Biden signs executive order to drastically tighten border as ACLU responds with a lawsuit
Summary
TLDRこのビデオスクリプトは、アメリカ合衆国大統領ジョー・バイデンが南部国境での難民の受け入れを制限する行政命令を発表し、その影響と合法性に関する議論を集約しています。スクリプトでは、共和党による反対に抗い、国境の管理強化を訴えるバイデン大統領の姿が映し出されます。一方で、ACLUはこの政策がトランプ前政権と法的に同等であり、難民の人権を侵害するとして訴訟を起こすと表明。難民問題に関する国民の関心が高まっている中で、選挙年にもなると、この決定が政治的弱みを露わにするかもとの議論が展開されています。
Takeaways
- 📜 ビデン大統領は南部国境での入国制限に関する行政命令に署名しました。これは彼が移民政策について行った最も強い措置です。
- 🚫 行政命令により、不法越境者による避難申請が拒否されるようになります。避難を求める移民の数が1500人/日未満に下がるまでその措置は続きます。
- 🛂 現在の国境での移民の平均遭遇件数は4000件を超えており、行政命令は直ちに発効する可能性があります。
- 🤔 アメリカ合衆国には国境を管理する十分な人員があるかどうかは疑問の声が上がります。
- 🔄 ビデン大統領の移民政策は大きく変わり、以前は批評していた政策を現在は実行しています。
- 📊 移民は選挙年における重要な問題であり、NBCニュースの調査によると、59%の人々がビデン大統領の国境取り決めに賛成していると報告されています。
- 👎 元大統領トランプはビデン大統領の新しい行政命令について批判的な意見を示しています。
- 🏛 裁判所はトランプ大統領が要求した共和党による措置にも2度も反対する判断を下しました。
- 🇵🇦 パナマの大統領は世界最大の移民ルートの1つを閉鎖すると表明し、メキシコも国境の他の側で独自の取り組みを行っています。
- 📚 ACLUはビデン政権の避難管理に対して訴訟を起こしました。彼らはトランプ政権の時代にも同様の訴訟を行いました。
- 👨⚖️ ACLUは避難者の適切な選別が必要ですが、ビデン大統領の行政命令はそれを実現しないと主張しています。
- 👨💼 経済学者からはアメリカに労働者を必要とする声が上がっており、合法な移民の道を開くことが重要だとされています。
- 🚨 ビデン大統領の行政命令はすぐにも裁判所によって停止される可能性があり、その合法性については疑問が残っています。
Q & A
バイデン大統領はなぜ南部国境での入国制限に関する行政命令を署名しましたか?
-バイデン大統領は共和党に他の選択肢を与えられていないと述べており、国境を不法に渡る人々からの避難申請を禁止する行政命令を出しました。これは国境の管理を維持するのに役立つとされています。
行政命令による避難申請の制限はどのように機能しますか?
-避難申請の制限は、日々の平均遭遇が1500人を下回るまで有効であり、2500を超えると避難申請を禁止します。現在の平均は4000人で、行政命令はすぐに発効すると予想されています。
アメリカ合衆国の国境はどのくらいの長さですか?
-アメリカ合衆国の南部国境はカリフォルニア南部からテキサスまでほぼ2000マイルにわたります。
バイデン大統領の移民政策は以前の主張とはどのように異なりますか?
-以前の主張では、避難を求める人々がアメリカに来るべきであり、彼らが安全に保全されるまで待機できる容量があると述べていましたが、現在の行政命令では避難申請を制限しています。
選挙年における移民問題の重要性はどのくらいですか?
-移民問題は選挙年においてはインフレに次いで重要な問題であり、NBCニュースの調査によると59%の人々がバイデン大統領の国境取り扱いに賛成していると報告されています。
ACLUはなぜバイデン政権を訴えていますか?
-ACLUは、バイデン大統領の避難政策が法律的にトランプ前政権の政策と同じであると主張し、避難申請を禁止することは法的に問題があるとされています。
ACLUは避難申請の制限に対してどのような主張を持っていますか?
-ACLUは、人々が避難所を必要とする場合、避難申請の審査を受ける権利があると主張しており、避難申請の審査を提供しない制限は人道的でないと述べています。
避難申請制限が法的に問題があるとされる理由は何ですか?
