Witness: "I saw YOU in my yard." Darrell Brooks Trial

Summary

In this tense courtroom interaction, the witness recounts their experience of an encounter with an individual in their backyard, emphasizing their uncertainty about the person's identity at the time. They describe giving a general description to an officer via a non-emergency line but later confirm that they were curious about the individual after seeing news coverage of related events. The dialogue reveals the complexities of memory, perception, and the legal process, highlighting the witness's concerns about trespassing and their subsequent interest in the police report.

Takeaways

• 👮‍♂️ The witness initially spoke to an officer on the non-emergency line, not in person.
• ❓ The witness struggled to recall specific details about the individual they described, indicating uncertainty.
• 🧑‍🤝‍🧑 The witness described the individual as either black, Latino, or mixed, emphasizing the generality of the description.
• 🕵️‍♂️ The conversation revealed the witness's confusion about identifying the individual, stating they were looking directly at the questioner.
• 📏 The witness provided an approximate description of the individual’s height and weight, but acknowledged it was a rough estimate.
• 🔍 The witness had seen the suspect on the news but insisted they did not know who the individual was at the time of the incident.
• 📰 After the incident, the witness checked the police report online and recognized the suspect from a mugshot.
• 😕 The witness expressed they did not care about the individual’s identity during the trespassing incident.
• ⚠️ The witness maintained that the individual was trespassing, regardless of any other details.
• 💭 Curiosity prompted the witness to look up the police report to understand who had been in their yard.

Q & A

What type of line did the witness use to contact the officer?

The witness contacted the officer using a non-emergency line.

What description did the witness provide of the individual in their yard?

The witness described the individual as either black, Latino, or mixed.

How confident was the witness in their description of the individual?

The witness claimed to be as positive as possible, although they acknowledged giving a general description.

What was the estimated height and weight of the individual according to the witness?

The witness estimated the individual to be approximately five feet nine inches tall and weighing around 160 pounds.

Did the witness know the identity of the individual in their yard at the time?

No, the witness stated they had no idea who the individual was at the time of the incident.

What prompted the witness to pull up the police report later?

The witness was curious about the individual who had trespassed and wanted to know if they were the person involved in crimes reported on television.

How did the witness feel about the individual trespassing in their yard?

The witness expressed concern about a stranger being in their yard unannounced and trespassing.

Did the witness see the individual in the news after the incident?

Yes, the witness noted that the individual was all over the news following the incident.

What was the reaction of the questioning attorney towards the witness's identification of the individual?

The questioning attorney challenged the witness's credibility by highlighting discrepancies between the witness's description and the actual appearance of the defendant.

What did the witness state about their knowledge of the individual before checking the police report?

The witness stated they had no prior knowledge of the individual and were primarily concerned with the trespassing incident.