Ranking Linux Distributions for 2024: a tier list for my use case !

Summary

In this video, the host presents their annual Linux distribution tier list for 2024, ranking various distros based on their suitability for content production and business use. They discuss the evolution of distros, personal preferences, and sponsor Square X, a privacy-focused web browsing tool.

Takeaways

• 📅 The video is a 2024 Linux distribution tier list update, reflecting the presenter's personal rankings based on their usage for content production and business.
• 🔒 The video is sponsored by Square X, a browser extension and web app that offers private and secure browsing with features like a burner browser, disposable file viewer, and email address.
• 💻 The presenter discusses the evolution of Linux distributions, noting improvements and changes since their last tier list, and shares personal preferences for different distributions.
• 🚀 Ubuntu is placed in the 'average' category due to its renewed focus on GNOME and performance patches, but the presenter dislikes its push for snap packages over flatpak.
• 🌟 Linux Mint retains its 'great' ranking for offering a complete out-of-the-box experience, with improvements like Wayland support and an edge ISO for newer hardware.
• 📉 Zorinos moves to 'average' due to its slow release cycle, with the presenter noting that it will be outdated by the time the next LTS is released.
• 🚫 Elementary OS remains in the 'no thanks' category due to its slow updates and lack of compelling features in the current version.
• 🌱 Fedora's Workstation is in the 'great' category for its stability, frequent updates, and innovation, despite being based on Red Hat.
• 📊 Debian is in the 'average' category, with the presenter preferring more up-to-date desktop environments and apps.
• 🎮 Tuxedo OS is the presenter's current choice, placed in the 'good' category for its semi-rolling release model, stability, and updates to critical components.
• 🔄 Pop!_OS is in the 'no thanks' category for the presenter due to its outdated GNOME version and lack of significant updates in the past two years.

Q & A

What is the main topic of the video?

The main topic of the video is a tier list ranking of various Linux distributions at the beginning of 2024, focusing on their suitability for content production and running a business.

What is the purpose of the tier list?

The purpose of the tier list is to rank Linux distributions based on their performance, updates, and overall suitability for the creator's personal use case.

What is the sponsor of the video and what do they offer?

The sponsor of the video is Square X, which offers a browser extension and web app that provides a suite of disposable tools for private and secure web browsing.

What are the categories used in the tier list?

The categories used in the tier list are 'Great', 'Good', 'Average', 'No Thanks', and 'Hell No', indicating the creator's likelihood of using each distribution.

What is the creator's current stance on Ubuntu?

The creator ranks Ubuntu in the 'Average' category, acknowledging its progress but criticizing its reliance on snap packages and Canonical's treatment of open-source projects.

Why does the creator place Linux Mint in the 'Great' category?

Linux Mint is placed in the 'Great' category because it provides a complete graphical experience out of the box, has fixed most annoyances, and is beginner and advanced user-friendly.

What is the creator's opinion on Zorin OS?

The creator moves Zorin OS to the 'Average' category, noting that while it has improvements, its release schedule makes it outdated by the time a new LTS is released.

Why does the creator rank Elementary OS in the 'No Thanks' category?

Elementary OS is ranked in the 'No Thanks' category due to its slow updates and lack of compelling features in its current version, despite the upcoming version having some improvements.

What is the creator's view on Fedora and why is it ranked in the 'Good' category?

Fedora is ranked in the 'Good' category because it is a solid improvement over previous versions, delivering better performance and a suite of useful pre-installed tools.

What are the creator's thoughts on Tuxedo OS and why is it in the 'Good' category?

Tuxedo OS is in the 'Good' category because it is a semi-rolling release that provides regular updates and has been very stable for the creator, making it the best KDE distribution they have used.

Why does the creator rank Pop!_OS in the 'No Thanks' category?

Pop!_OS is ranked in the 'No Thanks' category because its desktop is outdated, and the experience has not changed in two years, which is not acceptable for the creator.

What is the creator's final verdict on Chrome OS Flex?

The creator ranks Chrome OS Flex in the 'Hell No' category due to its poor performance, basic features, and privacy invasive nature.

What is the recommendation for those looking for a Linux-compatible device?

The creator recommends Tuxedo Computers for those looking for a Linux-compatible device, as they offer a range of customizable hardware that is tested and supported for Linux.

