What Ukraine means for America and vice versa | On The Record

TVP World
27 Sept 202424:13

Summary

TLDRThis transcript from a TVP World segment discusses the potential impact of the upcoming U.S. elections on Europe, specifically Poland and the region's security in the face of Russian aggression. The speakers debate whether a Kamala Harris presidency would ensure stability, continuing Biden's policies, while Donald Trump's possible return raises concerns over unpredictability and his softer stance toward Russia. The discussion touches on Ukraine, NATO, and the importance of U.S. involvement in maintaining transatlantic unity. The role of Polish-American voters and Trump's foreign policy approach are also explored.

Takeaways

  • 🗳️ The upcoming U.S. election is one of the most consequential in recent history, with a significant focus on foreign policy and implications for Europe and Poland.
  • 🌍 Europe, especially Poland, is concerned about the future of transatlantic unity, with foreign policy being a central topic in the U.S. election.
  • 🇺🇸 Kamala Harris is seen as a candidate likely to continue Biden's stable foreign policies, while Donald Trump is viewed as a disruptive force who may change the global order.
  • 🇵🇱 Poland and the Baltic states are concerned about potential Russian aggression if Putin isn't stopped in Ukraine, with fears that he could target these regions next.
  • 🛡️ Trump is perceived as more sympathetic to Putin and less supportive of Ukraine, which worries many in Europe who see U.S. support as crucial for regional security.
  • 📊 Polish-American voters, particularly in the Midwest, may lean towards Kamala Harris, given her recognition of Poland's importance and policies favorable to European security.
  • 🤝 Poland might benefit diplomatically from its relationship with both Trump and the Democratic Party, positioning it well regardless of the election outcome.
  • ⚖️ A Trump presidency could bring unpredictability in foreign policy, potentially shifting the balance in how the U.S. engages with NATO, Ukraine, and global security.
  • 💬 Trump's transactional view of foreign policy, particularly regarding Ukraine and Russia, is seen as risky, potentially weakening Western alliances and emboldening autocrats.
  • 🕊️ The possibility of peace talks between Russia and Ukraine remains uncertain, with a third-party mediator like China or India potentially playing a role, but the U.S. election outcome could greatly impact this process.

Q & A

  • What is the significance of the upcoming US elections for Europe and Poland?

    -The upcoming US elections are considered highly consequential for Europe and Poland due to the potential for significant changes in foreign policy, particularly regarding relations with Russia and the stability of transatlantic unity.

  • How does the perception of Kamala Harris' potential presidency impact Europe?

    -Kamala Harris is perceived as likely to continue President Biden's policies, which have been seen as positive for Europe, suggesting a stable foreign policy approach in contrast to the perceived chaos associated with a potential Trump presidency.

  • What are the concerns regarding a potential Trump presidency's impact on foreign policy?

    -There are concerns that a Trump presidency would bring unpredictable changes to foreign policy, potentially harming transatlantic unity and benefiting Russia's interests, as suggested by his past comments and attitudes.

  • What is the role of Polish Americans in the upcoming US elections?

    -Polish Americans, with significant populations in the Midwest and Pennsylvania, could play a crucial role in the elections. However, their voting patterns are similar to typical Americans, and they are likely to vote based on broader issues rather than solely their links to Poland.

  • How does the current US policy towards Ukraine align with European interests?

    -The current US policy, which supports Ukraine against Russian aggression, aligns with European interests as it is seen as a strategic move to prevent further expansion by Russia into Europe, particularly towards Poland and the Baltic states.

  • What are the implications of Trump's comments on Ukraine and its president, Volodymyr Zelensky?

    -Trump's comments reflect a transactional view of Ukraine and its president, potentially indicating a willingness to make deals that could be detrimental to Ukraine's interests, such as accepting Russia's territorial gains.

  • How might a change in US administration affect Poland's diplomatic relations?

    -A change in US administration could affect Poland's diplomatic relations, as Poland maintains close ties with both Trump and the current US administration. However, Poland's position as sympathetic to both US political camps is seen as advantageous.

