal and how it was revealed to Prophet Muhammad. The speaker clarifies these complex concepts without taking sides, aiming to inform viewers about the nuances of this theological discussion.

Takeaways

• 📜 Panji Gumilang's statement that the Quran is not the word of Allah is highly sensitive, despite being a topic deeply explored in Islamic theology.
• 📚 The debate about whether the Quran is created or not has been a long-standing issue in Islamic theology, particularly in the field of Ilmu Kalam.
• 🤔 Two major theological schools exist: the Mu'tazilah, who believe the Quran is created, and Ahlussunnah Wal Jamaah, who believe it is uncreated.
• 📝 The Ahlussunnah Wal Jamaah school divides the concept of 'Kalam Allah' into two types: 'Kalam Nafsi' (God's intrinsic speech) and 'Kalam Lafzi' (verbalized speech).
• 📖 'Kalam Nafsi' is eternal, without beginning, and not composed of letters or sounds, while 'Kalam Lafzi' is created and expressed in the form of the Quran.
• 🗣️ Panji Gumilang's statement about the Quran being the words of Prophet Muhammad aligns with the idea that the Quran is 'Kalam Lafzi'.
• 👂 There are three views on how the Quran was revealed to Prophet Muhammad, with some believing Jibril conveyed both its words and meanings, others that he conveyed only the meanings, and yet another that Jibril articulated it in Arabic.
• 📘 The scholar mentions important Islamic texts, such as 'Al Burhan' by Badruddin and 'Mabahith fi Ulum al-Quran' by Manna'ul Qattan, which discuss these theological debates.
• 🕌 The consensus among the majority of Islamic scholars is that the Quran is the word of Allah, and not the speech of Jibril or Muhammad, despite different interpretations.
• 🤝 The speaker clarifies that his analysis is not an endorsement or opposition to any party but aims to shed light on the complex theological discourse.

Q & A

What controversial statement did Panji Gumilang make about the Quran?

Panji Gumilang stated that the Quran is not the literal word (kalam) of Allah, which sparked controversy as this is a sensitive topic in Islamic theology.

What is the central theme discussed in the video related to Islamic theology?

The central theme discussed is the theological debate on whether the Quran is created (makhluq) or uncreated, a subject extensively debated in the field of 'Ilm al-Kalam (Islamic theology).

What are the two main theological schools of thought regarding the status of the Quran?

The two main theological schools are the Mu'tazilah, who believe the Quran is created and has a beginning, and the Ahlussunnah Wal Jamaah, who argue that the Quran is uncreated and eternal.

What distinction does the Asy'ariyah school make regarding the concept of 'kalam Allah' (speech of God)?

The Asy'ariyah school distinguishes between 'kalam nafsi' (internal speech) which is uncreated and eternal, and 'kalam lafzi' (expressed speech) which is created and temporal, applying the latter to the Quran.

According to the video, how does the Quran being termed 'kalam lafzi' relate to its origin?

The Quran is termed 'kalam lafzi' because it is the expressed speech of God, revealed to Prophet Muhammad through the angel Jibril, in Arabic language, making it created in form but divine in origin.

What are the three opinions mentioned in the video about how the Quran was revealed to Prophet Muhammad?

The three opinions are: 1) The Quran, both its words and meaning, was revealed directly from Allah to Jibril, who then conveyed it to Prophet Muhammad. 2) Only the meanings were revealed to Jibril, who conveyed these meanings to the Prophet in Arabic. 3) The meanings were revealed to Jibril, who then articulated them in Arabic.

Why does the video state that the Quran is referred to as 'kalam lafzi'?

The Quran is referred to as 'kalam lafzi' because it consists of articulated speech—words, sounds, and language—expressed by Prophet Muhammad, as conveyed to him by Jibril.

What is the video’s stance on whether the Quran is the speech of Jibril or Muhammad?

The video clarifies that according to Ahlussunnah Wal Jamaah, the Quran is not the speech of Jibril or Muhammad. It is considered the speech of Allah, revealed in Arabic through Jibril, and articulated by Muhammad.

