ChatGPT vs Copilot vs Gemini vs Claude - ¿Qué IA es mejor en 2024?

Summary

En este video, se exploran y comparan cuatro plataformas de inteligencia artificial prominentes en 2024: ChatGPT, Copilot, Cloud y BART. Cada una es evaluada en términos de su capacidad para mantener conversaciones naturales, procesamiento de información, integración con plugins y modelos personalizados, y actualización de conocimientos a través de internet. A través de una serie de pruebas, se analiza la calidad de las respuestas, la velocidad y la utilidad práctica de cada plataforma, destacando las ventajas y desventajas de cada una, y se sugiere que la combinación de varias plataformas puede cubrir las limitaciones de una sola.

Takeaways

• 📈 La inteligencia artificial ha ganado prominencia y está transformando la forma en que interactuamos con la tecnología.
• 🗣️ ChatGPT es un modelo de lenguaje generativo capaz de mantener conversaciones naturales y generar texto coherente y relevante contextualmente.
• 💬 GPT 4, el modelo más avanzado de ChatGPT, maneja indicaciones más complejas y tiene una ventana de contexto más grande que GPT 3.5.
• 🖼️ GPT 4 admite entrada multimodal, lo que permite generar texto a partir de elementos visuales como fotografías y diagramas.
• 🔗 GPT 4 puede conectarse a Internet, lo que le permite tener conocimientos actualizados, a diferencia de GPT 3.5.
• 📚 Copilot, la alternativa de Microsoft, ofrece tecnología GPT 4 sin restricciones para usuarios pagados y permite hasta 300 mensajes diarios.
• 📈 Cloud, desarrollado por Antropic, se destaca por su capacidad para leer, analizar y resumir archivos, aunque no tiene conexión a Internet.
• 🌐 BART, desarrollado por Google, se integra con el motor de búsqueda de Google para obtener información actualizada y no tiene límites de mensajes aparentes.
• 📝 En pruebas comparativas, ChatGPT muestra ser el más completo en respuestas técnicas y creativas, aunque BART destaca por su rapidez.
• 🤖 Cada plataforma de inteligencia artificial tiene sus ventajas y desventajas, y se sugiere combinarlas según las necesidades.
• 🚀 Se espera que el 2024 sea un año importante para la implementación de la inteligencia artificial en diferentes dispositivos y aplicaciones.

Q & A

¿Qué es La Manzana Morbida y qué tipo de contenido ofrece?

La Manzana Morbida es un canal de contenidos que aborda temas relacionados con la inteligencia artificial y la tecnología. En este caso, ofrece una revisión y comparación de cuatro plataformas de inteligencia artificial prominentes en el año 2024.

¿Cuáles son las cuatro plataformas de inteligencia artificial que se comparan en el video?

Las cuatro plataformas de inteligencia artificial que se comparan son ChatGPT, Copilot, Cloud y BART.

¿Qué modelo de ChatGPT es conocido por su capacidad para mantener conversaciones naturales y generar texto coherente?

ChatGPT 4, que es el modelo más avanzado de ChatGPT, es conocido por su capacidad para mantener conversaciones naturales y generar texto coherente y contextualmente relevante.

¿Cuáles son las principales diferencias entre los modelos GPT 3.5 y GPT 4 de ChatGPT?

Las principales diferencias entre GPT 3.5 y GPT 4 incluyen su capacidad de procesamiento, funcionalidad multimodal, gestión de contexto e integración con internet. GPT 4 puede manejar indicaciones más complejas y sundadas, admite entrada multimodal y tiene una ventana de contexto significativamente más grande.

¿Por qué podría ser un inconveniente el modelo GPT 4 de ChatGPT?

Un inconveniente del modelo GPT 4 de ChatGPT es que, incluso con una suscripción de ChatGPT Plus, el usuario está limitado a 40 mensajes cada 3 horas, lo que puede resultar insuficiente para aquellos que lo utilizan diariamente en su flujo de trabajo.

¿Qué ventaja tiene Copilot sobre ChatGPT en términos de uso de tecnología GPT4 y limitaciones de mensajes?

Copilot permite el uso de la tecnología GPT4 sin necesidad de una suscripción de pago, a diferencia de ChatGPT. Además, las limitaciones de mensajes en Copilot son menos restrictivas, permitiendo hasta 300 mensajes por día con un límite de 30 mensajes por chat.

¿Qué es Cloud y qué ventajas ofrece sobre sus competidores?

Cloud es una inteligencia artificial chatbot desarrollada por Antropic, capaz de leer, analizar y resumir archivos que se pueden cargar a través de su sitio web. Su principal ventaja es su gran ventana de contexto, que puede cubrir hasta 100,000 tokens, lo que equivale aproximadamente a 75,000 palabras.

¿Qué es BART y cuáles son sus principales características?