  • What is the importance of a consistent and predictable US foreign policy for Europe?

    -A consistent and predictable US foreign policy is valued for maintaining strong bilateral ties and ensuring stability in relations. However, the current situation with Russia's aggression has already introduced instability, making the need for a robust policy towards Ukraine crucial.

  • What are the potential dangers of an inconsistent US foreign policy under a Trump presidency?

    -An inconsistent US foreign policy could bring instability and unpredictability, which are detrimental to international security, particularly concerning NATO allies and countries like Ukraine that rely on the US for support against Russian aggression.

  • How does the script suggest Europe should prepare for a potential Trump presidency?

    -The script implies that Europe should prepare by having a clear strategy towards Russia and considering various diplomatic efforts to stabilize the situation, given the unpredictability and potential friendliness of a Trump presidency towards Putin.

  • What is the role of the US in mediating peace between Russia and Ukraine according to the script?

    -The script suggests that the US, being directly involved in the conflict through its support for Ukraine, may not be the best candidate to mediate peace. Instead, it proposes the need for a third party, such as China or India, to facilitate peace talks between Russia and Ukraine.

Outlines

00:00

🎤 Election Stakes: U.S. and Its Impact on Europe

The host, Aaron Dman, introduces the upcoming U.S. election, highlighting its importance for Europe, especially Poland. Kamala Harris is seen as a potential stabilizing force, while Donald Trump’s return is feared to disrupt the global order. The conversation focuses on how the U.S. election could reshape the future of transatlantic relations, with foreign policy playing a key role.

05:01

🌍 Kamala Harris vs. Donald Trump: Europe's Concerns

Martin Batki, a Polish MP, and Magdalena Yakubova, a policy analyst, discuss the differing foreign policy approaches of Kamala Harris and Donald Trump. Batki suggests that a Harris win would maintain stability, whereas a Trump victory could bring chaos, especially regarding Ukraine. Yakubova expresses concern over Trump’s policies, stressing that Eastern Europe benefits greatly from the current transatlantic relationship.

10:02

🗳️ The Polish-American Vote and Its Influence

Yakubova notes that Polish-Americans largely vote similarly to other Americans, but Harris may gain more support due to her attention to Poland in her campaign. The discussion then shifts to the close ties between Poland and both U.S. candidates, with Batki expressing relief that Polish President Duda didn’t directly support Trump’s campaign, as it could have strained relations if the opposite side won.

15:03

⚖️ Foreign Policy: Stability vs. Instability

Batki emphasizes the importance of consistent foreign policy, especially given the instability caused by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. While current U.S. policies have been beneficial, a potential Trump presidency could introduce unpredictability, which is dangerous for Europe. Yakubova and Batki agree that Europe should prepare for any changes, but it's hard to predict Trump's exact approach toward Russia and NATO.

20:07

🛡️ The Role of the U.S. in Global Security

The conversation explores the idea of the U.S. as a guarantor of global security. Batki criticizes Trump’s inconsistent foreign policy, fearing it could destabilize NATO, which is crucial for Polish and European security. Yakubova suggests that other global players like China or India might step in if the U.S. loses its leadership role, but the West must be prepared for any shifts in global power dynamics.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡US Elections

The video focuses on the upcoming US elections, describing them as 'one of the most consequential' in recent history. The discussion revolves around the potential outcomes depending on whether Kamala Harris or Donald Trump wins, with significant implications for US foreign policy, particularly in relation to Europe and Poland.

💡Kamala Harris

Kamala Harris, the current Vice President of the United States, is portrayed as a candidate who would bring stability in US foreign policy, particularly toward Europe and Ukraine. The video highlights her stance on defending Ukraine from Russian aggression, suggesting that her leadership could help maintain strong transatlantic ties.

💡Donald Trump

Donald Trump, the former President and candidate in the upcoming US elections, is characterized as a disruptive figure in foreign policy. The video contrasts Trump’s potential return to power with Harris, suggesting his policies could introduce instability, especially regarding NATO and US support for Ukraine, with Trump being perceived as sympathetic to Russia and Vladimir Putin.

