Every Logical Fallacy Explained in 11 Minutes

Summary

The video script provides an extensive overview of various logical fallacies, explaining how they are used to undermine arguments. Examples include ad hominem attacks, hasty generalizations, red herrings, slippery slopes, and circular reasoning, among others. Each fallacy is defined and illustrated with a brief explanation, helping viewers understand how these flawed arguments can distort truth and logic in debates. The script serves as a guide to recognizing and avoiding these common logical errors.

Takeaways

• 👤 The ad hominem fallacy occurs when someone attacks a person rather than addressing the substance of their argument.
• 📊 Hasty generalization involves making a claim based on insufficient evidence.
• 🎯 A red herring fallacy distracts from the relevant issue by changing the subject.
• 😠 Tu quoque discredits an argument by attacking the opponent's behavior, accusing them of hypocrisy.
• ⛷️ The slippery slope fallacy suggests that one action will lead to a series of negative events without sufficient evidence.
• 🔍 Special pleading applies different standards without justification, exempting oneself from criticism.
• ❓ A loaded question contains an assumption that cannot be easily answered without appearing guilty.
• ⚖️ The false dilemma fallacy misrepresents an issue by offering only two choices when more options exist.
• 🏗️ A strawman fallacy occurs when an argument is misrepresented to make it easier to attack.
• 🔄 Circular reasoning assumes the conclusion in the premise, making the argument logically incoherent.

Q & A

What is an ad hominem fallacy?

An ad hominem fallacy occurs when someone attempts to discredit an argument by attacking the person making the argument rather than addressing the substance of the argument itself.

What is a hasty generalization, and why is it problematic?

A hasty generalization, also known as the overgeneralization fallacy, happens when a claim is made based on evidence that is too small. It's problematic because it leads to conclusions that are not supported by sufficient evidence.

Can you explain the red herring fallacy?

A red herring fallacy involves introducing something irrelevant or distracting to divert attention from the original issue, thereby misleading or distracting from the relevant question.

What is the tu quoque fallacy?

The tu quoque fallacy discredits an opponent's argument by attacking their personal behavior or actions as inconsistent with their argument, rather than addressing the argument itself. It essentially accuses the opponent of hypocrisy.

What is a slippery slope fallacy?

In a slippery slope fallacy, a course of action is rejected because it is believed, often without sufficient evidence, that it will lead to a chain reaction resulting in undesirable outcomes.

How does the false dilemma fallacy misrepresent an issue?

The false dilemma fallacy misrepresents an issue by offering only two options when more exist or by presenting the options as mutually exclusive when they are not. This oversimplifies the situation.

What is the special pleading fallacy?

The special pleading fallacy occurs when someone applies standards, principles, or rules to others while making themselves or certain circumstances exempt from those same standards without providing adequate justification.

Can you describe what a loaded question is?

A loaded question is a question that contains an assumption within it, making it difficult to answer without accepting the assumption as true.

What is circular reasoning, and why is it considered a fallacy?

Circular reasoning is a fallacy where the argument assumes the very thing it is trying to prove as true. Instead of offering evidence, the argument simply repeats the conclusion, making it logically incoherent.

How does the appeal to authority fallacy work?

The appeal to authority fallacy occurs when an argument is deemed true simply because an influential or authoritative figure holds that position, rather than because of evidence or sound reasoning supporting the position.

Outlines

00:00

🗣️ Common Logical Fallacies: An Overview

This paragraph provides a comprehensive overview of various logical fallacies, including ad hominem, hasty generalization, red herring, tu quoque, slippery slope, special pleading, loaded question, false dilemma, strawman, circular reasoning, appeal to authority, appeal to nature, composition, division, affirming the consequent, anecdotal, appeal to emotion, burden of proof, no true Scotsman, Texas sharpshooter, suppressed correlative, personal incredulity, ambiguity, genetic, middle ground, affirming a disjunct, appeal to tradition, sunk cost, appeal to ignorance, continuum, equivocation, faulty analogy, denying the antecedent, false cause, definist, ecological, etymological, quoting out of context, false equivalence, historian's, inflation of conflict, incomplete comparison, ludic, moralistic, Nirvana, proof by assertion, cherry-picking, psychologist's, reification, retrospective determinism, thought-terminating cliché, single cause, appeal to the stone, ignoratio elenchi, circumstantial ad hominem, tone policing, association, appeal to accomplishment, courtier's reply, appeal to consequences, appeal to novelty, and bolism. Each fallacy is briefly explained, highlighting how they mislead or distort arguments.