BART es una inteligencia artificial chatbot desarrollada por Google basada en el modelo de lenguaje Lambda. Su operación consiste en interactuar a través de un chat y se destaca por su integración con el motor de búsqueda de Google, lo que le permite extraer información actualizada del internet.

¿Qué tipo de preguntas se hicieron para evaluar las capacidades de las inteligencias artificiales en el video?

Se hicieron preguntas técnicas, creativas, de conocimiento general y de asesoramiento práctico, así como preguntas que requerían conexión a internet para proporcionar una respuesta exacta.

¿Cuál es la principal conclusión que se puede extraer de las pruebas realizadas en el video?

La principal conclusión es que ChatGPT se destaca por la calidad de sus respuestas y la integración con GPTs configurables, plugins y más. Aunque los demás competidores también tienen ventajas y desventajas, se sugiere que la combinación de varias inteligencias artificiales puede ser la mejor estrategia para aprovechar sus capacidades individuales.

¿Cómo se puede mejorar la eficiencia en el uso de inteligencias artificiales según el video?

Se puede mejorar la eficiencia combinando las herramientas de inteligencia artificial de acuerdo con sus fortalezas. Por ejemplo, se puede utilizar Cloud para tareas de escritura que no requieren conectividad, ChatGPT para tareas específicas y análisis, Copilot para generación de texto y búsquedas en internet, y BART si mejora su capacidad de búsqueda y precisión.

¿Qué expectativas se tienen para el año 2024 en términos de desarrollo de la inteligencia artificial?

Se espera que el año 2024 sea un año importante para la implementación de la inteligencia artificial, no solo a nivel web sino también en dispositivos móviles, con mejoras significativas en los sistemas operativos y en la interacción con la tecnología.

Outlines

00:00

🚀 Introducción a las principales plataformas de inteligencia artificial

El primer párrafo presenta el tema central del video: la inteligencia artificial y su impacto en la interacción con la tecnología. Se mencionan cuatro plataformas destacadas: ChatGPT, Copilot, Cloud y BART. Se destaca la capacidad de ChatGPT para mantener conversaciones naturales y generar texto coherente. Se exploran las diferencias entre los modelos GPT 3.5 y GPT 4, incluyendo la capacidad del último para manejar indicaciones más complejas, su funcionalidad multimodal y conexión a internet. También se habla sobre los plugins y las versiones personalizadas de ChatGPT conocidas como GPTs.

05:02

🤖 Características y limitaciones de Copilot y Cloud

El segundo párrafo compara Copilot con ChatGPT, señalando que Copilot ofrece la tecnología GPT 4 sin restricciones y con un límite diario de mensajes más alto. Se menciona la capacidad multimodal de Copilot y su desventaja en comparación con la comunidad y los plugins de ChatGPT. Luego, se presenta a Cloud, una inteligencia artificial de Antropic, destacando su habilidad para analizar y resumir archivos grandes, pero también sus desventajas, como la falta de conexión a internet y la ausencia de integración con plugins.

10:03

🌟 BART y su modelo Gemini

Este párrafo describe BART, una inteligencia artificial desarrollada por Google que se destaca por su actualización continua a través de la integración con el motor de búsqueda de Google. Aunque es completamente gratuita y no tiene límites de mensajes, se considera la más débil de las cuatro opciones en términos de calidad de respuestas y posibilidades de uso de plugins. Además, no puede generar imágenes, lo que limita sus capacidades en comparación con Copilot y ChatGPT.

15:03

📝 Pruebas comparativas entre las cuatro inteligencias artificiales

El cuarto párrafo detalla un conjunto de pruebas para comparar las respuestas de las cuatro plataformas de inteligencia artificial. Se plantean preguntas técnicas, creativas, de conocimiento general y de asesoramiento práctico para evaluar su capacidad para abordar problemas de programación, generar contenido creativo, manejar temas actuales y ofrecer consejos aplicables. Se resaltan las respuestas de cada plataforma y se hace una evaluación preliminar de su desempeño.

20:04

🔮 Tendencias tecnológicas y proyecciones hasta 2025

Este párrafo se enfoca en la capacidad de las plataformas para analizar y proyectar tendencias tecnológicas para el año 2025. Seolicita a cada una de ellas que identifique las tendencias emergentes en la tecnología. Se destaca la importancia de la conexión a internet para proporcionar respuestas precisas y se evalúa la capacidad de cada plataforma para filtrar y proporcionar información correcta.

25:05

🏆 Conclusión y uso personal de las inteligencias artificiales

El sexto y último párrafo concluye la comparación y ofrece el punto de vista del presentador sobre el desempeño de cada plataforma. Se menciona que ChatGPT se destaca por la calidad de sus respuestas y la integración con GPTs, plugins y configuración personalizable. Se expresa la decepción con la lentitud de Copilot y se reconoce el buen rendimiento de Cloud en tareas que no requieren conectividad. Además, se sugiere que BART podría mejorar con su modelo Gemini. El presentador comparte cómo combina el uso de estas inteligencias artificiales en su flujo de trabajo diario y anima a los espectadores a compartir sus opiniones y usos en los comentarios.