Outlines

00:00

📅 New Year Linux Distribution Tier List

The script introduces a new Linux distribution tier list for 2024, reflecting changes in the Linux ecosystem and the author's personal experiences. The author mentions a previous list and acknowledges the evolution of distributions since then. The video is sponsored by Square X, a privacy-focused browser extension and web app, which offers a suite of disposable tools for secure browsing, file viewing, and email without risking user data or system security.

05:01

🔧 Ranking Criteria and Distributions Overview

The author outlines the criteria for ranking Linux distributions based on their suitability for content production and business use. The rankings range from 'great' to 'hell no'. The author reviews several distributions, including Ubuntu, Zorin OS, and Elementary OS, discussing their updates, performance, and community support. Ubuntu is placed in the 'average' category due to its reliance on snap packages and Canonical's treatment of open-source projects, while Zorin OS is criticized for its slow updates, and Elementary OS remains in the 'no thanks' category due to its slow development pace.

10:03

💻 Personal Experiences with Linux Distributions

The script continues with the author's personal experiences and opinions on various Linux distributions. Fedora, Debian, and openSUSE Tumbleweed are discussed, with Fedora being praised for its stability and innovation, Debian being considered outdated despite its stable release, and openSUSE Tumbleweed being appreciated for its admin tools and stability. The author also mentions Arch Linux and its derivatives, expressing concerns about the stability and suitability of Arch-based distributions for daily use.

15:04

🖥️ Desktop-Specific Rankings and Sponsor Mention

The author provides a detailed analysis of desktop-specific Linux distributions, such as Pop!_OS, Solus, and KDE Neon, discussing their features, stability, and suitability for different use cases. Pop!_OS is placed in the 'no thanks' category due to its outdated desktop environment, while Solus is considered unreliable due to its uncertain future and development direction. The author also discusses the sponsor, Tuxedo Computers, which offers Linux-compatible devices and contributes to the Linux community by submitting patches for hardware support.

20:05

🎮 Gaming and Specialized Linux Distributions

The script concludes with the author's thoughts on gaming and specialized Linux distributions, such as SteamOS, Nobara, and Vanilla OS. SteamOS is praised for its seamless gaming experience on a PC console, while Nobara is recognized for its performance and toolset. The author expresses disinterest in Vanilla OS for its container-based approach and Chrome OS Flex for its performance and privacy issues. The author also reiterates the recommendation of Tuxedo Computers for Linux-native hardware and encourages viewers to support the channel.

🎉 Closing Remarks and Call to Action

In the final paragraph, the author wraps up the video with a summary of the Linux distributions discussed and invites viewers to share their own rankings and opinions in the comments. The author also promotes the sponsor links and encourages viewer engagement through likes, subscriptions, and comments, while playfully acknowledging potential dislikes due to personal ranking preferences.

Keywords

💡Linux Distribution

A Linux distribution, or 'distro', is a version of the Linux operating system that includes a specific set of software applications, configurations, and documentation. In the video, the host discusses various Linux distributions and ranks them based on their suitability for content production and business use. The term is central to the video's theme as it is the main subject being evaluated.

💡Dro Tier List

A 'Dro Tier List' refers to a ranking system used by the host to categorize and prioritize Linux distributions. The term is a play on the word 'distro', short for distribution, and is used to organize the distributions into categories such as 'great', 'good', 'average', 'no thanks', and 'hell no'. This concept is central to the video as it frames the discussion around the host's personal preferences and experiences with each distribution.

💡Content Production

Content production refers to the creation and management of various forms of media, such as videos, articles, or podcasts. In the script, the host mentions that their personal use case for ranking the Linux distributions is content production, indicating that they are evaluating these systems based on their ability to support media creation and management tasks.

💡Snap Packages

Snap packages are a type of software packaging system used in some Linux distributions, which allows for easy installation and updates of applications. The host expresses irritation with distributions that push for snap packages, preferring flatpak as a solution. This term is relevant as it highlights a specific preference and potential drawback in the host's evaluation of Linux distributions.

💡Linux Mint

Linux Mint is a popular Linux distribution known for its user-friendly interface and out-of-the-box functionality. The host places Linux Mint in the 'great' category, praising its complete graphical experience and recent improvements like Whan support. This distribution serves as an example of a highly recommended option in the video.

💡Zorin OS

Zorin OS is a Linux distribution designed to mimic the look and feel of Windows, making it appealing to users transitioning from that environment. The host moves Zorin OS to the 'average' category, citing its slow updates and reliance on an older base as reasons for its placement.