What is the significance of the 'kalam nafsi' according to Islamic theology as discussed in the video?

In Islamic theology, 'kalam nafsi' refers to the eternal, uncreated speech of Allah that is not composed of letters, sounds, or language, thus transcending human expression and understanding.

What sources does the video suggest for further reading on the theological debates about the Quran?

The video recommends 'Al Burhan' by Badruddin and 'Mabahith Fi Ulum al-Quran' by Manna'ul Qattan as key references for understanding the theological debates and scholarly views on the nature of the Quran.

Outlines

00:00

📜 The Controversial Statement on the Quran

In this paragraph, the speaker addresses the controversial statement made by Panji Gumilang, who claimed that the Quran is not the literal word of God. The speaker acknowledges the sensitivity of this issue, which has been extensively discussed in the field of Islamic theology, known as 'Ilmu Kalam'. The speaker emphasizes the importance of discussing this topic for knowledge's sake, without taking sides, and introduces the video's intent to explore Panji Gumilang's statements in more detail.

05:03

📖 Two Theological Perspectives on the Quran

This paragraph delves into the differing theological views on the nature of the Quran. The speaker explains that there are two main Islamic theological schools of thought: Mu'tazilah, which considers the Quran to be a created entity, and Ahlussunnah Wal Jamaah, which believes the Quran is uncreated and eternal. The Ahlussunnah Wal Jamaah school, particularly the Asy'ariyah, divides the concept of God's speech into two types: 'Kalam Nafsi' (unspoken, eternal speech) and 'Kalam Lafzi' (spoken, created speech). The Quran is categorized under 'Kalam Lafzi', indicating that while its content is divine, its linguistic form is not eternal.

10:08

🧩 Different Interpretations of How the Quran Was Revealed

This paragraph discusses the differing scholarly opinions on how the Quran was revealed to the Prophet Muhammad. The speaker refers to Islamic scholarly texts such as 'Al Burhan' and outlines three main interpretations: (1) Both the words and meaning were directly revealed from God to the Prophet via the angel Jibril; (2) Only the meanings were revealed, and the Prophet articulated them in Arabic; (3) Jibril was given the meanings and then conveyed them in Arabic. These interpretations highlight the complexity and depth of the theological discussions regarding the Quran's revelation process.

🔍 Clarifying the Nature of the Quran's Words

In this concluding paragraph, the speaker emphasizes that according to the Ahlussunnah Wal Jamaah viewpoint, the Quran is the word of God, and its phrasing is not the speech of either Jibril or the Prophet Muhammad. The argument is that if the Quran were merely the words of Jibril or the Prophet, it would not be referred to as 'Kitabullah' (Book of God) but rather as the book of Jibril or Muhammad. The speaker stresses the importance of understanding these theological nuances and clarifies their own stance, distancing themselves from any particular allegiance to Panji Gumilang or his teachings.

Keywords

💡Kalam Allah

Kalam Allah, meaning 'Speech of God,' is a central concept in Islamic theology. It refers to the divine speech or the words of God, which are considered uncreated and eternal by some theological schools. In the video, Panji Gumilang's controversial statement questioning whether the Quran is Kalam Allah sparks a discussion on the nature of divine speech and its interpretation in Islamic thought.

💡Ilmu Kalam

Ilmu Kalam, or 'the science of discourse,' is a branch of Islamic theology that deals with the nature of God, the Quran, and other religious beliefs. The video discusses how Ilmu Kalam has long debated the status of the Quran, highlighting its complexity and sensitivity in the Muslim world. The script refers to how this discipline is less popular than other Islamic sciences like Fiqh due to its challenging and often contentious nature.

💡Mu'tazilah

Mu'tazilah is a school of Islamic theology that emerged in the 8th century, known for its rationalist approach to Islamic doctrine. In the context of the video, the Mu'tazilah's belief that the Quran is a created entity (makhluq) is discussed. This view contrasts with that of the Ahlussunnah Wal Jamaah, who believe the Quran is uncreated. The video explores these theological differences to provide context for the debate on the Quran's status.

