Me and My Friends Was Found, BUT....

Summary

The video explores the unsettling discovery of a community or wiki admins who hoarded content, specifically a sought-after TV show pilot. The narrator reveals how these admins misled others, faked contact details, and sabotaged efforts to obtain the pilot. Despite the admins claiming to have reached out to certain contacts, their actions suggest a deliberate attempt to protect their 'find' and prevent others from accessing it. The video reflects on the frustration and betrayal felt by those who spent years searching for something already in possession of the admins, revealing a deeper narrative of intentional hoarding and manipulation.

Takeaways

• 😀 The Backyard Against Wiki admins were allegedly involved in hoarding content, specifically a pilot episode, which was not disclosed to the public despite having it in their possession.
• 🤔 The video reflects the frustration and disappointment of the speaker and their friends, who spent years searching for the pilot that the wiki admins already had.
• 💼 There were suspicions that the admins intentionally misled and obstructed others from obtaining the pilot by offering false information and sabotaging efforts.
• 📧 The speaker recalls an instance where an individual they were communicating with ghosted them after openly sharing emails, suggesting possible interference by the wiki admins.
• 🤐 The video emphasizes the mysterious nature of certain events, including a director abruptly ending a conversation with the admins, which adds to the suspicion of hidden motives.
• 😞 The speaker feels betrayed by the admins' actions and is more disappointed by their behavior than by their refusal to release the content.
• 🔒 The admins could have simply stated that they possessed the material but couldn't release it, which would have been more acceptable than their deceptive actions.
• 📚 There is a growing theory that the admins are protecting the content they discovered to maintain control over it and its narrative, even at the expense of transparency.
• 🕵️‍♂️ The situation surrounding the Backyard Against Wiki is described as strange and possibly more complex than initially thought, with unanswered questions about the true extent of the interference.
• 🔍 The speaker suggests that the trail left by the admins points to a pattern of manipulation, which casts doubt on the validity of the information presented by the wiki.

Q & A

What is the main issue described in the video script?

The main issue revolves around the admins of a community (possibly a wiki or fan-based group) withholding and hoarding content, including rare media, while misleading others about its availability. The speaker and their group discovered that they had been misled and possibly sabotaged in their search for this content.

How did the speaker and their friends first get involved in the situation?

The speaker and their friends got involved through their search for rare media, specifically a copy of a piece of content (likely a pilot or video). They interacted with the admins who misled them by claiming the content was unavailable, when in fact, they had already obtained it.

What role did the admins of the wiki play in this situation?

The admins played a central role in withholding information about the rare content, misleading the speaker and their group, and possibly interfering with their efforts to obtain it. They also allegedly sabotaged communication with other potential sources for the media.

What evidence does the speaker have to support their claims?

The speaker refers to screenshots and emails that were posted in the group chat, which show signs of interference. They also note how certain key individuals, such as a director, abruptly ceased communication after interacting with the admins, further suggesting sabotage.

What is the speaker's main feeling about the admins' actions?

The speaker feels a mix of disappointment and frustration. They are upset that the admins hoarded the content and misled others, making their own search for the media much more difficult than necessary.

Why does the speaker think the admins did not release the content?

The speaker believes that the admins wanted to protect their perceived ownership of the content, valuing the exclusive discovery over sharing it with the community or others. They also think the admins intentionally made things difficult to prevent others from obtaining a copy.

What could have been a better way for the admins to handle the situation?

A better approach would have been for the admins to acknowledge that they had the content but could not release it, or to be transparent about their reasons. This honesty would have allowed others to continue their search without being misled or sabotaged.

How does the speaker feel about the content being hoarded by the admins?

The speaker is not angry that the admins hoarded the content, but rather disappointed that the community was kept in the dark for so long. They express frustration over not being told earlier, especially after spending years searching for it.

What impact did the admins' actions have on the speaker's search?

The admins' actions led to a prolonged and fruitless search. By misdirecting or interfering with the process, the speaker and their friends spent a considerable amount of time and effort pursuing dead ends, unaware that the content was already in the possession of the admins.

What is the 'bigger takeaway' from this situation, according to the speaker?

The 'bigger takeaway' is that information coming from the admins of the wiki cannot be trusted at face value. The speaker emphasizes that the misleading actions and hoarding of content cast doubt on the reliability of any information from these sources, especially in relation to research.