Understanding 'Levels of Evidence' - What are Levels of Evidence?
Summary
TLDRThis tutorial outlines the importance of understanding levels of evidence in physiotherapy practice, emphasizing the Pyramid of Evidence for identifying the best research studies. It highlights the hierarchy, starting from lab and animal studies to randomized control trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, and meta-analyses at the top. The video explains how higher levels of evidence, such as RCTs and systematic reviews, contribute to evidence-informed practice, guiding clinical decisions. It also introduces the concept of practice guidelines, which synthesize literature to recommend best practices, sometimes incorporating expert opinions and consensus. The tutorial aims to equip viewers with the skills to navigate the physiotherapy evidence database, PEDro, for effective clinical decision-making.
Takeaways
- 📚 The tutorial focuses on understanding levels of evidence based on research study design for evidence-informed practice in physiotherapy.
- 🔍 Evidence-informed practice combines the best available evidence, clinical expertise, and patient values to guide clinical decision-making.
- 📈 The Pyramid of Evidence illustrates the hierarchy of research study designs, with higher levels indicating more rigorous research and stronger evidence.
- 🧪 At the base of the pyramid are preliminary studies like lab investigations and animal studies, while the top includes more rigorous designs like RCTs and systematic reviews.
- 🧐 The higher the level of evidence, the more confidence one can have in applying the findings to clinical practice.
- 🤔 Not every topic will have the highest level of evidence available, especially for rare conditions or new therapies.
- 🔬 Randomized Control Trials (RCTs) are considered high-level evidence due to the random allocation of similar participants to intervention and control groups.
- 📝 Systematic reviews and meta-analyses save clinicians time by summarizing and combining the results of multiple studies, providing a comprehensive overview.
- 📊 A meta-analysis statistically combines results from studies using the same outcome measures, while a systematic review may include different measures.
- 📋 Practice guidelines are developed to assist in healthcare decisions, summarizing literature to guide best practices, and may include expert opinions and consensus.
- 🔍 The next tutorial will demonstrate how to use the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) to find the highest levels of evidence.
Q & A
What is the main purpose of the tutorial?
-The main purpose of the tutorial is to explain the levels of evidence based on research study design, helping viewers find the best evidence for their practice.
Why is it important to learn about levels of evidence in healthcare practice?
-It is important to learn about levels of evidence because it ties into evidence-informed practice, aiding in the search for information and applying the best available evidence, clinical expertise, and patient values and expectations to clinical decision-making.
What does 'evidence-informed practice' mean in the context of this tutorial?
-Evidence-informed practice refers to the application of the best available evidence, combined with clinical expertise and patient values and expectations, to make clinical decisions.
What does the Pyramid of Evidence represent?
-The Pyramid of Evidence represents different levels of research study designs, with the most rigorous and highest level of evidence at the top and less rigorous designs at the bottom.
What types of studies are considered to be at the bottom of the Pyramid of Evidence?
-At the bottom of the Pyramid of Evidence are lab investigations with test tubes or animal studies, which are considered to have a lower level of evidence.
What is a Randomized Control Trial (RCT) and why is it considered a high level of evidence?
-A Randomized Control Trial (RCT) is a study where participants are randomly allocated to either a group that receives a standardized intervention or a control group that receives usual care or a placebo. It is considered a high level of evidence due to its ability to control for confounding variables and provide strong evidence for cause-and-effect relationships.
What is the difference between a systematic review and a meta-analysis?
-A systematic review methodically searches, assesses, and summarizes studies according to predetermined criteria, often including RCTs. A meta-analysis, on the other hand, statistically combines the results of several studies that address a set of related research hypotheses, using the same outcome measures.
Why are systematic reviews and meta-analyses considered timesavers for clinicians?
-Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are considered timesavers because they combine the results of multiple studies, saving clinicians the effort of reading numerous individual articles to answer a clinical question.
What is a practice guideline and how does it help in evidence-informed practice?
-A practice guideline is a systematically developed statement that helps practitioners and patients make decisions about appropriate healthcare. It summarizes literature to guide best practice and may include opinions and consensus processes, making it a valuable resource for evidence-informed practice.
What is the physiotherapy evidence database mentioned in the tutorial, and what is its purpose?
-The physiotherapy evidence database, also known as PEDro, is a resource developed for members of the physiotherapy associations. Its purpose is to help users find the highest levels of evidence to inform their clinical practice.
How can viewers find more information or tutorials like this one?
-Viewers can find more information and tutorials through the organization's YouTube channel and website, as mentioned at the end of the tutorial.
Outlines
📚 Understanding Evidence-Based Practice
This paragraph introduces the concept of evidence-based practice in physiotherapy, emphasizing the importance of using the best available evidence to inform clinical decisions. It explains the Pyramid of Evidence, which categorizes research study designs by their level of rigor, from lab investigations and animal studies at the bottom to systematic reviews and meta-analyses at the top. The paragraph highlights the significance of distinguishing higher levels of evidence for more reliable clinical guidance and mentions that while the highest level of evidence may not always be available, especially for rare conditions or new therapies, the goal is to find the most rigorous research possible to support healthcare practices.
🔍 Navigating the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro)
The second paragraph serves as a transition, summarizing the importance of understanding levels of evidence for evidence-informed practice. It then teases the next tutorial, which will guide viewers on how to use the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) to find the highest levels of evidence. The paragraph concludes with an invitation for viewers to explore additional tutorials available through the provided YouTube channel and website, encouraging further learning and engagement with the content.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Evidence-based practice
💡Levels of evidence
💡Randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
💡Systematic reviews
💡Meta-analysis
💡Practice guidelines
💡Pyramid of evidence
💡Clinical expertise
💡Patient values and expectations
💡Physiotherapy
💡Pedro
Highlights
The tutorial explains levels of evidence based on research study design to find the best evidence for physiotherapy practice.
