The Death of the author and it's Postmodern implications
Summary
TLDRThis NPTEL lecture on Postmodernism in Literature explores the concept of 'The Death of the Author' by Roland Barthes, a seminal text for poststructuralists and postmodernists. The lecture delves into the intellectual tradition of authorship, contrasting it with modern practices and the influence of New Criticism. It emphasizes the shift from author-centric to reader-centric interpretations, where the text's meaning emerges through reader engagement rather than authorial intent. The lecture also touches on the historical emergence of the author figure and its implications for literary criticism and theory.
Takeaways
- š **Postmodernism Introduction**: The lecture begins by revisiting the concept of Postmodernism, emphasizing its role as a critical framework for analyzing cultural trends and literary events.
- š **Close Reading of Texts**: The session focuses on a close reading of specific texts to understand Postmodernism, moving beyond theoretical discussions to practical literary analysis.
- āļø **The Death of the Author**: The central text for discussion is Roland Barthes' 'The Death of the Author,' a foundational poststructuralist text questioning the traditional importance of the author in interpreting a text.
- šØ **Modernism to Postmodernism Shift**: The shift from Modernism to Postmodernism is marked by significant changes in various cultural practices, including the 'death' of certain artistic and literary conventions.
- š¼ļø **Art and Authorship**: The discussion extends the concept of authorship beyond literature to other fields such as graphic design and film, highlighting the broader implications of Postmodern thought.
- š **Historical Context of Authorship**: The essay 'The Intention Fallacy' by Wimsatt and Beardsley is mentioned as a precursor to Barthes' work, both challenging the idea that an author's intentions are central to understanding a text.
- š£ļø **Reader's Role**: Barthes argues for the primacy of the reader in the interpretation process, suggesting that meaning is not inherent in the text but is constructed by the reader.
- š **Text and Reader Connection**: The text is seen as reaching its full identity through the reader's engagement, detaching the importance of the author's role after the text's creation.
- āļø **Work vs. Text**: Barthes differentiates between a 'work' as a physical object and a 'text' as a process in language, where the latter involves the reader in a dynamic interpretive act.
- š« **Rejecting Authorial Authority**: The transformation of a work into a text occurs when the reader refuses to accept the author's authority over the text's meaning, promoting a democratic reading experience.
- š **The Rise of the Author Figure**: Barthes locates the emergence of the author as a modern construct, linked to Western philosophical ideas and the rise of individual prestige during the modern era.
Q & A
What is the main focus of the NPTEL course session on Postmodernism in Literature?
-The main focus of the session is to explore Postmodernism through a close reading of specific texts, particularly Roland Barthes' 'The Death of the Author,' and to discuss its implications on the concepts of authorship, text, and reading practices within a Postmodernist framework.
What is the significance of the title 'The Death of the Author' in the context of Postmodernism?
-The title 'The Death of the Author' signifies a critical shift away from traditional views of authorship, suggesting that the author's intentions and identity are not central to the interpretation of a text. It aligns with Postmodernist and Poststructuralist ideas that emphasize the reader's role in creating meaning.
How does the end of Modernism relate to the concept of 'The Death of the Author'?
-The end of Modernism marked a cultural and intellectual shift that included the 'death' of various frameworks and subject positions, including the traditional concept of the author. This shift paved the way for the emergence of Postmodernism, where the authority of the author over the text's meaning is questioned.
What is the role of the reader in Barthes' view of a text?
-In Barthes' view, the reader plays an active role in the meaning-making process. The reader engages with the text and participates in its interpretation, with the text's meaning being derived from this interaction rather than being inherent within the text itself.
How does the concept of a 'Readerly text' differ from a 'Writerly text' according to Barthes?
-A 'Readerly text' is one that requires a passive reader, as the author has predetermined the meaning and there is little room for interpretation. In contrast, a 'Writerly text' demands an active reader who engages with the text to create meaning, offering a more participatory and interpretative experience.
What is the distinction between a 'work' and a 'text' as defined by Barthes?
-A 'work' is a physical object, like a book, that can be held and occupies space on a shelf. It becomes a 'text' only when it reaches the reader and engages in a process of interpretation. A text is a process in language that involves the reader in decoding and meaning-making.