💡Ahlussunnah Wal Jamaah

Ahlussunnah Wal Jamaah refers to the mainstream Sunni Muslim community, which adheres to traditional Islamic beliefs and practices. In the video, this group's stance that the Quran is not a created being but an eternal word of God is presented in contrast to the Mu'tazilah view. The video further elaborates on how this theological position impacts the interpretation of the Quran's divine nature.

💡Kalam Nafsi

Kalam Nafsi, or 'internal speech,' refers to the divine word that exists eternally within God and is not composed of sounds or letters. This concept is discussed in the video as part of the theological debate about whether the Quran is a created entity. Kalam Nafsi is contrasted with Kalam Lafzi, showing the nuances in understanding the nature of divine speech within Islamic theology.

💡Kalam Lafzi

Kalam Lafzi, or 'external speech,' is the articulated form of divine speech, such as the Quran, which is expressed in human language. The video contrasts this with Kalam Nafsi to explain the different ways the Quran is understood in Islamic theology. Kalam Lafzi is described as having a beginning and being created, which fuels the debate on whether the Quran is eternal or created.

💡Panji Gumilang

Panji Gumilang is the speaker in the video whose statements on the Quran's status as Kalam Allah have sparked controversy. His assertion that the Quran is not the speech of God but a declaration by Prophet Muhammad based on divine inspiration challenges traditional views and prompts the theological discussion presented in the video. His perspective reflects a broader debate within Islamic thought.

💡Wahyu

Wahyu, or 'revelation,' refers to the divine guidance given to prophets by God. In the video, the process of Wahyu is discussed, particularly how the Quran was revealed to Prophet Muhammad. The video explores different interpretations of whether the Quran is directly God's speech or if it is a revealed message articulated by the Prophet, contributing to the broader discussion of the Quran's nature.

💡Loh Mahfuz

Loh Mahfuz, or 'Preserved Tablet,' is a concept in Islamic theology referring to the divine record where all events and the Quran are inscribed. The video mentions Loh Mahfuz in the context of discussing how the Quran was transmitted to Prophet Muhammad, with different theological schools offering varying interpretations of this process. This concept is central to understanding the belief in the Quran's pre-existence before its revelation.

💡Jibril (Gabriel)

Jibril, or Gabriel, is the archangel in Islam responsible for conveying God's revelations to the prophets, including the Quran to Prophet Muhammad. In the video, Jibril's role in transmitting the Quran is analyzed, with different opinions on whether he delivered the exact words or the meanings that the Prophet then articulated. This discussion is part of the broader theological debate on the nature of the Quran as divine speech.

Highlights

Panji Gumilang stated that the Quran is not the word of Allah, which is a highly sensitive topic.

The discussion about whether the Quran is the word of Allah or not has been extensively covered in 'Ilmu Kalam,' a field of Islamic theology.

Ilmu Kalam is not as popular as 'Ilmu Fiqih,' which is more commonly discussed by scholars and preachers.

There are two main theological views in Islam regarding the Quran: the Mu'tazilah school considers the Quran a creation, while the Ahlussunnah Wal Jamaah view it as not a creation.

The Ahlussunnah Wal Jamaah school further divides the concept of 'kalam Allah' (word of Allah) into 'kalam Nafsi' (internal word) and 'kalam Lafzi' (spoken word).

'Kalam Nafsi' refers to the internal speech of Allah, which is not composed of sounds, letters, or language.

'Kalam Lafzi' refers to the spoken word, which is created and expressed in sounds, letters, and language, such as the Quran.

According to the Ahlussunnah Wal Jamaah, the Quran is considered 'kalam Lafzi,' which means it is a created form of Allah's speech.

Some believe that the Quran, in terms of 'kalam Nafsi,' is uncreated and eternal, unlike 'kalam Lafzi,' which is created.

The idea that the Quran is the word of Prophet Muhammad, articulated based on divine revelation, is a consequence of the discussion on 'kalam Allah.'

There are differing views on how the Quran was revealed to Prophet Muhammad, ranging from the direct transmission of words and meaning to the transmission of meaning only.