Keywords

💡Inteligencia Artificial

Inteligencia Artificial (IA) es la capacidad de una máquina de replicar el comportamiento de un ser humano en términos de pensamiento, aprendizaje y toma de decisiones. En el video, se discute cómo la IA ha ganado prominencia en los últimos años y cómo ha transformado la interacción con la tecnología, siendo un tema central en la exploración y comparación de las plataformas de IA.

💡ChatGPT

ChatGPT es un modelo de lenguaje generativo desarrollado por OpenAI, conocido por mantener conversaciones naturales y generar texto coherente y relevante contextualmente. En el video, se explora su capacidad de manejar indicaciones más complejas y su uso de tecnología multimodal y conexión a Internet, destacando su importancia en la comparación de las plataformas de IA.

💡Copilot

Copilot es una plataforma de IA desarrollada por Microsoft y OpenAI, que ofrece similitudes con ChatGPT pero con sus propias ventajas y desventajas. En el video, se menciona que Copilot permite el uso de tecnologías avanzadas como GPT-4 sin necesidad de una suscripción de pago, lo que la distingue de otras opciones y es un punto relevante en la comparación.

💡Cloud

Cloud es un chatbot de IA desarrollado por Antropic, destacado por su habilidad para leer, analizar y resumir archivos que se pueden cargar a través de su sitio web. Aunque no tiene conexión a Internet ni integración con plugins, su ventana de contexto extensa lo hace notable en la gestión de textos y archivos, como se discute en el video.

💡BART

BART es un chatbot de IA desarrollado por Google basado en el modelo Lambda y que extrae información de Internet gracias a la integración con el motor de búsqueda de Google. A pesar de no contar con la integración de la tecnología GPT-4 en español, su capacidad de interacción y actualización de información lo posiciona como un participante en la comparación presentada en el video.

💡GPT-4

GPT-4 es el modelo más avanzado de ChatGPT, capaz de manejar indicaciones más complejas y matices que su versión anterior GPT 3.5. En el video, se destaca su capacidad de procesamiento, funcionalidad multimodal, gestión de contexto y conexión a Internet, siendo un factor diferenciador en la evaluación de las plataformas de IA.

💡Dalí 3

Dalí 3 es una tecnología mencionada en el video que permite la generación de imágenes, siendo utilizada por GPT 4 para crear imágenes a partir de elementos visuales como fotografías y diagramas. Esta capacidad de generación visual es un aspecto importante en la funcionalidad multimodal de las plataformas de IA.

💡Plugins

Los plugins son extensiones creadas por desarrolladores externos que proporcionan más capacidades a ChatGPT. En el video, se habla de la infinitud de plugins disponibles y su uso para ampliar las funciones de ChatGPT, destacando cómo estos plugins pueden personalizar y mejorar la experiencia del usuario.

💡GPTs

Los GPTs son versiones personalizadas de ChatGPT diseñadas para tareas específicas. El video menciona cómo los usuarios pueden crear sus propios GPTs o encontrarlos en la tienda de GPT, resaltando su utilidad para tareas repetitivas y la eficiencia que pueden aportar a la rutina diaria del usuario.

💡Comparación

La comparación es el método utilizado en el video para evaluar y contrastar las características y capacidades de las cuatro plataformas de IA. A través de preguntas variadas, el video busca establecer cuál es la mejor opción en diferentes contextos y necesidades, ofreciendo una perspectiva más informada al público.

💡Tecnologías Emergentes

Las tecnologías emergentes son aquellas que están en fase de desarrollo o introducción y que tienen el potencial de causar un cambio significativo en la sociedad o el mercado. En el video, se cuestiona a las plataformas de IA sobre las tendencias tecnológicas para el año 2025, lo que demuestra su capacidad para proyectar y analizar futuras innovaciones.

Highlights

El video explora y compara cuatro de las plataformas de inteligencia artificial más destacadas en 2024: ChatGPT, Copilot, Cloud y BART.

ChatGPT es capaz de mantener conversaciones naturales y generar texto coherente y relevante contextualmente.

GPT 4, el modelo más avanzado de ChatGPT, maneja indicaciones más complejas y es multimodal, admitiendo entradas de texto e imágenes.

GPT 4 puede generar texto a partir de elementos visuales y crear imágenes utilizando la tecnología Dali 3.

GPT 4 ofrece una ventana de contexto más grande, lo que mejora la coherencia y relevancia de las respuestas en conversaciones largas.

ChatGPT Plus permite el uso del modelo GPT 4 y acceso a plugins y GPTs personalizados diseñados para tareas específicas.