What is the historical context of the emergence of the author figure according to Barthes?
-Barthes argues that the author figure is a modern construct, emerging at the end of the Middle Ages in connection with English empiricism, French rationalism, and the personal faith of the Reformation. It is a product of Western philosophical ideas and the needs of modern society.
How does the concept of authorship evolve across different historical periods?
-The concept of authorship has evolved significantly over time. In primitive societies, the author was often absent, with more emphasis on the performance of the speaker or mediator. In earlier literary periods, many works were authored anonymously, and the identity of the author was not crucial. It was not until the modern era that the author's identity became central to the text.
What is the relationship between the author's intentions and the interpretation of a text in the New Criticism approach?
-In the New Criticism approach, the author's intentions are considered irrelevant to the interpretation of a text. This school of thought, represented by Wimsatt and Beardsley's 'The Intention Fallacy,' argues that the text should be read in isolation from the author's biography and intentions.
How does the essay 'The Death of the Author' challenge traditional views on the authority of the author?
-The essay challenges traditional views by arguing that the author's identity and intentions are not central to the meaning of a text. It posits that the text's unity lies not in its origin (with the author) but in its destination (with the reader), and that the reader, not the author, is the key participant in the meaning-making process.
What is the significance of the title 'The Death of the Author' as a pun on 'Le Morte dāArthur'?
-The title 'The Death of the Author' is a pun on 'Le Morte dāArthur,' a work that popularized the legends of King Arthur. This allusion suggests a parallel between the end of the author's dominance in textual interpretation and the end of the reign of King Arthur, highlighting the thematic focus on the decline of the author's authority.
Outlines
š Introduction to Postmodernism in Literature
This paragraph introduces the NPTEL course on Postmodernism in Literature, highlighting the aim to delve into specific texts that exemplify Postmodernism as a concept and a critical framework. The session's focus is on Roland Barthes' seminal essay, 'The Death of the Author,' which is frequently referenced by Poststructuralists and Postmodernists to discuss the relationship between the text, the author, and contemporary reading practices. The lecturer also connects the end of Modernism with the 'death' of various frameworks and the rise of new cultural practices, such as the evolution in painting and the emergence of Pop-art, to set the stage for the discussion on the changing role of the authorship.
šØ The Evolution of Authorship Across Disciplines
The paragraph explores the broader implications of authorship beyond literature, referencing recent discussions in graphic design and film theory that elevate the roles of the designer and the director, respectively, to that of an author. It also mentions the historical evolution of the author's role, from the anonymity of early literary works to the modern emphasis on the author's identity. The discussion leads to the intellectual tradition that predates Barthes' essay, with references to Wimsatt and Beardsley's 'The Intention Fallacy,' which marked a significant shift in literary criticism by differentiating between the author and the text, challenging the importance of the author's intentions in interpreting a text.
š The Intellectual Context of 'The Death of the Author'
This paragraph provides historical context for Roland Barthes' essay, positioning it within the broader literary and cultural shifts of the 1960s. Barthes' work, which argues for the 'death' of the author as a critical figure, is situated alongside other influential texts of the time, such as Derrida's 'Of Grammatology.' The paragraph emphasizes the significance of the essay's publication in 1967, a pivotal year in the history of Postmodernism, and discusses Barthes' own intellectual journey from Structuralism to Poststructuralism. The summary also touches on the distinction between 'Readerly' and 'Writerly' texts, highlighting the active role of the reader in the latter and the shift away from the author as the sole source of meaning.
š The Transformation of Work into Text
The paragraph delves into the transformation of a work into a text, emphasizing the reader's role in this process. It discusses how a work becomes a text when the reader engages with it, refusing to acknowledge the author's authority over meaning. The text is described as a 'play' between the reader and the text, allowing for an open and experimental interaction. The paragraph also distinguishes between a work and a text, with the latter being a process in language that is brought to life through the reader's engagement. The author's role is diminished, and the reader is celebrated as the key participant in the meaning-making process.
