HUAWEI FUNDS USA RESEARCH to bypass SANCTIONS - china laughs at biden...
Summary
TLDRIn this episode of The Daily Blob, the host discusses the contrasting approaches to intellectual property between the US and China, using Huawei's strategy as a case study. While the US values patenting and monopolizing ideas for economic growth, China prioritizes execution and rapid product development. The video highlights how Huawei, despite being blacklisted, funds US research to gain access to publicly available information that can be integrated into their products. This raises questions about the effectiveness of sanctions and the future dynamics of technology and business between these two economic powerhouses.
Takeaways
- 📣 The video discusses the disconnect between American and Chinese perspectives on intellectual property and business practices.
- 🏛️ The United States values intellectual property as a cornerstone of its wealth and innovation, with a focus on patenting and owning ideas.
- 🌏 In contrast, China prioritizes execution over the concept of intellectual property ownership, valuing those who can produce and ship products quickly.
- 🚫 The US has imposed sanctions to contain China's development in areas like AI, restricting the export of high-power AI chips.
- 💡 Huawei, a Chinese tech giant, has been secretly funding open-source American research to bypass intellectual property restrictions.
- 🤔 The video raises concerns about the effectiveness of sanctions when different cultures have different views on intellectual property.
- 🔍 It highlights a case where Huawei funded a research competition through a Washington-based foundation, without direct affiliation.
- 🏫 The research funded by Huawei is happening at prestigious universities, including Harvard, and could impact both defense and commercial interests.
- 📈 The video suggests that as China grows economically, its business paradigms will increasingly influence global practices.
- 🤝 It encourages viewers to consider how different societies view the world and the implications for international business and politics.
- 🔑 The script ponders the future of technology and business, questioning whether the American model of intellectual property ownership will remain dominant.
Q & A
What is the main topic of discussion in the video script?
-The main topic of discussion in the video script is the difference in approaches to intellectual property between the United States and China, and how this impacts the technology industry, particularly in the context of Huawei funding American research.
Why does the speaker believe that intellectual property is a cornerstone of the United States' wealth?
-The speaker believes that intellectual property is a cornerstone of the United States' wealth because it allows individuals and companies to patent ideas, own them, and then monopolize and profit from them, which in turn drives innovation and investment in new ideas.
What is the speaker's view on the Chinese approach to intellectual property?
-The speaker suggests that China focuses more on execution rather than the idea of owning intellectual property. In China, the emphasis is on who can build and ship products the fastest, rather than on who can monopolize an idea.
What is the issue with the current sanctions against China, according to the speaker?
-The issue with the current sanctions against China, as per the speaker, is that they might not be effective because they are based on the assumption that China values intellectual property in the same way the United States does. The sanctions aim to contain China's development, but the speaker questions the effectiveness of this approach.
How is Huawei allegedly bypassing restrictions on intellectual property?
-Huawei is allegedly bypassing restrictions on intellectual property by secretly funding American research that will be published openly. They then take this public information and integrate it into their products, circumventing the need to own the intellectual property.
What is the role of the Optica Foundation in Huawei's research funding?
-The Optica Foundation is used as a conduit for Huawei's research funding in the United States. It remains anonymous to avoid being seen as a promotion, and the foundation is interested in high-sensitivity optical sensors and detectors among other categories of research.
What is the speaker's concern regarding the United States' approach to dealing with China?
-The speaker's concern is that the United States has a paternalistic view towards China, attempting to control the level of technological and societal growth that China can achieve, which the speaker finds problematic and not reflective of how life and global dynamics work.
What does the speaker suggest as an alternative to the current approach to intellectual property?
-The speaker suggests considering an open-source approach to everything, documenting all aspects of a business so thoroughly that even a 9-year-old could replicate it, and then asking if one could still be the best despite this transparency.
What is the potential impact of Huawei's strategy on the future of technology and business?
-The potential impact of Huawei's strategy is that it could lead to a shift in how technology and business operate, with a greater emphasis on execution and the ability to innovate quickly, rather than on owning and monopolizing ideas.
How does the speaker view the future dynamics between the US and China in terms of business and technology?
-The speaker views the future dynamics as being significantly influenced by the differing paradigms of the US and China. While the US has historically been based on monopolizing ideas, China is pushing a paradigm based on execution and production capacity, which could reshape the global business landscape.
Outlines
🌐 Intellectual Property and Business Dynamics
The speaker discusses the contrast between the American emphasis on intellectual property and the Chinese focus on execution. In the US, the ability to patent and monopolize ideas is foundational to wealth creation, whereas in China, the priority is on who can manufacture and ship products most efficiently. The narrative highlights the issue of differing perspectives when issuing threats or ultimatums in international relations and business. It also touches on the current sanctions and the American attempt to contain China's technological advancement, particularly in AI, by restricting the export of high-power AI chips. The speaker suggests that Chinese companies like Huawei might circumvent these restrictions by funding open-source American research, thereby gaining access to publicly available information to integrate into their products without concern for intellectual property ownership.
