Thomas Lubanga case study - Inside the International Criminal Court (4/5)
Summary
TLDRIn March 2012, the International Criminal Court (ICC) secured its first conviction against Congolese warlord Thomas Lubanga for recruiting child soldiers. The case highlighted challenges in victim contact, witness protection, and language translation. Despite criticism for its slow pace, the ICC's pursuit of justice for international crimes sends a strong message on holding powerful individuals accountable, emphasizing the importance of due process over speed.
Takeaways
- 🕵️♂️ The International Criminal Court (ICC) secured its first conviction in 2012 against Congolese warlord Thomas Lubanga for recruiting child soldiers.
- 🏛️ Lubanga was sentenced to 14 years in prison for war crimes involving the use of child soldiers in hostilities.
- 🚧 The ICC faced challenges in the Lubanga case, including logistical difficulties and ensuring witness protection.
- 🗣️ The court had to manage the linguistic diversity by translating proceedings into a language understood by the suspect.
- 👥 The case highlighted the complexity of dealing with witnesses in unstable environments, such as the Democratic Republic of Congo.
- 🤝 The ICC had to use intermediaries to find and elicit evidence from witnesses, due to the fear and power dynamics in conflict zones.
- 🚫 Despite the ongoing conflict involving multiple allegations of rape, no charges were brought against Lubanga for gender-based violence.
- 💼 Barrister Rebecca Wilson emphasized the importance of ensuring that women's voices were heard within the court process.
- 🏥 The case took a long time due to the prosecutor's management and the challenges of gathering witness evidence.
- 🌐 The ICC has been criticized for its slow pace, having only two verdicts in its first decade, but the importance of getting the cases right is emphasized.
- 💰 While international criminal courts are not inexpensive, they are a cost-effective means of reinforcing the message that international crimes must be punished.
Q & A
When did the International Criminal Court (ICC) secure its first conviction?
-The ICC secured its first conviction in March 2012.
Who was the first person convicted by the ICC?
-The first person convicted by the ICC was Congolese warlord Thomas Lubanga.
What was Thomas Lubanga convicted of?
-Thomas Lubanga was convicted of the war crimes of recruiting child soldiers and using them to participate in hostilities.
What was the sentence given to Thomas Lubanga?
-Thomas Lubanga was sentenced to 14 years in prison.
What challenges did the ICC face during the Lubanga case?
-Challenges included contacting victims, logistical difficulties in a conflict zone, managing witness testimonies, and ensuring the accused understood the proceedings in their language.
Why did the Lubanga case take a long time to conclude?
-The case took a long time due to logistical difficulties, particularly dealing with witnesses in an unstable environment like the northern Democratic Republic of Congo.
What was the role of intermediaries in the Lubanga case?
-Intermediaries, local people working for the court, were used to find witnesses and elicit evidence from them where international crimes were committed.
Why were some witnesses reluctant to come forward during the Lubanga case?
-Some witnesses were afraid to come forward due to the risk of reprisals against them for cooperating with the court.
What was the role of NGOs like the one represented by Barrister Rebecca Wilson?
-NGOs like the one represented by Barrister Rebecca Wilson worked to ensure that women's voices were heard within the court process, particularly regarding gender-based violence.
Why were there no charges related to gender-based violence in the Lubanga indictment?
-Despite the involvement of multiple allegations of rape in the DRC conflict, no charges were brought against Lubanga concerning crimes of gender-based violence.
How has the ICC been criticized in its first 10 years of existence?
-The ICC has been criticized for obtaining only two verdicts in its first 10 years, with one conviction and one acquittal, indicating a slow pace of justice.
What is the significance of the ICC's work despite its slow pace?
-The significance lies in reinforcing the message that international crimes must be punished and powerful people held accountable, which is a worthy goal in itself.
Outlines
🏛️ ICC's First Conviction: Thomas Lubanga
In March 2012, the International Criminal Court (ICC) achieved its first conviction after a decade of operation. Thomas Lubanga, a Congolese warlord, was found guilty of conscripting and enlisting children under the age of 15 to participate in hostilities. Lubanga was sentenced to 14 years in prison for these war crimes. The case was significant but also challenging due to the need to contact child victims, logistical issues in the Democratic Republic of Congo, and the necessity to translate proceedings into a language the suspect could fully understand. The trial faced criticism for its slow pace and the handling of witness testimonies, with some witnesses being less than honest. The case also highlighted the difficulty of obtaining testimony from those directly affected by the violence due to fear of reprisals.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡International Criminal Court (ICC)
💡Thomas Lubanga
💡Child Soldiers
💡War Crimes
💡Witness Protection
💡Interpreters and Translators
💡Logistical Difficulties
💡Gender-Based Violence
💡Accountability
💡Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)
💡Indictment
Highlights
The International Criminal Court (ICC) secured its first conviction in March 2012 against Congolese warlord Thomas Lubanga.