šļø The Historical Emergence and Role of the Author
This paragraph examines the historical emergence of the author figure, arguing that the author is a modern construct that arose during the transition from the Middle Ages. It discusses how the author's role has evolved over time, from a period where authorship was not emphasized to the modern era where the author's identity is central to the interpretation of a text. The paragraph also connects the rise of the author with broader intellectual and philosophical trends, such as English empiricism and French rationalism, and suggests that the author figure is a product of Western intellectual thought and societal needs.
Mindmap
Keywords
š”Postmodernism
š”Close Reading
š”Author
š”Poststructuralism
š”Text
š”New Criticism
š”Reader
š”Meaning
š”Structuralism
š”Work vs. Text
Highlights
Introduction to the NPTEL course on Postmodernism in Literature, emphasizing the importance of understanding Postmodernism as both an idea and a critical framework.
The session's focus on close reading of texts to understand Postmodernism, particularly Roland Barthes' seminal text 'The Death of the Author'.
Discussion on the Postmodernist and Poststructuralist use of 'The Death of the Author' to challenge traditional views on text, authorship, and reading practices.
Exploration of the end of Modernism and the beginning of Postmodernism as a period marked by the 'death' of multiple frameworks and subject positions.
Analysis of changes in painting and the emergence of Pop-art as indicative of the shift from Modernism to Postmodernism.
The concept of the Author's death being part of broader cultural and intellectual shifts beyond the literary realm.
The intellectual tradition traced back to Wimsatt and Beardsley's 'The Intention Fallacy' as a precursor to Barthes' ideas.
Introduction of the Auteur theory in film and the evolving perception of the Author's role across different media.
Barthes' distinction between 'Readerly' and 'Writerly' texts and the implications for reader engagement and meaning-making.
The argument that the text's unity lies not in its origin (Author) but in its destination (Reader), emphasizing reader's role in interpretation.
Differentiation between a 'work' and a 'text', with the latter being a process in language involving the reader.
Barthes' view on the Author as a symbol of authority and controller of meaning, and the necessity for the reader to challenge this authority.
The transformation of a work into a text through the reader's engagement and refusal to acknowledge Authorial Authority.
The historical context of the Author's emergence as a modern figure, linked to English empiricism, French rationalism, and Reformation.
The Author's role in discovering the prestige of the individual and its significance in the historical context.
Encouragement for participants to read the original version of 'The Death of the Author' for a deeper understanding of Barthes' arguments.
Transcripts
Good morning everyone; welcome to today'sĀ session of the NPTEL course PostmodernismĀ Ā
in Literature. In the first weekās lectures weĀ started looking at the idea of Postmodernism,Ā Ā
we spoke about the different frameworks withinĀ which Postmodernism exists and the multipleĀ Ā
ways in which one could begin to access itĀ as an idea and also as a critical framework.Ā
So, in today's session, we begin to lookĀ at particular texts, we begin to undertakeĀ Ā
a close reading of texts which are helpful toĀ frame and understand Postmodernism as an idea,Ā Ā
as a movement, and as a conceptual and theoreticalĀ framework. We also in the first weekās lectures,Ā Ā
reiterate the idea that Postmodernism inĀ this course, is being used as a conceptualĀ Ā
and theoretical framework which couldĀ be used to analyze particular culturalĀ Ā
trends particular literary events and alsoĀ various intellectual and literary sites.Ā
So, today's lecture is titled The Death ofĀ the Author and its Postmodern Implications.Ā Ā
The Death of the Author, as some of youĀ may know, is a very seminal text which isĀ Ā
increasingly being used by PoststructuralistsĀ and also by Postmodernists to talk about theĀ Ā
ideas related to text and Author and also theĀ practices of reading in the contemporary. So,Ā Ā
we try to undertake a close reading of this textĀ by Roland Barthes by engaging with it within theĀ Ā