Copilot, la alternativa de Microsoft, ofrece la tecnología GPT 4 sin restricciones de pago y con límites de mensaje más altos que ChatGPT.

Copilot también permite un trabajo multimodal, incluyendo la interacción con imágenes y la generación de imágenes.

Cloud, desarrollado por Antropic, se destaca por su capacidad para leer, analizar y resumir archivos grandes con hasta 100,000 tokens.

BART, desarrollado por Google, se integra con el motor de búsqueda de Google para extraer información actualizada y responder preguntas.

BART no tiene limitaciones de mensajes aparentes y no requiere de una suscripción para usar su tecnología.

Las pruebas incluyen preguntas técnicas, creativas, de conocimiento general y de actualidad para evaluar la calidad de las respuestas de cada plataforma.

ChatGPT muestra una respuesta más completa y detallada en la pregunta técnica sobre optimización de un algoritmo de ranking de imágenes en Python.

BART proporciona respuestas rápidas y precisas en preguntas de conocimiento general, como los impactos ambientales del cambio climático.

Copilot muestra una respuesta más breve y menos detallada en comparación con otras plataformas en la pregunta de estrategias de gestión del tiempo.

Las respuestas de ChatGPT y BART son consideradas mejores que la de Copilot en la pregunta sobre estrategias de gestión del tiempo.

En la pregunta sobre tendencias tecnológicas para 2025, ChatGPT proporciona una respuesta más completa, destacando la coexistencia con robots y la implementación rápida de 5G.

Cloud ofrece una respuesta precisa y concisa en la pregunta sobre tendencias tecnológicas, destacando la inteligencia artificial y la conectividad mejorada.

En la pregunta sobre quién es el presidente de Argentina, se evidencia la importancia de la conexión a Internet para proporcionar respuestas precisas.

ChatGPT y Copilot se destacan como las mejores opciones para búsquedas en línea y respuestas actualizadas, mientras que Cloud se utiliza mejor para tareas sin necesidad de conectividad.

El creador del video sugiere combinar las diferentes plataformas de IA para aprovechar sus ventajas y compensar las desventajas individuales.

Transcripts

Very good friends and welcome to La Manzana Morbida.

A video that I was very, very excited about

of doing.

And, well, in recent years intelligence

artificial has gained a lot of prominence

and has transformed the way we interact

With technology.

From writing codes without having much idea

from programming to having conversations.

Artificial intelligence we could say

that is beginning to be present everywhere.

But which is the best in 2024?

Today we are going to explore and compare four of the

most prominent platforms.

ChatGPT,

Copilot,

Cloud and BART.

So make yourself comfortable, let's get started.

Let's start with ChatGPT.

ChatGPT is a generative language model

developed by OpenAI and known for its ability

to maintain natural conversations and generate

coherent text and, we could say, contextually

relevant.

At this time, through its website,

We can choose two models,

GPT 3.5 and GPT 4, which is its most advanced model.

We can only use the latter if we have

a subscription to ChatGPT Plus for something more

20 euros a month,

everything must be said.

The main differences between GPT 3.5 and

GPT 4 lies in its processing capacity,

multimodal functionality,

context management and internet connection.

GPT 4 is capable of handling more indications

complex and nuanced than GPT 3.5.

Besides,

while GPT 3.5 only accepts text requests,

GPT told you that it is multimodal, that is,

supports text and visual input, which

allows you to understand and describe practically

any picture.

This means that GPT 4 can generate text

from visual elements such as photographs

and diagrams, you can also create images using

Dalí's technology 3.

For example, if I tell you to analyze this diagram

of iPhone sales and write a text

of at least 300 words analyzing it,

Not only does it do it, but it does it very well.

In terms of context management,

GPT 4 offers a context window and size

significantly larger than GPT 3.5.

This allows GPT 4 to retain important details

during a chat session,

which improves the coherence and relevance of

their responses, especially if we maintain a

very long conversation with many nuances

in the questions to the answers.

Last but not least, GPT

4 allows you to connect to the internet,

something GPT 3.5 cannot do,

so your knowledge is limited to

September 2021.

And as I said, it can also generate images

with Dalí 3 technology, which we cannot

do with GPT 3.5.

And if it was not enough,

ChatGPT can use plugins and their newly released GPTs.

Plugins are extensions created by developers

external ones that serve to provide more capabilities

to ChatGPT.

There are an infinite number of them and for many uses.

different.

For example, if I activate this plugin

designed to offer summaries of videos of

YouTube and ask ChatGPT to make me a

summary of it, and describing the apps

what I mention in it,

he does it very well.

Lastly, we have the GPTs,

which are a customized version of

ChatGPT that are designed for specific tasks.

We can create our own or find one

from their GPT store that they just launched.

For example, I regularly use this created

for text correction.

Since it is already configured for it, I only have

I paste the text and it gives me an answer

very complete and detailed.

