Games Media implodes over Dragon Age the Veilguard

Summary

The speaker passionately critiques the current state of the video game industry, emphasizing the importance of audience-first content creation over social messaging or censorship. They argue against the elitist mindset of some gaming media figures who attempt to dictate the conversation, claiming that content creators should validate or challenge the audience’s own opinions. Highlighting the disillusionment with how the industry and media interact with players, the speaker stresses the need for authenticity and integrity, concluding with excitement for an upcoming game while encouraging viewers to remain true to themselves.

Takeaways

• 😀 The gaming industry and media should prioritize the interests of the audience over insiders and industry elites.
• 😀 Content creators serve their audience by either validating or challenging their opinions, not the other way around.
• 😀 The term 'silent majority' is often used to undermine the influence of the general public, but it’s not accurate.
• 😀 The belief that only certain voices should shape the conversation around games is seen as arrogant and elitist.
• 😀 The focus on social issues by some within the gaming industry is portrayed as vanity rather than genuine concern.
• 😀 Many critics and media insiders are disconnected from the actual gaming audience, failing to understand their needs.
• 😀 Attempts to control or censor voices within the gaming industry are criticized as problematic and counterproductive.
• 😀 The relationship between content creators and their audience should be rooted in mutual respect, with creators prioritizing audience desires.
• 😀 There is a growing disillusionment among gamers with both the media and the gaming industry, largely due to perceived disconnects in priorities.
• 😀 The gaming community often looks for content that challenges their own perspectives or provides validation, rather than being told what to think.
• 😀 The speaker expresses frustration over the moral authority some in the industry claim, believing that the audience’s voice should be paramount.

Q & A

What is the main criticism the speaker has towards the gaming media and insiders?

The speaker criticizes gaming media and insiders for believing that their voices should dominate the conversation about gaming. They argue that these individuals act as if they are the moral authority, shaping the discourse without truly considering the perspectives of the audience and gamers.

What is meant by the term 'silent majority' in the context of this video?

In the video, the term 'silent majority' is used to make people feel as if they have no control or impact on the gaming industry or its discourse. The speaker rejects this idea, stating that it is a tactic to silence those with differing opinions and diminish their influence.

How does the speaker view the role of content creators and the audience?

The speaker believes that content creators and platforms should serve the audience, not the other way around. They emphasize that creators are meant to validate or challenge the audience’s thoughts and opinions, rather than dictate what they should believe.

What does the speaker mean by 'virtue signaling' in the video?

Virtue signaling refers to people or companies aligning themselves with social issues not out of genuine concern, but to appear morally superior or virtuous. The speaker views this behavior as vain and driven by self-image rather than authentic care for the causes being promoted.

What is the speaker’s opinion on how video games are being made in relation to social issues?

The speaker believes that video game companies and creators do not genuinely care about social issues, and instead, they engage with these issues out of vanity or to appear socially conscious. They argue that the true purpose of games is to serve the audience and their entertainment needs, not to preach or push social agendas.

What does the speaker mean when they say the audience is 'always right' in the context of gaming content?

The speaker suggests that the audience should always be prioritized because they are the consumers of the content. The speaker believes that content should be made to meet the needs and interests of the audience, not shaped by an agenda from creators, companies, or media outlets.

How does the speaker feel about the current state of the gaming industry and media?

The speaker feels disillusioned with the gaming industry and media. They believe that the industry's focus on social issues, censorship, and controlling the narrative has led to a loss of trust and connection with the audience. The speaker feels that the industry has forgotten its purpose of serving the consumer.

What does the speaker mean when they refer to 'soft people living soft lives'?

The phrase 'soft people living soft lives' is used to criticize those who engage in social issues or advocacy without understanding the real struggles of others. The speaker implies that these individuals are looking for causes to align with, not out of genuine concern, but to feel like they are contributing to something meaningful.

What is the speaker's view on censorship in relation to video games?

The speaker opposes censorship, particularly when it is motivated by controlling what people can say or think. They criticize those who push for censorship, labeling it as an attempt to stifle differing opinions and control the narrative, which they see as detrimental to free expression and creativity in the gaming world.

How does the speaker react to the idea of shaping the conversation around games?

The speaker strongly rejects the idea that certain individuals or groups, such as game journalists and insiders, should be the ones shaping the conversation around games. They believe that the conversation should reflect the diverse perspectives and interests of the gaming community, not be dictated by a few people with an agenda.