Postmodernist frameworks. And also to see howĀ this text enables us to question and to redefineĀ Ā
various conventional aspects related to reading,Ā textās Author and also the practices of criticism.Ā
In the end of Modernism, as we have seen inĀ the previous lectures, it signaled the deathĀ Ā
of many things that Modernism stood for. So,Ā when we talk about The Death of the Author itĀ Ā
is not a singular thing that happened in theĀ Postmodern phase. The end of Modernism andĀ Ā
the beginning of Postmodernism also signaledĀ and marked the death of multiple frameworks,Ā Ā
various objects and subject of positions as well. For example, if we take the case of painting afterĀ Ā
the Modernist period; we saw a gradual breakingĀ down of form, leading to a denial of subject. AndĀ Ā
then we also saw how brush stroke and textureĀ was altogether demolished from the practice ofĀ Ā
painting, we also saw significantly the emergenceĀ of Pop-art with Andy Warholās digital art, digitalĀ Ā
painting. It also became a movement and a dominantĀ cultural iconic practice. And gradually, towardsĀ Ā
the end of the Modernist period, and with the highĀ period of Postmodernism, we also saw there is aĀ Ā
complete annihilation of any painting technique. So, this is the end of a Modernist journey inĀ Ā
painting. And in various other forms of practicesĀ and trends, we could see similar kinds of deathsĀ Ā
happening. In fact, we saw the death of art asĀ an institution, the idea of a text has undergoneĀ Ā
a number of changes and even the AuthorāsĀ authorship- all of those are the contestedĀ Ā
notions in the contemporary times for theĀ shift from Modernism to Postmodernism.Ā
So, in today's session, we begin to locate theĀ idea of the Author, if Roland Barthesā essayĀ Ā
talks about The Death of the Author, and in theĀ beginning it is also important for us to traceĀ Ā
within which intellectual tradition, discussionsĀ about the Author had begin to emerge; this is notĀ Ā
a new thing that Barthes entirely initiated andĀ this is not the discussions about the Author evenĀ Ā
now we need to reiterate that it is not yet over. For example, there is a book as recent asĀ Ā
published in 2013, about the designer, titledĀ The Designer as Author Producer ActivistĀ Ā
Entrepreneur Curator and Collaborator-Ā this is a work by Stephen Mccarthy;Ā Ā
it has been much discussed in this field ofĀ graphic designing also elevating the positionĀ Ā
of a graphic designer to that of the Author. And in film theory this has been discussed aĀ Ā
little earlier in the previous decades itselfĀ there is Auteur theory which film criticsĀ Ā
often talk about where the film directorĀ is equated with the Author of a film. AndĀ Ā
as Stanley Kubrick has famously stated, āoneĀ man writes a novel. One man writes a symphony-Ā Ā
it is essential that one man make a filmā. So, this discussion about the Author is notĀ Ā
limited to the printed words on a page. It is notĀ limited to books; it in fact, could be extendedĀ Ā
to a number of texts whether it is a graphicĀ design or a movie or anything that we see around.Ā
So, in that sense, the ideas about the Author,Ā the discussions the discourses generated aboutĀ Ā
the Author is a is a very prolific and aĀ thriving field in itself. So, if we try toĀ Ā
trace the intellectual tradition of this evenĀ before Roland Barthes wrote The Death of theĀ Ā
Author, we have an essay published by Wimsatt andĀ Beardsley in 1946 titled The Intention Fallacy.Ā
So, this work was a product of the school ofĀ criticism known as New Criticism; we may alsoĀ Ā
begin to see certain echoes of New CriticismĀ in some of the arguments that Barthes begins toĀ Ā
make in his own essay. And in fact, The IntentionĀ Fallacy is a work which went down in the historyĀ Ā
of literary criticism as a seminal work whichĀ drew a wedge between the Author and the text.Ā
So, there is a distinction that this workĀ makes between the Author and the text. So,Ā Ā
this is in stark contrast with the previousĀ periods in literary history; where the AuthorĀ Ā
and the text function as inseparable objects.Ā The text becomes a product of the Author and theĀ Ā
Authorās biography, the Authorās intention so,Ā to speak in writing the text becomes very veryĀ Ā
important in our understanding of the text itself. So, we have the new critics emerging in the 1940sĀ Ā
