What is the cheapest way to beat climate change?
Summary
TLDRThis video discusses the urgency of achieving net-zero emissions to combat climate change, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach. It explores the concept of 'silver buckshot', suggesting that no single solution exists. The video highlights 'bike infrastructure' as a cost-effective solution according to Project Drawdown, but also acknowledges the complexity of evaluating climate solutions due to varying costs and benefits. It stresses the importance of implementing quick, impactful solutions like reducing methane leaks and deforestation, and mentions an upcoming update to Project Drawdown for more localized climate solution data.
Takeaways
- 🌍 The current carbon emission rate exceeds natural removal processes, leading to an imbalance that needs to be corrected to achieve Net Zero emissions.
- 🚀 'Silver Buckshot' refers to the multitude of approaches needed to combat climate change, as opposed to a single 'Silver Bullet' solution.
- 🏗️ The most cost-effective climate solution identified by Project Drawdown is bike infrastructure, which can reduce emissions and even save money by reducing the need for car infrastructure.
- 💸 Many climate solutions have negative costs, meaning the savings from implementing them outweigh the costs, making them economically beneficial.
- 🌳 Project Drawdown's upcoming update will provide more localized data on climate solutions, making the information more relevant to individuals' specific locations.
- 🔍 The concept of 'degrowth' is discussed as an alternative economic model that could contribute to reducing emissions, although it's not directly considered a solution by Project Drawdown.
- 🌿 Stopping deforestation is highlighted as an immediate and impactful solution, as it provides benefits from day one, unlike some other solutions that take years to show results.
- 💨 Methane leaks, especially from landfills, are identified as a quick and impactful solution to reduce emissions, emphasizing the need for immediate action.
- 🌡️ The urgency of the climate crisis is emphasized, with a focus on solutions that can be implemented quickly to prevent dangerous levels of warming.
- 🌐 The importance of considering both the financial cost and the social cost of carbon emissions is discussed, with the suggestion that many solutions provide broader benefits beyond just financial savings.
Q & A
What is the main goal of achieving Net Zero emissions?
-The main goal of achieving Net Zero emissions is to balance the amount of carbon added to the Earth's atmosphere with the amount removed by natural processes, preventing an imbalance that leads to negative environmental impacts as outlined by the IPCC.
What does 'net negative emissions' mean in the context of climate change?
-Net negative emissions refer to a state where more carbon dioxide (CO2) is being removed from the atmosphere than is being emitted, resulting in a decrease in atmospheric CO2 concentration.
Why is it important to reduce emissions from various sectors like energy, cement production, and agriculture?
-It is important to reduce emissions from various sectors because each sector contributes differently to the overall carbon entering the atmosphere, and thus requires unique solutions for decarbonization. There is no single solution to address climate change effectively.
What is the significance of Project Drawdown and its role in climate solutions?
-Project Drawdown is significant because it compiles and analyzes the top solutions to prevent climate change, focusing on what works best to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. It aims to provide a resource to the world on the most effective climate solutions and how to implement them.
Why did the video mention 'silver buckshot' instead of a 'silver bullet' in addressing climate change?
-The video mentioned 'silver buckshot' to emphasize that there is no single solution to climate change but rather a multitude of approaches that need to be implemented simultaneously, each contributing to the overall goal of reducing emissions.
What is the most cost-effective climate solution according to Project Drawdown's updated data?
-According to Project Drawdown's updated data, the most cost-effective climate solution is bike infrastructure, which involves building new infrastructure for bikes or converting existing infrastructure, as it can reduce the need for car usage and is relatively inexpensive to implement.
What does it mean when the cost to implement a solution is 'negative'?
-A 'negative' cost to implement a solution means that the operational savings from implementing the solution outweigh the initial cost of implementation, effectively meaning that it saves money in the long run.
Why is considering the social cost of carbon important when evaluating climate solutions?
-Considering the social cost of carbon is important because it accounts for the broader impacts of emissions on future generations, including health, biodiversity, and environmental damage, which may not be fully captured in financial costs alone.
What is the concept of 'degrowth' and why was it mentioned in the video?
-The concept of 'degrowth' challenges the idea of continuous economic growth and suggests that reducing consumption and waste can lead to a more sustainable and efficient use of resources. It was mentioned in the video to highlight the need for systemic changes beyond immediate emission reduction strategies.
Why is it crucial to implement climate solutions quickly, according to the video?
