The Biggest Problem With ChatGPT | Tsoding

Tsoding Highlights
20 Jul 202402:12

Summary

TLDRThe speaker expresses frustration with LMS (Large Language Models) for their propensity to generate inaccurate or fabricated information, which they find anxiety-inducing and impractical for serious tasks. They compare the current reliance on LMS to the simpler, more efficient use of Google for straightforward queries a decade ago, suggesting a degradation in tool quality. The speaker criticizes the overreliance on complex tools for trivial tasks and questions the value of such technology when it introduces more uncertainty and verification work.

Takeaways

  • 🤖 The speaker expresses dissatisfaction with LMS (Learning Management Systems) due to their propensity to generate incorrect or fabricated information.
  • 🚫 The speaker finds LMS unusable for anything beyond trivial tasks because of the time-consuming verification process required to ensure accuracy.
  • 😓 There is a sense of anxiety conveyed about the reliability of information provided by LMS, as the speaker questions the veracity of the content.
  • 💻 The speaker criticizes the reliance on LMS for tasks that were once efficiently handled by simpler tools like Google searches.
  • 📉 The speaker laments a perceived degradation in the quality of tools over the past decade, suggesting that what was easily managed with basic search engines now requires complex systems.
  • 😡 There is a strong opinion against the idea of accepting LMS-generated inaccuracies as a norm, indicating a value for precision and integrity in work.
  • 🤔 The speaker questions the convenience of LMS, arguing that they create more work and uncertainty rather than simplifying tasks.
  • 🧐 The speaker reflects on the necessity of critical thinking and verification in the digital age, where information can be easily manipulated.
  • 🔍 The speaker highlights the importance of skill in discerning reliable information sources, suggesting that the value of tools like Google has diminished over time.
  • 💬 There is a call for a return to more reliable and efficient methods of information retrieval, indicating a preference for quality over convenience.

Q & A

  • What is the main concern expressed about using LMS for tutorials?

    -The main concern is the potential for LMS to 'hallucinate' or generate incorrect or non-existent information, which can lead to anxiety and the need to spend more time verifying the content than learning from it.

  • Why is the speaker suggesting that LMS is nonusable for certain tasks?

    -The speaker finds LMS nonusable because the risk of receiving incorrect information outweighs the benefits, especially for tasks that require accuracy and verification.

  • What does the speaker imply about the convenience of using LMS?

    -The speaker questions the convenience of LMS due to the need to constantly verify the information it provides, which can be more cumbersome than finding the information through traditional means.

  • What is the speaker's opinion on the quality of tools and their evolution over time?

    -The speaker believes that the quality of tools, specifically referencing Google, has degraded over time to the point where complex systems like LMS are now necessary for tasks that were once simple.

  • What does the speaker suggest about the relationship between the quality of work and the use of LMS?

    -The speaker implies that a lack of concern for the quality of work could lead to an acceptance of LMS adding incorrect information, suggesting a correlation between work ethic and reliance on LMS.

  • How does the speaker view the current state of LMS in comparison to Google's capabilities 10 years ago?

    -The speaker views the current state of LMS as a regression in quality, comparing it unfavorably to the capabilities of Google a decade ago and suggesting that the need for LMS indicates a decline in the effectiveness of simpler tools.

  • What does the speaker mean when they mention 'trivial things' in the context of LMS?

    -The speaker refers to 'trivial things' as basic information that should be easily accessible and verifiable without the need for complex systems like LMS, implying that LMS's use for such tasks is overkill.

  • What is the speaker's stance on the necessity of LMS for trivial tasks?

    -The speaker is critical of the use of LMS for trivial tasks, arguing that it is an inefficient use of resources and indicative of a decline in the quality of simpler tools like search engines.

  • How does the speaker feel about the current reliance on complex systems for tasks that were once simple?

    -The speaker expresses frustration and disbelief at the current reliance on complex systems like LMS for tasks that were once simple and could be handled by basic search engines.

  • What does the speaker suggest is the 'real problem' with the use of LMS?

    -The 'real problem' the speaker identifies is the complacency and lack of concern for the quality of work, which leads to an acceptance of LMS's potential inaccuracies.

Outlines

00:00

🤔 Concerns Over AI's Unreliable Outputs

The speaker expresses skepticism towards using AI, specifically LMS, for creating tutorials due to its tendency to generate unreliable or incorrect information. They mention that the AI's ability to 'hallucinate' content can lead to significant anxiety, as verifying the AI's output becomes more time-consuming than solving the problem independently. The speaker criticizes the reliance on AI for tasks that were once easily managed with simple search engines like Google, suggesting a decline in the quality of tools over the past decade. They also question the value of AI's contributions to work, implying that it may lead to a lack of care for the accuracy and quality of work.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡LMS

LMS stands for Learning Management System, which is a software application or web-based technology used to plan, implement, and assess a specific learning process. In the context of the video, the speaker is expressing dissatisfaction with an LMS that seems to generate incorrect or unreliable information, which detracts from its utility for learning.

💡Hallucinate

In the video, 'hallucinate' is used metaphorically to describe the LMS generating incorrect or nonsensical information. This term is typically used to describe the experience of perceiving something that is not present, but here it is applied to criticize the LMS's output as being fantastical or erroneous.