The good thing is that we save a lot of time using

GPTs when we have to do frequently

tasks that require asking ChatGPT to

act in a certain way.

Of course, I see a very big drawback to ChatGPT

and its GPT4 model,

And even if you pay the plus subscription,

you are limited to 40 messages every 3 hours,

which seem very few to me if you are a

user that you use it daily for your workflow.

We leave ChatGPT to talk now about Copilot,

the Microsoft alternative that works

a form very similar to ChatGPT but with some

advantages and disadvantages.

Copilot is developed by Microsoft, but

also by OpenAI and as a result of the agreement

between both companies.

This allows Copilot to slowly leave

updating with features that are coming out

first on ChatGPT.

For example, we can use technology

GPT4 and soon they will also be able to be used

Custom GPTs.

The advantage of Copilot over ChatGPT is that,

For example, the use of technology

GPT4 is not limited to paying users like

if it happens in ChatGPT,

but in Copilot we can

use it freely without having to pay anything.

Additionally, message limitations per day

of Copilot are much less annoying, so to speak

so, that in ChatGPT.

At Copilot we have up to 300 messages per day

with a limit of 30 messages per chat,

more than enough for a large part of users.

Copilot also allows you to work in a multimodal way,

that is to say,

we could send you images so you can interact

with them or ask it to generate images.

For example, I'm going to ask you to create the image

of a kitten in a jungle, with a green hat

or a kitten in general.

Well, he's going to do it in a few seconds.

The good thing, I insist, is that this is not limited

to paying users as if it happens on ChatGPT.

Now, I do see a major disadvantage.

regarding ChatGPT and it is the community behind it.

For example, in ChatGPT I told you that we had

an infinite number of plugins and in Copilot just

we have a few plugins and also selected

by Microsoft itself.

And regarding the GPTs,

The OpenAI store looks like it's going to

be much larger than what you can have

Microsoft out.

Additionally, Microsoft just announced a subscription

called Copilot Pro,

which offers some added advantages over

to the free version.

In this case it would be priority access to

GPT-4 and GPT-4 Turbo technologies at peak times,

Copilot integration into applications

of Microsoft 365 and a higher image limit

that can be created daily with technology

of DALI 3.

We move on to Cloud,

an artificial intelligence chatbot developed

by Antropic, which is a company founded by

a former OpenAI worker.

Among its main strengths is

your ability to read, analyze and summarize

files that we can upload through your website.

Furthermore, they can contain a large amount of

words since it has a context window

which can cover up to 100,000 tokens, which

It is approximately 75,000 words.

However,

has some obvious disadvantages

to ChatGPT and Copilot.

For example, you do not have an internet connection,

It is not available in Spain,

nor does it have integration with plugins

or similar that expand their capabilities.

Let's say you are more or less focused on working

with texts based on their own knowledge

or in files that we may send to you.

And I must say that for some uses even

I like your answers better than ChatGPT's

and Copilot.

Now later we are going to do some tests

to compare precisely the four.

And finally let's talk about BART.

BART is the artificial intelligence chatbot

developed by Google based on the model

of Lambda language and which came out in Spain on

July 13 of last year.

A few weeks ago they presented Gemini,

which is the most advanced model of intelligence

artificial Google and that in some characteristics

It even surpasses OpenAI's GPT-4 technology.

However, at the moment it is not integrated into

Google BART in Spanish.

And well, let's see, just like in the previous three,

Its operation consists of interacting with

through a chat,

but in this case with updated information,

since it continuously extracts information from

internet thanks to integration with the search engine

of Google.

BART is completely free and has no limitations

of messages apparently.

And I say apparently because it is not specified

neither.

Now, I have to admit that in my opinion,

before doing some tests now,

He has always seemed to me the weakest of the four,

both for the quality of their answers and

for the possibility of being able to use plugins

that improve the things that we can ask for from BART.

It also cannot generate images, something that

we can do for example with Copilot and ChatGPT.

Well, once the presentations are made

Of the four models, it is true that perhaps

It's been a little long, but it's just that

I had to tell you all this,

Now is the time to test them.

And for this I have compiled a few questions

quite varied to, well, see the

answers they give us and be able to compare.

I warn you, in ChatGPT I am going to use the most

advanced, in this case GPT-4, and in Copilot

the creative mode, which is what they announce

also uses GPT-4.

Ready?

Well come on, let's get to the first question.

Come on, let's start with GPT-4 on ChatGPT,

and the first question is a technical question.

How can I optimize a ranking algorithm

of images in Python?

This question,

Well, let's see, it will allow us to evaluate how

every artificial intelligence addresses problems

programming and optimization.

I hit send, and while ChatGPT is contextualizing,

I'm going to put the question to the rest as well.

of alternatives.

For example, I activate creative mode here,

in Copilot,

I stick and send,

and we wait.