05:01

📚 More Logical Fallacies: Detailed Explanations

This paragraph continues the discussion on logical fallacies, covering chronological snobbery, 'I'm entitled to my opinion,' two wrongs make a right, vacuous truth, and the fallacy fallacy. It explains how these fallacies work and why they are problematic in logical reasoning. The paragraph ends with a prompt to check out a recommended video on YouTube for further learning.

Keywords

💡Ad Hominem Fallacy

The ad hominem fallacy occurs when someone attacks their opponent's character or personal traits instead of engaging with their argument. In the video, it is highlighted as a common tactic used to discredit someone's argument without addressing the substance. For example, dismissing someone's stance on environmental policy by calling them uneducated rather than discussing the policy itself.

💡Hasty Generalization

A hasty generalization is made when a conclusion is drawn from insufficient evidence. The video explains it as making a broad claim based on a small or unrepresentative sample. For instance, concluding that all politicians are corrupt after encountering a few corrupt politicians.

💡Red Herring Fallacy

The red herring fallacy involves introducing irrelevant material to the argument to distract and lead away from the point being made. In the video, it's used to illustrate how changing the subject can mislead the audience, such as diverting a discussion about healthcare costs by suddenly bringing up tax policies.

💡Slippery Slope Fallacy

A slippery slope fallacy asserts that a relatively small first step will inevitably lead to a chain of related events culminating in a significant (usually negative) effect. The video mentions it to show how this reasoning lacks evidence for the chain reaction, like arguing that legalizing a minor drug will lead to widespread drug addiction.

💡Loaded Question

A loaded question contains an assumption that traps the respondent regardless of their answer. In the video, it’s described as a way to unfairly discredit the respondent, such as asking 'When did you stop cheating on exams?' which presumes the person has cheated.

💡False Dilemma Fallacy

The false dilemma fallacy presents a situation as having only two options when more options are available. The video uses it to show how complex issues are oversimplified, like saying 'You’re either with us or against us' in a political debate.

💡Circular Reasoning

Circular reasoning is when the conclusion of an argument is assumed in the premises. The video points out its logical incoherence, as it merely restates the conclusion without offering evidence, for example, 'We must obey the law because it’s illegal to break it.'

💡Appeal to Authority Fallacy

An appeal to authority fallacy asserts that a claim is true simply because an expert or authority figure believes it. The video illustrates this by showing how arguments are often supported without actual evidence, like citing a famous scientist’s belief without explaining the underlying research.

💡Anecdotal Fallacy

The anecdotal fallacy occurs when personal experience or an isolated example is used instead of a sound argument. In the video, this is shown as drawing sweeping conclusions from limited cases, such as claiming a medical treatment is effective based on a single patient’s experience.

💡Cherry-Picking

Cherry-picking involves selecting data that supports a position while ignoring data that contradicts it. The video uses this to highlight how selective use of information can mislead, such as presenting only positive reviews of a product while ignoring negative feedback.

Highlights

Ad hominem fallacy occurs when someone attacks the person instead of the argument.

Hasty generalization happens when a conclusion is drawn from insufficient evidence.

Red herring fallacy is used to distract from the main issue.

Tu quoque fallacy discredits an argument by accusing hypocrisy.

Slippery slope fallacy argues that a small step will lead to a chain of related events.

Special pleading applies standards to others while exempting oneself without justification.

Loaded question contains an assumption that biases the response.

False dilemma fallacy presents only two options when more exist.

Strawman fallacy involves misrepresenting an argument to easily refute it.

Circular reasoning assumes the conclusion in the premise without evidence.

Appeal to authority fallacy uses an influential figure's opinion as evidence.

Appeal to nature fallacy argues something is good because it is natural.

Composition fallacy infers that what is true for a part is true for the whole.

Division fallacy assumes what is true for the whole is true for its parts.

Affirming the consequent incorrectly infers a cause from an effect.

Anecdotal fallacy uses personal experience instead of sound evidence.

Appeal to emotion manipulates feelings to win an argument.

Burden of proof fallacy shifts the obligation to disprove a claim onto others.