💡Trivial

The term 'trivial' is used to describe tasks or information that are of little importance or value. In the script, the speaker suggests that the LMS is only useful for the most basic and insignificant tasks, implying that for more complex or critical applications, its reliability is questionable.

💡Verify

Verification in this context refers to the process of checking the accuracy or truth of the information provided by the LMS. The speaker expresses frustration with having to spend more time verifying the LMS's output than it would take to find the information independently, indicating a lack of trust in the system.

💡Anxiety

Anxiety, as mentioned in the transcript, reflects the speaker's emotional response to the uncertainty and unreliability of the LMS. It suggests a state of unease or worry about the potential for the system to provide incorrect information, which could lead to wasted time or incorrect conclusions.

💡Convenient

The speaker questions the convenience of using an LMS that requires extensive verification of its output. The term 'convenient' is typically used to describe something that saves time or effort, but here it is used ironically to highlight the speaker's belief that the LMS is actually more cumbersome than helpful.

💡Out come

Outcome refers to the result or effect of a particular course of action. The speaker implies that some users might not care about the accuracy of the LMS's output, focusing instead on the process or effort involved. This suggests a disregard for the end result's quality, which the speaker criticizes.

💡Degraded

Degradation in this context refers to a decline in quality or performance. The speaker uses 'degraded' to express disappointment in the tools available for information retrieval, suggesting that they have become less effective or reliable over time compared to what was available a decade ago.

💡Google

Google, mentioned in the transcript, is a search engine often used as a verb to describe the act of searching for information online. The speaker contrasts the current need for complex systems like LMS with the simplicity of using Google for the same purpose a decade ago, indicating a perceived decline in the efficiency of information tools.

💡Insanity

The term 'insanity' is used to express the speaker's disbelief at the situation where complex and resource-intensive systems are required to perform tasks that were once simple. It underscores the speaker's view that the reliance on such systems represents an irrational or extreme approach to information retrieval.

Highlights

Use of LMS for rewarding well-worded tutorials

Hallucination of content on top of LMS

LMS's ability to spontaneously generate content

Nonusability of LMS for complex tasks due to verification time

Anxiety caused by the need to verify LMS-generated content

Concerns about the reliability of LMS in specific contexts

Comparison of LMS with Google's capabilities from 10 years ago

Degradation in quality of tools over time

The necessity of a powerful computing cluster for current LMS use cases

The insanity of relying on complex systems for simple tasks

The impact of LMS on work quality and attitude towards outcomes

The problem of not caring about the quality of work due to LMS

The real problem identified as the reliance on LMS for trivial tasks

The decline in the quality of tools compared to 10 years ago

The need for a return to simpler, more reliable tools

The importance of skill over reliance on technology

The degradation of Google's tool over time

Transcripts

play00:00

one thing ionically use LMS for the

play00:01

rewarding abely worded tutorials and

play00:03

also hallucinated some [ __ ] on top

play00:05

of it yeah very cool use case like the

play00:09

fact that they can out of the blue

play00:12

completely hallucinate like some sort of

play00:14

[ __ ] makes llms nonusable for me

play00:18

honestly like pretty much nonusable

play00:20

unless it's something super trivial like

play00:23

super super trivial because I will spend

play00:26

more time verifying the [ __ ] that they

play00:29

sped out than actually figuring out

play00:31

myself like I can't use that it's just

play00:33

like uh the whole experience gives me a

play00:35

huge anxiety like how the [ __ ] know

play00:38

if it like in that specific little place

play00:41

it didn't actually lie or like put some

play00:44

sort of a thing that doesn't exist like

play00:45

how do I know I have to like go through

play00:47

everything now like how is that even how

play00:49

people find these kind of things

play00:51

convenient to use they're unusable

play00:54

because of that or you don't give a [ __ ]

play00:56

is that how you Trea in your work you

play00:58

don't give a [ __ ] about the out come you

play01:00

work so so much that you are okay of

play01:02

llms adding [ __ ] to it like you're

play01:05

that okay with

play01:06

that this is the real problem honestly

play01:09

this is the real problem why you don't

play01:11

care about your work that much man that

play01:14

is bad it is usable to remember like

play01:16

when you looked up answer code again I'm

play01:19

telling you trivial things the things

play01:22

that Google like was completely

play01:25

sufficient 10 years ago like you realize

play01:28

that this is a use case of Google 10

play01:30

years ago like just think about it like

play01:33

think how much we degraded in quality

play01:36

like the tools how much degraded in

play01:37

quality that this is a use case of a

play01:39

Google 10 [ __ ] years ago it's not

play01:41

about no dude you don't [ __ ]

play01:43

understand it's not even about skill of

play01:45

Googling this is not what the [ __ ] I'm

play01:47

talking about it's about [ __ ] Google

play01:51

it's not about the skill the Google as a

play01:54

tool degraded so [ __ ] much that for

play01:57

its use case that we had 10 years ago

play01:59

you need a [ __ ] cluster of

play02:02

gpus think about that this is

play02:07

insanity it's not about

play02:09

skills it's about tools

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

الوسوم ذات الصلة
AI ReliabilityInformation VerificationDigital ToolsGoogle DecadeAI AnxietyTool DegradationSkill DebateSearch EngineContent QualityAI Ethics
هل تحتاج إلى تلخيص باللغة الإنجليزية؟