Motorcycle rider group, inamin ang modus para kumita ng karagdagang-kita lalo kapag rush hour

Summary

The transcript highlights the frustrations of motorcycle riders involved in a long-running pilot study, with years of delays in formalizing motorcycle ride-sharing services. Riders feel abandoned by the government, especially during election cycles, and express frustration over poor monitoring systems and app manipulation during peak times. Despite the government’s claims of fraud detection, there is little enforcement. The legislative process has repeatedly stalled, and riders are dissatisfied with the lack of support amidst rising fuel costs. The conversation emphasizes the need for better regulation, swift legislative action, and support for riders' welfare.

Takeaways

• 😀 The pilot study for motorcycle taxis has been ongoing for several years, causing frustration among riders who feel the process has been unnecessarily prolonged.
• 😀 Riders express dissatisfaction with the government's failure to implement proper monitoring systems, such as tracking when riders shut down their apps during peak hours or bad weather.
• 😀 The lack of a clear and enforced regulatory framework leaves riders vulnerable to exploitation, with no immediate recourse for issues like app shutdowns during rush hour or rain.
• 😀 There are concerns about pricing manipulation, with riders turning off their apps to take advantage of better fare rates, despite the existence of a fraud detection system.
• 😀 The legislative process has been slow, with the motorcycle taxi bill passing in the House of Representatives but getting delayed or stalled in the Senate, leaving the issue unresolved.
• 😀 Riders feel the government's continued delays are costing them their livelihoods, as the regulations remain uncertain and they continue to operate without clear legal support.
• 😀 Despite passing the bill multiple times in different legislative periods, progress has been slow, causing a sense of disenfranchisement among riders who feel ignored by lawmakers.
• 😀 The frequent changes in leadership within the Department of Transportation (DOTr) and the LTFRB (Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board) have contributed to the ongoing delays and confusion.
• 😀 Riders highlight that they have been providing essential transportation services (e.g., for long periods since 2009) yet are still treated as informal or illegal operators by the government.
• 😀 The frustrations of the riders reflect broader systemic issues in the transport sector, where the lack of coherent policy and long delays in implementing solutions are hindering progress for all stakeholders.

Q & A

What is the main frustration expressed by the riders in the transcript?

The main frustration expressed by the riders is the prolonged delay in formalizing the pilot study into law, the lack of support from the government, and the inefficiency in addressing issues such as the deactivation of the app during peak times or bad weather.

What issue do the riders raise regarding the app's functionality?

Riders highlight that during rush hours or when it rains, many drivers turn off the app to avoid working, which causes inconvenience to passengers who simply want to get home.

How does the government address the issue of app deactivation?

The government mentions having a fraud detection system in place that checks the frequency of app deactivations. If a driver repeatedly turns off the app, it triggers an alert, and some drivers have already been banned based on this system.

What is the general sentiment towards the government's efforts to regulate the ride-sharing industry?

The sentiment is largely negative, with riders feeling that the government has been slow and inefficient in formalizing the system. They also feel that the process has been delayed too long, with frequent changes in leadership at the LTFRB (Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board).

Why are the riders particularly frustrated with the pilot study process?

Riders are frustrated because the pilot study has been extended beyond the initial planned period, and they feel that the process has not resulted in any real progress or legal clarity. They argue that they are caught in a cycle of prolonged experimentation without any clear benefits.

How long has the pilot study been running, and what is the riders' perspective on its duration?

The pilot study has been running for several years, far longer than the initial 6-month to 1-year duration expected. Riders feel that this extended period has been unnecessary, and they are upset that the process is still ongoing without resolution.

What concerns are raised about the legislative process regarding the ride-sharing laws?

The riders and some government officials express concern that the legislative process has been slow and inconsistent. Laws were passed in the lower house, but have faced challenges in the Senate, and even when passed, the laws have not been effectively implemented.

What is the impact of leadership changes on the regulatory process?

Frequent changes in leadership at the LTFRB have caused confusion and inconsistency in the regulatory process. This has led to delays and a lack of continuity in addressing the issues faced by riders and the overall implementation of the ride-sharing system.

What role do the riders believe the government plays in their challenges?

Riders believe the government is largely unhelpful, particularly after elections, when they feel they are abandoned. They express that they are often left to fend for themselves, and the government's lack of action has led to frustration and the perception that they are being exploited.

What is the government's response to the criticisms raised by the riders?

The government acknowledges the frustrations and promises to look into the issues raised, including the slow legislative process. However, there is recognition that the problem is complex, involving both regulatory inefficiencies and political hurdles.