Alyssa Mercante And Sweet Baby CEO CAUGHT SCRUBBING Twitter Accounts As SmashJT Lawsuit Backfires

Summary

The ongoing lawsuit between Alyssa Marante, former Kotaku editor, and YouTuber Smash JT has escalated with bizarre updates. Marante’s defamation case against Smash JT is marred by her own public social media posts, which contradict her claims. As the legal battle unfolds, both Marante and her allies have been deleting tweets, raising suspicions of a coordinated effort to hide evidence. Additionally, Marante’s handling of personal information in the lawsuit has drawn backlash, further fueling the controversy. Despite these moves, Smash JT has gained significant public support, raising over $50,000 for his legal defense, putting Marante's case under increasing scrutiny.

Takeaways

• 😀 Alyssa Marante has filed a lawsuit against Smash JT, accusing him of defamation, tortious interference, and stochastic terrorism.
• 😀 Marante claims that Smash JT's coverage of her social media posts led to her losing her job at Kotaku, after allegations of antisemitism surfaced.
• 😀 One of the central claims in the lawsuit involves Marante's allegations that Smash JT made defamatory comments about her being a sex worker and using favors for career advancement.
• 😀 The lawsuit is seen by some as unsubstantiated, especially considering Marante's own Twitter posts, which align with the claims Smash JT made about her.
• 😀 Marante's social media activity, including tweets about sex work and career struggles, appears to contradict her defamation claim against Smash JT.
• 😀 On December 7th, 2023, Alyssa Marante started deleting numerous tweets, which is considered suspicious given the timing of the lawsuit and ongoing legal proceedings.
• 😀 Deleting tweets in the middle of a lawsuit could result in legal penalties, as evidenced by past court cases where deleting social media posts led to sanctions.
• 😀 Marante redacted her home address from the lawsuit, citing security concerns, but failed to extend the same protection to Smash JT, whose home address was shared publicly.
• 😀 There are accusations of 'doxxing' and threats against Smash JT and his family, which some see as a deliberate strategy by Marante's team to intimidate or silence critics.
• 😀 Other figures in the gaming industry, including Black Girl Gamers and Kim Belir, are also reported to be deleting tweets at the same time, leading some to speculate about a coordinated effort to cover up damaging content or prepare for upcoming legal battles.
• 😀 The combination of tweet deletions, false copyright claims, and legal tactics is viewed by some as an indication that these individuals or groups are feeling desperate and trying to silence opposition through questionable methods.

Q & A

What is the main subject of the lawsuit involving Smash JT and Alyssa Marante?

The lawsuit revolves around Alyssa Marante, a former Kotaku editor, accusing Smash JT of defamation, tortious interference with a contract, and stochastic terrorism. Marante claims that Smash JT's criticism led to her losing her job at Kotaku and caused harassment against her.

What specific defamation claims did Alyssa Marante make against Smash JT?

Alyssa Marante accuses Smash JT of defamation for comments suggesting she may have been involved in sex work or exchanging favors to advance in her career. Marante's lawsuit claims these statements were false and damaging to her reputation.

How does the evidence from Alyssa Marante's own Twitter account challenge her defamation claim?

Alyssa Marante's own Twitter account contains posts where she admits to engaging in sex work and making explicit statements about her experiences in the industry. This undermines her defamation claim, as the posts seem to support the very claims Smash JT made.

What suspicious activity occurred around December 7th regarding social media deletions?

On December 7th, Alyssa Marante, along with others in the industry, began deleting a significant number of tweets. This mass deletion occurred around the time the lawsuit was filed, raising suspicions that the deletions were intended to hide evidence or alter the public record.

What are the potential legal consequences of deleting tweets during an ongoing lawsuit?

Deleting tweets during an ongoing lawsuit can lead to legal penalties, including sanctions. In the case of Alyssa Marante, deleting tweets relevant to the case could interfere with the legal process, as deleted tweets can still be retrieved by legal teams and courts.

Why did Alyssa Marante redact her home address in the lawsuit documents?

Alyssa Marante redacted her home address from the lawsuit documents, claiming that revealing it could result in threats and harassment. However, she did not extend the same protection to Smash JT, whose personal address was made public in the documents.

What controversy surrounds the release of Smash JT’s personal information?

Alyssa Marante's legal filing included Smash JT's personal home address, which she shared publicly on social media, leading to threats against him and his family. This action is viewed as malicious, especially since Marante sought to protect her own private information in the same filing.

How does the Black Girl Gamers group relate to the case, and what suspicious activities have been noted?

The Black Girl Gamers group is linked to Alyssa Marante through shared ideological positions. The group has been involved in deleting a large number of tweets and filing false copyright takedowns on YouTube, which may be an attempt to silence criticism or gather personal information.

What is the significance of the December 7th date in relation to other industry figures?

The December 7th date is significant because it marks the beginning of mass tweet deletions by several figures in the industry, including Alyssa Marante, Black Girl Gamers, and Kim Belir. This coordinated deletion suggests an attempt to cover up or hide information during a time of heightened scrutiny.

How has the public reaction to Smash JT’s legal battle affected the outcome of the lawsuit?

Smash JT has received significant public support, with over $50,000 raised for his legal defense. This unexpected support has likely backfired on Alyssa Marante and her legal team, as it shows that their efforts to silence criticism may not be as effective as they hoped.