We leave while Cloud,

I'll ask the question and we'll see.

And finally I paste the question to Bart and we wait.

to respond.

Let's go back to ChatGPT to see if it's finished yet.

to make your answer.

And as we see, it is still in the process of

respond, but with a sufficient explanation

well structured and seems knowledgeable

quite advanced technicians.

Copilot, you have seen that the

answer when I have stayed within the question.

Until then it had not started.

I consider this a negative point.

Let's see how things go in Cloud in the meantime.

And Cloud is practically done answering.

It's true that Cloud's answer seems

a little less elaborate than the one we were

doing ChatGPT.

And let's see Bart, Bart indeed

He has made a pretty good answer and also

It seems pretty fast

because he had already finished writing everything

this while GPT-4 was still

in the process.

Anyway, you can pause the video and then analyze,

Those of you who are more knowledgeable in this, if the

question of one or the other has been more correctly

elaborate.

But it gives me the feeling, so soon,

that the most complete answer could be that of ChatGPT.

Bart's is very much on par.

Cloud's seems a little more vague.

And Copilot, unfortunately, it still ends here

to respond.

So let's speed up the process a little

Let's see when it ends.

Okay, Copilot just finished.

And well, here we are seeing that indeed

It is not a very elaborate answer.

He has practically invited us to visit some

web pages at the bottom of the response,

as you see,

so that, well, let's look for more information there.

So I have a clear winner here.

Now let's go with a creative question.

I'm going to ask our assistants to write

a short story about a trip to Mars.

Let's go pasting it.

Ultimately, the purpose of this question

is to show the ability of each chatbot to

generate creative and narrative content.

Let's go to Copilot, we'll paste the question,

We go to Cloud, we paste the question and we go to Bart.

And I want to make sure Bart speeds with

the one who writes his answer, because he has given me

the feeling that it was quite fast precisely

writing the answer from before.

And indeed,

eye,

The speed of the response is not bad at all.

GPT-4 is still at it.

Copilot,

until you click on the window, it doesn't start

write.

And Cloud is in it too.

So the one you wrote

the story in a faster way, without place

Without a doubt, it's Bart.

He has also given it the title The Trip to Mars.

Once upon a time there was a girl Martina who dreamed of

traveling to the planet Mars since she was little,

She had been fascinated.

Anyway, the beginning seems good.

Then there is a knot and Martina continued working

as an astronaut and carried out several more missions

to space.

Her dream of traveling to Mars had come true.

and she decided to continue exploring the universe.

So she has a well-marked outcome.

Okay, in Cloud's case,

Well,

It's also a shorter answer than Bart's,

but at the end of the day, we have asked

a short story, since she has stuck to what

we have asked him.

Copilot is still at it.

And Chat-GPT,

in this case,

well, it also seems to be over.

And from what I'm seeing and reading, in the

year 2084 humanity was finally ready

for the biggest step of it.

Okay, a manned trip to Mars,

The protagonist in that story is Eva.

Maybe I even like the beginning of GPT-4 better.

I liked Bart's speed.

I think the story is best written

It is Chat-GPT.

Cloud, well,

It doesn't seem like she did it wrong, although she did.

It's true that I see it as very short.

And nothing, let's wait for Copilot to finish

because, well, it takes its time.

He is the slow friend of the equation.

I was, I don't know if you accelerated me in the video

seen the face,

but he was reading while Copilot wrote the story

and I must say that I liked him a lot.

It's true that I asked you for a short story,

but,

oysters,

I think he is the best of the four.

I really invite you, so as not to make the

video, I'm not going to read the answers

of the four literally,

I invite you to take breaks and go

analyzing you, when you are seeing the

video, the answers they are giving us to each

one so that, well, you too can get

your conclusions.

But to me,

input,

He's giving me the feeling that he's the best

story, in this case,

Copilot takes it, although he is terribly slow.

Okay, the next question is general knowledge.

I'm going to ask you what the impacts are.

most significant environmental impacts of climate change.

Here, we will be able to appreciate how they handle

current affairs and general knowledge.

Let's go with Chat-GPT,

let's go with Copilot,

let's go with Cloud, in this case,

and let's go with BART.

And wait for a response.

We are going to make sure that, indeed,

BART's response may be the fastest

and we could already reach the first conclusion.

Sure enough, BART begins to respond and

toss off.

Besides,

from what we are seeing, increase in temperature

global,

increased frequency and intensity of

extreme weather events, changes

in precipitation patterns,

ocean acidification,

species extinction...

It seems that the answer is correct, indeed.

Cloud already responded while we were reading

BART's response and, from what we see,

yes, you also agree with your analysis

about the consequences.

It is true that, in a more summarized way, as you see,

Cloud does not go for the duvida lands, it gives you

very specific answers to what you ask.

Copilot doing his thing...

There is.