-It is crucial to implement climate solutions quickly because the nature of the climate crisis is cumulative, and the longer emissions continue, the more severe the impact on the climate. Reducing emissions sooner has a more significant effect on the long-term state of the atmosphere.
What is the role of methane leaks in climate change mitigation, as discussed in the video?
-Methane leaks, especially from landfills, pipelines, and oil and gas infrastructure, play a significant role in climate change mitigation because methane is a potent greenhouse gas. Addressing these leaks can provide immediate reductions in emissions.
What is the significance of deforestation in global emissions, and why is it important to address it?
-Deforestation is significant in global emissions, contributing to about 10-11% of them. Addressing deforestation is crucial because it not only reduces emissions but also has immediate benefits for biodiversity and climate change mitigation.
What updates is Project Drawdown planning to provide in the near future?
-Project Drawdown is planning a massive update that will map climate solutions down to the satellite pixel level, providing tailored information for different regions. They also plan to shorten the time horizon to discuss climate solutions, focusing on the next 3 years instead of 30.
Outlines
🌱 Addressing Climate Imbalance
The paragraph discusses the urgent need to halt the increasing carbon emissions that are causing an imbalance in the Earth's atmosphere. The goal is to achieve Net Zero emissions, where the amount of carbon added to the atmosphere is equal to the amount removed. The speaker explains that reaching Net Zero is complex due to the diverse sources of greenhouse gas emissions, which include energy production, cement manufacturing, deforestation, and agriculture. The video aims to explore cost-effective solutions to reduce emissions, referencing Project Drawdown's compilation of the top 100 solutions to combat climate change.
🚴♂️ Bike Infrastructure as a Climate Solution
This section of the script highlights the findings from Project Drawdown, which suggest that investing in bike infrastructure is one of the most cost-effective ways to reduce carbon emissions. By building new bike lanes or converting existing infrastructure, people are encouraged to cycle instead of using cars, thereby reducing emissions. The script points out that many of the solutions listed by Project Drawdown have negative cost-to-draw-down ratios, meaning the operational savings over time outweigh the initial implementation costs. The speaker also mentions that while bike infrastructure is cost-effective, there are uncertainties and varying assumptions in estimating the impact of such solutions.
🌐 Broader Perspectives on Climate Solutions
The speaker expands on the concept of cost-effectiveness, arguing that it's not just about financial costs but also about the broader environmental and societal impacts. Solutions like stopping fossil fuel use can have significant health and ecological benefits, while actions like restoring wetlands can enhance biodiversity. The paragraph emphasizes that while financial costs are important, the social cost of carbon emissions, which includes impacts on future generations and ecosystems, should also be considered. The speaker discusses the difficulty of assigning a monetary value to such benefits but acknowledges efforts to do so, such as the social cost of carbon.
🏡 Immediate and Long-Term Climate Solutions
In this paragraph, the focus is on the practicality and time frame of implementing climate solutions. The speaker distinguishes between individual actions, like improving home insulation, and systemic solutions like bike infrastructure. The paragraph discusses the limitations of certain solutions based on what can realistically be achieved at a given scale and within a specific time frame. It also touches on the concept of 'degrowth,' which suggests reducing economic activity to lessen environmental impact. The speaker acknowledges the need for fundamental societal changes but emphasizes the urgency of implementing solutions that can have an immediate impact on emissions.
🌳 Prioritizing Quick and Effective Climate Actions
The final paragraph emphasizes the need to prioritize climate solutions that can be implemented quickly and have a significant impact. The speaker suggests that while restructuring the economy and society is necessary, it's also crucial to focus on solutions that can be put into action within the next few years. Examples given include plugging methane leaks, which have immediate benefits, and stopping deforestation, which provides front-loaded benefits. The speaker concludes by reiterating the importance of a multifaceted approach to climate change, acknowledging that all solutions are necessary but some are more immediately effective.
📱 Data Privacy and the Role of Incognito
The last part of the script is a segue into a sponsorship message. The speaker discusses the importance of data privacy and how they have benefited from using Incognito, a service that helps protect personal information from data brokers. The speaker shares their positive experience with the service and encourages viewers to consider using it to safeguard their privacy. This section also includes a thank you to the video's sponsor and the speaker's patrons, highlighting the support from the community.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Net Zero
💡Net Negative Emissions
💡Greenhouse Gas Emissions
💡Decarbonize
💡Project Drawdown
💡Cost of Drawdown
💡Bike Infrastructure
💡Landfill Methane
💡Social Cost of Carbon
💡Degrowth
💡Climate Realpolitik
Highlights
We are adding more carbon to the Earth's atmosphere than is being removed by natural processes.