💡Elementary OS

Elementary OS is a Linux distribution known for its clean, minimalist design and focus on user experience. Despite the host's appreciation for its aesthetics, they place Elementary OS in the 'no thanks' category due to its slow update cycle and lack of compelling features in the current version.

💡Fedora

Fedora is a Linux distribution that serves as a testbed for new technologies and is often used by developers and tech enthusiasts. The host places Fedora in the 'good' category, noting its solid improvements and pre-installed tools, but also expressing concerns about its smaller project size and potential lack of community support.

💡Pop!_OS

Pop!_OS is a Linux distribution developed by System76, known for its polished user experience and integration with hardware. The host places Pop!_OS in the 'no thanks' category, criticizing its outdated desktop environment and lack of updates, despite acknowledging its overall stability.

💡Tuxedo Computers

Tuxedo Computers is a company that specializes in Linux-compatible hardware, offering laptops, desktops, and other devices. The host endorses Tuxedo Computers, highlighting their commitment to Linux compatibility and customization, and recommends them as a go-to for Linux users looking for hardware that supports their operating system of choice.

💡Holo ISO

Holo ISO is a Linux distribution designed for gaming, offering a user experience similar to that of the Steam Deck. The host places Holo ISO in the 'great' category for gaming-related use, praising its ease of installation and performance, making it an ideal choice for those looking to game on a Linux system.

Highlights

Introduction of a new Linux distribution tier list for 2024.

Sponsor announcement for Square X, a privacy and security-focused browser extension and web app.

Ubuntu's ranking as 'average' due to performance improvements but issues with snap packages and Canonical's open-source treatment.

Linux Mint's retention in the 'great' category for its complete out-of-the-box experience and updates to support newer hardware.

Zorin OS's move to 'average' due to slow updates and reliance on an outdated Ubuntu LTS base.

Elementary OS remains in the 'no thanks' category due to slow updates and lack of compelling features.

Fedora's placement in the 'great' category for its stability, frequent updates, and innovative approach to Linux.

Debian's ranking as 'average' due to its stable nature but outdated software with the release of Debian 13.

OpenSUSE Tumbleweed's 'good' ranking for its solid rolling release and unique admin tools.

OpenSUSE Leap's 'average' ranking due to its slower pace and enterprise focus.

Arch Linux's 'average' ranking reflects the reviewer's personal experience with system updates and stability.

Manjaro's 'no thanks' ranking due to package version mismatches and instability.

TUXEDO OS's 'good' ranking for its semi-rolling release model and stability on TUXEDO hardware.

Pop!_OS's 'no thanks' ranking due to outdated software and slow development pace.

Solus's 'hell no' ranking due to uncertainty about the project's future and changes in its development approach.

NixOS's 'no thanks' ranking because of the reviewer's lack of need for its unique features.

KDE Neon's 'average' ranking for its rolling release model but concerns over stability.

aahi Linux's 'average' ranking due to its feature-complete nature but incompatibility with the reviewer's hardware.

NY OS's 'average' ranking reflects the reviewer's appreciation for its unique features but lack of necessity for their use case.

Holo ISO's 'great' ranking for gaming-related use cases and seamless installation experience.

Nobaria's 'good' ranking for improved performance and pre-installed tools, with caution due to its smaller project size.

Vanilla OS's 'no thanks' ranking as the reviewer does not require its container-based approach for their use case.

Chrome OS Flex's 'hell no' ranking due to poor performance, limited features, and privacy concerns.

Deepin's 'hell no' ranking because of its telemetry, outdated base, and limited app ecosystem.

Tuxedo Computers' recommendation for Linux-native hardware that is customizable and supports open-source development.