It doesn't start until I click on the window

to respond.

Failed.

And here, GPT-4 is still writing its answer.

But hey, it seems like a pretty good answer too.

complete.

It is true that the good thing about BART here is that

has even given us some images that come

to be resources that we can click on to

go see more information about each of those blocks.

But hey, GPT-4 has given a perfect answer,

accompanied by BART, which also seems to me

very very good.

Let's see if Copilot finishes.

You know, friends.

Okay, Copilot just finished.

Well, a pretty vague answer, things as they are.

Here it is true that it seems to me that the

response from GPT-4 and BART is a lot,

much better than the one Copilot has given us.

Four points that,

well, it seems that he gave them to us to send us

quickly.

So the point is missing the point here, of course.

Let's move on to the next question.

Come on, a question to give us some practical advice.

What are some effective strategies for

manage time?

This question, well in the end,

It will help us to evaluate the capacity of

each AI to offer practical advice and that

we can then apply.

Come on, let's go with ChatGPT, let's go with Copilot,

Let's go with Cloud.

And look, I like Copilot, but, damn,

about him not starting to respond until

We open the window, it seems like a big mistake to me,

fat, fat, because we can't do several

things at the same time.

So,

precisely, I'm going to the Copilot window

so you don't have to wait.

Well, I've already pasted the question on all of them.

Here we are seeing him begin to respond.

I also don't like that Copilot always says,

Hello, this is Bing.

You can say, hello, I'm Bing or something, but

This is Bing.

He has always said that from the beginning.

Anyway,

here we are seeing that he is already starting with the first

recommendations.

For example, prioritize your daily tasks.

You can use the Eisenhower matrix method.

Set realistic goals and deadlines.

I agree.

Eliminate distractions and create a conducive environment

to work.

Use tools for time management.

Rest and take care of your health.

Okay, there he is giving us an answer with,

As you can see, multiple sources that cite us in

the bottom.

And well, it seems to be over.

Well, let's see what we have done

responding in this case to the rest of the options.

Come on, let's go with Cloud.

Cloud gives a fairly brief answer.

Also like Copilot, establishes priorities

and focus on what is most important, first.

I agree.

Use a calendar or agenda to schedule your

activities, reduce distractions, avoid procrastination,

take breaks, delegate,

optimize your morning routine and prepare yourself

last night.

I do that and it is very useful.

OK,

Come on, let's go to Bart.

Bart, the truth, an answer,

well, pretty good too.

He even says,

There are some additional tips to manage

the time effectively that we could apply.

Places,

Create an organized and free workspace

of distractions.

Use time management tools.

Learn to say no to requests

they are not important.

Set realistic achievable goals and monitor

your progress and make any necessary adjustments.

In addition to, of course, the recommendations above.

And let's go with GPT-4,

which in this case, well, it has also given us

a fantastic answer.

The truth is that ChatGPT,

In my opinion, it is the one that gives the best answers.

At least for now, everything we have tried

is the most precise.

But well, here I believe that the four of them have

accomplished moderately well.

Come on, next question,

We are finishing, I don't want to make the video

not much longer either.

I'm going to ask the four attendees here

what are the emerging trends in technology

for the year 2025.

With this question,

Well, one can get an idea of ​​how each

platform handles projections and trend analysis.

Come on,

We return to Copilot, which seems the slowest,

the one who needs a little bit of our help.

Makes a search,

Emerging trends in technology by 2025.

Here,

Those who connect to the internet have an advantage.

The one who is at a disadvantage, let's say here, would be

in any case Cloud, which can only give us answers

based on the knowledge of him, they are blocked,

as I have told you before.

Here,

Copilot is starting to give us five points,

which at the end of the day says optimized production

of artificial intelligence,

long-range renewable energies,

quantum computers, the elimination of

CO2 from the air and biotechnology.

Let's go with Cloud,

artificial intelligence,

quantum computing, augmented and virtual reality,

I agree,

autonomous vehicles,

the internet of things and smart cities

and improved connectivity.

Very good answer, personally on the internet

I agree with it.

Here, what are the trends, what BART tells us,

AI, internet of things and quantum computing.

And other emerging trends, virtual reality

increased bar,

makes sense,

metaverse and cybersecurity.

Let's go with ChatGPT,

has given us a response after making

a quick search.

Coexistence with robots, an increase is expected

of the adoption of robots in domestic environments

and personal,

powered by artificial intelligence.

That's very interesting, although I don't know,

I see it as very close.

Supervision, automated search, transportation

intelligent, work with robots,

increased creativity,

consistent communication,

symbiotic economy,

rapid implementation of 5G,

global digital government.

Oh my gosh, it's true.

The truth is that everything looks like ChatGPT

has given perhaps the most complete answer of all.

BART,

surprisingly good.

CompileOnAir and here Cloud, you should give

even an extra because he has had, based on

To his knowledge, I believe a very accurate answer.