Some scholars believe Jibril received the Quran in both its words and meaning directly from the 'Lohmahfuz' (Preserved Tablet) and then transmitted it to Prophet Muhammad.

Other scholars argue that Jibril only transmitted the meaning of the Quran to Prophet Muhammad, who then articulated it in Arabic.

There is also a belief that Jibril was given the meaning and then expressed it in Arabic to Prophet Muhammad.

The transcript emphasizes the importance of understanding different theological views on the nature of the Quran and how these views impact Islamic beliefs.

Transcripts

apa yang disampaikan oleh Panji Gumilang bahwa  Alquran bukan kalam Allah memang hal yang sangat  

sensitif meskipun sebenarnya persoalan ini  sudah panjang lebar dibahas dalam ilmu kalam  

ilmu yang mungkin tidak sepopuler ilmu fiqih  yang banyak dibahas oleh para Ustaz para dai  

di samping karena memang ilmu kalam ini sangat  sulit dipelajari dan juga Memang karena sangat  

sensitif sangat berbahaya tapi atas nama ilmu  pengetahuan ini penting untuk saya sampaikan  

tidak untuk mendukung atau melawan siapa-siapa  suka atau tidak suka tetap harus kita sampaikan

Assalamualaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh Salam  Harmoni sahabat-sahabat harmonis kalian di video  

kali ini kita akan membahas tentang yang lagi  viral statement Panji Gumilang tentang Alquran  

Nah untuk lebih jelasnya kita saksikan  dulu video statement dari Panji Gumilang  

saya sejak tahun awal berdiri  Ma'had ini sudah menganjurkan baca  

baca Mengapa Nabi Muhammad juga sudah  mendeklar dzalikal kitab lah Rohim

itu Nabi Muhammad yang mendeklar itu atas wahyu  ilahi bukan kalam Allah dalam Nabi Muhammad yang  

didapat daripada Wahyu kalau Allah berbahasa  Arab Susah nanti ketemu dengan orang Indramayu

nggak ngerti kalau artinya bacalah semua itu jadi  memang salah satu tema Sentral yang dibahas dalam  

ilmu kalam yang menjadi perdebatan dari dulu  sampai sekarang adalah tentang status Alquran  

Apakah Alquran itu makhluk atau bukan nah  paling tidak ada dua pandangan mazhab teologi  

Islam tentang status Alquran ini nah mazhab yang  pertama namanya mazhab mu'tazilah mu'tazilah ini  

beranggapan bahwa Alquran itu makhluk dia bersifat  baru diciptakan ada awal mulanya kemudian mazhab  

yang kedua mazhab Ahlussunnah Wal Jamaah nah  sebaliknya mengatakan Alquran itu bukan makhluk  

nah kemudian mazhab asy'ariyah Ahlussunnah  Wal Jamaah membagi kalam Allah itu menjadi dua  

jenis ada kalam Nafsi ada kalam lari nah jenis  yang pertama kalau Nafsi Apa itu kalam Nafsi  

itu adalah kalam Allah yang tidak tersusun dari  suara ataupun huruf ataupun bahasa ada di dalam  

zatnya Allah karena dia ada dalam zatnya Allah dan  dzatnya Allah itu qadim maka kalam ini qadim itu  

artinya tanpa awal mula Bukan ciptaan sama seperti  kita kapan bermula sejak dilahirkan kalam nafsu  

ini bukan makhluk tidak ada awal mulanya kemudian  jenis yang kedua menurut mazhab asy'ariyah ada  

namanya kalam lovebi nah kalam lovebi ini tidak  qadim di hadis dia baru dia tercipta dia ada  

awal mulanya Nah di sinilah Alquran Jadi kalau  dikatakan Alquran itu bukan kalam Allah sebenarnya  

kalau kita mau jujur ada benarnya kalau yang  dimaksud kalam Nafsi memang bukan kalam Nafsi  

tapi dalam lovebi Alquran itu bukan kalam jenis  yang pertama kalam Nafsi tapi dari Alquran adalah  

kalam jenis yang kedua yaitu kalam lovebird sampai  di sini bisa dipaham ya Nah kemudian Bagaimana  