💡Foreign Policy

Foreign policy is central to the discussion in the video, particularly regarding how the US elections might shift relations with Europe and its stance on the Ukraine conflict. The script debates whether a Trump or Harris administration would alter the US's approach to NATO, transatlantic alliances, and involvement in Ukraine's defense.

💡Poland

Poland is frequently mentioned as a key player in the European region, especially in relation to its ties with the US. The video touches on Poland's strategic importance in NATO, its close relationship with both Democratic and Republican leaders, and its concerns over US foreign policy toward Russia and Ukraine.

💡Ukraine Conflict

The war in Ukraine is a major focus of the video, with discussions centered on the potential consequences of the US election for ongoing support to Ukraine. Kamala Harris is described as a strong supporter of Ukraine, while Trump's stance is seen as more conciliatory towards Russia, with concerns that his policies might undermine Ukraine’s defense efforts.

💡Vladimir Putin

The Russian president, Vladimir Putin, is portrayed as an aggressor in the video, with references to his invasion of Ukraine and ambitions to extend his influence in Europe, potentially targeting countries like Poland. The script debates the dangers of Trump’s favorable attitude toward Putin, which contrasts with Harris's commitment to countering Russian aggression.

💡Transatlantic Unity

Transatlantic unity refers to the close cooperation between the US and European countries, particularly through NATO. The video discusses how the outcome of the US elections might affect this unity, with Trump’s unpredictable foreign policy posing a potential threat to the alliance, while Harris is seen as someone who would maintain strong ties with Europe.

💡NATO

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is mentioned as a critical element of the security alliance between the US and Europe. The video explores the concern that a Trump presidency might weaken US commitments to NATO, whereas a Harris victory would likely continue the current support for the alliance, particularly in defending against Russian aggression.

💡Polish-Americans

The script highlights the significant population of Polish-Americans, especially in key states like Pennsylvania, and discusses how their voting patterns might influence the outcome of the US elections. The relationship between the US and Poland, and Harris's mentions of Poland, are noted as potential factors that could sway their votes.

Highlights

Aaron Darman hosts the show discussing the upcoming US election and its impact on Europe and Poland.

Kamala Harris is seen as a potential stabilizer in global uncertainty.

Donald Trump is portrayed as a potential disruptor to foreign policy norms.

Poland's foreign policy is a central topic in the US election debate.

Martin Batki, a Polish MP, discusses the potential outcomes of the US election for Poland.

Magdalena Yakubov, a policy analyst, shares her views on the election's implications for Europe.

Concerns are raised over the future of transatlantic unity post-election.

Batki suggests a Trump presidency could be a danger to the current favorable policies towards Europe.

Yakubov agrees with Harris's warning that Putin could target Poland and the Baltic states.

The importance of US support for Ukraine is emphasized by both guests.

Polish Americans' voting patterns are discussed, with a prediction that they may lean towards Harris.

Batki considers the potential benefits for Poland of President Duda's relationship with Trump.

The show debates the value of consistent vs. unpredictable foreign policy.

Yakubov expresses concern over Trump's attitude towards Putin and its global implications.

The discussion touches on Trump's past comments on withdrawing the US from NATO.

Zelensky's recent visit to the US and its strategic importance are analyzed.

The potential impact of the US election on peace talks between Russia and Ukraine is considered.

