1o PASSO- 10 Passos Fundamentais da Revisão Sistemática (DÚVIDA CLÍNICA)

Summary

In this video, the speaker introduces the first step in conducting a systematic review, emphasizing the importance of starting with a clear clinical question. Clinical doubts, ranging from treatment methods to diagnostic techniques, guide systematic reviews in healthcare. The video highlights the importance of identifying knowledge gaps in the literature and planning a systematic review to address these issues. The speaker also recommends further reading in the book 'Fundamentals of Systematic Reviews in Dentistry,' which provides a comprehensive guide not only for dentistry but for health research as a whole.

Takeaways

• 😀 The first step in developing a systematic review is identifying a clinical question or doubt, which is crucial for guiding the entire process.
• 😀 Systematic reviews are based on clear, focused questions that help narrow down the scope of research, whether it's about treatment options, diagnostic techniques, or other clinical concerns.
• 😀 Many clinical doubts can be answered by consulting books or scientific articles, but answers can vary, highlighting the importance of systematic reviews to provide clarity.
• 😀 Systematic reviews help synthesize existing evidence and resolve divergent conclusions in the scientific literature by focusing on a specific clinical question.
• 😀 Despite their powerful evidence, systematic reviews often begin with a simple, unplanned clinical doubt that arises from daily practice.
• 😀 Health professionals often seek courses, updates, or specializations to address gaps in knowledge, especially in areas where the evidence is unclear or conflicting.
• 😀 In cases where clinical doubts cannot be answered easily through books or articles, systematic reviews offer a more comprehensive, evidence-based solution.
• 😀 Researchers may also conduct systematic reviews to address gaps in the literature where clinical questions remain unanswered or where existing reviews are outdated or methodologically flawed.
• 😀 A researcher identifying a gap in the literature can create an opportunity for generating new scientific evidence, particularly in areas that are underserved by previous systematic reviews.
• 😀 The book 'Fundamentals of Systematic Reviews in Dentistry' offers a theoretical foundation for conducting systematic reviews not just in dentistry but across various health disciplines.

Q & A

What is the first step in developing a systematic review?

The first step is to identify a clinical question or doubt. This could be something like 'What is the best treatment for canker sores?' or 'Which is the best method for locating supernumerary teeth in the maxilla?' This clinical question drives the systematic review process.

How do systematic reviews help in clinical practice?

Systematic reviews help by providing a comprehensive synthesis of existing scientific evidence. They address clinical questions that may have multiple, sometimes conflicting, answers and help guide clinical decision-making based on the most reliable evidence.

Can a clinical question be answered by random clinical trials or other high-level studies alone?

Not always. While randomized clinical trials (RCTs) provide high-level evidence, systematic reviews are necessary when there are multiple studies with divergent results. They aggregate evidence from various sources to provide a clearer, more reliable answer.

What challenges are commonly faced by health professionals when addressing clinical doubts?

Health professionals often face the challenge of having questions during their practice that require more in-depth theoretical knowledge. These questions may not always have straightforward answers and might require the consultation of multiple studies or expert opinions.

What is the importance of systematic reviews in dealing with clinical doubts?

Systematic reviews are crucial because they summarize the evidence on a specific clinical question, providing clarity when multiple conflicting studies exist. This allows clinicians to make better-informed decisions in practice.

Do systematic reviews always start with a well-planned clinical question?

Not necessarily. In many cases, clinical doubts arise spontaneously during practice, and the need for a systematic review is identified only later. However, researchers can also actively seek gaps in the literature that have not yet been addressed by systematic reviews.

What should researchers do if they identify a gap in the literature regarding clinical questions?

If researchers identify a gap in the literature, they should plan and conduct a systematic review to address this gap. This process involves a thorough search for studies, followed by a detailed analysis and synthesis of the evidence.

How does the book 'Fundamentals of Systematic Reviews in Dentistry' contribute to the field?

The book provides a foundational guide to conducting systematic reviews in the health field, particularly in dentistry. While it is geared toward dentistry, the principles and methodologies it discusses are applicable to a wide range of health disciplines.

Who is the target audience for the book 'Fundamentals of Systematic Reviews in Dentistry'?

The book is intended for researchers, healthcare professionals, and anyone interested in learning how to conduct systematic reviews in health sciences. While it focuses on dentistry, its approach is broadly applicable across various healthcare fields.

What should viewers do if they want to learn more about the steps to conduct a systematic review?

Viewers are encouraged to follow the channel for more videos detailing the remaining nine essential steps for conducting a systematic review. They can also explore the book for an in-depth understanding of the process.