So point for Cloud.

And the last question.

This is a question that requires the use of

internet connection to give us an answer

exact.

And it is the type of questions in which AIs

Sometimes they tend to mix things up and fail.

Let's put these four to the test a little.

alternatives.

I'm going to ask you who the president of Argentina is.

You already know that there has been a change recently.

We are going to demonstrate, as I say, here with this

asks about the lack of internet, for example Cloud,

in addition to checking if these assistants, to

Despite searching for information on the Internet, they are

capable of filtering them and giving us a correct answer.

We go with GPT4, in ChatGPT, we go with Copilot

and we go with Cloud and finally with BART.

Come on, we're back to Copilot.

Here Copilot does a quick search and says

The president of Argentina is Javier Milei,

an economist, politician and teacher who assumed

the position on December 10, 2023.

He was elected in the second round of elections,

with 55% of the votes, defeating the candidate

Peronist Sergio Massa.

Here is the date when he took office I understand

that will be correct.

It sounds like it was in December but I don't know if

It was December 10th.

In any case he has given the correct name

of the president and also who he defeated in

the elections.

ChatGPT says the current president is Javier

Milei, was elected in the 2023 elections

defeating Sergio Massa.

Javier Milei represents the Freedom Party

Keep it up.

Cloud here obviously says that the president

It is Alberto Fernández, something that is not correct.

And BART says as of January 17,

no, January 17 is when I'm recording

the video but it is not from January 17,

The president of Argentina is Javier Milei,

He was elected in the general elections of

October 12, 2023 defeating the candidate

official Alberto Fernández.

Here it screws up.

Milei is a known far-right economy

for his libertarian and anti-Semitic positions.

Here what we are seeing is that indeed

BART screws up.

This is what I

critic of BART, which I often do when

I have searched for information, for example, about iPhones and such,

I start to mix things and that which connects to the internet.

So when I have to search

on the internet I always trust more in this case

from Compilot and ChatGPT.

Well, I could continue doing many more tests

but the video would practically last almost as long

a movie.

So I think that with these we can get

already a slight idea that ChatGPT is still

ahead of its competitors for quality

from his answers,

but above all because of the integration with GPTs,

configurable, plugins and more, which are not

I have tried here because if not, then yes, this

It would be a feature film.

Comppilot, for example, disappointed me

for their slowness in responding.

I understand that in part they are forcing him to

force people to buy the subscription

to Compilot Pro,

but in any case I didn't expect it to work

so bad in that aspect.

Let's see,

During all this time I have not felt that

their answers are bad nor that they really

was so slow.

Until now that I have started to compare answers

From both of them I have seen that it is always the

slowest of all.

Regarding VAR,

hey, it works well in terms of speed and

structure of your answers, but it is true

which in my experience offers inaccurate data

much more frequently than the rest,

which means that I don't trust myself

and as I told you before, I prefer to use

alternatives like ChatGPT, Compilot or even

Perplexity, which I told you about in a video

a few weeks ago,

when, for example, I have to do

information searches and contrasting multiple

sources.

And lastly, Cloud,

In my case I use it mainly for tasks

writing that do not require connectivity,

since it seems to me that he makes some very

concise and very precise.

I particularly, to give you a specific case,

I use it to create titles and descriptions

of my YouTube videos when I have any

Doubt about their approach.

In short, I think that what we can do best

any of us is

combine them, okay?

Because in the end, why are you going to stay alone?

with a?

I believe that they all have good things and things

bad and I think that the shortcomings of some

They can cover other intelligences.

Me, for example, for my daily workflow

I'm combining precisely some things from one

and for other things I use others.

Cloud told you that I use it to suggest myself

titles and descriptions based on the scripts

that I see him counting.

Then I use ChatGPT with a custom GPT

that analyzes the different titles that I consider

and then evaluates them for their possible potential.

And Copilot sometimes I use it to generate texts

for social networks and search on the internet.

And then BART,

Well, I don't use BART.

I hope that when they improve it with Gemini it will be

much better, but in my case I haven't been able to find it

the profit.

In any case, I have no doubt that in 2024

we are going to see a considerable improvement in these

technologies since everything is advancing very

fast and I think that this year particularly

It is going to be the most important year in the implementation

of artificial intelligence.

Not only at the web level as we are seeing now,

but also on our mobile devices

such as the iPhone, whose rumors suggest

that is going to have a significant improvement with the

upcoming updates to their operating systems.

Anyway, tell me in the comments how clever

artificial seems better to you and

I'm also interested in knowing how you use it,

for what purposes.

Anyway,

For my part this is all.

If you liked this almost movie about intelligence

artificial you can leave your like, your

subscription and nothing, see you very soon with

more content here on La Manzana Mordida because

You know,

I am Fernando and I promise to do it.

Ciao!