Transcripts

play00:02

[Music]

play00:13

good evening and welcome to on the

play00:15

record I'm Aaron dman filling in for

play00:18

Adam

play00:19

yaser in just over a month America goes

play00:22

to the polls in what is shaping up to be

play00:24

one of the most consequential us

play00:27

elections in recent history on one hand

play00:30

there are hopes carela Harris would

play00:31

deliver stability at a time of global

play00:34

and domestic uncertainty on the other

play00:37

Donald Trump is being vaunted as the

play00:39

former president who plans to tear up

play00:42

the rule book once again for Europe and

play00:45

Poland foreign policy is at the heart of

play00:47

this debate so how will November's

play00:50

election change the game for the region

play00:52

on the record Europe maintains it will

play00:54

keep a strong relationship with the US

play00:57

regardless of what happens but off the

play01:00

Record it's clear serious concerns

play01:02

remain over the future of transatlantic

play01:05

Unity now the election campaign has been

play01:08

in full flight this week and again

play01:10

Poland was a Hot Topic let's take a

play01:13

listen history has shown us if we allow

play01:17

aggressors like Putin to take land with

play01:20

impunity they keep going and Putin could

play01:24

set its sights on Poland the Baltic

play01:27

states and other NATO allies the United

play01:30

States cannot and should not isolate

play01:33

ourselves from the rest of the world

play01:37

isolation is not

play01:40

insolation so then the United States

play01:43

supports Ukraine not out of Charity but

play01:47

because it is in our strategic interest

play01:50

we will continue to provide the security

play01:53

assistance Ukraine needs to succeed on

play01:56

the

play01:57

battlefield here to discuss all of this

play01:59

right here in the studio is Martin batki

play02:02

current polish MP of the Civic Coalition

play02:05

a liberal and Centrist party the biggest

play02:07

of the ruling Block in Poland and former

play02:09

polish ambassador to Canada good evening

play02:12

good evening and also joining me is

play02:15

Magdalena yakubova who is a vice

play02:17

president at the rubla foundation and

play02:19

has previously served as the Director of

play02:21

operations at the US Think Tank Center

play02:23

for European policy analyst thank you

play02:25

for taking the time good evening happy

play02:28

to be here Mr batki I want to start with

play02:31

you the perception is that carela Harris

play02:34

will provide a stable foreign policy

play02:36

response while Donald Trump equals chaos

play02:39

is it as simple as that and does that

play02:42

mean Europe is desperate for Harris

play02:45

win I would say it's a little bit

play02:47

simplistic uh view but yes uh I presume

play02:53

that if Kamala Harris wins she will um

play02:58

continue most of uh President Biden's

play03:01

policies which were generally very

play03:04

positive to Europe and especially to our

play03:07

region whereas um for sure

play03:12

um former president Trump if he wins

play03:16

will deliver a change as well as in uh

play03:20

foreign policy as well as in uh in

play03:23

domestic uh

play03:25

policies uh and change is always um

play03:31

uh a danger if the previous policy is

play03:34

quite all right which I think the the

play03:36

Biden's policy is quite all right so is

play03:39

a potential Trump change a

play03:42

danger it might be because what we heard

play03:46

especially in his running mates uh Mr

play03:50

V's speech and proposal for uh so-called

play03:54

peace in Ukraine is

play03:56

basically uh a surrender to two main uh

play04:01

Putin's demands which is uh I Putin

play04:04

Russia keep all the lands I conquered

play04:08

and secondly and maybe even more

play04:11

importantly for us uh Ukraine will never

play04:14

join uh Western structures European

play04:17

union and NATO that's that's basically

play04:21

uh delivering Putin his

play04:24

goals Magdalen just on the last day as

play04:27

we heard in that intro CA Harris has

play04:29

again warned that Vladimir Putin could

play04:31

quote set his sights on Poland and the

play04:33

Baltic states if he is allowed to win in

play04:35

Ukraine is she right is that what you

play04:37

make of of what's happening in the

play04:38

region too I I very much agree with um

play04:42

Miss Harris uh regarding that idea that

play04:46

