한일전 3연패, 승패보다 중요한 것에 대해 진지하게 애기해봤습니다

Summary

The transcript offers an in-depth analysis of South Korea's football tactics under Coach Hong Myung-bo during a match against Japan. The speaker critiques the team's use of a long-ball approach, questioning its suitability for the squad, especially when facing Japan's more physically resilient players. They also discuss the challenges of implementing a three-back system and the lack of a unified football philosophy in South Korea, highlighting the difference with Japan's consistent approach. The speaker emphasizes the importance of coaching stability and refining existing tactics in preparation for the World Cup.

Takeaways

• 😀 Coach Hong Myung-bo is experimenting with Baek-ri in the current tournament, testing new tactics like the back three and long-ball soccer.
• 😀 The long-ball strategy, though a valid approach, contrasts with modern football's focus on build-up play from the back, which emphasizes passing and goalkeeper involvement.
• 😀 The team's attempt at long-ball soccer didn't achieve success, with Joo Min-kyu losing aerial battles to Japan's center backs, making it difficult for South Korea to capitalize on second balls.
• 😀 The South Korean players, like Kim Jin-gyu and Seo Min-woo, aren't naturally suited for the physical style of play that was tested, which made the strategy less effective.
• 😀 The three-back system, though effective for some teams, doesn’t seem well-suited to South Korea's current squad composition, leading to doubts about its practicality.
• 😀 South Korea struggled physically against Japan, with Japan's players—who include more mixed-race athletes—showing better strength and physicality in the match.
• 😀 Japan's success in pressuring South Korea and using short passes highlighted the differences between the two teams, with Japan's organized play outshining South Korea's long-ball attempts.
• 😀 The absence of South Korea's best players contributed to the loss, and the match exposed some flaws in the current team structure and tactics under coach Hong Myung-bo.
• 😀 Despite the loss, the experiment with new tactics is viewed as valuable, as experimenting with different approaches can lead to better strategies for the future, especially heading into the World Cup.
• 😀 The overall conclusion is that South Korea should refine and focus on their Plan A, moving away from experimenting with unfamiliar tactics like long-ball soccer with the World Cup qualifiers approaching.

Q & A

What is the main tactical approach that Coach Hong Myung-bo tested in this match against Japan?

Coach Hong Myung-bo tested a long-ball style of play during this match, focusing on physical power and aerial battles, which contrasted with modern football's emphasis on build-up play from the back.

Why is the commentator skeptical about the long-ball strategy employed by Coach Hong Myung-bo?

The commentator believes the long-ball strategy is outdated and not well-suited for the current team, particularly given the squad's lack of players who excel in physical duels or aerial battles.

What does the commentator think about the physicality of the Korean team compared to Japan?

The commentator feels that Japan's physicality is better than Korea's, noting that Japan has players with stronger athletic abilities, which challenges the Korean team's ability to compete in physical battles.

How does the commentator feel about the Korean team's ability to execute a three-back system?

The commentator is doubtful about the Korean team's ability to execute a three-back system effectively, questioning whether the current squad is suited for this formation given the lack of experience with it.

What is the significance of Japan's approach to playing football, according to the transcript?

Japan's approach to football is described as unified and consistent, with a focus on passing and possession-based play, which has been cultivated over many years and gives the national team a solid, coherent philosophy.

What is the main criticism of Korea's approach under different coaches?

The commentator criticizes the lack of a unified football philosophy in Korea, pointing out that the style of play changes with each new coach, making it difficult for the team to develop a cohesive and effective approach.

What does the commentator suggest about the future of Coach Hong Myung-bo's tenure?

The commentator suggests that despite the experimentation, it might be better for Korea to stick with the established tactics under Coach Hong Myung-bo and refine them further instead of continuously changing approaches before the World Cup.

What is the commentator's perspective on the Korean national team's player pool?

The commentator acknowledges that Korea's player pool is more limited compared to countries like France, Spain, or Portugal, which makes it difficult for the national team to compete at the highest level without a strong, unified tactical framework.

What are the main differences between Japan's football and Korea's football according to the speaker?

Japan is described as having a well-established, consistent football philosophy focused on passing and possession, while Korea lacks this kind of continuity and tends to change its style based on the coach in charge.

What does the commentator think about the current state of Korean football in terms of strategy and execution?

The commentator believes that Korean football is currently in a state of uncertainty, with no clear, unified strategy. This lack of continuity is seen as a major issue, as the team is not executing a consistent game plan that could lead to success at the World Cup.