The goal is to reach Net Zero emissions to prevent a climate crisis.
Different sectors require unique solutions for decarbonization.
Project Drawdown's book lists the top 100 climate solutions.
Bike infrastructure is identified as the most cost-effective solution for reducing emissions.
Many solutions have negative implementation costs, meaning they save money.
The financial cost of solutions should be weighed against operational savings.
There are non-financial costs to consider, such as health and biodiversity.
Some solutions have social costs associated with carbon emissions.
Project Drawdown does not account for the social cost of carbon in their estimates.
The most cost-effective solutions over their lifespan include improved insulation and electric cars.
Water distribution efficiency is a new climate solution that can save water and money.
The definition of 'cost' can change the answer to what is the most cost-effective solution.
Degrowth is a concept that suggests reducing economic activity to decrease climate impact.
Project Drawdown will update their solutions to be more localized and time-sensitive.
Incog is a service that helps protect personal data from unwanted calls and breaches.
The video discusses the urgency of implementing climate solutions within a limited timeframe.
Methane leaks and deforestation are highlighted as areas needing immediate action.
Transcripts
thanks to incog for sponsoring this
video currently we are adding more
carbon to the Earth's atmosphere than is
being removed by natural processes if
that keeps going on for too long then we
will eventually have what the ipcc
refers to as a very bad time so we want
to stop that imbalance and get to Net
Zero where we're not adding more to the
atmosphere than is removed and
eventually get to net negative emissions
where CO2 concentration in the
atmosphere Falls I'm often asked how do
we get to Net Zero and the answer is
complicated you see this is when our
greenhouse gas emissions come from
largely energy but within that large
sector you've got emissions from stuff
as diverse as heating buildings flying
airplanes and making chemicals and away
from energy you've got lots of different
sources of emissions such as making
cement deforestation landfills and
agriculture among many other sectors
each section of this diagram sees carbon
enter the atmosphere in a different way
and so we'll need a different solution
to decarbonize
so there's no one Silver Bullet to fix
climate change there's silver Buckshot
lots of approaches all at once some more
important than others but which one
could give us the most bang for buck
what is the most coste effective climate
solution in other words where could we
plow a bunch of money in the short term
and get the maximum return of emissions
reduction I don't know but I do have a
place to start in 2017 project drawdown
published this book compiling the top
100 solutions to prevent
[Music]
electricity doing so produces CO2 but
because methane is a more powerful
greenhouse gas and is no longer being
emitted the result is a net positive
it's basically a free source of natural
gas so while the draw down effect is
pretty modest 2 and a half gigatons by
2050 the cost to implement it is very
low in fact it's um wait what it's
negative wait a minute loads of these
cost to draw down ratios are negative it
cost negative money to implement these I
had question so using my friend Miriam
as an entry point check out her YouTube
channel she's great I gave project draw
down a call I'm uh John Foley I'm the
executive director of project drawdown
I'm a climate scientist and been working
in various aspects of climate change for
about 30 years at universities museums
and now that project drw down where we
try to be a resource to the world and
focusing on what the best climate
Solutions are and how we can move
forward with them the book is you know
was a signature first Cornerstone but it
was 2017 2018 when it came out and it's
it's quite obsolete now
right okay so I went through their
excellent website compiled all the most
upto-date data for cost and Emissions
reductions in another spreadsheet
calculated the cost of draw down ratio
sorted low to high and the new winner is
bike infrastructure by building new
infrastructure for bikes or converting
existing infrastructure you free people
up from having to use their cars and you
allow for greater Urban transport of
freight by bikes and ebikes actually
ties in quite nicely with last week's
video and you can do this really cheaply
in fact the cost is it's still negative
and what you need to do is look at the
cost of climate Solutions compared to
what you're already paying for cuz
you're not going to do both you're going
to do one or the other so if you look at
a net net cost curve um you find again
about 80% of climate Solutions end up
being cheaper over 30 years than what we
do today which is kind of amazing for
bike infrastructure and landfill methane
and most of the solutions considered by
project draw down the cost of
implementing those Solutions between now
and 2050 is lower than the cost of just
maintaining our current way of doing
things or if you want to look at it this
way the cost of implementation is more
than paid off by operational savings for
example there's an upfront cost
associated with building solar panels
but the electricity we get from those
panels is cheaper per kilowatt hour than
the electricity we get from coal or gas
upfront cost but savings between now and
2050 which are larger resulting in a net
negative implementation cost as long as
you can afford the initial investment if
