Audiência Cível 20- Processo: 0830211-22.2013.8.12.0001

José Andrade
2 Sept 201714:03

Summary

TLDRThis judicial hearing centers on a property dispute involving Teresa Gonçalves and her claim to a lot at Jardim Anache. Witnesses, including Marli Rodrigues Lima, Sueli Aparecida dos Santos, and Claudenice Rodrigues dos Santos, testify to Teresa’s long-standing care and maintenance of the property, although none know how she acquired it. The defense challenges the legitimacy of her ownership, citing lack of documentation. The court session is part of an educational project, recorded for academic purposes. The case is yet to be resolved, with the final ruling pending after the testimonies and legal arguments.

Takeaways

  • 😀 The judge introduces the session, stating it is a continuation of a previous hearing in May, focusing on hearing testimonies of witnesses who were absent then.
  • 😀 The judge mentions the involvement of a new legal defender for one of the parties and the use of an online hearing project, where the session will be recorded for academic purposes.
  • 😀 The judge asks all participants to ensure their microphones are close enough for clear audio during the recording, which will be used for educational purposes for students.
  • 😀 Marli Rodrigues Lima, the first witness, confirms she has known the defendant, Teresa Gonçalves, for about 26 years, as they were neighbors in Piratininga.
  • 😀 Marli testifies that Teresa and her son have maintained the lot in question for over 15 years, although Marli does not know if Teresa purchased or inherited it.
  • 😀 The lot in question is described as a clean, fenced piece of land with no construction or cultivation, which Teresa and her family have been taking care of for many years.
  • 😀 The second witness, Sueli Aparecida dos Santos, has known Teresa for around 15 years, having been neighbors in the Coronel Antonino neighborhood.
  • 😀 Sueli confirms Teresa had a lot in the Jardim Anache area for over 20 years and would visit the lot to maintain it, noting that Teresa was seen as the landowner.
  • 😀 The third witness, Claudenice Rodrigues dos Santos, has known Teresa for 15 years, and like the other witnesses, she testifies that Teresa has maintained the lot over time, without any construction or significant cultivation present.
  • 😀 The lawyer representing the defense reiterates the stance of denying the plaintiff's claims, highlighting that the defense has no knowledge of the supposed property transfer and opposes any settlement or agreement regarding the case.

Q & A

  • What was the purpose of this hearing?

    -The purpose of the hearing was to continue the process and hear testimonies that were previously scheduled but had not appeared at an earlier hearing in May.

  • What is the role of the new defender mentioned in the transcript?

    -The new defender is also acting as a curator in the case, ensuring legal representation for the involved parties.

  • What is the significance of the online audience project mentioned?

    -The project aims to record hearings for academic purposes, allowing students to watch and learn from the proceedings later. The recordings are made with the consent of all parties involved.

  • Why is it important for the witnesses to speak clearly into the microphone during their testimonies?

    -It is important so that the audio and video can be recorded properly, ensuring that their statements are captured accurately for later review by the academics.

  • What is the relationship between Marli Rodrigues Lima and Teresa Gonçalves?

    -Marli Rodrigues Lima and Teresa Gonçalves are not related by blood, but they have known each other for around 26 years and were once neighbors.

  • What did Marli Rodrigues Lima testify about the lot in question?

    -Marli confirmed that Teresa Gonçalves has been taking care of the lot for over 15 years, and that Teresa's son also helped with the maintenance of the lot. The lot was not developed, but it was kept clean and looked after.

  • What did Sueli Aparecida dos Santos testify regarding the lot?

    -Sueli Aparecida dos Santos testified that Teresa Gonçalves had been the possessor of a lot in Jardim Anache for over 20 years. She also mentioned that Teresa's lot was kept clean, though there were no buildings or crops on it.

  • How long has Claudenice Rodrigues dos Santos known Teresa Gonçalves?

    -Claudenice Rodrigues dos Santos has known Teresa Gonçalves for approximately 15 years. They were once neighbors in the same neighborhood.

  • Did any witness indicate that Teresa Gonçalves was trying to claim ownership of the land through force or illegal means?

    -No witness indicated that Teresa Gonçalves was attempting to claim ownership through force or illegal means. All witnesses testified that she had maintained the lot for many years without issues.

  • What did the defense attorney argue in the final statements?

    -The defense attorney argued that they did not have knowledge of the plaintiff's claim to the property and could not proceed with any agreements based on the situation. They also reiterated the request for exemption from court fees.

Outlines

plate

此内容仅限付费用户访问。 请升级后访问。

立即升级

Mindmap

plate

此内容仅限付费用户访问。 请升级后访问。

立即升级

Keywords

plate

此内容仅限付费用户访问。 请升级后访问。

立即升级

Highlights

plate

此内容仅限付费用户访问。 请升级后访问。

立即升级

Transcripts

plate

此内容仅限付费用户访问。 请升级后访问。

立即升级
Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

相关标签
Legal HearingProperty DisputeTestimonyOwnership ClaimLand PossessionCourt ProceedingsWitness StatementsJardim AnacheDona TeresaProperty RightsLegal Process
您是否需要英文摘要?