dengan statement Alquran adalah perkataannya Nabi  Muhammad shallallahu alaihi wasallam yang dalam  

istilah Panji itu diklairnya Nabi Muhammad  atas wahyu ilahi Nah untuk lebih jelasnya  

kita saksikan lagi statement dari Panji Gemilang  Nabi Muhammad juga sudah mendeklar dzalikal kita

wahyu ilahi bukan karena Allah Nabi Muhammad  atas Wahyu daripada Wah Nah ini juga sebenarnya  

menjadi konsekuensi dari pembahasan kalamallah  yang saya tadi sudah jelaskan kalau kalam nafsu  

itu tidak tersusun dari apa dari suara  dari bahasa atau dari huruf sedangkan  

kalam lovebird itu tersusun dari suara huruf  ataupun bahasa secara logika kita tidak bisa  

mengetahui kalam nafsinya Allah kecuali melalui  perantara lidah Baginda Rasulullah Shallallahu  

Alaihi Wasallam yaitu Alquran karena Alquran  itu diturunkan kepada Nabi Muhammad Shallallahu  

Alaihi Wasallam Nah makanya Alquran dinamakan  kalam Laudi karena dia terlafaur oleh Baginda  

Rasulullah Shallallahu Alaihi Wasallam makanya  para ulama juga berbeda pendapat Bagaimana  

Alquran itu bisa sampai kepada Rasulullah banyak  sebenarnya di bahas dalam kitab-kitab Ulumul Quran  

di sini Saya sudah punya kitabnya kitab yang  wajib dimiliki oleh pegiat ilmu Alquran ini  

Kebetulan saya dosen Ilmu Alquran jadi yang wajib  punya ini nama kitabnya Al Burhan Karya badruddin  

rahimahullah di pembahasan tentang bagaimana  turunnya Alquran beliau menyebutkan warna

qandi bahwa ada tiga pendapat mengenai  bagaimana turunnya Alquran itu apa sih  

yang diturunkan kepada Nabi Muhammad ahaduha yang  pertama annahu allaf Wal makna yang diturunkan  

kepada Nabi Muhammad adalah lafal dan maknanya wa  an-na jibrillah hafidzal Quran minallah hilmaful  

jadi Jibril itu sebagai perantara dia menghafal  Alquran dari lohem Mahfudz lafaz dan maknanya  

nah kemudian disampaikan kepada Baginda  Rasulullah Shallallahu Alaihi Wasallam itu  

sahabat yang pertama kemudian pendapat yang  kedua apa katanya annahu innama Nazala jibriru  

Alan Nabi Shallallahu Alaihi Wasallam Jibril itu  membawa kepada Baginda Nabi itu maknanya secara  

khusus jadi maknanya saja yang Jibril bawa kepada  Baginda Rasulullah Shallallahu Alaihi Wasallam

tahu paham makna-makna tersebut yang dibawa  oleh Jibril itu wa Akbar kemudian Nabilah yang  

mengartikulasikan membahasakan dengan bahasa  Arab bahasa yang dipahami oleh kaumnya wa  

innama tamasaku Bi kholihi ta'ala ini berdasarkan  firman Allah nazalabihiruhul amin ala qolbika nah  

dalam surah asy-syu'ara ayat 193-194 Nah itu  pendapat yang kedua ya Nah kemudian pendapat  

yang ketiga Anna Jibril Alaihi Salam H Jibril  itu diberikan kepadanya makna jadi dari Allah  

diberikan kepada Jibril makna Alquran wa  annahu Akbar biluwatil Arab dari makna itu  

Jibril membahasakan mengartikulasikan dengan  bahasa Arab jadi ada tiga pendapat yang berbeda  

Kalau pendapat yang pertama lafal dan makna itu  diambil dari lahem Mahfud dibawa kepada Baginda  

Rasulullah pendapat kedua Jibril membawa kepada  Nabi Muhammad itu dalam bentuk makna saja nah  

kemudian Nabilah yang membahasakan dengan bahasa  Arab kemudian pendapat yang ketiga Jibril itu  

diberikan makna kemudian dia Bahasakan dengan  bahasanya Jibril yaitu dengan bahasa Arab Nah  

itu tiga pendapat yang berbeda ini disebutkan  dalam kitab Al Burhan Silahkan dicek sendiri  