🔍 The Impact of Huawei's Secret Research Funding
This paragraph delves into the revelation that Huawei has been secretly funding research in the US through a Washington-based foundation and university competitions, despite being blacklisted. The research, which is happening at prestigious institutions like Harvard, is aimed at developing cutting-edge technologies that could potentially benefit China's defense and commercial interests. The money is funneled in a way that raises national security concerns for the US government. The foundation has shown interest in high-sensitivity optical sensors and detectors, among other areas of research. The concern is that this could lead to innovations that give China an advantage. The speaker also points out the irony of the situation, where the US is trying to prevent China's commercial growth by restricting technology exports, which may not be effective if China can access the necessary knowledge through public research.
🚀 The Future of Technology and Business Paradigms
The final paragraph contemplates the future of technology and business, particularly the impact of differing global paradigms on innovation and execution. The speaker questions the US's paternalistic approach to China's technological growth and the effectiveness of containment strategies. They suggest that China's investment in public research and development could be a strategic move to bypass traditional intellectual property barriers. The paragraph also encourages individuals to consider how they prepare their careers and businesses for a future where execution may be more valuable than the idea itself. The speaker invites viewers to reflect on the dynamics between the US and China's business practices and ponders the implications for personal and corporate strategies in a rapidly evolving global economy.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Intellectual Property
💡Patent
💡Copyright
💡Monopolize
💡China
💡Huawei
💡Research Funding
💡Open Source
💡Sanctions
💡Optica Foundation
💡National Security
💡Commercial Interests
Highlights
The Daily Blob discusses the impact of politics on technology and the challenges of differing global perspectives on intellectual property.
The U.S. values intellectual property as a cornerstone of wealth and innovation, with a system that allows for the patenting and monopolization of ideas.
China focuses more on execution and product shipment rather than owning intellectual property, leading to a different approach to idea monetization.
The Chinese system allows for the taking of ideas and competition based on execution, potentially leading to different outcomes in innovation.
U.S. sanctions aim to contain China's development in areas like AI, but China's approach to intellectual property could circumvent these restrictions.
Huawei's strategy of funding open-source American research allows them access to ideas without violating intellectual property laws.
The Optica Foundation, funded by Huawei, supports global research and academic communication, remaining anonymous to avoid promotional perceptions.
Huawei's funding of research competitions at U.S. universities like Harvard raises concerns about national security and commercial interests.
The fear is that publicly published research funded by Huawei could give China an advantage in defense and commercial sectors.
The legality of Huawei's actions is questioned, as funding research for publication does not fall under the current ban.
Huawei operates similar research competitions openly in other parts of the world, showing a global interest in advancing technology.
The U.S.'s approach to containing China's technological growth is criticized as paternalistic and potentially ineffective.
China's economic growth and production capacity are significant factors in the global technological landscape.
The video ponders the future of technology businesses in a world where intellectual property laws may not be as dominant.
The importance of considering different societal paradigms when building a business or career in technology is highlighted.
The video concludes with a call to action for viewers to consider the implications of Huawei's actions and the future of U.S.-China relations in technology.