-避難申請制限は、国会議決に基づく法律と相違しており、人々が危険を逃避するためにアメリカに到達する権利を拒否するとされます。
アメリカ国民は避難所申請についてどのように考えていますか?
-アメリカ国民はバランスの取れた移民政策を望むとされており、避難所申請を完全に閉鎖することは望んでいないとされています。
避難申請制限が実際に機能する可能性はどのくらいですか?
-避難申請制限が実際に機能する可能性は低いとされており、人々は依然として国境に来て危険を冒すことを選びます。
避難申請制限が法廷でどう扱われると予想されますか?
-避難申請制限が法廷で問題があると判断される可能性があり、トランプ政権の際と同様に法廷で制限が却下される可能性が高いとされています。
移民問題を解決するために必要な措置はどのようなものでしょうか?
-移民問題を解決するためには、法律的な道を提供し、避難希望者が国境で貢献できるようにすることが必要です。さらに、国境に避難審査官を配置して迅速な審査が可能になるような措置が必要です。
Outlines
📜 ビデン大統領の移民政策の変更
ビデン大統領は南部国境での不法移民を抑制するための行政命令を発令しました。これは彼が移民政策において行った最大の行動であり、法的な正当性にも問いがあります。新たに発令された命令は、1日あたり2500人の移民が国境を超えると、政治的な保護を求める権利を拒否するもので、その数は1500人に減少するまで持続します。現在の国境での平均遭遇件数は4000件を超えており、この命令はすぐにも発効するでしょう。アメリカは約2000マイルにわたる国境を有しており、移民問題は常に政治的な議論の的となってきましたが、ビデン大統領は共和党からの強い反対にもかかわらず、移民政策の変更を強行しました。
🏛 移民政策と政治的動向
移民は選挙において重要な議題となり、インフレに次いで投票者にとって重要な問題となっています。NBCニュースの調査によると、59%の人々がビデン大統領が国境問題を扱う方法に賛成していると回答しました。しかしながら、ビデン大統領はかつては移民の受け入れを主張していたにもかかわらず、現在の政策はトランプ前政権と同様の移民規制を行っています。この変更は選挙戦術の一環と受け止められており、トランプ前大統領もその意義を問い、移民規制の強化を主張しています。
👨⚖️ 移民権益と裁判所の対応
アメリカ市民自由連盟(ACLU)は、ビデン政権の移民政策を非難し、訴訟を起こしています。彼らはトランプ政権の移民政策にも異議を唱え、多くの訴訟を起こしてきましたが、ビデン政権の新たな行政命令についても同じアプローチを取ることを表明しています。ACLUは、移民に対して適切な審査を受ける権利を保障する法律に基づいて、この命令が合法的でないと主張しています。彼らは、移民がアメリカに到達するだけではなくて、危険を脱するためにも適切な審査を受けるべきだと述べています。
🌐 移民問題と国際的な動向
移民問題は単なる国内の問題ではなく、国際的な協力と取り組みが求められます。パナマの大統領は世界最大の移民ルートの一つを閉鎖すると表明し、メキシコも自国の側で移民対策を強化しています。一方で、移民はアメリカに来て働くことで家族を養うためだと主張しており、彼らの声も重要な視点です。移民問題は多面的な要因が絡み合った複雑なものであり、単純な解決策は存在しないとされています。
🛂 国境管理と移民の未来
移民問題はアメリカの歴史と共に発展してきた重要な議題です。国境管理と移民の受け入れ方針は常に政策の変更と裁判所の判断によって左右されており、新たな行政命令がもたらす影響はまだ明確ではありません。しかしながら、移民権益を擁護する人々は、より多くの合法的な移住の道を開き、国境にいる人々に対してはより多くの審査官を配置することで移民制度をより効率的かつ人道的に行うべきだと主張しています。
Mindmap
Keywords
💡移民政策
💡アスイルム
💡行政命令
💡国境
💡移民
💡人権団体
💡選挙
💡裁判所
💡アスイルム申請
💡人道主義
Highlights
President Biden signs an executive order restricting access at the southern border.
The executive order bars migrants from requesting asylum if encounters exceed 2500 per day, lasting until it dips below 1500 per day.
The border spans nearly 2000 miles with over 3000 points of entry, raising questions about the U.S. manpower to enforce the order.
The executive order represents a significant shift in immigration policy from Biden, who criticized similar measures before becoming president.