you're interested the solutions with the
most negative implementation costs
between now and 2050 according to
project drawdown were BK infastructure
you're saving on constructing and
maintaining car infrastructure LED
lighting it's just more energy efficient
and recycled paper it's just cheaper
than regular paper Okay so that's the
answer right bike infrastructure is the
most cost-effective way to reduce carbon
emissions because it saves you the most
money for each ton of carbon you don't
emit into the atmosphere Fe wait a
minute how much longer is left in this
video oh yeah it's never that easy so
there are error bars associated with all
of these solutions for example there's
not much literature on cycling adoption
worldwide so it's difficult to predict
how that will evolve in the future and
any estimate of the cost of a given
solution is going to involve making
assumptions so comparing different
solutions can be a bit like comparing
apples and oranges depending on the
assumptions made though it is worth
saying that project draw down does try
to keep their assumptions consistent no
but that's not what the problem is the
problem is the question itself what is
the most coste effective solution well
there are two parts to this question
firstly what do we mean by cost so far
we've just considered the dollar value
cost of implementing a solution minus
the operational Savings of that solution
relative to business as usual but that's
just a financial ual cost and the way
that we do things at the moment
particularly relying on fossil fuels for
energy has other costs too for example
it's estimated that stopping the use of
fossil fuels would save 5 million lives
a year by reducing air pollution
stopping deforestation prevents the
irrevocable loss of biodiversity and
while it's easy to look at the positive
impact of not doing something anymore
there's also the positive impacts of
choosing to do something restoring
Wetlands draws down carbon but also
improves biodiversity not you investing
in bike infrastructure reduces emissions
but also improves People's Health and
and we have to look at the real cost
here not just in dollars but also in
lives in future generations and in
security and things that we can't always
put a dollar figure on though that's not
stopped some people from trying some
people assign a social cost to each ton
of carbon that we emit with estimates of
the total harm to Future Generations
ranging from4 to
$400 per ton with a 2022 nature paper
deciding on
$185 there's a fantastic carbon brief
breakdown on this I'll link it below
with all the other references suffice to
say it's difficult to assign a monetary
value to stuff like biodiversity and
Happiness Project draw down don't
account for a social cost of carbon in
their estimates they are purely
Financial which if anything makes their
estimated negative costs of implementing
many solutions even more startling like
those costs should be even more negative
if anything our our costs are very
conservative we're just looking at the
cost of I mean to put it in real terms
for your listener like the cost of
electricity that you pay your bill for
every month from coal versus solar no
environmental taxes no Health cost
nothing just the straight up cost of
making the electricity even there solar
kicks Coal's ass and Beyond this all of
the numbers we've talked about in this
video so far have been calculated up to
2050 but many of the solutions that
project draw down considers are going to
last much longer than that like land
restoration for example so they also
considered the net cost of implementing
a solution by 2050 and the lifetime
operational savings or in some cases
profit of a solution the solutions with
the largest savings over their lifespan
then are utility scale solar PV improved
insulation electric cars bamboo
production and distributed solar PV if
you're not accounting for the social
cost of carbon if you do at $185 per ton
then the top five become utility scale
solar PV onshore wind turbines improved
insulation distributed solar PV and
plant-based diets because most of those
Solutions can each draw down more than
100 gatons of carbon between now and
2050 which uh changes the rankings a bit
but coming back to the question of this
video the most cost effective climate
Solutions over their entire lifespan are
improved insulation electric trains
electric cars water distribution
efficiency and bike infrastructure
whether you're accounting for the social
cost of carbon or not editing Simon here
I just wanted to briefly explain what
water distribution efficiency is because
this was a climate solution that was new
to me all this refers to is reducing
leaks from pipes and installing pressure
sensors so you're not needlessly using
electricity to pump water places because
the pressure is already high enough and
the carbon draw down of this is pretty
small but it can save hundreds of
millions of cubic meters of water over
the next like couple of decades from
being lost and save almost 1 and5
trillion dollar from being spent
needlessly kind of kind of blew my mind
why aren't we doing this already why so
depending on your definition of cost and
the time scale that you're considering
it over you get very different answers
to this question but what about the
second part to this what do we mean by a
solution as an individual the climate
solution with the largest emission
reduction potential for an a given
initial outlay is almost certainly
improving the insulation of your house
massive net negative cost over several
decades though your mileage will
obviously vary whereas if you're looking