and 1950s who argue that this entire notion isĀ a fallacy. And they also begin, the New CriticsĀ Ā
particularly they also begin to argue that theĀ reader could never really know the Author. So,Ā Ā
knowing the Author also becomes a very contestedĀ notion and further in their arguments Wimsatt andĀ Ā
Beardsley; they began to say that the point isĀ not really belong to the Author, it is detachedĀ Ā
from the Author right from moment of its birthĀ and the poem actually belongs to the public.Ā
So, to assume that, to believe that the AuthorĀ has got any control over the intent of the poem;Ā Ā
or any sort of a power to control how the poem isĀ being received- it is a complete fallacy to evenĀ Ā
assume that such a power is being invested on theĀ Author. So, the New Critics began to argue for aĀ Ā
way in which the texts could be read in isolationĀ with the Author by focusing only on the practicesĀ Ā
of reading, only on the aspects of reading. So, from this moment we come to RolandĀ Ā
Barthesā The Death of the Author which isĀ published in 1967; 1967 is an importantĀ Ā
date in the history of literary criticism andĀ also in the history of Postmodernism. In fact,Ā Ā
this is one year after the year that Brian MchaleĀ designates as the starting point of Postmodernism,Ā Ā
this is also the year when Derrida published hisĀ celebrated work Of Grammatology. Of GrammatologyĀ Ā
incidentally also became a foundationalĀ text of deconstructive literary criticism.Ā
So, Barthesā essay gets published at such aĀ critical juncture in literary and culturalĀ Ā
history and he very controversially titles it TheĀ Death of the Author. And that is not just the endĀ Ā
of the discussion and after Barthesā essay inĀ 1967 which announces The Death of the Author,Ā Ā
we come to Foucaultās work in 1968, where heĀ asked this question ā what is an Author?ā-Ā Ā
he breaks down the idea of the Author, heĀ tries to problematize the Author functionĀ Ā
and talks about how the Author function hasĀ changed historically and what its positionĀ Ā
is in the contemporary which is the 1960ās. So, these two texts also, as we see in theĀ Ā
later sessions; we will be reading these twoĀ texts in dialogue with each other trying toĀ Ā
see together what kind of sense they helpĀ us to make about text and the functions ofĀ Ā
the text and functions of the Authors. So, here we now begin to take a look atĀ Ā
the essay The Death of the Author- thisĀ is published by Roland Barthes in 1967.Ā Ā
And first it appeared in an American journalĀ titled Aspen. And Roland Barthes incidentally,Ā Ā
was a French literary critic and theorist mostĀ of his works were available to us in translation.Ā
And his work in terms of criticism, in termsĀ of cultural theory, it is a very interestingĀ Ā
and it is considered as particularly importantĀ because he has located at the intersection ofĀ Ā
structuralism and Poststructuralism. And here,Ā if we also survey some of the Barthesā works,Ā Ā
we will get to know that in his early phaseĀ he was more Structuralist in his approach,Ā Ā
but towards the second half of his carrier; weĀ find him being more influenced and also becomingĀ Ā
more influential in Poststructuralist practices. The Death of the Author is one such essay whichĀ Ā
could be located as a seminal text within theĀ sphere of Poststructuralism, it is also consideredĀ Ā
as one of the essays which would help us to beginĀ talking about not just Postmodernism, but also theĀ Ā
various practices within Poststructuralism. AndĀ this title The Death of the Author, is In fact,Ā Ā
is a pun on Le Morte dā Arthur which could beĀ translated as The death of Arthur referring toĀ Ā
King Arthur and Thomas Malory had popularizedĀ Arthurian legends by compiling the variousĀ Ā
legends, folk tales, stories about King ArthurĀ and this text was published in 1485. So, thisĀ Ā
title The Death of the Author is a pun allusionĀ to the fifteenth-century text Le Morte dā Arthur.Ā
So, the primary argument in this essay TheĀ Death of the Author is against a method ofĀ Ā
reading and criticism that relies on aspectsĀ of Author's identity. So, throughout thisĀ Ā
essay what primarily tries to contest isĀ the Author's identity and also pronouncesĀ Ā
his or her death towards the end of the work. It is important to see how Barthes establishesĀ Ā
