Pemilik 4nj1ng Berkalung Bendera Jadi Tersangka

Summary

The video discusses the controversy surrounding a man who placed the Indonesian national flag around a dog's neck, leading to his being charged with insulting the national symbol. The police chief of Bengkalis, AKBP Setyo Bimo Anggoro, explains the legal aspects, referring to the 2009 law on national symbols, and highlights the viral nature of the incident. Despite public backlash and a warning from locals, the man didn't remove the flag, prompting police action. The police emphasize both legal enforcement and efforts to maintain public peace, with the suspect acknowledging his wrongdoing and apologizing.

Takeaways

• 😀 A man from Bengkalis was arrested for allegedly insulting the national flag by placing it on a dog's neck.
• 😀 The case gained significant attention when it went viral on social media, prompting public outrage and a demand for clarification.
• 😀 The police took the suspect into custody for his safety and to prevent further conflict from arising in the area.
• 😀 The key issue revolves around the violation of the 2009 Law on the National Flag, which specifies proper flag sizes and usage.
• 😀 The national flag in question was improperly displayed as it was placed around a dog's neck, which led to accusations of disrespect.
• 😀 Witnesses and evidence, including the flag itself, played a crucial role in establishing the suspect's involvement in the incident.
• 😀 Experts, including criminal law specialists, constitutional scholars, and cultural experts, were consulted to assess the legality of the act.
• 😀 A lawyer, Hotman Paris, questioned the criminal implications of using a flag in such a way, suggesting it may not meet the legal criteria for insult.
• 😀 The police emphasized the importance of maintaining public order (hankamtimas) alongside legal enforcement in this case.
• 😀 The suspect admitted that his actions were wrong, apologized to the public, and expressed regret for disrespecting the national flag.

Q & A

Why was the individual with the flag tied around the dog’s neck named a suspect?

The individual was named a suspect for insulting the national flag, as the act of tying the Indonesian flag around a dog’s neck was seen as a form of disrespect to the national symbol.

What law did the police refer to in this case?

The police referred to Law No. 24 of 2009, which outlines the proper handling and respect for the national flag. This law includes specifications on the acceptable size of the flag and prohibits acts that insult or disrespect it.

What were the key pieces of evidence in this case?

The key pieces of evidence included a video that went viral, witness statements, and the Indonesian flag found tied around the dog’s neck. These were used to establish the basis for the legal case.

What role did public reaction play in this case?

The public reaction was significant, with many people approaching the suspect's location to demand clarification. The authorities intervened by taking the suspect into custody to ensure safety and control the situation.

What is the argument regarding whether tying the flag to a dog’s neck constitutes an insult?

The argument revolves around whether the act violates the dignity of the national flag. Legal experts, including criminal law, constitutional law, and cultural experts, were consulted to assess whether this act qualifies as a form of insult according to the law.

What does Law No. 24 of 2009 state about the national flag?

Law No. 24 of 2009 specifies the proper sizes for the national flag and outlines the actions that disrespect the flag, including its improper use or defacement. Tying the flag to a dog's neck could fall under these prohibited acts.

How did the suspect react to the accusations?

The suspect acknowledged their actions as wrong, apologized to the public, and expressed regret for the mistake. The suspect’s admission and apology were considered in the legal proceedings.

What steps did the police take to manage the situation?

The police focused on ensuring public order and safety by taking the suspect into custody. They also engaged in persuasive measures by explaining the situation to the local community and clarifying the legal implications.

How did experts contribute to the investigation?

Experts in criminal law, constitutional law, and cultural affairs were consulted to provide opinions on whether the act of tying the flag to the dog’s neck truly constituted an insult to the national symbol, which helped shape the legal approach.

Did the police consider reviewing the criminal charges based on expert advice?

The police considered the suggestions made by the legal expert, including Hotman Paris’s advice to revisit the criminal charges. However, the focus remained on maintaining public order and ensuring that the legal process followed due course.