Juga misalnya kitab mabakhiffi Ulumul Quran  juga ini menjadi referensi utamanya para  

pegiat Ilmu Alquran yang ditulis oleh  manna'ul khotan di halaman 29 Walid  

dzalikatahabal ulama ulama berpendapat  Fika ifiati Wahyu Ila Jibril bil quran

Bagaimana Wahyu dibawa oleh Jibril yaitu Alquran  ada tiga mazhab disini disebutkan mazhab yang  

pertama Anna jibrilah talak kafahusimaan Jibril  menerimanya secara Siman dia dengarkan dari Allah  

subhanahu wa ta'ala dengan lafaz yang khusus  yang tidak diketahui nah kemudian pendapat yang  

kedua Anda jibrilah Jibril menghafalnya dari  Rohim Mahfudz seperti tadi di kitab Al Burhan  

lafal dan makna kemudian pendapat yang ketiga  an Najib Al ma'na Jibril hajibril diberikan  

secara makna sedangkan lafaznya bahasanya itu  dari Jibril Auli muhammaddin atau bahasanya  

dari Muhammad jadi bukan makna dan lafal  tapi maknanya saja diberikan kepada Jibril  

kemudian Jibril lah yang membahasakan  meskipun memang mana Urutkan mengatakan

ini pendapat yang benar adalah pendapat  yang pertama apa itu Jibril mendengarkan  

dari Allah subhanahu wa taala dengan lafaz yang  khususnya Wal Jamaah inilah yang diyakini oleh  

ahlusunah Wal Jamaah hafal Quranul Karim  kalamullah Jibril au Muhammadin al-qur'an  

itu adalah kalamullah dengan lafadznya bukan  perkataannya Jibril bukan lafaznya dari Jibril  

au Muhammad dan bukan juga perkataannya  Nabi Muhammad Wahyu ini untuk menjawab  

anggapan mazhab yang mengatakan Alquran itu  kalamnya Jibril ahaduha annall muslimin ajma'in

semuanya kalau membaca ayat mereka mengatakan  kalau Allahu ta'ala Allah berfirman walau kan haba  

qaul Jibril kalau misalnya ini perkataan Jibril  maka mereka akan mengatakan kalau Jibril Jibril  

berkata kalau itu perkataannya Jibril ah sama  seperti kalau misalnya Alquran itu perkataannya  

Nabi Muhammad kalamnya Muhammad maka bukan kalau  Allahu Taala tapi qola Rasulullah Shallallahu  

Alaihi Wasallam Maha sama seperti yang dia zaitun  itu kalau Rasulullah Shallallahu Alaihi Wasallam  

fil karena dia mengambil mazhab pendapat yang  ketiga kemudian jawaban kedua untuk membantah  

anggapan bahwa Alquran itu perkataannya  Jibril atau perkataannya Nabi Muhammad

antara dua sampul ini mushaf Alquran ini sepakat  umat Islam adalah kitabullah kitabnya Allah waala  

khalifah Kalau misalnya al-qur'an itu kalam Jibril  maka bukan kitabullah tapi kita Bu Jibril ah  

begitu pula kalau misalnya al-qur'an itu kalamnya  Muhammad maka Namanya kitabu Muhammad atau kitab  

Rasulullah bukan kitabullah Nah jadi memang ada  mazhab pendapat yang mengatakan bahwa Alquran  

lafaznya kalamnya dari Muhammad tapi maknanya dari  Allah Jadi kesimpulannya sahabat-sahabat harmonis  

kalian Saya bukan pendukung Panji saya juga  bukan alumni Saya hanya seorang Azhari namanya  

Fuad Fansuri yang punya semangat channel salam  Harmoni demikian Terima kasih semoga bermanfaat  

saya akhiri wallahul adzimi Assalamualaikum  warahmatullahi wabarakatuh Salam Harmoni