a connection between the reader and theĀ text. So, he begins to see that the readerĀ Ā
is directly connected with the text and theĀ text has an identity, the text begins to reachĀ Ā
its destination only through an engagementĀ with the reader. And his works, in general,Ā Ā
Barthesā works in general could be consideredĀ as some of the earliest moves in rebellingĀ Ā
against Structuralist reading of texts. So, this is very important because thoughĀ Ā
Barthes begins his intellectual journey as aĀ structuralist, though most of his early works areĀ Ā
predominantly structuralist, towards the end, heĀ is better known in history as a poststructuralistĀ Ā
theorist or someone who rebelled against theĀ structural methods and practices of reading andĀ Ā
criticism. And Barthes also makes a distinctionĀ between Readerly text and Writerly text and forĀ Ā
him, the Readerly text is sort of a text whichĀ does not demand anything much from the reader;Ā Ā
it only requires a passive reader because theĀ Author has already sorted out everything for the,Ā Ā
reader there is hardly any puzzle to solve,Ā there is hardly any work for the Author, there isĀ Ā
hardly any work for the reader in a Readerly text. But on the other hand the Writerly text demands anĀ Ā
active role of the reader and here we also seeĀ that the reader when he engages with the text,Ā Ā
he also participates in this meaning-makingĀ process. And the meaning according to Barthes,Ā Ā
is not embodied within the text; textĀ ceases to be an object which offers meaning,Ā Ā
but the meaning is within the reader. So, only when the text comes in communion,Ā Ā
in connection with the reader; the text begins toĀ send out meanings the text begins to make meaning.Ā Ā
So, this is a derived meaning which comesĀ out after a process as he identifies it. So,Ā Ā
reading becomes an active process only when theĀ reader engages with the text and participates inĀ Ā
the meaning-making process. And in that sense,Ā Barthes also argues that textās unity lies notĀ Ā
in its origin, but in its destination when itĀ reaches the reader and origin is with the Author.Ā
So, the text which gets produced originallyĀ by the Author ceases to be important and theĀ Ā
relation between the, connection between the textĀ and reader becomes all the more important in theĀ Ā
meaning-making process and also in accessingĀ the text as a coherent, understandable feature.Ā
Here it is also important to make a distinctionĀ between a work and text; if reading is a textualĀ Ā
process, then certainly the texts are veryĀ different from works. So, Barthes makes thisĀ Ā
distinction in number of his works and some ofĀ his important works are The Pleasure of the TextĀ Ā
published in 1973 and Image Music and Text- aĀ compilation of his essays in 1977. Trying toĀ Ā
distinguish work from a text, Barthes arguesĀ that work is a physical object that occupiesĀ Ā
shelf-space and itās carried in the hand, it doesĀ not become a text until it reaches the reader.Ā
But text is a process in language; so, this isĀ important to remember that this is also linkedĀ Ā
with some of the Deconstructionist practices, andĀ Derrida also had an immense influence in the wayĀ Ā
in which Barthesā ideas were getting shaped.Ā And for Barthes texts are series of linguisticĀ Ā
processes that are decoded by the reader; so,Ā when Barthes talks about a text, the AuthorĀ Ā
ceases to be important, the reader emerges as theĀ single most important entity who is participatingĀ Ā
in this meaning-making process. And text alsoĀ assumes a structure of a narrative negotiationĀ Ā
between language of the text and the reader. So, all of these aspects, all of theseĀ Ā
negotiations, all of these interactions happenĀ between the text and the reader and we do notĀ Ā
see the Author emerging as an important figureĀ at any point of time. His task ends the momentĀ Ā
he completes his work and the work becomes a textĀ only when it reaches the reader and as he codes inĀ Ā
one of his works the text is experiencedĀ only as an activity of production. So,Ā Ā
it becomes an experience in the hand ofĀ the reader and the work gets transformedĀ Ā
into a text only when the reader accesses it. Having said that, this transformation from workĀ Ā
to text we need to see how this happens as well.Ā So, a work becomes a text not just when the readerĀ Ā