if Putin is not stopped he will go even

play04:50

further and take advantage of a weaker

play04:54

spots of of the West so um that's very

play04:58

much possible and the threat would

play05:00

definitely grow uh if the peace talks or

play05:06

uh or if there's any progress in the War

play05:10

uh in the battlefield in Ukraine do you

play05:13

agree with um Mr bat's comments that

play05:17

there might be a danger with the Trump

play05:18

presidency when it comes to the war in

play05:20

Ukraine but also for the

play05:22

region of course uh we had Vis Secret

play05:26

inside that uh that I represent here is

play05:29

we we see that there is a a difference

play05:32

in the attitude uh uh between the

play05:35

candidates of course Mr Trump I'm not

play05:38

saying that he's bringing chaos but the

play05:40

policies as uh as Mr bosski also

play05:43

confirmed will be different there will

play05:46

be a change and the policy now ongoing

play05:50

Democrats uh policies towards the region

play05:53

is quite favorable and we benefit a lot

play05:57

on this transatlantic bond that we saw

play05:59

far or have if if this is Poland or if

play06:02

these are other countries in the region

play06:05

both the btic Baltic states or Romania

play06:08

we all are in the same basket of being

play06:11

in a in a strong bond with uh with the

play06:13

US uh

play06:16

Partners I want to ask you about the

play06:18

number of polls in the US too because

play06:20

there are a lot of them 8.8 million

play06:21

polish Americans about 3 million in the

play06:23

midwest 800,000 in Pennsylvania what do

play06:27

you think will be top of mind for them

play06:29

when voting given their links to Poland

play06:31

and the

play06:33

region the links to Poland they don't

play06:36

change much of their attitude uh in in

play06:39

many researches that have been done the

play06:42

their uh type of the way they vote is

play06:45

very similar to the typical Americans uh

play06:49

um voting right they they share the same

play06:51

problems they share the same uh

play06:54

successes uh in politics have the same

play06:56

similar idea however they are it's easy

play07:00

to to foresee how they vote uh therefore

play07:03

I think that um Kamala Harris would

play07:07

benefit a little more from uh from votes

play07:11

from polish uh minorities do you think

play07:13

she'll she'll get

play07:15

it uh I I think she would get those

play07:18

votes because uh because she is at least

play07:22

very um she's mentioning Poland this is

play07:26

this is important for polls whom so far

play07:29

have been IGN ignored in a sense uh in

play07:32

terms of uh of

play07:35

Elections uh and now this is very

play07:37

important the the difference in between

play07:39

the votes between the candidates is so

play07:41

narrow that every vote counts Mr bazazi

play07:46

could the argument be made that Poland

play07:48

is actually in a good position when it

play07:49

comes to this election I mean you've got

play07:51

president Andre studa seemingly quite

play07:53

close with Trump he was going to appear

play07:55

uh reportedly at a rally with Trump and

play07:57

then your governing Coalition on the

play07:58

other side of the aisle is it a

play08:00

diplomatic win-win whoever is

play08:03

President you know I I think that the

play08:06

the quite um close ties between

play08:10

President Duda and and uh former

play08:13

president Trump are not bad uh for

play08:17

Polish interest because that might

play08:19

soften a little bit this um um uh trade

play08:25

manner of uh Trump's foreign policy uh

play08:30

and it could somehow help Poland

play08:33

although I think it's good that

play08:35

President Duda was

play08:37

not um holding um you know uh rally

play08:42

political rally and election rally

play08:44

together with uh uh candidate Trump

play08:48

because that would be the the direct

play08:51

involvement in US election campaign

play08:53

which I think would would not be uh

play08:56

particularly wise would you have seen

play08:58

that as unacceptable from someone of his

play09:00

standing as a president of a country

play09:02

yeah I think it it it would be um at

play09:05

least strange for you know diplomatic

play09:09

standards uh and uh it would cost us I

play09:15

mean

play09:16

Poland uh if uh the opposite side uh

play09:20

would win but uh saying that I I really

play09:25

think that

play09:26

uh contrary to to Ukraine which

