HUKUM MUSIK ITU HALAL ATAU HARAM ? | USTADZ SYAFIQ RIZA BASALAMAH

Summary

This transcript discusses the Islamic perspective on music, focusing on the differing opinions of Islamic scholars regarding its permissibility. The speaker emphasizes the debate between those who consider music haram (forbidden) and those who deem it halal (permissible). The discussion covers the views of various scholars, including Ibn Hazm and the four major imams, highlighting the importance of studying religious texts and respecting scholarly opinions. The speaker also reflects on the broader implications of these religious rulings, stressing the need for careful consideration and adherence to expert knowledge.

Takeaways

• 😀 The script begins with a conversation about music in Islamic boarding schools, discussing whether it is halal (permissible) or haram (forbidden).
• 😀 The child discusses two opposing opinions on music: one considers it haram, while the other deems it halal.
• 😀 The speaker explains the concept of 'filaf,' referring to disagreements among scholars, and how some disagreements can be acceptable in Islam.
• 😀 The importance of following the guidance of the four great imams of Islamic jurisprudence (Abu Hanifah, Malik, Shafi’i, and Ahmad) is emphasized in understanding Islamic rulings.
• 😀 The four imams' views on music are explored, with mention that the Zahiriyah school (led by Ibn Hazm) believes music is halal.
• 😀 Ibn Hazm’s opinion that all hadiths related to music are weak or false is debated and contrasted with the opinions of other scholars like Imam Bukhari and Ibn Hibban.
• 😀 The speaker stresses the importance of knowing which scholars validate or reject hadiths on music, specifically highlighting that several prominent scholars disagree with Ibn Hazm’s stance.
• 😀 Scholars like Ibn Kathir, Ibn Taimiyah, and Imam Nawawi are mentioned as validating the hadiths on music, thus supporting the view that music is haram.
• 😀 The concept of ‘taqlid’ (following the teachings of a scholar) is discussed, particularly when it comes to laypeople choosing which scholarly opinion to follow.
• 😀 The speaker warns against taking personal opinions in religious matters without the backing of qualified scholars, emphasizing the danger of making forbidden acts permissible in Islam.
• 😀 The script concludes with a call for deeper study and respect for the expertise of scholars, cautioning against superficial interpretations of Islamic texts on controversial topics like music.

Q & A

What was the main issue discussed in the transcript?

The transcript discusses the Islamic views on music, particularly whether it is considered halal (permissible) or haram (forbidden). It also touches on the opinions of various Islamic scholars and imams regarding the permissibility of music.

Which scholars and imams are mentioned in the transcript?

The transcript mentions several Islamic scholars and imams, including Abu Hanifah, Imam Malik, Imam Shafi'i, Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal, Ibn Hazm, and others such as Imam Bukhari, Ibn Hibban, and Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani.

What is the opinion of Ibn Hazm on the topic of music?

Ibn Hazm holds the opinion that music is permissible (halal). He also stated that all the hadiths regarding music are false or weak, which is a central point of his argument.

How do the opinions of the four imams differ from Ibn Hazm's view?

The four imams (Abu Hanifah, Imam Malik, Imam Shafi'i, and Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal) generally consider music to be haram, while Ibn Hazm disagrees and considers it permissible. This difference of opinion highlights the diverse views within Islamic jurisprudence.

Why do some scholars accept the hadiths about music despite Ibn Hazm's rejection?

Scholars such as Imam Bukhari, Ibn Hibban, and others authenticate the hadiths about music. They argue that these hadiths are valid, contrasting Ibn Hazm's view that they are weak or false. The acceptance of these hadiths by well-known hadith scholars plays a significant role in shaping the consensus on the issue.

What is the significance of following the opinions of the four imams according to the speaker?

The speaker emphasizes that, for laypeople, it is important to follow the opinions of the four imams (Abu Hanifah, Imam Malik, Imam Shafi'i, and Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal) since they are considered more knowledgeable and pious in matters of Islamic jurisprudence compared to Ibn Hazm.

What is the role of 'taqlid' in Islamic jurisprudence as mentioned in the script?

In the context of the script, 'taqlid' refers to following the established opinions and rulings of prominent scholars, especially for laypeople who may not have the expertise to derive rulings from primary sources like the Qur'an and Hadith.

How does the speaker view the opinions of modern scholars like Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi and Muhammad al-Ghazali?

The speaker suggests that modern scholars such as Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi and Muhammad al-Ghazali follow Ibn Hazm's opinion that music is permissible, which contrasts with the views of the traditional imams who consider it haram.

What is the speaker’s stance on the validity of the hadiths related to music?

The speaker argues that the hadiths related to music, which were authenticated by major scholars like Imam Bukhari and Ibn Hibban, should be considered valid. They emphasize the importance of studying these hadiths properly rather than dismissing them as weak.

What analogy is used in the transcript to explain the need for expertise in Islamic legal matters?

The speaker uses an analogy comparing the need for expertise in Islamic jurisprudence to seeking a professional mechanic to repair a motorbike, rather than consulting someone who lacks the necessary knowledge. This analogy highlights the importance of relying on experts in their respective fields.