Transcripts

did you know we moved into 2024 now

which means I now have the right to do

another Linux drro tier list because

yeah I'm limiting myself to one of these

per year and since the last one I tried

a lot of other distributions either in a

video on the channel or in my own time

and the dros I ranked last time have

also evolved so let's see how I would

rank everything at the beginning of 2024

and what I would personally use and what

I would pass on but what I wouldn't pass

on is this segue to our sponsor this

video is sponsored by square X and if

you like to browse the web privately and

securely you really should give them a

shot Square X can be installed as a

browser extension for chromium based

browsers and it also has a web app for

any other browser and it will give you

access to a suite of disposable tools

that open everything in the cloud

instead of locally so your system and

your data are never at risk with square

X you get a burner browser that will

block ads and trackers and give you

access to any geographical location

you'd like or even multiple different

locations in different tabs and

everything is simply deleted when you

close the window sort of like a VPN plus

tracker blocker Plus incognito mode

combo in one click Square X also will

give you a disposable file viewer that

lets you open files and view documents

from senders you don't trust just yet

without risking your system nothing you

open in there can access your real

physical computer and you also get a

disposable email address that you can

use to create accounts and subscribe to

various newsletters without giving away

your real address and identity and apart

from this they have other security smart

Integrations that you get out of the box

to make you safer online so click the

link in the description and give Square

x a shot it's an excellent tool to make

sure that your browsing stays safe and

private so obviously it is is all

subjective and I decided to rank all of

these distributions in terms of How

likely I would be to use them for my own

use case which is content production and

running a business and everyone will

have different criteria so don't get

offended if I ranked your drro lower

than what you would have and don't

hesitate to let me know in the comments

if you would have ranked it higher and

why so we'll have the following

categories we'll have great as in I

could absolutely recommend this with my

closed we'll have good which is I would

use that drro we'll have average which

is it's good but it's not for me we'll

have no thanks as in I would not run

that and we have hell no as in I'm not

touching that ever so let's start with

the big one obuntu I feel it has

progressed a lot since last time the

obuntu team has a renewed focus on

improving their implementation of gnome

with plenty of patches to improve

performance and newer addition in the

form of extensions like a tiling

assistant you know it is going to work

reliably it has tons of help online and

if an app exists on Linux it has an

auntu package but their insistence on

pushing snap packages for desktop

applications really irritates me because

I feel flat pack would be a far superior

solution and also I'm not a big fan of

how canonical treats various open-

Source projects recently so I'm only

putting this one in average it's like

last time it's not incredible and to use

it I would have to remove snap and

reinstall some stuff so it's not great

it's just decent and I would place all

its derivatives at the same spot because

they suffer from the same problem Linux

Mint though I feel still deserves its

place in the great category not only

does it provide the most complete

graphical experience out of the box with

utilities for everything but they also

fixed most of my annoying with it as in

they have started work on whan support

to Future proof their drro and their

first draft of a whan session is

actually not bad at all and they now

have an edge ISO with a newer kernel so

you can actually install it on recent

Hardware so it is definitely still a

great Linux Dr recommended for any

beginner or even for advanced users the

only reason I'm not using Linux Mint as

a daily driver is because I'm not a huge

fan of the cinnamon desktop for myself

now zorinos is going to move up to the

average category it's not a bad Dr it

looks good it has plenty of improvements

and layouts for Gnome but for a desktop

drro it is still moving way too slow

zorinos S7 just came out and it's based

on auntu

22.4 which is going to be replaced in a

few months by a new LTS it's not a

terrible choice but with their current

release reschedule you will get

something that is half recent in 2025

and that's just not acceptable for a

desktop in my opinion it is not as much

of a problem as it once was because with

flatback you can basically get recent

applications even if your base is pretty

old but the desktop they use is old and

I just could not see myself sticking

with that for 2 years Elementary OS will

unfortunately stay in the no thanks

category for now as well I love the drro

I love their desktop but I just cannot

use it nowadays it's updated way too

slowly and Elementary os8 will bring

some cool stuff they'll finish the

transition to gtk4 they'll bring a

Wayland session so it will move into the

modern Linux era but it just doesn't

offer enough for me anymore today it's

not a bad drro but as it stands right

now with Elementary os7 it is just not

for me now for Dora is a drro I used for

a long while as a daily driver until

very recently and this drro I'll place

in the great category it is very stable

it is updated often it is pushing the

new Linux desktop stack with portals

whan pipe wire and flatback and it's the

embodiment of everything I enjoy about

Linux constant improvements and

Innovation and risk taking that pays off

and sure it's a red hat thing red hat is

not my favorite company right now but as

a distribution it's one I could

recommend to everyone especially if you

want to move into the present or the

future of Linux they're not afraid to