An NBC News poll finds 59% approve of how Biden has handled the border, indicating its importance to voters.
Former President Trump suggests Biden could have easily closed the border, highlighting a difference in approach.
The ACLU is suing the Biden administration over the new executive order, comparing it to past legal challenges against Trump's policies.
The ACLU argues that the policy is legally the same as what President Trump did and that it violates the right to screening for asylum.
The deputy director of the Immigrants' Rights Project emphasizes the need for a balanced approach to immigration and asylum.
The discussion highlights the American public's desire for a middle-ground solution on immigration that is neither too lax nor too strict.
President Biden expresses his preference for a bipartisan legislative solution to the immigration issue.
Concerns are raised about the lack of resources at the border to effectively implement the new executive order.
The interview with Time Magazine reveals Biden's regret about not lifting Trump's anti-immigration measures sooner.
The Biden administration is criticized for potentially pushing people back to danger without proper asylum screening.
There is a call for more legal pathways for immigrants and more asylum officers at the border to streamline the process.
The interview concludes with the acknowledgment of a crisis and the need for solutions that balance humanitarian concerns with border security.
Transcripts
ALLOWING PORN AND ADULT CONTENT
ON THEIR SITE.
TOP STORY STARTS RIGHT NOW.
>>> GOOD EVENING.
TONIGHT FOR THE FIRST TIME,
PRESIDENT BIDEN SIGNING AN
EXECUTIVE ORDER RESTRICTING
ACCESS AT THE SOUTHERN BORDER.
THE PRESIDENT ANNOUNCING HIS
STRONGEST IMMIGRATION ACTION
YET.
WILL IT WORK AND IS IT EVEN
LEGAL?
HERE IS THE PRESIDENT TODAY.
>> REPUBLICANS HAVE LEFT ME NO
CHOICE.
I AM ANNOUNCING ACTIONS TO BAR
THOSE FROM CROSSING THE BORDER
UNLAWFULLY FROM RECEIVING
ASYLUM.
THIS WILL ESSENTIALLY HELP US
MAINTAIN CONTROL OF OUR BORDER.
WE MUST FACE THE SINGLE TRUTH.
TO PROTECT AMERICA AS A LAND
THAT WELCOMES IMMIGRANTS.
WE MUST SECURE THE BORDER AND
SECURE IT NOW.
>> HERE'S WHAT THE BORDER
ORDERABLE DO.
ONCE THEY PASS 2500, IT WILL
BAR MIGRANTS FROM REQUESTING
ASYLUM.
IT WILL LAST UNTIL THEY DIP
BELOW 1500 PER DAY.
RIGHT NOW AVERAGE ENCOUNTERS IS
AMONG 4000 MEANING THIS
ORDERABLE GO INTO EFFECT
IMMEDIATELY. A REMINDER, THE BORDER SPANS
A REMINDER, THE BORDER SPANS
NEARLY 2000 MILES FROM SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA ALL THE WAY DOWN TO
TEXAS.
THERE ARE MORE THAN 3000 POINTS
OF ENTRY.
THERE ARE QUESTIONS ON WHETHER
THE U.S. EVEN HAVE THE MANPOWER
TO MAKE THIS A REALITY.
THE BIDENS ORDER SIGNALS A HUGE
SHIFT ON IMMIGRATION.
A MOVE HE STRONGLY CRITICIZED
ON THE DEBATE STAGE BEFORE
BECOMING PRESIDENT.
>> I WOULD IN FACT MAKE SURE
THAT THERE IS IMMEDIATELY A
SURGE IN THE BORDER FOR ALL
THOSE PEOPLE SEEKING ASYLUM.
WE ARE A NATION THAT SAYS IF
YOU WANT TO FLEE YOU SHOULD
COME.
AND THOSE WHO COME SEEKING
ASYLUM, WE SHOULD IMMEDIATELY
HAVE THE CAPACITY TO ABSORB
THEM, KEEP THEM SAFE, UNTIL
THEY CAN BE HEARD.
THE FIRST PRESIDENT IN THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WHERE
SOMEONE SEEKING ASYLUM CANNOT
COME TO THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA.
>> WHY IS THE CHANGE?
>> IMMIGRATION IS ON THE TOP OF
THE MIND FOR VOTERS.
IT COMES IN AT NUMBER TWO
BEHIND INFLATION ACCORDING TO
AN NBC NEWS POLL.