No true Scotsman fallacy excludes counterexamples by redefining criteria.

Texas sharpshooter fallacy cherry-picks data to fit a conclusion.

Suppressed correlative redefines terms to make one option impossible.

Personal incredulity fallacy dismisses something as untrue because it's hard to understand.

Ambiguity fallacy uses unclear phrases with multiple meanings.

Genetic fallacy judges an argument based on its origin rather than its content.

Middle ground fallacy assumes the truth is always a compromise between two extremes.

Affirming a disjunct incorrectly assumes only one of two possibilities can be true.

Appeal to tradition fallacy argues something is better because it is traditional.

Sunk cost fallacy continues an endeavor based on past investments.

Appeal to ignorance asserts a claim is true because it has not been proven false.

Continuum fallacy argues no distinct states exist because of gradual differences.

Equivocation fallacy uses an ambiguous term in different senses within an argument.

Faulty analogy assumes similarity in one aspect implies similarity in others.

Denying the antecedent incorrectly infers the inverse from an original statement.

False cause fallacy assumes a causal relationship based on correlation alone.

Definist fallacy defines terms to make one's position easier to defend.

Ecological fallacy assumes what is true for a group is true for individuals.

Etymological fallacy assumes the original meaning of a word is its true meaning.

Quoting out of context distorts intended meaning by removing surrounding material.

False equivalence draws a flawed comparison between two subjects.

Historian's fallacy judges past decisions by present knowledge and standards.

Inflation of conflict exaggerates disagreement to invalidate claims.

Incomplete comparison presents an assertion without sufficient basis for refutation.

Ludic fallacy mistakes uncertainty in real life for the uncertainty in games.

Moralistic fallacy makes statements about reality based on how things should be.

Nirvana fallacy dismisses realistic solutions by comparing them to perfect ones.

Proof by assertion repeats a proposition until opposition ceases.

Cherry-picking selects data that supports a position while ignoring contradictory evidence.

Psychologist's fallacy assumes subjective experience reflects true nature of an event.

Reification fallacy treats abstract concepts as concrete events.

Retrospective determinism assumes an event was bound to happen due to circumstances.

Thought-terminating cliché stops an argument with a cliché instead of a point.

Fallacy of the single cause assumes a single cause for an outcome that may have multiple causes.

Appeal to the stone dismisses an argument as absurd without further justification.

Ignoratio elenchi presents a conclusion that fails to address the issue in question.

Circumstantial ad hominem discredits an argument by citing the arguer's personal interest.

Tone policing focuses on the emotion behind a message to discredit it.

Association fallacy asserts properties of one thing apply to another due to group association.

Appeal to accomplishment uses someone's achievements to validate their argument.

Courtier's reply dismisses criticism by claiming the critic lacks knowledge or credentials.

Appeal to consequences concludes a hypothesis is true or false based on its desirable or undesirable outcomes.

Appeal to novelty claims something is better solely because it is new.

Bulverism asserts an argument is flawed due to the arguer's identity.

Chronological snobbery considers modern ideas superior just because they are modern.

I'm entitled to my opinion fallacy discredits opposition by claiming a right to an opinion.

Two wrongs make a right counters an allegation with a similar allegation.

Vacuous truth asserts a claim that is technically true but meaningless.

Fallacy fallacy concludes an argument's conclusion is false because it contains a fallacy.