Lubanga was found guilty of conscripting and enlisting children under 15 for use in hostilities.
He was sentenced to 14 years in prison for war crimes involving child soldiers.
The ICC faced challenges in its first case, including establishing procedures and ensuring justice.
Contact with child victims under 15 was necessary to facilitate their participation in the courtroom.
Witness protection and the translation of proceedings into a language understood by the suspect were crucial.
Logistical difficulties in the Democratic Republic of Congo's unstable environment prolonged the case.
The prosecutor's management of the case was criticized, with some witnesses not being entirely honest.
Many with firsthand experience were afraid to come forward due to the power of those being prosecuted.
The ICC used intermediaries to find witnesses and elicit evidence in conflict or post-conflict societies.
The possibility of cooperation with the court could lead to reprisals against witnesses.
NGOs ensured that women's voices were heard within the court process, despite no charges for gender-based violence.
The ICC has been criticized for its slow pace, with only two verdicts in its first 10 years.
The ICC's focus is on ensuring that international crimes are punished and powerful individuals are held accountable.
Despite the ICC's costs, it is considered a worthy goal to reinforce that international crimes must not go unpunished.
The ICC's modus operandi and effectiveness will be reassessed in the coming years.
Transcripts
the international criminal court is now
in session in March 2012 10 years after
it was set up the international criminal
court finally secured its first
conviction against the congales warlord
Thomas lubanga that Mr Thomas lubanga
Dilo is guilty of the crimes of
conscripting an enlisting children under
lubanga was later sentenced to 14 years
in prison for the war crimes of
recruiting child soldiers and using them
to participate in
hostilities I think that the court in
pursuing that case was to a large extent
feeling its way because it was the first
case they were very anxious to get it
right that as a result of the
implementation of the common plan to
build an army the case against Mr
tomango has raised a number of challenge
first regarding the contact with the
victims boys and girls under the age of
15 to facilitate their participation to
make their voices heard inside the
courtroom before the judges but also to
protect the different Witnesses we have
also the obligation to translate the
whole procedure to a language that the
suspect uh fully
understand and we need to train specific
translators and interpreters to be able
to deal with our obligations in
regarding this linguistic issue
September
2002 one of the reasons why the leang
case took so long was the logistical
difficulties with dealing with Witnesses
in particular in a very unstable
environment which is the northern
Democratic Republic of Congo I have to
say I don't think the prosecutor managed
the case especially well there were some
suggestions that uh the witnesses some
of the Witnesses were were not were not
always entirely honest with the court
and it has to be said that actually the
the trial chamber disregarded a great
deal of the witness evidence which the
prosecutor
brought many people with firsthand
experience of the events in question
were too afraid to come forward so the
ICC used intermediaries local people who
worked for the court to find witnesses
and elicit evidence from
them where International crimes being
committed we tend to be dealing with
conflict or postconflict societies and
of course people who are being
prosecuted before the interational
criminal court are very powerful local
actors and even the possibility of
somebody having cooperated with the
court could lead to to reprisals being
taken against them and their
Barrister Rebecca Wilson worked for a
non-governmental organization in the ha
which represented women who were victims
of sexual violence during the Civil War
in the Democratic Republic of
Congo drives but while the ICC was aware
while the luanga case was ongoing that
the DRC conflict involved multiple
allegations of rape no one was charged
with the
offenses those children our role as an
independent NGO was to make sure that
women women's voices were firmly heard
within that court process a number of
military training camps were added we
hoped that we would ensure there was a
women's perspective within that case and
those
proceedings and so we worked with
organizations that were based within the
Democratic Republic of the Congo in
particular women's
organizations to try and make sure that
for example they could be recognized as
victims in the case an order relating to
the unfortunately in the indictment
there were no charges at all concerning
crimes of gender based violence Mr
lubanga will remain in custody and that
concludes this hearing despite its
achievements the ICC has been widely
criticized for obtaining just two
verdicts in its 10year existence one
conviction and one
acquittal it is not quick but getting
things right isn't quick and I think
what we need to do is to look to see
where we are in another 10 years to see
whether one case every 10 years is going
to be the modus operandi of the court or
whether in fact it was simply it was it
was starting in first gear although
international criminal courts aren't
cheap they're far cheaper than fighter
jets and in the end if the message has
to be has to be reinforced that
International crimes must be punished
and that powerful people must be held
accountable then that in itself is a
worthy
goal get more from the open University
check out the links on screen now
تصفح المزيد من مقاطع الفيديو ذات الصلة
Is the International Criminal Court Racist? | System Error
International Criminal Court - ICC
EXPLAINER VIDEO | Difference between the ICJ and the ICC
EXCLUSIVE: ICC prosecutor seeks arrest warrants against Sinwar and Netanyahu for war crimes
Israel's DESPERATE Attempt To Stop Netanyahu Arrest
What’s the point of international law? | Start Here
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)