AND IT IS GOOD NEWS, ESPECIALLY
IN AN ELECTION YEAR.
THIS NBC POLL FINDING 59%
APPROVE OF HOW BIDEN HAS
HANDLED THE BORDER. BIDE
DETERMINING THE POLITICAL
DETERMINING THE POLITICAL
WEAKNESS AGAINST PRESIDENT
TRUMP JUST FIVE MONTHS UNTIL
THE NOVEMBER ELECTION.
SOME ARE WONDERING IS THERE
EVEN ENOUGH TIME?
FORMER PRESIDENT TRUMP IS
SAYING THIS ABOUT THE NEW
EXECUTIVE ORDER.
>> HE COULD HAVE DONE IT VERY
EASILY.
ALL HE HAD TO DO WAS SAY CLOSE
THE BORDER.
THAT IS THE POWER OF
PRESIDENCY.
>> NOW, THE COURT HAS NOT
ALWAYS AGREED WITH THAT.
KEEP IN MIND, THE BIPARTISAN
ORDER HAS FAILED TWICE AT THE
HANDS OF REPUBLICANS AFTER
PRESIDENT TRUMP REQUESTED IT.
THE NUMBER OF POOR SLEEP BORDER
ENCOUNTERS HAS SHARPLY
DECREASED FROM REACHING RECORD
HIGHS BACK IN DECEMBER, WE
SHOULD POINT OUT.
PANAMA'S PRESIDENT IS SAYING HE
WILL SHUT DOWN ONE OF THE
WORLD'S BUSIEST, BUSIEST
IMMIGRATION ROUTES AND NOW
MEXICO IS WORKING ON THE OTHER
SIDE OF THE BORDER WITH ITS OWN
EFFORTS AS WELL.
THIS MORNING NBC NEWS SPOKE
WITH A VENEZUELAN FAMILY WHO
SAID THEY SLEPT ON THE STREET
IN MEXICO WHILE AWAITING.
>> Reporter: HOW LONG ARE YOU
WAITING?
SEVEN MONTHS AND SIX DAYS, HE
TELLS US, SAYING HE CAME TO THE
U.S. TO WORK TO FEED HIS YOUNG
FAMILY.
>> THAT IS JULIA ANSLEY WHO IS
AT THE BORDER.
IT IS BECAUSE OF STORIES LIKE
THAT THAT THE ACLU IS NOW SUING
THE BORDER ADMINISTRATION.
THAT ESSAY.
THE SAME ACLU THAT TOOK ON THE
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION.
EVERYTHING FROM CHILD
SEPARATION TO WHAT PRESIDENT
BIDEN IS NOW DOING IT.
SO WHAT DOES THE ACLU THINK
ABOUT THIS MAJOR EXECUTIVE
ORDER IN A MAJOR CHANGE COMING
FROM JOE BIDEN?
THIS IS THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF
THE IMMIGRANTS RIGHTS PROJECT.
HE LED SOME OF THE BIGGEST
LAWSUITS IN THE TRUMP
ADMINISTRATION. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR JOINING
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR JOINING
TOP STORY TONIGHT.
THIS WAS BOTH UNDER THE TRUMP
ADMINISTRATION AND NOW UNDER
THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION.
TALK TO ME ABOUT WHY THE ACLU
IS NOW SUING THE BIDEN
ADMINISTRATION.
>> YEAH.
WE SUED UNDER TRUMP.
NOW WE HAVE A HUNTER BIDEN.
HE LEFT US NO CHOICE.
THE POLICY IS LEGALLY THE SAME
AS WHAT PRESIDENT TRUMP DID.
SO WE SUCCESSFULLY SUED ONTO
TRUMP AND WE THINK WE WILL HAVE TO HUNTER BIDEN.
WE WILL WHEN THAT TIME IS TO BE
WE WILL WHEN THAT TIME IS TO BE
DETERMINED.
IT IS BASICALLY THAT THE EXECS
CANNOT DO THIS WITHOUT
CONGRESS.
CONGRESS HAS VERY CLEARLY SAID
YOU MAY APPLY FOR ASYLUM, BUT
BE AWARE WHEN YOU ENTER.
THE REASON IS VERY CLEAR.
SOMETIMES PEOPLE CANNOT GET TO
A COURT.
SOMETIMES THEY ARE PUSHING YOU
THROUGH AT DIFFERENT PLACES.
