Suno, Udio (and other music AI). We're F*ED and it's really BAD. Seriously.
TLDRPaul, a music creator, expresses his concerns about the impact of AI-generated music on the music industry. He discusses the capabilities of Sunno AI, which can produce high-quality music at an incredibly low cost, and predicts that human-created stock music will become obsolete within a year. Paul argues that AI music generation is a form of theft, as it uses and replicates human creativity without the original creators' consent or compensation. He also raises questions about the legality of AI learning from copyrighted material. Despite his opposition to AI's role in music creation, Paul acknowledges the inevitability of change and emphasizes the irreplaceable value of human creativity and the personal connection between artists and their audience.
Takeaways
- 🎵 AI music creation platforms like Sunno AI are becoming increasingly sophisticated and pose a serious threat to human musicians and composers.
- 🚀 AI can generate high volumes of music quickly and cheaply, which could lead to the obsolescence of human-created stock music within a year.
- 💸 The economic model of AI music generation is based on producing music at a fraction of the cost and time it takes humans, potentially making human composers non-competitive.
- 🤖 AI music systems learn from existing human-created music, raising questions about the legality and ethics of using copyrighted material for training these systems.
- 🎶 AI-generated music can mimic various styles, from corporate tunes to complex compositions, which could disrupt the market for professional music creators.
- 📉 The impact of AI on the music industry could lead to a significant loss of jobs and income for human musicians, affecting their livelihoods.
- 🌐 The speaker expresses a strong emotional response against the use of AI in music, viewing it as a form of theft from human creators.
- 😔 There is a concern that artists, being a less 'visible' workforce compared to miners or farmers, may not receive the same level of societal support or protest against AI's encroachment on their work.
- 🛠️ Despite the potential loss of income from music, the speaker emphasizes the importance of passion and creativity, suggesting that human musicians will continue to create for love of the art.
- 🤔 The video raises the question of how human musicians can adapt and find new ways to earn money as their traditional roles are threatened by AI-generated music.
- ⚖️ The ethical implications of AI in music are highlighted, with a call for consideration of the rights and livelihoods of human musicians in the face of rapid technological advancement.
Q & A
What is the main concern expressed by the speaker regarding AI music generation?
-The speaker is primarily concerned about the impact of AI music generation on human musicians and composers, particularly in the stock music industry. They fear that AI's ability to create music quickly and cheaply will render human composers obsolete.
What does the speaker believe will happen to the stock music industry due to AI?
-The speaker believes that within a year, the stock music industry will be dead, as AI will be able to generate music that is faster, cheaper, and increasingly skillful, making it impossible for human composers to compete.
What is the speaker's opinion on the legality and ethicality of AI music generation?
-The speaker raises questions about the legality of AI music generation, particularly concerning copyright laws. They also express ethical concerns, comparing AI music generation to theft, as AI learns from human-created works and then reproduces them.
How does the speaker describe the potential societal impact of AI music generation?
-The speaker suggests that AI music generation could lead to a deeply inhuman and unjust society, where human creativity and emotion are commodified and exploited. They express concern for the livelihoods of professional musicians and the potential loss of human expression in music.
What does the speaker think about the future of human musicians in the face of AI music generation?
-The speaker is pessimistic about the future of human musicians, especially those who rely on composing stock or commercial music for their income. However, they acknowledge that passionate musicians will continue to create music for the love of it, regardless of AI.
What is the speaker's personal stance on capitalism in relation to AI music generation?
-The speaker expresses a strong anti-capitalist sentiment regarding AI music generation, viewing it as exploitative and detrimental to human creators. They feel that the system values profit over human creativity and emotion.
How does the speaker describe their experience with Sunno AI?
-The speaker describes their experience with Sunno AI as both impressive and terrifying. They are amazed by the quality and variety of music produced by the AI but are also deeply concerned about the implications for human musicians.
What is the price point for generating music with Sunno AI as mentioned by the speaker?
-The speaker mentions that they were able to generate 500 songs for $10 with Sunno AI, which equates to approximately two cents per track.
What does the speaker suggest will be the fate of human-written commercial music?
-The speaker suggests that human-written commercial music will become largely obsolete, with AI-generated music taking over the majority of the market due to its speed and cost-effectiveness.
How does the speaker feel about the potential extinction of human-created music in certain sectors?
-The speaker feels terrified and strongly against the potential extinction of human-created music. They express a sense of loss and injustice for the musicians whose work may be replaced by AI.
