ÜBERRASCHT von der Ladeleistung! BYD vs. LG Akku Lade-Vergleich ⚡️

Summary

In this video, two Tesla Model 3 variants, the Standard Range and Performance, are put to the test on a road trip between Hamburg and Bremen. The comparison covers energy consumption, charging speeds, and overall performance. While the Performance model offers superior acceleration and dual motors, the Standard Range model delivers nearly identical real-world efficiency and range. Both vehicles exhibit impressive charging speeds, with the Performance model having a slight edge in recharge times. Ultimately, the video demonstrates that both models are capable long-distance options, with the Standard Range providing a more budget-friendly choice.

Takeaways

• 😀 The Tesla Model 3 Performance has a slightly faster charging speed, especially when charging above 60%, thanks to its battery technology and optimization.
• 😀 The Standard Range Model 3, while slightly less efficient in terms of battery consumption, still offers a competitive performance for long-distance trips.
• 😀 Both Tesla models were tested in real-world conditions, covering a road trip of around 100 km, with similar energy consumption despite differences in motor configurations.
• 😀 The Performance Model consumes about 31% of battery for 100 km, while the Standard Range uses 35%, showing a minor difference in energy usage on the highway.
• 😀 Charging times for both cars are quite efficient; the Performance Model charges to 80% in around 30 minutes, while the Standard Range takes about 45 minutes.
• 😀 The Performance Model’s dual-motor setup offers better acceleration, making it quicker for overtaking, but it doesn’t drastically reduce overall efficiency for long trips.
• 😀 The Standard Range Model, though it has a single motor, provides sufficient range for most drivers and offers a more budget-friendly option without significant loss of performance.
• 😀 Both models are well-suited for long trips, with only marginal differences in range and efficiency, making them both good options for everyday and road trip use.
• 😀 Tesla’s fast-charging capabilities allow both models to quickly regain significant battery charge, with the Performance version benefiting from quicker charge times.
• 😀 Overall, for daily use, the Performance Model is ideal for those who prioritize speed and power, while the Standard Range is better for those seeking a lower-cost option without sacrificing too much performance.

Q & A

What is the main focus of the video?

The video compares the **Tesla Model 3 Standard Range** and the **Tesla Model 3 Performance**, specifically focusing on their battery performance, charging speeds, energy consumption, and real-world driving differences.

What is the significance of the battery comparison between the two Tesla models?

The main difference lies in their battery capacities: the **Standard Range** has a **60 kWh** battery, while the **Performance** has a **75 kWh** battery. The video highlights how these differences affect charging speeds and real-world driving efficiency.

How do the charging speeds compare between the two models?

The **Performance** model charges faster, needing only about **30 minutes** to reach **80%**, whereas the **Standard Range** takes longer, about **45 minutes** to fully charge. This difference is due to the higher charging capability of the Performance model's larger battery.

Did the larger battery in the Performance model translate to significantly better range?

While the Performance model has a larger battery, the real-world range difference is minimal. Both cars consumed a similar amount of energy during the trip, with only a slight difference in efficiency and consumption (about 2 kWh more for the Performance model per 100 km).

What impact does driving behavior have on energy consumption in the Tesla Model 3 Standard Range and Performance models?

Driving at **130-140 km/h** speeds resulted in a consumption rate of **31% battery** for the Standard Range and **35%** for the Performance model. This shows that despite the Performance model’s higher power, the energy usage difference is not drastically larger in real-world driving conditions.

How does the dual-motor setup in the Performance model affect its performance compared to the Standard Range?

The dual-motor system in the Performance model provides **better acceleration** and power, particularly noticeable during overtaking or fast acceleration. However, this performance advantage doesn't translate into significantly better efficiency for long-distance driving.

Why did they choose to charge the Standard Range model to 100% and the Performance model to 80%?

Charging the Standard Range to 100% ensures that it has the full range available for the test, while the Performance model, with its larger battery, was charged to 80% to simulate typical real-world usage, as Tesla recommends charging it to around 80% for longevity.

What are the driving range results from this trip?

During the trip, the **Standard Range** used **35% of battery** to travel **100 km**, while the **Performance** model used **31%** for the same distance. Both vehicles would theoretically achieve similar ranges over a long journey, with a minor difference in energy consumption.

What did the drivers experience regarding the charging time during the trip?

The video demonstrates that while the **Performance model** charges faster, the Standard Range model, despite taking longer, still performs well on long trips, especially if charging stops are strategically planned. For example, both models took similar times to reach an **80% charge** on the return leg.

How does real-world driving and traffic affect energy consumption during long trips?

Real-world factors like **traffic conditions** and **weather** (such as rain) impacted energy consumption, leading to marginal differences between the two models. Despite the Performance model having higher acceleration power, it didn't lead to significantly better efficiency in regular driving conditions.