SOMETIMES THEY JUST DO NOT KNOW
WHERE THE PORT IS.
SO CONGRESS HAS SAID IF YOU ARE
GENUINELY IN DANGER, JUST GET
TO U.S. OIL AND WE WILL SCREEN
YOU.
I WANT TO BE CLEAR ABOUT A FEW
THINGS.
WE ARE NOT SAYING EVERYONE IS
ENTITLED TO ASYLUM BUT WE ARE
SAYING THAT EVERYONE IS
ENTITLED TO SCREENING AND THAT
IS A SOLEMN PROMISE WE MADE
AFTER WORLD WAR II.
THIS WOULD NOT EVEN GIVE PEOPLE
A SCREENING FOR ASYLUM.
IN YOUR INTRO, YOU TALKED ABOUT
THE AMERICAN PUBLIC AND THAT IS
RIGHT.
I THINK THERE IS A
MISCONCEPTION ABOUT WHAT THE
AMERICAN PUBLIC WANTS.
THEY WANT SOMETHING BALANCED
AND IN THE MIDDLE.
THEY DO NOT WANT TO SHUT OFF
ASYLUM COMPLETELY.
LOOK, THERE'S A FAMILY AND THEY
ARE BEING PERSECUTED BECAUSE OF
THEIR RELIGION.
BECAUSE THEY ARE CHRISTIAN.
WHATEVER.
AND THEY MAY BE IN DEADLY
DANGER.
WOULD YOU WANT THEM TO HAVE A
SCREENING FOR ASYLUM?
THEY MAY ALSO WANTED TO BE
STREAMLINED SO PEOPLE ARE NOT
WAITING FOR YEARS WHILE THERE
IS CHAOS AT THE BORDER.
WE ARE ALL IN FAVOR OF
STREAMLINING THE PROCESS BUT WE
DO NOT WANT PRESIDENT BIDEN TO
GO TO THE OTHER END TO
PRESIDENT TRUMP DID AND SAY WE
ARE GOING TO BAN ASYLUM
COMPLETELY.
>> LET ME GET YOUR TAKE FROM
THE OTHER END.
>> TODAY, I AM GOING PAST
PUBLIC INSTRUCTION AND USING A
SET OF AUTHORITY AS PRESIDENT
TO DO WHAT I CAN ON MY OWN TO
ADDRESS THE BORDER.
FRANKLY, I WOULD HAVE PREFERRED
TO HAVE ADDRESSED THIS ISSUE TO
BIPARTISAN LEGISLATION BECAUSE
THAT IS THE ONLY WAY TO
ACTUALLY GET THE KIND OF SYSTEM
WE HAVE NOW THAT IS BROKEN
FIXED.
>> SO YOU JUST MENTIONED THIS.
HE NEEDS CONGRESS.
HE SAID HE TRIED.
HE CANNOT GET ANYWHERE WITH OUR
PUBLICANS.
HE IS LEFT WITH NO OTHER
OPTIONS.
>> WHAT I THINK PRESIDENT BIDEN
HAD IS THAT ANOTHER OPTION WAS
COMPLETELY SHUTTING OFF ASYLUM.
WE WOULD HAVE LIKED TO HAVE
SEEN THEM SURGING RESOURCES TO
THE BORDER AND TRIED THAT.
AS YOU KNOW, YOU HAVE BEEN TO
THE BORDER MANY, MANY TIMES.
FAMILIES ARE NOT TRYING TO
INVADE.
THEY WALK ACROSS THE BORDER AND
SIT DOWN AND WAIT FOR AN OFFICER
TO SAY NOW IS MY TIME TO APPLY
FOR ASYLUM AND BE SCREENED.
WE DO NOT NEED MORE
ENFORCEMENT.
WE NEED MORE ASYLUM OFFICERS TO
SCREEN PEOPLE TO MOVE VERY
QUICKLY.
WE GET THAT THE AMERICAN PUBLIC
WANTS THIS SYSTEM TO WORK MORE
EFFICIENTLY AND MOVE IT SO
THERE IS NOT CHAOS.
DO WE THINK THE PRESIDENT COULD
HAVE DONE MORE WHILE HE WAS
THERE?
MORE IMPORTANTLY, CONGRESS
NEEDS TO ALLOCATE MORE
RESOURCES.