play09:30

obviously is uh very unpopular in uh

play09:35

Trump circles and also with himself uh

play09:40

what he stated many times uh Poland is

play09:45

somehow uh sympathetic to both camps in

play09:48

in the US which is good and

play09:50

it's fundamentally it is good that

play09:53

polish and Central Europe security is

play09:57

the topic of this election this is

play10:00

probably

play10:02

more credit to to Mrs Harris uh she

play10:06

mentioned that more often but uh it's

play10:10

good that this is the topic of the US

play10:12

elections between because this is the

play10:15

still the only Western superpower uh

play10:19

which is we we like it or not the

play10:21

guarantee of our security given your

play10:24

background as an ambassador I'm

play10:25

interested to look into sort of the

play10:28

concept of foreign policy I mean

play10:30

consistent and predictable foreign

play10:31

policy is often seen as this Benchmark

play10:33

for strong bilateral ties keep it boring

play10:35

because then everyone knows what you're

play10:37

up to but do you see an environment

play10:39

where the foreign policy of major

play10:41

superpowers like the US for example

play10:43

under a trump presidency becomes

play10:44

inconsistent and unpredictable and what

play10:48

does that do to the

play10:49

world yeah uh you know

play10:54

um the stability of relations Is a

play11:00

value but Frankly Speaking since

play11:03

February

play11:05

2022 nothing is stable in our part of

play11:07

the world because of Putin so uh when

play11:12

you have actually a good policy which is

play11:16

uh to help Ukraine win this war it's not

play11:19

ideal policy because I for example very

play11:22

much uh uh criticize the Restriction

play11:27

restrictions which US imposes on use of

play11:30

its uh Weaponry for

play11:33

Ukraine uh but but it's a good policy u

play11:36

i mean both from uh European NATO

play11:40

members and especially from from us side

play11:44

uh then uh changing that could

play11:49

bring um instability and danger of

play11:54

unknown uh future in terms of security

play11:58

which always this is a bad bad sign

play12:01

therefore I U strongly uh hope that

play12:06

after us elections the um United States

play12:11

policy toward NATO toward its allies and

play12:14

toward Ukraine will change uh not much

play12:19

and Magdalena just lastly for the

play12:21

segment can I ask you is it even

play12:23

possible for Europe to prepare itself

play12:26

for someone like Trump I mean you this

play12:28

is a guy who talks about Russ quote

play12:29

obliterating Ukraine and is uh by his

play12:33

own admission quite cozy with Vladimir

play12:34

Putin can Europe be prepared for

play12:37

something like that or should Europe be

play12:40

worried so of course we can prepare for

play12:43

that um I'm I mean many scholars think

play12:48

tanks already are already ready but it's

play12:50

hard it's it's hard and we don't know

play12:53

right but um uh but still I think that

play12:57

something that worries

play12:59

um the opinion public all over the world

play13:02

most is the attitude of Mr Trump towards

play13:05

Mr Putin and this that this is let's say

play13:09

a little friendly or uh more

play13:12

transactional uh attitude is not um um

play13:18

is easy to be provisioned and E easy to

play13:21

be responded in a sense there are

play13:23

different diplomatic also uh efforts

play13:26

that can be taken in advance or later

play13:29

pre-planned uh so to me a response would

play13:34

be that Europe specifically the EU

play13:37

countries should have the idea what to

play13:40

do with Russia and in this way um help

play13:47

um kind of stabilize the situation or

play13:50

the attitude of Mr Trump uh and the way

play13:53

he acts towards Russia now talking of

play13:57

Vladimir Putin let's take a look into

play14:00

the specific question of Ukraine when it

play14:03

comes to the US election and how this is

play14:05

all playing out on the

play14:08

ground as Ukraine continues to seek

play14:11

additional help from its allies the

play14:12

country's President Vladimir zalinski

play14:14

paid a recent visit to the state of

play14:16

Pennsylvania on the sidelines of the

play14:17

United Nations General

play14:21

Assembly cinski is the greatest salesman

play14:24

in history every time he comes into the

play14:26

country he walks away with $60 billion

play14:30

[Applause]

