Crimes against humanity ang ilang inamin ni FPRRD sa Senado ayon sa ilang QuadComm member | 24 Oras

Summary

The transcript discusses former President Rodrigo Duterte's acknowledgment of responsibility regarding crimes associated with his war on drugs, emphasizing his stance on the International Criminal Court (ICC). It highlights the complexities of prosecuting a former leader domestically versus through the ICC, with legal experts debating the admissibility of evidence and statements made in the Senate. As the Department of Justice faces scrutiny, the conversation centers on whether justice can be achieved within the Philippines or if external intervention is necessary. The ongoing tension between local and international legal perspectives is palpable.

Takeaways

• 😀 Former President Rodrigo Duterte is implicated in crimes against humanity related to his administration's war on drugs.
• 😀 A member of the House Quad Committee states that Duterte's statements could be admissible in the International Criminal Court (ICC).
• 😀 Duterte claims full legal responsibility for actions taken during his presidency, stating he is willing to face consequences.
• 😀 The Department of Justice (DOJ) in the Philippines is considering domestic prosecution rather than allowing the ICC to handle the case.
• 😀 There is ongoing discussion about the relevance of evidence pertaining to Duterte's war on drugs in the ICC investigation.
• 😀 Concerns were raised about the difficulty of achieving justice against a former president.
• 😀 A legal expert noted that the material presented to the ICC must be relevant to the investigation.
• 😀 The DOJ's effectiveness in handling the case may impact whether the ICC intervenes.
• 😀 Some Quad co-chairs express a desire to keep the investigation within the Philippines.
• 😀 The international community is closely monitoring the DOJ's actions regarding this matter.

Q & A

What recent statements did former President Rodrigo Duterte make regarding his legal responsibility?

Duterte stated that he takes full legal responsibility for his actions and indicated that he is willing to be imprisoned if necessary.

What legal framework is being referenced in relation to crimes against humanity in the Philippines?

The discussion refers to Republic Act No. 9851, which is the Philippine Act on Crimes Against International Humanitarian Law, Genocide, and Other Crimes Against Humanity.

What did the co-chairs of the Quad Committee express about the ICC's involvement?

The co-chairs mentioned their preference for domestic prosecution, asserting that it would be better to handle cases within the country rather than turning documents over to the ICC.

How does the Department of Justice (DOJ) view its role in this situation?

The DOJ is responsible for investigating and potentially prosecuting cases related to Duterte's war on drugs, and they are expected to present evidence to support their actions.

What concerns did victims' lawyers express regarding justice for the war on drugs?

Victims' lawyers indicated that achieving justice is challenging, especially when the accused is a former president, and they highlighted the importance of the ICC's admissibility of evidence.

What factors determine the admissibility of Duterte's statements in the ICC?

The key factors for admissibility include whether the statements are relevant and material to the ongoing ICC investigation.

What was the response to concerns about the DOJ's effectiveness?

It was noted that if the DOJ fails to adequately handle the situation, the ICC would be more likely to take jurisdiction over the case.

What role does the international community play in this situation?

The international community is closely monitoring the situation, particularly the DOJ's actions regarding the investigations and potential prosecutions.

How did Duterte's administration handle requests for ICC documents?

Duterte expressed a strong stance against allowing the ICC to access documents, preferring that legal proceedings be conducted domestically.

What implications could the ICC's involvement have on the Philippines?

ICC involvement could lead to significant scrutiny of the Philippines' legal processes and might pressure the government to ensure accountability for alleged human rights violations.