for a cost effective systematic solution
to be delivered by a government then
you're looking at bike infrastructure or
water distribution efficiency the point
being there are limitations on which
climate Solutions can be implemented
based on practical considerations what
can you actually get done at the given
scale you're considering there are
several other climate solutions that I
haven't considered so far and project
draw down Haven considered for this
exact reason such as Thanos snapping the
planet solar radiation management
packing it all in and colonizing Mars
but there is one other solution that
isn't considered by project draw down
that comes up in my comments quite
frequently and I thought this might be a
good opportunity to finally address it
here's the basic idea if everything we
do has an impact on the climate small or
large then surely the best way to reduce
our impact is just to do less stop
focusing on growing GDP and accepting
the fact that maybe economies shouldn't
just grow forever and actually maybe get
smaller over time this is the idea of
degrowth and I'll be
honest I'm not really the person to talk
about this look I'm not an economist I a
physical scientist sure I've read donor
economics but I'm not the person to make
a Nuance video about degrowth I will say
that I do agree with a lot of its ideas
though I am aware that there are
seemingly questions that it struggles to
answer just look at that Wiki I asked
John why it wasn't considered as a
climate Solution by project draw down I
think the word degrowth is like the
worst ter term on Earth instead can we
talk about better and quality and
efficiency because I think the degrowth
community has a point and of course
people can agree with it to a certain
extent having heat pouring out of your
windows and out of your attic while
you're paying bills that's dumb uh we
can make homes much more energy
efficient improve your quality of life
improve your um comfort and reduce your
bills if that's called degrowth fine I
call it efficiency same thing with food
waste we're throwing a third of all the
planet's food away between the farm and
our Forks if we could get rid of that if
they want to call it degrowth fine I
call it efficiency I think my term will
be much more appealing to people okay so
you can still live you know eat a
healthy meal and have nice dinners and
whatever it's not asking people a term
that is kind of implicitly sounds like
sacrifice the reason I bring degrowth up
is because it casts into relief what to
me is the defining characteristic of a
climate solution as I said a minute ago
what can you actually Implement and and
in what time frame I firmly believe that
we need widespread economic and social
restructuring in order to bring our
societies back within planetary
boundaries and make people's lives
better no arguments there but is that
concept the most cost- effective way to
reduce our
emissions I don't think so because much
as it is the fundamental change we need
in the long Arc of History it's also not
a solution that I can see being meaning
Yul implemented from the perspective of
emissions in the next 10 to 20 years
because that's the thing we don't have
long to implement these changes and
bring our emissions down the nature of
the climate crisis is cumulative once
you put extra carbon in the atmosphere
it doesn't go away quickly so the longer
emissions continue the more carbon
builds up and the more warming we
experience it's pretty much linear and
at the current rate of emissions we have
about 10 20 years tops to avoid
dangerous levels of warming the flip
side to this is the sooner you reduce
emissions the larger the impact you have
on the long-term state of the atmosphere
the faster you can Implement a solution
the greater the time integrated effect
it has in other words the more effective
it is that's not to say that we
shouldn't attempt to implement solutions
that take longer like building new
infrastructure or researching new
nuclear fusion or restructuring our
financial institutions just that I think
we should prioritize those solutions
that we can Implement quickly in a
considered manner more speed less haste
I guess what I'm getting at here is
climate real politic given the immensely
flawed game that we find ourselves
playing that we are forced to play and
The Limited hand that we hold and the
very limited time that we have to make a
decision how can we play our hand what
can we actually do should we restructure
the game yes absolutely but right now
the cost of not playing our hand is too
high I am not proposing that we should
abandon our ideals or sh our
responsibility for building a fairer
more sustainable world I think we should
do that and we should make that part of
our response to the climate crisis in
this narrow window of opportunity that
we have but I also think the other parts
of our response are more actionable and
will have a larger positive impact on
the environment in the relevant time
frame so let's reframe this question
really we want to know which climate
Solutions are achievable that we can
actually Implement in the next couple of
years that are quick to implement to
maximize our returns and are cheap to
implement to limit our outlay
unfortunately there are plenty of
climate solutions that check all three
boxes methane leaks especially in land
pills you know gas infrastructure and
pipelines and refineries and fugitive
flaring emissions those are stupid you
know they don't benefit anybody let's
just plug those leaks and as you know
methane's a disproportionately fast part
of the climate system it it only lives