What alternative skills does the speaker mention having that provide some comfort amidst the changes in the music industry?
-The speaker mentions having skills in construction and renovation, such as building studios, working with doors, windows, ceilings, walls, electricity, and hydraulics, which provide a sense of security outside of the music industry.
How does the speaker conclude their thoughts on AI music generation?
-The speaker concludes with a sense of acceptance of the inevitable changes but also a strong personal commitment to continue creating music and engaging with their audience. They emphasize the irreplaceable human experience in music creation and consumption.
Outlines
🎵 The Impact of AI on Music Creation
Paul, a YouTuber and music creator, discusses the alarming advancements in AI music generation and its potential to disrupt the music industry. He predicts that within a year, human-created stock music will become obsolete due to AI's ability to produce music faster and cheaper. Paul expresses concern for the future of music creators, as AI threatens to replace human effort and creativity in music production.
🚀 AI's Capability to Generate Music
The video demonstrates the capabilities of an AI music platform, Sunno AI, which can generate high-quality music at an incredibly low cost. Paul experiments with the platform, creating corporate music and a fast dubstep track with ease. He highlights the platform's ability to understand and replicate various music styles, raising questions about the future of music creation and the potential loss of jobs for human musicians and composers.
💸 The Economic Implications for Music Creators
Paul addresses the economic impact of AI-generated music on professional music creators. He explains that the time and effort required to produce music traditionally will not be competitive against AI's rapid and inexpensive output. He warns that commercial music creators may soon find themselves out of work, as businesses prioritize cost and efficiency over human creativity.
🤖 AI and the Ethics of Creativity
Delving into the ethical considerations, Paul questions how AI learns to mimic human-created music and the legality of using copyrighted material for AI training. He expresses his fear that AI's ability to replicate human creativity could lead to widespread job loss in the music industry and a lack of public outcry due to the relatively small number of artists compared to other professions.
😞 The Emotional Toll on Artists
Paul laments the emotional and existential impact on artists whose life work and passion could be undermined by AI. He compares the situation to large corporations exploiting natural resources, suggesting that tech companies are now exploiting human creativity. He emphasizes the potential loss of human value and the injustice of AI stealing human creativity and leaving artists without a means to earn a living from their craft.
🌐 The Societal Shift and the Future of Music
In the concluding paragraph, Paul reflects on the societal changes that AI music generation could bring, predicting a future where human-created music is marginalized. He expresses his opposition to this future, stating that while he will adapt, he does not support it. Paul remains passionate about music and the human connection it fosters, believing that this cannot be replaced by AI. He ends on a note of defiance, asserting that the human experience in music creation and appreciation will persist despite the challenges posed by AI.
Mindmap
Keywords
AI Music
Stock Music
Music Generating AI
Suno AI
Neural Networks
Copyright
Commercial Music
Artists
Protests
Economy and Social Life
Human Passion for Creation
Highlights
AI music generation is becoming increasingly skillful, posing a serious threat to human music creators.
The speaker predicts that within a year, human investment in stock music will be obsolete due to AI capabilities.
AI music platforms like Sunno AI can generate high volumes of music at a fraction of the cost, making it difficult for human composers to compete.
The AI-generated music is not just replicating styles but also creating lyrics that can be surprisingly good.
The rapid and inexpensive creation of music by AI could lead to the displacement of commercial music creators.
AI's ability to generate music in various styles, including complex ones like trip-hop or ambient, raises questions about the future of niche music markets.
The ethical and legal implications of AI music generation are questioned, particularly regarding copyright and the use of human-created material.
Noam Chomsky's view that generative AI is a form of plagiarism software is cited, labeling it as the greatest thievery humanity has witnessed.
The impact of AI on music creation is compared to the exploitation by large companies, suggesting a lack of regard for the original creators.
The speaker expresses concern that AI will lead to a society that is deeply inhuman and unjust, particularly for those whose livelihoods depend on music creation.
Despite the rise of AI, the speaker remains committed to human creativity and the irreplaceable human experience in music.
The potential extinction of human-written stock music is predicted, with only a small percentage of top artists and those adept at using AI remaining in the market.
AI is described as an extended search engine that can quickly generate music by searching through human ideas.
The speaker emphasizes the importance of the human connection in music creation, which AI cannot replicate.
A call for awareness and adaptation is made, as the speaker acknowledges the inevitability of AI's role in the music industry but does not support it.
The video concludes with a reminder of the enduring value of human creativity and the personal connection to music, which AI cannot take away.