I THINK THAT IS THE WAY TO DO
IT.
I THINK THE REPORTING HAS SHOWN
OVER THE YEARS WHEN PEOPLE ARE
THAT DESPERATE, THEY ARE GOING
TO LEAVE THEIR COUNTRY NO
MATTER WHAT.
I ALSO THINK THAT ULTIMATELY WE
NEED MORE LEGAL PATHWAYS FOR
PEOPLE WHO WANT TO WORK.
I DO NOT KNOW A SINGLE
ECONOMIST NOW SAYING WE DO NOT
NEED MORE WORKERS IN THE U.S.
AND MORE IMMIGRANT WORKERS.
IF WE OPENED UP ALL THESE LEGAL
PATHWAYS, PEOPLE WOULD NOT BE
SO DESPERATE TO LINE UP AT THE
BORDER AND THEN WE WOULD HAVE
SHORTER LINES AT THE BORDER FOR
PEOPLE WHO GENUINELY NEED IT
AND PEOPLE COMING IN WITH LEGAL
PATHWAYS TO WORK.
AND THAT WOULD BE A BENEFIT TO
OUR COUNTRY.
AND EVERYTHING IS SO POLARIZED
THAT PEOPLE THINK ALL THESE
FAMILIES ARE HERE TO DO HARM.
THEY ARE NOT HERE TO DO HARM
IT.
THINK ABOUT THE IMMIGRANTS YOU
KNOW.
THEY ARE NOT FITTING THAT
NARRATIVE.
>> I WENT TO SPEAK ABOUT.
NEW YORK CITY MAYOR ERIC ADAMS
HAS BEEN SPEAKING ABOUT THAT.
AND WHAT PRESIDENT BIDEN HAS
BEEN DOING TODAY RIGHT BEFORE
THE ELECTION.
DO YOU FEEL DUPED? >> YOU KNOW, LOOK, THE REALITY
>> YOU KNOW, LOOK, THE REALITY
IS A LOT OF THINGS PLAY INTO
THIS SITUATION.
I WOULD SAY WE ARE DISAPPOINTED
THAT THE ADMINISTRATION HAS
TAKING THIS ROAD BECAUSE THE
POLICIES ARE MISGUIDED.
I THINK THEY PLAY INTO EVERY
DECISION EVERY WHITE HOUSE
MAKES.
I DO NOT WANT TO FOCUS
COMPLETELY THINKING THAT IT IS
THE ADMINISTRATION AND NOT THE
COURTS.
IT MAY BE THE ADMINISTRATION
THAT ROLLED IT BACK OR
MITIGATED IT.
I THINK THAT THE BIDEN
ADMINISTRATION NEEDS TO HEAR
FROM PEOPLE SAYING, YEAH, WE
HAVE NAMED IMMIGRATION AS A BIG
ISSUE FOR US BUT THAT IS NOT
HOW WE WANTED TO GO.
WE DID NOT WANT AN EXTREME
TRUMP POLICY.
THERE STILL TIME FOR THE BIDEN
ADMINISTRATION TO MITIGATE IT
IF YOU WENT TO.
>> I HAVE COVERED THE BORDER
FOR A LONG TIME AND I HAVE
NOTICED A DIFFERENCE THOUGH
WHEN YOU TALK TO MIGRANTS.
I SPEAK SPANISH AND I'M VERY
SENSITIVE TO THIS ISSUE.
THE DIFFERENCE I NOTED IS THAT
WHEN YOU TALK TO MIGRANTS YEARS
AGO, THEY WOULD GIVE YOU A
VARIETY OF REASONS WHY THEY
WERE COMING OVER.
NOW, WHEN I SURVEY MIGRANTS,
AND A LOT OF IT ARE VENEZUELANS
-- AND, TRUST ME, I HAVE BEEN
TO VENEZUELA.
THEY HAVE SERIOUS ISSUES THERE.
THAT BEING SAID, THEY ALL SEEK
ASYLUM.
THIS ONE HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO
WORK.
THEY CANNOT EAT.
IF EVERYONE IS SEEKING ASYLUM, DOES THAT HURT YOUR ARGUMENT IN
DOES THAT HURT YOUR ARGUMENT IN
THINK WE NEED TO GIVE ASYLUM?
IS PRESIDENT BIDEN'S HANDS NOT
TIED?
>> SO THAT IS A FAIR POINT.