Transcripts

ad homonym fallacy the ad homonym

fallacy happens when someone attempts to

discredit someone's argument with

personal attacks rather than the

substance of the argument itself Hasty

generalization Hasty generalization also

known as the overgeneralization fallacy

happens when making a claim based on

evidence that is just too small red

herring fallacy a red herring is

something that misleads or distracts

from a relevant or important question it

might be used to change the subject to

quo fallacy to quo is a technique that

tends to discredit the opponent's

argument by attacking the opponent's own

personal behavior and actions as being

inconsistent with their argument

therefore accusing hypocrisy instead of

countering the actual argument slippery

slope fallacy in a slippery slope

argument a course of action is rejected

because with little or no evidence one

insists that it will lead to a chain

reaction resulting in an undesirable end

or ends special pleading fallacy special

pleading happens when applying standards

principles or rules to other people or

circumstances es while making oneself or

certain circumstances exempt from the

same critical criteria without providing

adequate justification loaded question a

loaded question is a question that

already contains an assumption false

dilemma fallacy the false dilemma

fallacy also called the black and white

fallacy occurs when someone

misrepresents an issue by offering only

two options when more exist or by

presenting the options as mutually

exclusive when they are not stamman

fallacy a stamman fallacy happens when

one rebuts an argument by misconstruing

it circular reasoning the circular

reasoning fallacy is an argument that

assumes the very thing it is trying to

prove is true instead of offering

evidence it simply repeats the

conclusion rendering the argument

logically incoherent appeal to Authority

fallacy it is a form of argument in

which the mere fact that an influential

figure holds a certain position is used

as evidence that the position itself is

correct appeal to Nature fallacy it's an

argument in which it is proposed that a

thing is good because it is natural or

bad because it is unnatural natural it's

a fallacy because the unstated primary

premise what is natural is good is

typically irrelevant and an opinion

instead of a fact composition fallacy it

arises when one infers that something is

true of the whole from the fact that it

is true of some part of the whole

division fallacy the division fallacy

occurs when one reasons that something

that is true for a whole must also be

true for all or some of its parts

affirming the consequent affirming the

consequent is the fallacy of taking a

true conditional statement such as if

the lamp were broken then the room would

be dark under certain assumptions like

it is nighttime and the windows are

closed and invalidly inferring its

Converse the room is dark so the lamp

must be broken anecdotal fallacy the

anecdotal fallacy occurs when people use

their limited personal experience to

draw sweeping conclusions about a given

topic appeal to emotion fallacy it's a

technique characterized by the

manipulation of the other person's

emotions in order to win an argument

especially in the absence of factual

evidence burden of proof fallacy the

burden of proof Li lies with the one who

makes a claim not the one who denies it

the burden of proof fallacy happens when

a person tries to remove their need to

provide proof for many reasons no true

Scotsman fallacy it's an attempt to

defend a generalization of a certain

group by excluding any counter examples

for not being pure enough Texas

Sharpshooter fallacy the Texas

Sharpshooter fallacy takes its name from

the metaphor of a gunman shooting and

then drawing targets Around The Bullet

Hole clusters to make it look like he

hit the target it illustrates how people

first figure out what their conclusion

is and then go looking for data that

supports it ignoring differences and

Randomness suppressed correlative the

attempt to redefine one of two mutually

exclusive options so that one

alternative encompasses the other thus

making one alternative impossible

something like I need to know if we

should stop for lunch or not you are

either hungry or not hungry which is it

if being hungry means being able to eat

I am always hungry personal incredulity

fallacy it's committed when the arguer

presumes that whatever is true must be

easy to understand or to imagine

ambiguity fallacy it happens when an

unclear phrase with multiple definitions

is used within the argument therefore it

does not support the conclusion genetic

fallacy the genetic fallacy is the act

of rejecting or accepting an argument

solely on the basis of its origin rather

than its content Middle Ground fallacy

it's the fallacy that the truth is

always in the middle of two opposites

affirming a disjunct the affirming a

disjunct fallacy occurs when given an

either or scenario you wrongly assume

that if one statement or outcome is true

the other one cannot be true

appeal to tradition it happens when we

ignore the evidence that we should

change because we have been doing

something for a long time sunk cost

fallacy the sunk cost fallacy is our

tendency to continue with something

we've invested money effort or time into

even if the current costs outweigh the

benefits appeal to ignorance it happens

when someone asserts that a proposition

is true because it has not yet been

proven false or that a proposition is

false because it has not yet been proven

true Continuum fallacy it's the argument

that two states are conditions cannot be

considered distinct or do not exist at

all because between them there exists a

Continuum of States equivocation the

equivocation fallacy refers to the use

of an ambiguous word or phrase in more

than one sense within the same argument

faulty analogy a faulty analogy is

saying that two things are alike in

other ways just because they are alike

in one way denying the antecedent