accesses it, but also when the reader refusesĀ to engage with the Authorial Authority. So,Ā Ā
Author in this sense, becomes a symbol ofĀ Authority and also a controller of meaning.Ā
So, only when the reader refuses to acknowledgeĀ that the Author is invested with the power toĀ Ā
control meaning, or Author is invested withĀ this power to be ultimate Authority on whatĀ Ā
the text actually implies, or what theĀ text actually means only then the workĀ Ā
actually gets transformed into a text. So, the text is in fact, according toĀ Ā
Barthes a play between the text and theĀ reader, and You need to pay attention toĀ Ā
this word āplayā because he also uses it veryĀ deliberately because play is something which is,Ā Ā
which is not confined to any sort of rigidĀ understanding. So, there is a lot of room toĀ Ā
experiment, a lot of ways in which the readerĀ can play with the text, the reader can interactĀ Ā
with the text. So, this basic understanding isĀ very very important to be able to understandĀ Ā
and access the work The Death of the Author. So, when we talk about the absence of theĀ Ā
Authorial figure, when we talk about understandingĀ the text in isolation with the Author and aboutĀ Ā
completely refusing to take into consideration;Ā the Authorās intentions while he was composingĀ Ā
a particular work; well perhaps this almostĀ sounds like a restatement of the New CriticalĀ Ā
dogma of literary workās independence-Ā autonomy as the New Critics will put it;Ā Ā
and this autonomy that the new critics celebratedĀ from historical and biographical backgroundĀ Ā
reading a text in isolation with all the otherĀ factors that surround the textās production whichĀ Ā
also was articulated by Beardsley and WimsattĀ in their 1946 essay The Intention Fallacy.Ā
Whether Barthesā work is a continuation of thisĀ New Critical approach; or whether it echoes orĀ Ā
restates any of the concerns new critics had inĀ the beginning is a question that we shall comeĀ Ā
back to deal with. But; however, at this pointĀ it would just suffice to know that Barthesā worksĀ Ā
dismiss all humanistic notions and in that sense,Ā it is not quite New Critical in its approach. AndĀ Ā
in Barthesā approach according to Raman Selden, aĀ leading cultural theorist and critic, the readersĀ Ā
are free to open and close the textās signifyingĀ process without respect for the signified.Ā
So, these are certain terms which areĀ associated with a number of structuralists,Ā Ā
poststructuralists and deconstructive readingĀ methods; we shall be coming back to some of theseĀ Ā
terms in detail. So, Barthesā work gives autonomyĀ to the reader and it is more about a celebrationĀ Ā
of the readerās attempts to freely read andĀ interpret without any limiting categories.Ā
So, as and when we begin to discuss BarthesāĀ work, it is very important to locate the Author-Ā Ā
the figure of the Author. Barthes argues thatĀ the Author is a very modern figure and this isĀ Ā
a significant point to be noted because he himselfĀ states that in the primitive societies the Author,Ā Ā
the Author figure was absent, it was onlyĀ a mediator who was available or a speaker.Ā Ā
And his performance was more valued by the publicĀ who gathered to listen to a story or a particularĀ Ā
rendition, or a narration because oral literatureĀ was also prominent in the primitive societies,Ā Ā
the performance of the mediator or the speakerĀ was more important and his genius was not reallyĀ Ā
admired. So, the function of the Author; the roleĀ of the Author was of a different kind altogether,Ā Ā
In this context it is also useful to rememberĀ that if we look at the ways in which the ideaĀ Ā
of the Author has evolved across literaryĀ historical periods; in the earlier periods,Ā Ā
we come across a number of works which wereĀ Authored by anonymous Authors because theyĀ Ā
considered it not very important to put downĀ their name against their own works; it was notĀ Ā
important to identify the work in connection withĀ the Author of the work. So, even, you know, if youĀ Ā
take the case of the first available Anglo SaxonĀ text Beowulf, the Author is anonymous and numberĀ Ā
of attempts have been made in the later stages toĀ see whether the Author is a Christian writer orĀ Ā
a Pagan writer influenced by Christian elements.Ā So, the current way in which we accesses texts isĀ Ā