in the atmosphere a decade or two but it
does a hell of a lot of warming in that
short amount of time so it's that's kind
of the emergency break we hit now in
real time to start bending the curve on
emissions and maybe even temperature
increasing another one is D4 forestation
uh it's always overlooked but
deforestation now emits about 10 to
11% of global emissions that's more than
the whole US economy right now the US
economy is about 10% and falling
deforestation's around 11% and lately
it's been rising again and the benefits
of stopping deforestation are all front
loaded to day one you get all the
benefit today compared to replacing a
coal power plant with a solar panel it
takes years and years and years to
accumulate that kind of total benefit of
that intervention so yeah there are a
lot of things we could do in the near
term that are big fast and cheap and I
like big fast and cheap when it comes to
climate Solutions though to repeat
something I said at the start of the
video all of the solutions talked about
in this video are going to be necessary
we've picked out the ones which are most
cost effective sure but we need to
decarbonize this whole diagram if you
would like more information about how we
can do that then I am delighted to say
and apparently this is an exclusive
scoop that project draw down will be
getting a massive update in the not too
distant future we're going to map
climate Solutions down to the satellite
pixel basically everywhere in the world
so the information isn't just the
average for the world but it would
actually be tailored to where you live
like how would solar work in England
versus you know Florida versus Bay or
something we'll be launching about a
year from now or quarter one of 2025
we're also going to shorten the time
Horizon to talk about climate Solutions
in like not just 30 years out to the
Future which is kind of hard for most
people to visualize
but really give people tools to look
well how about in the next 3 years not
just the next 30 and really kind of roll
them out a little bit at a time we're
working very very hard on that right now
and it's a it's a Quantum Leap and uh
the amount of data and uh work to kind
of pull that together and no one's ever
done it um so this is going to be very
very exciting and if instead of wanting
more you want less information online
then I also have you covered I really
despise getting cold cooled and and the
way that it works is is these companies
were able to get my number through data
Brokers these businesses that collate
people's personal information online
often without you even realizing it and
then selling it to these other companies
who can then call you fortunately in the
last couple of months I've noticed a
significant decrease in the number of
cold calls I receive and that's because
a couple of months ago I signed up to
incog who kindly sponsored this video
incog is a service that contacts these
data Brokers and requests your
information to be deleted from their
records they deal with any follow-up
respondents and will periodically check
in to make sure your data isn't being
stored that's of course all stuff that I
could do myself but a I wouldn't know
where to find those data Brokers and B
it would take a lot of time to get
through all of them signing up to enog
took literally 5 minutes and according
to them over 58 different data removal
requests I've saved myself 39 hours of
boring admin work and quite apart from
limiting the number of Co calls I now
receive I've also protected myself from
breaches of my personal data something
that's increased in frequency by more
than 40% in the past 3 years perhaps I'm
hyper aware of this because I'm a known
person online but I really value keeping
my private
information private and if you do too I
think you should sign up to incog
because I've had a fantastic experience
with them nothing but positives and I've
already seen the impact protect your
personal data at incognit
docomo Clark which will be linked down
there in the description and if you go
there you'll get a 60% discount on an
annual plan that link again was in
cog.org
for doing all the leg work for me and
for sponsoring this video thank you so
much for watching the video and thank
you so much to John for taking the time
out of his very busy schedule to talk to
me if you haven't checked out project
draw down please do it's a mine of
valuable information I must also say an
enormous thank you to my patrons over on
patreon.com Simon Ox Fizz the names
you're seeing on screen right now are my
executive producer patrons and higher
tiers all patrons get early access to my
videos and exclusive content every month
including behind the scenes Vlog and
producer patrons and higher tiers get to
vote on a video topic a month this video
was actually one that they chose so if
you like the sound of all of that if
you'd like to help me make more videos
please consider supporting me over on
patreon if you enjoyed the video please
do share it with others who you think
May benefit from it and if you'd like
something to watch next here's two I
prepared earlier that just leaves me to
say thank you again for watching and
I'll see you in the next one
Weitere ähnliche Videos ansehen
Unit 2: Stopping Climate Change
100 solutions to reverse global warming | Chad Frischmann
Project Drawdown presents the Drawdown Roadmap: The Five Parts of the Drawdown Roadmap | Unit 3
Three Solutions That Can Slow or Stop Climate Change I NOVA I PBS
The Climate Solutions Worth Funding — Now | Jonathan Foley | TED
Climate change: the trouble with trees
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)