Evidence-informed practice combines the best available evidence, clinical expertise, and patient values for clinical decision making.
Higher levels of evidence provide more confidence in using literature to guide clinical decisions.
The Pyramid of Evidence illustrates different levels of evidence based on research study design, from lab investigations to systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Higher levels of research evidence are generally more rigorous and provide greater confidence for clinical practice.
Not all topics may have the highest level of evidence available, especially for rare conditions or new therapies.
Randomized control trials (RCTs) are considered a high level of evidence, with participants randomly allocated to intervention or control groups.
The quality of an RCT can be assessed using various appraisal tools to determine its validity.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses save clinicians time by combining results from multiple studies to answer clinical questions.
A systematic review methodically searches, assesses, and summarizes studies according to predetermined criteria, often focusing on RCTs.
A meta-analysis statistically combines results from multiple studies that use the same outcome measures.
Practice guidelines are systematically developed statements that help practitioners and patients make informed healthcare decisions.
Practice guidelines may summarize literature to guide best practice, but the methodology used can vary.
The tutorial will demonstrate how to use the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) to find the highest levels of evidence.
The next tutorial will provide practical steps for using PEDro to enhance evidence-informed physiotherapy practice.
The tutorial emphasizes the importance of understanding levels of evidence to improve clinical decision making in physiotherapy.
Transcripts
this tutorial will explain levels of
evidence based on research study design
so that you can find the best evidence
for your practice using a database it
was developed by the physiotherapy
Association of British Columbia for pabc
members and for members of the Ontario
physiotherapy
Association you may be wondering why it
is important to learn about levels of
evidence it is important because of how
it ties into evidence in form practice
and how it can Aid in your search for
information evidence informed practice
aims to apply the combination of one the
best available evidence two your
clinical expertise and three the patient
values and expectations to clinical
decision making generally the higher the
level of evidence the more comfortable
you will be in using the evidence in the
literature to guide your clinical
decision- making so distinguishing
higher levels of evidence from lower
levels is an important skill in
providing evidence in formed
practice this image shows the Pyramid of
evidence based on the research study
design when we are looking for the best
evidence available we can consider what
types of studies have been
published at the bottom of the pyramid
research may involve investigations in
the lab with test tube or animal studies
based on the amount of research that
already exists and the specific
questions that researchers are trying to
answer there are other types of study
designs these may include ideas and
opinions randomized control trials
systematic reviews and meta analyses at
the top of the pyramid generally the
higher up on the pyramid the more rigor
there is involved in the research and
thus the greater the level of
evidence however the highest level of
evidence will not be available for every
topic you're searching typically for a
rare condition a very new therapy or a
type of treatment which ethically can't
be randomized a case study found Midway
up the pyramid may be the highest level
of evidence available to you for many
diseases conditions and Therapies in
healthcare higher levels of research
evidence are available this may include
rcts systematic reviews metaanalyses and
practice guidelines when this research
has been published you can start your
research by looking at the top of the
pyramid
first let's review the different types
of research studies the randomized
control trial or RCT is a very high
level of evidence it is distinguished
from other types of studies because
participants who are very similar at
Baseline are allocated randomly to one
of two groups while one group receives
the standardized intervention the other
group the control group doesn't receive
the standardized intervention instead
they receive usual care or a placebo
intervention
instead
as we will see in part two of this
tutorial the quality of an RCT may be
determined by one of many different
appraisal tools a wonderful timesaver
for clinicians is to try and find a
systematic review or a metaanalyses
first as we will see these studies save
you from Reading 20 different rcts to
answer your clinical question because
they systematically and rigorously
combine the results of a collection of
previous articles published on the
topic another research study with a high
level of evidence is a systematic review
a systematic review methodically
searches for assesses and summarizes
studies according to predetermined
criteria most often these studies are
rcts however systematic reviews can also
include a metaanalysis a metaanalysis
combines the results of several studies
that address a set of related research
hypotheses the difference between a
systematic review and a meta analysis is
that a systematic review combines the
results of a group of previously
published articles that use different
outcome measures while a metaanalysis
combines statistically the results of a
group of previously published articles
that use the same outcome
measures a practice guideline is a
systematically developed statement that
helps practitioners and patients with
decisions about appropriate Healthcare
such as how to treat fibromyalgia it may
be multidisiplinary in nature such as
osteoporosis guidelines for MDS which
might include exercise guidelines
relevant to
physiotherapists most importantly a
practice guideline summarizes literature
in order to guide best practice it may
or may not have used a rigorous
methodology such as a systematic review
to determine the
recommendations in addition it includes
opinions and usually consensus
process in this tutorial we have
reviewed levels of evidence and how this
can help your evidence inform form
practice the next tutorial will
demonstrate how to use the physiotherapy
evidence database otherwise known as
Pedro to find the highest levels of
evidence thanks for watching please
check our other tutorials available
through our YouTube channel and website
Weitere ähnliche Videos ansehen
EVIDENCE BASE MEDICINE( EBM)
How Meta-Analysis Works | NEJM Evidence
Critical evaluation of scientific articles
What is Evidence-Based Practice?
New Study finds common Sugar Alcohols (Xylitol) linked to Heart Disease - is it true?
Judge the Validity of Evidence Listened to|| GRADE 9|| MELC-based VIDEO LESSON | QUARTER 3| MODULE 3
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)