THIS IS WHAT I WOULD SAY.
ONE IS, IF YOU HAVE PEOPLE WHO
WANT TO WORK, AND THEY SEE NO
OTHER PATH THAN TO APPLY FOR
ASYLUM, THAT IS A PROBLEM WITH
OUR DESIGN.
LET US HAVE LEGAL PATHWAYS TO
WORK.
THE OTHER THING IS YOU ARE
RIGHT.
NOT EVERYONE HAS AN ASYLUM
CLAIM BUT THEY STILL NEED
SCREENING.
FOR THE PEOPLE WE SEND BACK TO
REAL DANGER WHO HAVE ASYLUM
CLAIMS, WE ARE GOING TO SEND
YOU BACK TO TORTURE.
SO WE NEED A PROPER SCREENING
SYSTEM AND YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY
RIGHT.
IT NEEDS TO BE MORE EFFICIENT.
WE ARE NOT GOING TO SAY
EVERYONE CANNOT WIN.
WE ARE GOING TO SEND EVERYONE
BACK.
>> THIS EXECUTIVE ORDER TAKES
EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.
BUT IT IS GOING TO BE STOPPED
PRETTY QUICKLY BY THE COURTS IF
THEY ROLLED LIKE THEY RULED ON
THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION.
>> WE ARE HOPEFUL.
WE HAVE TO FIGURE OUT THE
TIMING OF THE LAW.
WE JUST GOT THE ROLE TODAY.
WE WILL GO THROUGH IT CAREFULLY
AND DECIDE THE TIMING OF THE
LAWSUIT AND WHERE WE ARE GOING
TO FILE IT.
THEN WE WILL HOPE FOR QUICK
ACTION BY THE COURTS.
I THINK PRESIDENT BIDEN AND HIS
TEAM HAVE ACKNOWLEDGED THERE
ARE REAL DOUBTS ABOUT THE
LEGALITY OF IT.
I THINK THEY WERE EXPECTING A
LAWSUIT.
YOU WILL SEE.
NOTHING IS GOING TO PREVENT YOU
FROM FILING THAT LAWSUIT UNLESS
THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION PULLS
BACK.
>> YOU ARE GOING FORWARD WITH
THE LAWSUIT?
WHERE ARE YOU FILING?
CALIFORNIA OR NEW YORK?
>> WE HAD NOT DECIDED.
THE OPTIONS ARE CALIFORNIA AND
D.C. I WILL CERTAINLY KEEP YOU
POSTED ON THAT.
>> YOU THINK THIS IS EVEN
POSSIBLE KNOWING THE MANPOWER
ISSUES AT THE BORDER?
IF THIS WERE TO GO INTO EFFECT
IN THE ORDER IS THE LAW OF THE LAND, WILL BORDER OFFICIALS --
LAND, WILL BORDER OFFICIALS --
WILL THIS ACTUALLY WORK? IS IT
FEASIBLE?
>> I DO NOT THINK IT WILL WORK
IN THE SENSE THAT PEOPLE WILL
NOT STILL COME TO THE BORDER.
LIKE LET'S JUST TAKE OUR
CHANCES WITH DANGER IN OUR
COUNTRY.
THEY ARE STILL GOING TO COME. BUT I THINK WHAT IS SO
BUT I THINK WHAT IS SO
TROUBLING THAT HAS NOT GOT
ATTENTION IS I'M NOT SURE HOW
MANY RESOURCES IT WILL TAKE
BECAUSE UNDER NORMAL POLICIES
YOU HAVE TO AFFIRMATIVELY ASK PEOPLE, WILL YOU BE TORTURED?
PEOPLE, WILL YOU BE TORTURED?
WILL SOMETHING HAPPEN TO YOU?
YOU NEED TO SCREEN THOSE
RESOURCES.
WHAT THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION
IS DOING WHICH IS REALLY
DRACONIAN, UNLESS YOU ASK TO BE
SCREENED, YOU WILL GET NO
SCREENING.
SO THEY WILL NOT NEED ASYLUM
OFFICERS THERE.
THEY ARE JUST GOING TO PUSH YOU
BACK ACROSS THE BORDER.
AND SO WE ARE VERY WORRIED THAT
EVERYONE IS GOING TO GET PUSHED
BACK ACROSS THE BORDER WITHOUT
ANY ASYLUM OFFICERS SEEING
THEM.