play14:31

billion walks in with $60 billion he

play14:34

wants them to he wants them to win this

play14:36

election so

play14:39

badly Trump's comments follow zelinsky's

play14:41

visit to the Scranton Army ammunition

play14:43

plant in

play14:44

Pennsylvania Please Mr President can you

play14:47

talk to us now the main goal of

play14:50

zelinsky's US tour was to present his

play14:52

comprehensive Victory plan to President

play14:54

Biden lawmakers and international

play14:56

Partners Putin has broken so many many

play14:59

International norms and rules that he

play15:03

want stop on his own Russia can only be

play15:07

forced into peace and that is exactly

play15:10

what's needed zelinsky's visit has paid

play15:13

off so far late on Thursday Biden

play15:16

announced a sizable security assistance

play15:18

package for Ukraine right now we have to

play15:20

strengthen Ukraine's position on the

play15:22

battlefield and that's why today I'm

play15:24

proud to announce a new $2.4 billion

play15:28

package of security assistance earlier

play15:31

this week the White House announced the

play15:33

authorization of a new military aid

play15:35

package for Ukraine war 375 million us

play15:39

the package includes for the first time

play15:41

a medium-range Glide bomb known as The

play15:43

Joint standoff weapon compatible with

play15:45

F-16 fighter

play15:49

jets now magdalina I want to start with

play15:51

you now because I saw you giggle a

play15:53

little bit when Donald Trump made that

play15:55

comment about Vladimir zalinski being a

play15:57

Salesman what does that type of comment

play16:00

tell us about how Trump views Ukraine

play16:02

and the war in this

play16:05

region uh it's it's been a very

play16:08

populistic comment that's why I was I

play16:10

was so much uh giggling uh uh the truth

play16:14

is like um Mr Trump sees it as um as as

play16:20

a kind of a a a moment where he can be a

play16:24

star and he can finish up and rule the

play16:26

world and you know finish up the war

play16:29

being this um this person who makes

play16:32

America great again you know lead uh so

play16:36

this geopolitical factor is of course in

play16:38

his uh in his opinion very important to

play16:42

have America or us being again like the

play16:45

the the main actor of uh on the on this

play16:49

world stage but um this doesn't change

play16:54

the the fact that uh um Mr this attitude

play16:59

is uh is very transactional and may

play17:03

bring some uh not very positive uh

play17:07

especially for Ukraine not very positive

play17:10

outcomes now Mr batki when we look at

play17:14

the election in the US and obviously

play17:16

Trump makes a comment like that but as

play17:18

we sit here talking about the potential

play17:20

Fallout of the election all the things

play17:21

that could happen in this region do you

play17:23

think Americans actually care if the US

play17:26

is involved in Ukraine in Europe or not

play17:29

you know it's always uh the question who

play17:34

you ask uh because there are those who

play17:37

care and there are many those

play17:41

who don't care that much of course maybe

play17:45

two years ago when this fullscale war

play17:49

started uh Ukraine had much more

play17:51

sympathy in in us than it has now and it

play17:55

was not such a partisan issue as it is

play18:00

now

play18:01

unfortunately now it has changed because

play18:04

also of the election campaign because of

play18:06

the I would say the the psychological

play18:09

hostility of trump toward Ukraine which

play18:11

I think dates back to to the to his

play18:16

um uh consistent view that Ukraine

play18:20

somehow helped uh son of President

play18:25

Biden um when he uh made uh his

play18:29

businesses there in in in Ukraine so the

play18:32

problem with Trump is that I don't see

play18:36

he has consistent world view or uh

play18:41

principles of his foreign policy he's

play18:44

fascinated by

play18:45

Putin uh he uh likes to be with strong

play18:50

leaders like Kim zun or uh other strong

play18:55

men in the world it's it's

play19:01

um on on the Democratic ticket

play19:04

you you don't have to love what you get

play19:07

but you know what you get with Trump

play19:10

there will be a change how um deep of a

play19:14

change we don't know but I must add one

play19:18

more

play19:19

thing the in the first Trump uh

play19:22

Administration foreign policy was

play19:25

run

play19:27