drop all the things to help everyone

progress and I love that as per Debian I

only ever used the stable version and I

will put it in average for my use case

deian 12 was released relatively

recently and so it is not utter L

outdated yet but it will be utterly

outdated by the time Debian 13 gets

updated the desktop it uses the apps in

the repost they will all be terribly

terribly old and for apps it's not as

much of a problem because obviously now

you have flat pack that can solve the

problem but for the desktop you use it's

just not for me I like my stuff to get

updates when the new desktops comes out

and Debian just doesn't give me that

maybe the unstable version would be

worth a shot to see if it changes my

opinion still Dean offers a solid

experience it's easy to use there's

plenty of documentation and they now

have proprietary firmware ready to be

installed if you need it so it's a solid

drro no matter the use case now open

soua tumble weed is next and I will put

this one in the good category it's a

really good rolling release and while my

experience with soua is limited they do

have some really good admin tools to

configure a bunch of things that other

disos simply do not have a graphical

user interface for and in my testing it

was rock solid as far as rolling

releases go I could definitely see

myself using it as per op soua leap I'll

put it in average it's virtually the

same experience as with tumble weed in

terms of the benefits of using open

Souza but it's just not interesting to

me as a distribution it it's a bit too

slow moving it's a bit too Enterprise

focused for my own tastes and the

current way this dis R Works will be

changed soon with the future of leap

lying with Alp making it an image-based

operating system so it is not bad not at

all but I just don't find it interesting

or suitable for my needs now the good

old Arch Linux will go in average for me

because I would personally not use it on

my computer but it's not not because

it's a bad Dro it's because it's not for

me all my experiences with Arch and Arch

based dros were cut short by issues

after updating my computer and I cannot

deal with that on a daily basis I need a

system where I can just click the update

button with my eyes closed reboot and

expect everything to work when the

computer comes back alive without having

to read update notes or look over

various install scripts to check if they

are safe or not and Arch just does not

provide that experience for me and I

understand why people love and use Arch

and a bunch of its derivatives and if

you have the time to invest in making

sure it's solid it can be very very

stable but for me it's just not cutting

it and speaking of arge derivatives

manaro I will place in the no thanks

category again this year the way it is

built just doesn't make sense to me

you're getting access to the a but since

you're also not using the latest Arch

packages you will have issues with that

as there will be mismatches between

libraries and package versions and if

you don't use the Aur on it you're left

with a roding release that takes bad

decisions like shipping unstable

versions of apps that developers don't

want them to ship yet and not testing

updates that come from Arch adequately

like the grub incident I feel there are

better rolling releases to use like

tumble wheat for example so yeah it's

just not for me it's too

unstable now tuxedo OS is the Dr I use

these days and I will place it in good

it's a semi- rolling release meaning you

don't get major updates every six months

like what obuntu does but you're getting

regular updates to the kernel to the

drivers and the apps plus a rolling

release model for the KD plasma desktop

it has been super stable for me it's the

best KD distribution I have ever used

and while it is based on a bunch to

22.4 since you're getting updates to the

critical Hardware support components

it's not really an issue and the tools

tuxedo ads like their control center are

also really good on a tuxedo laptop so I

love using it and the only reason why

it's not in the great category is

they're still basing themselves on a b 2

LTS and yes they do update the hardware

support components like drivers and the

kernel but the packages in the repos are

pretty damn old it's not been a big

issue for me but it could be so I'll

wait to see how fast they will rebase on

24.4 before placing this one in the

great category now as per popos it will

be in the no thanks category for me this

year it is not a bad disc R it's pretty

much the same behavior as tuxedo OS you

get updates to the drivers and the

kernel but the desktop they ship is just

completely outdated it's based on a very

old gnome version with a bunch of

extensions and the experience has not

changed in 2 years and that's just not

acceptable for me and I would expect

that to change by the time

24.4 releases for pop OS which is going

to be apparently in the Summer with the

brand new Rewritten from scratch Cosmic

desktop but for now installing

22.4 on my desktop or on my laptop would

be a big big regression in terms of

workflow and performance and features

now Solus is a Dr I expected to not even

mention in that tier list since it was

pretty much dead last year but since

then it apparently revived and it looks

like they have plans now it is still

going to go in hell no for me because I

cannot tell if this is a temporary

Revival or if it is here to stay I need

more time to see if they will repeat the

mistakes of the past and since they also

want to completely change how the drro

is built and works for soless 5 I cannot

place any long-term trust in them for

now when I install something I like it

to last for a year or two and soless

just does not give me the confidence I

need to reliably have that experience so

it's in hell no for me now Gen 2 I will

put in no thanks for my own use case

again I understand why people want to

use it but personally I do not find it a

compelling proposition at all I don't

want to compile any of my programs to

gain one to 3% performance and using the

binary packages on Gen 2 why just use

