ANIMASI GAYA KEPEMIMPINAN OTORITER DAN DEMOKRASI

Summary

The meeting begins with addressing the disorganized Dies Natalis event. One member apologizes for not checking equipment, and another for the delayed schedule. The chairman criticizes them harshly, but another member defends their efforts, prompting a heated exchange. The meeting ends with a resolution to improve communication and teamwork for future events. In a new discussion, concerns about inconsistent member participation are raised, highlighting specific absences and unfinished tasks. A member explains their absence due to part-time work and apologizes for incomplete jobs. The group acknowledges misunderstandings and emphasizes the need for better communication as a foundation for effective collaboration.

Takeaways

• 😔 The previous day's anniversary event was chaotic and embarrassing.
• 🙏 Apologies were given for not checking the equipment before the event and for the late start.
• 🗣️ There was a suggestion to appreciate the hard work of the team despite the issues.
• 🤔 The chairman has the right to evaluate the team and there was a misunderstanding in the instructions.
• 🔚 The meeting was suggested to be ended to continue the discussion the next day.
• 🤔 The next meeting will discuss future work plans and credit programs.
• 😐 There were concerns about the inconsistency of some team members, such as not attending meetings or contributing.
• 😡 A specific member, Mas Junaedi, was criticized for not attending the previous meeting and not contributing to the recent work.
• 💬 The need for better communication was highlighted as a basic requirement for teamwork.
• 🤔 There was a suggestion to clarify issues before discussing further plans.

Q & A

What was the main issue discussed in the meeting?

The main issue discussed in the meeting was the chaotic organization of the previous day's anniversary event.

Why was the anniversary event considered chaotic?

The anniversary event was considered chaotic because the necessary preparations and equipment were not checked before the event started, leading to delays and embarrassment.

What was the speaker's role in the meeting?

The speaker appears to be in a leadership position, possibly the chairman, as they are evaluating the performance of the team and addressing issues in the meeting.

What was the speaker's response to the team's performance?

The speaker expressed disappointment and asked for appreciation for the team's hard work, despite the chaotic event.

Why was there an apology from the speaker?

The speaker apologized for not checking the event's rundown and for the team's lack of preparation, which led to the chaotic event.

What was the suggestion made by the speaker to improve future events?

The speaker suggested that the team should be more compact and careful in handling future events to avoid repeating the mistakes of the previous event.

What was the issue with the team's attendance and contribution?

Some team members were inconsistent, not attending school meetings or contributing, which was highlighted as a problem by the speaker.

Who was mentioned as not attending the previous meeting and not contributing?

Junaedi was mentioned as not attending the previous meeting and being jobless, implying a lack of contribution.

What was the speaker's stance on the team's communication?

The speaker pointed out that there was a misunderstanding among the team members due to poor communication and suggested that they need to improve their communication for better teamwork.

What was the speaker's final decision regarding the meeting?

The speaker decided to end the meeting and continue the discussion the next day, focusing on future work plans.

What was the main topic for the next meeting?

The main topic for the next meeting was to discuss the team's work plan for the upcoming credit period.