MANTAB! Test Passive Cooling with Heater Heatpipe A1 Vs ArticShark vs Vapor Chamber Coolheat VC

Summary

In this video, Rendi compares two cooling solutions: the A1 heat-type paper chamber and the Arctic Shark. The A1 features a unique magnetic attachment for easy installation on devices like iPhones, offering superior heat distribution and performance, especially in low-loop cooling tests. However, it’s bulkier compared to the compact Arctic Shark, which uses copper and graphene for a thinner profile. While the A1 outperforms the Arctic Shark in several tests, the full vaper chamber cooling system is ultimately the most effective. The video emphasizes choosing the right product based on cooling needs and size preferences.

Takeaways

• 😀 The A1 heat chamber is a heat type vapor chamber, which uses 3M 8810 and magnets to attach directly to devices like iPhones.
• 😀 A major advantage of the A1 chamber is its use of magnets, which allow easy attachment to devices without worrying about glue or wireless charging interference.
• 😀 The A1 heat chamber has some protrusion issues if not used with an iPhone Pro Max, but it remains safe and functional.
• 😀 The A1 heat chamber has better cooling performance compared to the Arctic Shark in certain benchmarks, particularly in terms of low loop stability.
• 😀 Both the Arctic Shark and A1 heat chamber were tested under a 12V heat source to compare their heat dissipation performance.
• 😀 The A1 chamber demonstrated quicker heat dissipation and more even heat distribution compared to the Arctic Shark, as visible on a thermal camera.
• 😀 The temperature distribution on the A1 chamber was more even with the bottom temperatures showing a more balanced spread compared to the Arctic Shark.
• 😀 When using a 12V power source, the A1 heat chamber showed slightly better cooling performance than the Arctic Shark by about 1-2 degrees.
• 😀 The vaper chamber in the A1 outperforms lower-cost vaper chambers, which are typically smaller and less effective in heat dissipation.
• 😀 The A1 heat chamber, while thicker and bulkier than the Arctic Shark, offers better cooling performance and includes features like magnets for easy attachment.
• 😀 The conclusion of the test indicates that each cooling system has its own strengths, with the A1 chamber being the best option for those who prioritize better cooling performance despite its size.

Q & A

What is the A1 heat chamber, and what makes it different from other cooling systems?

The A1 heat chamber is a vapor chamber that uses a heat pipe and magnets to cool down devices like smartphones. Unlike other coolers, the A1 has a unique magnetic feature that allows it to be easily attached to devices, offering convenience and superior heat dissipation.

How does the magnetic design of the A1 heat chamber work?

The A1 heat chamber uses magnets to attach directly to devices such as an iPhone. This design eliminates the need for adhesives, making it easier to install and remove the cooler. However, there is a slight protrusion when used with devices that are not Pro Max models.

What is the advantage of using magnets in the A1 heat chamber compared to traditional adhesives?

The magnetic design allows for easy attachment and detachment of the cooler without the hassle of adhesives or complicated installation. It also avoids the potential difficulty of removing sticky residues, which makes the process more user-friendly.

How did the A1 heat chamber perform in comparison to the Arctic Shark during testing?

The A1 heat chamber outperformed the Arctic Shark in cooling efficiency. Benchmark tests showed that the A1 had better heat distribution, with lower temperatures on the heat pipe, making it more effective at cooling compared to the Arctic Shark.

What were the temperature results from the thermal camera tests for the A1 and Arctic Shark?

The thermal camera results showed that the A1 had better heat distribution, with temperatures averaging 38-45°C on the heat pipe. In contrast, the Arctic Shark had temperatures of around 50°C, indicating that the A1 provided better cooling performance.

What are the disadvantages of the A1 heat chamber?

One disadvantage of the A1 heat chamber is that it may stick out slightly when used with devices that are not Pro Max models. This protrusion can be an issue for users who prefer a completely flush design. However, the cooler remains fully functional despite this issue.

Why did the speaker compare the A1 heat chamber with a copper vaper chamber?

The speaker compared the A1 heat chamber with a copper vaper chamber to evaluate the cooling performance differences between the materials. Copper and aluminum have different thermal properties, which can affect heat dissipation efficiency.

What is the cost difference between the A1 heat chamber and the copper vaper chamber, and how does that affect performance?

The copper vaper chamber is priced higher, but it offers more efficient cooling due to its superior heat dissipation properties. Despite this, the A1 heat chamber provides good performance at a similar price point and includes the added advantage of magnetic attachment.

What was the conclusion after comparing the cooling performance of the A1 heat chamber and the copper vaper chamber?

The A1 heat chamber was found to have slightly inferior cooling performance compared to the copper vaper chamber. However, the A1 still performed well enough to be considered a good choice for users seeking effective and convenient cooling, especially with its magnetic attachment feature.

What factors should consumers consider when choosing between the A1 heat chamber and the Arctic Shark?

Consumers should consider factors such as cooling performance, portability, and design. The A1 offers better cooling but is bulkier, while the Arctic Shark is thinner and more portable but provides slightly less efficient cooling. The choice ultimately depends on whether users prioritize performance or convenience.