any other drro that has binary packages

so if you love Gen 2 that's cool but the

very concept is simply just not working

for me at all now KD neon will go in

average I like the rolling release model

for the desktop and the rebasing on a

new LTS when it's available but also it

hasn't been extremely stable the last

time I tried it and I feel that nowadays

tuxa os does the same job but much

better so I just wouldn't use neon

personally now aahi Linux and Fedora

aahi are in a weird spot here I cannot

use any of these myself but it's not

because they're bad it's because it runs

on Hardware I don't like my MacBook Pro

M1 will be sold soon it's way too heavy

and it lacks useful ports and it is arm

so there is no D Vinci resolve on that

meaning that I can just not use these

disos but aahi as a Dr is awesome and

almost feature complete so I will put it

in average because placing it lower

would not really be justified now let's

talk about NY OS and this one will make

some people grid their teeth but it's

only going in average for me meaning I

could see myself using it but currently

I don't see the point having a

reproducible system is great and I loved

learning the syntax to configure the

system but some things were just

annoying to get to work like the Venture

res which the studio version I could

never run or NVIDIA drivers and for my

use case there is no point really I

don't reinstall often enough that I need

a config file that would recreate my own

system and other dros are stable enough

that I don't feel like I need to use

something like NYX it is a really good

Dr and I loved experimenting with it but

I just don't see the point for my own

use case personally now Holo ISO is a

weird one because you don't use it for

desktop use it's for gaming related

stuff and for that specific use case I

will place it in great I have recently

reinstalled it on my own console which

is basically just a tower PC from toxedo

and this time I had nothing to configure

or change it just installed and worked

perfectly right at the bat so for my

gaming needs it's basically the steam

deck experience on a big TV with good

hardware and performance and for that

it's wonderful now for more mixed gaming

and desktop usage I would place nobara

in good it's a solid improvement over

Fedora it actually delivers better

performance the suite of tools that are

pre-installed is great the only thing I

don't quite like is that it's a smaller

project and as such I would be wary of

running it as a daily driver because

it's not seeing a ton of external

contributions and I am not sure I would

find enough help online if I needed it

now for vanilla OS I would place that in

no thanks for my own use case I like the

concept of running dros in containers to

get access to any package or app you

want but also I don't need that I can

already run any app on any dros these

days and it's more men for development

purposes and that is not my use case so

I would not run vanilla OS as my main

operating system now for fun I will

include Chrome OS Flex because it's

basically a regular Linux dis these days

with a proprietary desktop and I will

place it in hell no because well it

completely sucks it lags the most basic

of features the desktop is Bare Bones

and performs badly and installing

anything that is not a web app requires

you to use but it's basically a VM so

performance is really bad it is a bad

operating system a bad desktop there's

proprietary stuff all around and it's

also privacy invasive so hell no for

chromos flex and as per deepen it's

still going in hell no as well because

it has Telemetry baked in it's using a

very old Debian base and the desktop

might look nice but all of its apps are

super limited and installing anything

else on top of that just breaks the

unified look and feel I would never use

that Dro but if you like the desktop the

deep in desktop I would recommend maybe

using it on another Dro because it can

look really good so that's it for all

the dros I have used on my own time or

on the channel and how I would rank them

for my own use case obviously yours

might be different so let me know where

you would have placed all those

distributions yourself using the same

ranking system and in the meantime I

will let you know about sponsor it's

tuxedo computers if you need a new

device to run Linux on you should

probably stop buying devices from

bigname manufacturers that only support

Windows natively and trying to install

Linux on that and fighting the various

Hardware that is not well supported you

should buy something that supports Linux

natively and that's tuxedo computers

they have laptops desktops and N at all

form factors all performance levels all

price points all the hardware is very

customizable and it is picked

specifically because it works well with

Linux and if it didn't in their testing

they actually submit patches Upstream to

fix those issues for everyone you can

customize the keyboard layout you can

have your own logo on the LD of your

laptop you can open the laptop repair it

and upgrade it these are really good

it's all I use these days I run this

channel on a tuxedo Infiniti Book Pro 16

and all my gaming is done on a tuxedo

Cube which is just a PC I install Holo

ISO on so if you want a new computer you

want to Linux on it and you want to

support linux's development click the

link in the description below and get

yourself a computer from tuxedo I can

only recommend them so thanks everyone

for watching the tier list I hope you

enjoyed it if you did don't hesitate to

like to subscribe to turn on

notifications and to write a comment and

if you didn't like the video well you

can always click the dislike button and

let me know why in the comments it's

probably because I rated Arch not in the

great category probably so if you and

also if you really like the channel

there are plenty of ways to support it

in the description below just check out

any of those links and you'll get access

to some cool stuff so thanks for

watching and I guess you'll see me in

the next one

[Music]

bye