Transcripts
welcome to another episode of The Daily
blob where I come on to YouTube every
day to Roar about the things going on in
the technology world and sadly talk way
too much about
politics when I came back to do the
daily blob I was like I'm just gonna
talk about technology I'm not going to
talk about
politics oh and then the world happened
and then the world happened so I think
this is an interesting story and I think
this is a perfect example of the problem
when politicians look at the world a
particular way and they expect everybody
else to look at the world the same way
one of the problems that you have
whether you're you know whatever type of
leader that you are is that when you
issue threats when you issue ultimatums
if the other side doesn't see the world
in the same way that you see the world
those threats and ultimatums might not
go the way that you think and so one of
the interesting things with the American
way of doing business is that we really
care about intellectual property so
intellectual property is literally a
founding building block of the United
States the idea that you can get a a
patent the idea that you can have
copyright the I the the idea that you
can literally own and essentially
monopolize an idea and make money off of
it is a Cornerstone of basically what
has been able uh to make the United
States wealthy somebody comes up with
with an idea for something they patent
it then other people who want to use it
basically have to pay a royalty all that
money then comes in to the original
Venture of the idea they get a lot of
money and then the idea is that they can
then invest that into coming up with
other ideas and other ideas and other
ideas and other ideas and basically with
that consolidation of money that comes
in from that one idea then you can
create you know major industries uh the
problem is is when you get to countries
like China they actually
uh uh concentrate on execution more than
they concentrate on the idea of owning
intellectual property so what I mean by
that is the the the concept there is the
people that should make the money are
the people that can build and actually
ship product the fastest right so if
somebody has an idea uh and they patent
it and then for whatever reason they
don't allow other people to use the
patent or the royalties are too high
that idea doesn't actually help the
citizen R and it doesn't really help the
world essentially that person has
captured that idea so that nobody else
can use it right and that is a fault of
the intellectual property system that we
have and so basically what the Chinese
system is is you don't really own the
idea in such a way you come up with the
idea you start shipping product and then
the idea the concept is almost anybody
else can basically take that idea they
can start shipping product and whoever
executes best in ends up being the
winner and why this is important is
because there's a lot of sanctions going
on right now in order to try to prevent
China from I don't
know I still don't get
it we're trying to prevent them from
getting AI or
something I I I'm giving up on the Biden
Administration they're just kind of
doing what they're doing right there's
this idea that
somehow we can contain right again a
political thing there's this idea that
we can contain pain China both
economically and militarily and
developmentally right and so we're not
going to ship them uh basically uh chips
that are able to do high power Ai and a
lot of these other things and the idea
is that will contain them well the
Curious Thing though is a lot of that
comes from the idea of owning
intellectual property right Nvidia owns
the right to be able to manufacture
processors or whatever in a certain way
well what becomes interesting is if you
have companies such as Huawei
what if wuwei starts funding American
Research that essentially will be open-
sourced it will be
published because they don't care about
the intellectual property they do not
care about monopolizing the idea all
they care about is finding a way to
solve the problem so instead of worrying
about monopolizing the idea they start
funding American highquality Research so
that Americans can solve the problem
publicly and then they take that public
information bring it back into China in
order to integrate that into their
product since they don't care about the
IP to begin with and I think this is an
interesting thing where you have
societies come together and again humans
look at the world differently one of my
problems having traveled around the
world and listening and listening again
you sit down and you listen to people
and you know it's a diverse conversation
when they say crap you wouldn't have
even imagined and the thing is when you
sit down and you talk with people all
around the world the reality is is
different societies vook at the world
differently the idea that we're all the
same is abjectly stupid and so the
problem is is when two societies come
together and they look at the world
differently you can run into some major
problems if you don't take that into
account remain Gadget Huawei has been
secretly funding research in America
after being blacklisted so they can't
get the products that are protected by
intellectual property so they'll just
fund research so that somebody creates
the documentation so they can just take
that documentation back home the money
is being funneled through a Washington
base foundation and a University
competition Chinese Tech GI giant wuwei
has been secretly funding research in
America despite being blacklisted The
Cutting Edge research is happening at
universities including Harvard and the
money is being funneled through an
independent Washington based Research
Foundation along along with a
competition for scientists uh Bloomberg
found that wuwei was the sole funer of a
research competition that has awarded
millions of dollars since 2022 and
attracted hundreds of proposals from
scientists some of these scientists are
the top us universities that have banned
research researchers from working with
the company so basically it's a
competition so you're not working with
the company you're just doing a
competition uh the fear is that this
research could lead to innovations that
give China a leg up with regard to both
defense Contracting and commercial
interest according to Kevin wolf a
partner at the business focused Law Firm
Akin who specializes in export controls
Optica the foundation behind all this
has posted online that it is interested
in quote high sensitivity Optical
sensors and detectors among other
categories uh of research and again so
one of the the the concerning Parts here
again you always hear about the defense
Contracting right everything's about
security we got to ban Tik Tock because
National Security or something right so
anyway you always hear about the
security thing but again think about
this
we we are
stating that we are trying to prevent
China's commercial interests from
increasing does that sound like a good
idea at least to say publicly quote it's
a bad look yes that is a bad look but
anyways it's a bad look for a
prestigious Research Foundation to be
anonymously accepting money from a
Chinese company that raises so many
National Security concerns for the US