by they were called calling them Elder

play19:30

Statesmen those who were traditional

play19:34

establishment Republicans in foreign

play19:36

policy

play19:37

for um decades uh General matis John

play19:42

Bolton etc etc I think it it is going to

play19:46

change if Trump wins because all of them

play19:49

at the end of their tenure with him or

play19:53

after his term um denounced him and said

play19:57

that he's not

play19:59

um responsible and serious uh policy

play20:02

maker so I think it will be quite

play20:07

difficult uh to predict a bunch of

play20:10

people who will run US security and

play20:13

foreign policy which again as we

play20:15

mentioned before brings a factor of

play20:18

instability to the table which is not

play20:20

good you mentioned that Trump likes to

play20:23

Get Cozy with strongman Kim jongan in

play20:25

North Korea for example uh and and her

play20:29

breth Magdalena said the word autocrats

play20:31

do you believe that someone like Kim

play20:32

Jong-un like Vladimir Putin is an

play20:35

autocrat you know some say that Trump

play20:38

wants to um please Putin with the

play20:41

outcome of the Ukraine war to take him

play20:44

back from Alliance with China which of

play20:46

course is geopolitically the main uh

play20:50

World rival for for us I don't believe

play20:53

this is the case I believe that in

play20:56

Trump's um uh world view this is just oh

play21:01

I will I will bring peace at all costs

play21:04

and concentrate on foreign policy if

play21:07

Trump has any foreign policy instincts

play21:10

this is I don't care about the world uh

play21:13

he he want it it is on the record from

play21:16

his former advisers he wanted to

play21:19

withdraw or contemplated to withdraw us

play21:22

from from NATO for us with our

play21:26

geostrategic um geography

play21:29

under the long shadow of Russia it's

play21:32

it's dangerous yes or no is Vladimir

play21:34

Putin an

play21:35

autocrat of course of course Magdalena I

play21:39

want to ask you about this renewed talk

play21:41

about peace so to try and get Russia and

play21:44

Ukraine at the same table Russia doesn't

play21:45

seem to want to come to the table now

play21:48

where too next from here does the US

play21:51

play a role in mediating that peace and

play21:52

does the US election then impact what

play21:54

that role looks like because Trump and

play21:56

CA Harris have such different views

play21:57

where do we go from here

play22:00

it's a it's a difficult uh question now

play22:03

who would be the because we need the

play22:05

third party right who would push uh Mr

play22:09

Putin to to sit down at this table to

play22:12

who would make sure that uh Mr zalinski

play22:16

has this feeling that he can really

play22:19

negotiate in the sense that there is a a

play22:23

a pool of of solutions that can be taken

play22:25

at the table so we need this third party

play22:28

party and that would not probably be us

play22:32

this is because us is engaged in the um

play22:35

in the in the war this is the NATO of

play22:38

course Alliance uh that that is involved

play22:43

uh so um admittedly there are a few

play22:46

candidates China wants to be one of

play22:48

those uh which is also not uh not the

play22:52

best idea but um but also um such a such

play22:57

a country as as India has its uh reasons

play23:01

to to play a role in this um in this

play23:05

let's

play23:07

say play of uh of uh of

play23:12

geopolitical um

play23:14

um connections right so hopefully there

play23:20

will be we will agree finally and uh and

play23:23

find a a global so partner that uh that

play23:27

could gather this uh this round table

play23:30

where we can sit down and talk um it is

play23:34

important and now very crucial to have

play23:37

Mr Putin at that table not to repeat the

play23:41

I'm sorry to say a failure from

play23:44

Switzerland um in in June a long road to

play23:49

come magdalina yakobov and matchin batki

play23:52

thank you again for your time thank you

play23:54

thank you and good night and that's on

play23:57

the record for tonight thank you for

play23:59

watching us here on TVP world I'm Aaron

play24:02

Darman goodbye for now

play24:05

[Music]

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

الوسوم ذات الصلة
US ElectionForeign PolicyUkraine WarPoland RelationsKamala HarrisDonald TrumpTransatlantic UnityRussia ThreatNATO AlliesEuropean Security
هل تحتاج إلى تلخيص باللغة الإنجليزية؟