entirely based on the identity of the Author. So, there was a period of time in historyĀ Ā
where the identity of the Author or even theĀ presence of the Author was not very important.Ā Ā
Narratives when they were seen as repositoriesĀ from which anyone could freely borrow and freelyĀ Ā
take; there were absolutely no idea of storiesĀ or particular art objects being copyrighted.Ā
And also significantly, until about the fifteenthĀ and sixteenth centuries, the Author was not heldĀ Ā
responsible or accountable for a particularĀ work that he produced. The responsibilityĀ Ā
and the accountability entirely rested on theĀ printer because he was the one who publishedĀ Ā
it the owner of the printer, the owner of theĀ publishing house was more responsible for it.Ā
Given that printing was a very modern phenomenonĀ which made its entry in the fifteenth century,Ā Ā
it took a while to be able to understand that; theĀ printer was perhaps only a medium in disseminatingĀ Ā
the work; the primary responsibilityĀ rests entirely with the Author. So,Ā Ā
we shall be taking a more detailed and closerĀ look at the Author functionary, talk aboutĀ Ā
Michel Foucaultās work What is an Author. So, in Barthesā works right at the beginning,Ā Ā
he tries to locate the Author as a modern figure.Ā And this is very important for taking the argumentĀ Ā
forward because Barthes also wants us to keepĀ in mind that the Author is a constructed figureĀ Ā
that it was not an idea which was always alreadyĀ there; that it is produced by our society at theĀ Ā
end of the middle ages. So, this historicalĀ understanding about the idea of the Author;Ā Ā
the emergence of the Author becomes very importantĀ in and also locate in the significance of theĀ Ā
Author vis-Ć -vis the reader and also inĀ context, in connection with the text.Ā
So, when he talks about the Author being a veryĀ modern phenomenon; that the birth of the AuthorĀ Ā
happens at a very modern stage in history,Ā he also makes particular references here. HeĀ Ā
associates the emergence of Author as a modernĀ in connection with English empiricism, FrenchĀ Ā
rationalism and the personal faith of Reformation. So, here we can also see that the Author asĀ Ā
Barthes sees it, is a construct, is a product ofĀ the Western-dominant philosophical ideas; it is aĀ Ā
product of the Western intellectual thought.Ā It is also a product of whatever the modernĀ Ā
society required, whatever the modern societyĀ was responding to. As the essay progresses,Ā Ā
we will also see how he uses this historicalĀ location, how he uses this relatively modernĀ Ā
emergence of the idea of the Author to alsoĀ talk about the text, reader and the readingĀ Ā
process equally as a historical phenomenon. And Barthes, in that sense, makes a connectionĀ Ā
between the emergence of the Author as aĀ modern figure and how it discovered theĀ Ā
prestige of the individual. So, there is a wayĀ in which the Author gets situated historically;Ā Ā
he is a product of a number of intellectualĀ trends and thoughts; he is also someone whoĀ Ā
helps discover the prestige of the individual. So, as we wind up today's session, it is importantĀ Ā
for us to keep in mind these starting points inĀ order to be able to access the essay in the nextĀ Ā
session. I strongly encourage you to read theĀ original version of Barthesā essay The DeathĀ Ā
of the Author. It is a fairly short pieceĀ and the translations are widely availableĀ Ā
in the web for you to access. So, a closeĀ reading of this particular text would beĀ Ā
undertaken in the next session, where we shallĀ be dissecting the various things that BarthesĀ Ā
puts forward in order to be able to argue andĀ convince us about The Death of the Author.Ā
Thank you for listening I look forwardĀ to seeing you in the next session.
Weitere Ƥhnliche Videos ansehen
The Death of the author and it's Postmodern implications ( Continued 1)
Beyond the Reader's Viewpoint | a breakdown of the Omniscient Reader's Viewpoint
Bahas Buku Teori Kesusastraan Rene Wellek dan Austin Warren
Literary Theory 1: New Criticism - Concept + Questions - NTA UGC NET English - Sunaina Jethani
Poststructuralism: WTF? Derrida, Deconstruction and Poststructuralist Theory Explained
INTRODUCTION TO LITERARY CRITICISM || QUARTER 3 WEEK 6 || GRADE 10 || MELC-Based || Aizie Dumuk
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)