denying the anteed infers the inverse

from an original statement it's

something like if you are a ski

instructor then you have a job you are

not a ski instructor therefore you have

no job false cause a false cause fallacy

occurs when someone incorrectly assumes

that something causes something else

without enough proof usually using just

a correlation as proof definest fallacy

it happens when one defines a term in

such a way that makes one's position

much easier to defend ecological fallacy

ecological fallacies assume what is true

for a population is true for the

individual members of that population

eological fallacy eological fallacy is

the faulty argument that the true

meaning of a word is its oldest or

original meaning quoting out of context

it's a fallacy in which a passage from a

quote is removed from its surrounding

matter in such a way as to distort its

intended meaning context may be omitted

intentionally or accidentally false

equivalence it's a fallacy in which an

equivalence is drawn between two

subjects based on flawed or false

reasoning historians fallacy the

historian's fallacy occurs when one

assumes that decision makers in the past

viewed events from the same perspective

and had the same information as those

subsequently analyzing the decision

inflation of conflict it's the error of

exaggerating the amount of disagreement

in a field in order to invalidate claims

in that field incomplete comparison it's

a misleading argument popular in

advertising since the assertion is

incomplete it cannot be refuted ludic

fallacy it's a term used to describe how

people mistake the kind of uncertainty

found in games for the kind of

uncertainty found in real life for

example organized competitive fighting

trains the athlete to focus on the game

and in order not to dissipate his

concentration to ignore the possibility

of what is not specifically Allowed by

the rules moralistic fallacy making

statements about what is on the basis of

claims about what ought to be in

violation of fact value distinction

Nirvana fallacy comparing a realistic

solution with an idealized one and

discounting or even dismissing the

realistic solution as a result of

comparing it to a perfect world or

impossible standard proof by assertion

it's a fallacy in which a proposition is

repeatedly restated regardless of

contradiction and reputation the

proposition can sometimes be repeated

until any challenges or opposition cease

letting the proponent assert it as fact

solely due to a lack of Challengers

cherry-picking it's the act of pointing

to individual cases or data that seem to

confirm a particular position while

ignoring a significant portion of

related and similar cases or data that

may contradict that position

psychologists fallacy it's a fallacy

that occurs when an observer assumes

that his or her subjective experience

reflects the true nature of an event

reification fallacy it happens when an

abstract concept is treated as if it

were a concrete real event something

like saying that Evolution selects which

traits are passed on to Future

Generations while evolution is not a

conscious entity with Will retrospective

determinism it's the thought that

because something happened under some

circumstances it was therefore bound to

happen due to those circumstances

thought terminating cliche it's a form

of loaded language often passing as Folk

wisdom with the function of stopping an

argument from proceeding further ending

the debate with a cliche rather than a

point fallacy of the single cause it

occurs when it is assumed that there is

a single simple cause of an outcome when

in reality it may have been caused by a

number of small causes appeal to the

stone it happens when a dismissal is

made by stating or reiterating that the

argument is absurd without providing

further argumentation ignoro Eleni

ignoro Eleni also called missing the

point is the fallacy of presenting an

argument that may or may not be

logically valid and sound but whose

conclusion fails to address the issue in

question circumstantial ad homonym

stating that the arguer personal

interest in advancing a conclusion means

that their conclusion is wrong tone

policing an ad homonym fallacy that

focuses on the emotion behind a message

rather than the message itself as a

discrediting tactic Association fallacy

it's the fallacy that asserts that

properties of one thing must also be

properties of another thing if both

things belong to the same group appeal

to accomplishment it's kind of an appeal

to Authority fallacy it happens when an

assert is deemed true or false based on

the accomplishments of the proposer

corders reply when a criticism is

dismissed by claiming that the critic

lacks sufficient knowledge credentials

or training to credibly comment on the

subject matter appeal to consequences

it's an argument that concludes a

hypothesis to be either true or false

based on whether the premise leads to

desirable or undesirable consequences

appeal to novelty it happens when a

proposal is claimed to be Superior or

better solely because it is new or

modern bolism it is the assump

assumption and assertion that an

argument is flawed or false because of

the arguer identity chronological

snobbery chronological snobbery

considers modern ideas Superior to those

from earlier ages just because they are

modern it's a form of appeal to novelty

I'm entitled to my opinion fallacy when

a person discredits any opposition by

claiming that they are entitled to their

opinion instead of logically analyzing

said opposition two wrongs make a right

it's an argument in which an allegation

of wrongdoing is countered with a

similar allegation vacuous truth a claim

that is technically true but meaningless

such as claiming that no mobile phones

in the room are on when there are no

mobile phones in the room fallacy

fallacy it's saying that when an

argument contains a fallacy its

conclusion must be false if you like

this format check out this video YouTube

thinks that you'll like

it