>> IF YOU ARE A MEXICAN
IMMIGRANT, YOU WILL GO BACK TO
MEXICO.
BUT IF YOU ARE VENEZUELAN, IF
YOU'RE FROM AFRICA, IF YOU'RE
FROM ASIA -- THESE COUNTRIES
ARE NOT GOING TO TAKE YOU BACK.
>> I GUESS YOU HAVE GOTTEN SOME
AGREEMENT IN MEXICO.
PEOPLE DO NOT KNOW WHERE TO GO
IN MEXICO.
>> THE U.S. CANNOT EVEN HOUSE
ALL THESE MIGRANTS.
>> THEY WILL BE ON THE STREETS.
THEY'LL BE SUBJECT TO CARTELS.
>> THIS IS FROM EARLIER TODAY
ON THE SAME DAY THAT BIDEN
ANNOUNCED HIS ORDER.
THIS IS AN INTERVIEW WITH TIME
MAGAZINE.
IN IT, TIME RIGHT THAT BIDEN
SAYS HIS ONLY REGRET ABOUT
LIFTING TRUMP'S ANTI
IMMIGRATION MEASURES IS THAT
HE DID NOT DO IT SOONER.
HIS GOAL AND SECOND TERM IS TO
FINISH WHAT HE STARTED.
ISN'T THAT A COMPLETE REVERSAL
OF WHAT WE ARE SEEING TODAY?
>> YEAH.
I AM NOT ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE
WHO WOULD SAY THAT BIDEN'S
TRUMP.
>> WE ARE NOT SAYING THAT.
>> BUT THIS IS EXTREMELY
DISAPPOINTING.
HE DID PROMISE HE WOULD HAVE A
HUMANE ASYLUM SYSTEM.
>> WHERE DO YOU THINK THE NEXT
STEP IS HERE?
DO YOU THINK YOU ARE SUCCESSFUL
IN YOUR LAWSUIT OR DO YOU THINK
THE ORDERS PUSHED THROUGH?
>> I THINK THEY'RE NOT LOOKING
TO PULL THAT EXECUTIVE ORDER.
I THINK THEY WILL MAKE A
DECISION ON HOW TO DO IT.
I THINK AT THIS POINT, YOU WILL
PROBABLY HAVE TO RELY ON THE
COURTS AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS.
DEFINITELY GOING TO WIN OR
LOSE.
THERE'S TOO MUCH AT STAKE HERE.
WE ARE SEEING A SEA CHANGE IN
AMERICA NOW.
THE ASYLUM SYSTEM IS DIVERGING
FROM THE REST OF THE WORLD.
WE SAID WE WOULD AT LEAST GREEN
PEOPLE BEFORE WE SEND THEM BACK
TO DANGER.
>> WHAT IS THE SOLUTION?
CLEARLY THERE IS A CRISIS.
I MEAN, CLEARLY WE HAVE TO HAVE
LAWS AND BORDERS.
I KNOW YOU ARE ON THE FRONTLINE
FIGHTING BUT WHAT IS THE
SOLUTION?
>> TWO.
WE NEED MORE LEGAL PATHWAYS SO
EVERYONE DOES NOT HAVE TO LINE
UP AT THE BORDER.
THEY COME IN AND CONTRIBUTE TO
THE ECONOMY.
THE SECOND THING IS WE NEED TO
PUT MORE ASYLUM OFFICERS AT THE
BORDER TO DO THE SCREENINGS.
WE HAVE THE RESOURCES.
THERE IS ALREADY A LAW IN PLACE
THAT ALLOWS THE SCREENINGS TO
HAPPEN VERY QUICKLY.
WE DO NOT NEED MORE ENFORCEMENT
AGENTS.
THEY ARE NOT TRYING TO ESCAPE.
THEY ARE TRYING TO APPLY FOR
ASYLUM.
THOSE ARE THE SOLUTIONS WE NEED
Weitere verwandte Videos ansehen
US President Joe Biden signs executive order drastically tightening US-Mexican border | DW News
Sen. Manchin reacts to Trump’s criminal conviction
Biden’s border actions are a ‘stalling tactic’: Gianno Caldwell
Alejandro Mayorkas: We have further strengthened the border through executive action
Biden announces sweeping changes to asylum system
President Biden’s sweeping changes going into effect at the southern border
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)