Is it the best AI Note-Taking app again? - State of Mem in 2024 Q1

Summary

The video reviews Obsidian after several years, following updates and improvements. It walks through the interface and new features, testing capabilities like note creation, embedding, search, PDF handling, and more. While some progress is evident and M has kept users informed, major shortcomings like speed and usability remain issues. Overall M still lacks capabilities seen in competitors, failing to justify a return for the creator's needs. The video invites viewers to share insights if they have found more value from recent M updates.

Takeaways

• 😕 The author revisited Anthropic's AI note-taking app Me after not using it for a while
• 😀 Me has improved its communication and updates to users about new features
• 🤔 The author still finds some UI elements confusing or unnecessary
• 👎 Embedding videos and PDF search still does not work in Me
• 🤨 Loading times in Me are still quite long
• 😊 Me's AI can now summarize notes and recommend related content
• 😐 Overall the author does not see big improvements in Me recently
• 🔍 The author will keep an eye on Me's development going forward
• 💡 The author believes note organization is key for productivity
• 😴 Many users requested a dark mode, but it's still not available

Q & A

Why did the speaker decide to remove M from their tool stack?

The speaker removed M from their tool stack due to several reasons, which are not specified in the provided script but are mentioned to be available in another video.

What updates has M implemented to improve communication with its community?

M has improved communication by sending updates and emails about new implementations and features, which was something the speaker felt was missing in the past.

What features of M does the speaker appreciate after revisiting it?

The speaker appreciates the clean interface, the collaboration features, the preview pop-up when hovering over notes, and the ability to see all notes categorized as 'added by me' and 'shared with me'.

What features did the speaker find lacking in M's current version?

The speaker noted the absence of video embed capabilities and PDF embeds, as well as the inefficiency of the search function in some instances, such as not recognizing newly added PDF content immediately.

How does M's search functionality work with respect to PDF content?

M's search functionality allows searching within PDFs once they are indexed, but the speaker experienced a delay in this indexing, indicating it might not be immediate.

What is the speaker's opinion on the use of AI in note-taking apps, based on their experience with M?

The speaker believes that while AI can enhance note-taking apps by providing serendipitous discovery and language recognition, a well-organized structure is crucial for effective knowledge management.

What concerns did the speaker have regarding M's performance and feature set?

The speaker was concerned about long loading times, the lack of significant advancements in M's development, and the absence of a dark mode, which affects usability.

How does the speaker view M's potential for future use?

The speaker remains skeptical about M's current offerings but is open to keeping an eye on its development for any significant improvements that might warrant reconsideration.

What specific feature does the speaker feel is missing in M's interface?

The speaker mentioned the absence of a dark mode as a significant missing feature, especially given M's clean and bright interface.

Does the speaker encourage feedback from M users?

Yes, the speaker encourages feedback from M users in the comments section to possibly address or highlight features they might have missed during their review.