government says James Mulin a defense
contractor who's worked on security
research issues uh it's worth noting
that this money money funneling
operation doesn't look to be illegal
right so again that's the interesting
thing if Huawei tried to purchase
processors from the United States that
would be illegal if
wuwei Funds American researchers so that
they develop new ways of building
processors and then they publicly
publish that information
well that's
fine again this becomes the interesting
thing when you start think about nation
state actors when you're dealing with
actors that can spend tens of billions
or hundreds of billions of dollars in
order to implement Solutions it entirely
changes the game
plan um uh let's see here illegal as
research intended for publication
doesn't fall under the purview of the
ban Huawei operates similar competitions
in other parts of the world though
openly people who participate in the
us-based research comption didn't even
know that Huawei was involved believing
the money to come from Optica the
competition Awards $1 million per year
and Optica didn't give any indication
that Huawei was supplying the cash a
Huawei spokesperson told Bloomberg that
the company and the Optica Foundation
created the competition to support
Global Research and pro promote academic
communication saying that remained
Anonymous to keep from being seen as a
promotion of some kind yeah sure there
you go uh we're we're Anonymous so it
doesn't seem uh like it's
advertising really um so anyways I
thought this was kind of an interesting
story again to be thinking about you
know how the world of technology is
going to progress and how we again we
think about things like technology there
so much you know go thing you know this
idea of owning intellectual property
right the right to monopolize an idea
that's something very inherent into the
American system how do we deal when it
entirely different Society basically
says no nah right what happens again
when
manufacturing uh becomes so relatively
trivial if expensive that the idea
actually becomes more valuable than the
product again right now the idea the
concept is is that Nvidia can't ship AI
chips to China because whatever right
but here's the thing what if China gets
to the point where they don't actually
need the hardware itself they don't need
Nvidia to build the ship they just kind
of sort of need to know how to build a
ship and so then again they put this
funding out there for research and they
can they can rightly say they can
rightly say look look China China is
putting so much money into public
research and development how can you be
snarky about that right everybody a clap
look at how good China is being for the
world and then when that when the the
the the research is is published
publicly published China then just takes
all that research and you know basically
it's paint by numbers okay so we need
one of those and we need one of those
and we do one of those and we do a
couple of these and we need a couple of
phds and yay we now have an AI chip or
Optical sensor uh or whatever else um
again I do think it's kind of like that
fascinating idea and and that's my
concern with how the United States is
trying to deal with China is we're
really we really have that
paternalistic view of China not just not
just again that we want a better
military than China or you know we care
about the n-h line or something like
that but there's this this this massive
paternalism as in we are trying to State
at what level their society can
grow
what as I've said many times hey have
you all said that out loud it doesn't
sound that good right but again that's
really like oh okay we We As Americans
like the level of technology that China
is currently at so we are going to keep
them
there yeah that's that's not how life
works again you look at kids you look at
you look at The Minister's daughter The
Minister's daughter how does that work
out in the real world you want to talk
about bat crap crazy doing drugs and
sleeping with everybody and you're like
wow what does your father do oh he was a
minister like ah now I understand right
cuz people are going to do what they're
going to do um and so it's kind of
curious to see this interplay between uh
between the US and China and again one
of the other other important things to
be thinking about this is again as you
create your technology businesses
thinking about the world viiew again
China is the second largest economy in
the world and again it really depends on
how you look at it they're they're
producing so much their production
capacity essentially they passes
everybody else and so one of the things
to be thinking about is what what is the
Paradigm you're pushing your career
forward right if the United States and
the Western World were the powers for
the past couple of hundred years then
how we look at the world uh is is
significant for how you became powerful
rich and Powerful yesterday but again as
China grows as these other countries
grow
economically their paradigms are going
to start pushing the world more and more
our paradigm is based on monopol
monopolizing the idea their Paradigm is
based on the ACT the actual ability to
execute so one of the things to be
thinking about with your career and your
business and all that kind of stuff is
are you designing the business your
business for how business will operate
within the next 5 to 10
years and that is something to think
about again imagine imagine if you open-
sourced everything imagine if you
literally
documented everything about your
business to the point that a 9-year-old
could do it could you still be the best
could you still be the best and I think
that's one of the things uh to ponder
here so anyways so what do you think
about this what do you think about
Huawei uh funding American Research so
they that they can get access to the
information and build the crap
themselves right again basic basically
that's what what basically what H Huawei
is doing right now is they're hiring
tech consultants hey we're essentially
just Hing you so that you can explain
some stuff to us we'll go do it
ourselves right what do you think about
this what do you think about the
Dynamics between how the US does
business and how China does business and
how that'll work going into the future
um again I will be fascinated by this
and I really hope at some point we get
an Administration that isn't trying to
you know be apparent to China that would
ever be ever so lovely as an American
like I may have issues with China but
I'm not your mommy or
daddy but anyo uh if you like these
videos give us a thumbs up subscribe if
you want to leave a comment down below
and if you want to throw a couple of dog
bones to Roxy there's a donor box Link
in the description and with that see
y'all later
Weitere ähnliche Videos ansehen
Biden vuole "punire la Cina": come la guerra in Ucraina sta cambiando forma, da Ovest a Est
Joseph S. Nye, Jr.: What Is Power?
An American in China; A Quiet Invasion | 60 Minutes Full Episodes
What Does Apple's Falling Revenue Indicate? | Vantage with Palki Sharma
China WARNS Russia: "GET OUT!"
How do American universities make their money? | Counting the Cost
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)