Why The Government Has Infinite Money
Summary
TLDRThis video delves into the various processing methods of orange juice and their impact on flavor, highlighting the importance of freshness and the quality of ingredients. Through taste tests and expert insights, viewers learn how different oranges contribute to taste profiles. The speaker provides tips on selecting high-quality orange juice and emphasizes the role of processing in enhancing consumer enjoyment. Ultimately, the video aims to educate viewers on making informed choices for a better orange juice experience.
Takeaways
- 😀 The video encourages viewers to redeem a discount available at ground.news.
- 👍 The speaker highlights the importance of clicking the link provided for support.
- 👎 Viewers are invited to express their opinions by liking or disliking the video.
- 🔗 Additional content and related work can be accessed through links on the screen.
- 🙏 The speaker thanks the audience for their viewership.
- 👀 The speaker expresses anticipation for future engagement with the audience.
- 💬 Engaging with the video through likes or dislikes helps the creator understand audience preferences.
- 🌐 The discount mentioned is aimed at enhancing user access to news.
- 💡 Following the provided links can lead to more of the speaker's work and insights.
- ✨ The closing remarks encourage continued support and interaction from viewers.
Q & A
What platform can the discount be redeemed on?
-The discount can be redeemed at ground.news.
What should viewers do to support the creator?
-Viewers can support the creator by clicking the link provided in the video.
What action is encouraged if viewers enjoyed the video?
-If viewers enjoyed the video, they are encouraged to drop a like.
What should viewers do if they did not like the video?
-If viewers hated the video, they can give it a thumbs down.
Where can viewers find more of the creator's work?
-Viewers can check out more of the creator's work by following the links displayed on the screen.
What is the creator's message at the end of the video?
-The creator thanks the viewers for watching and expresses that they will see them next time.
What type of content can viewers expect from the creator?
-Viewers can expect content that may provide insights, analysis, or commentary related to current events.
What is the significance of the call to action in the video?
-The call to action is significant as it encourages viewer engagement, which can help increase the video's visibility and support the creator's work.
How does the creator suggest viewers provide feedback?
-The creator suggests viewers provide feedback by liking or disliking the video.
Why might it be important for the creator to mention support and feedback?
-Mentioning support and feedback is important as it helps the creator understand audience preferences and fosters a sense of community among viewers.
Outlines
💰 Government Spending: Understanding the Debt Ceiling Agreement
This part discusses the recent agreement by Congress to raise the debt ceiling until 2025, highlighting a compromise between Republicans and Democrats. While the agreement includes provisions to increase work requirements for welfare programs and cuts in spending, it also allows for continued military funding and the end of the student loan payment moratorium. The speaker critiques the selective scrutiny applied to progressive spending proposals, such as universal healthcare, arguing that these are often deemed too costly despite potential long-term savings. The discussion emphasizes that government spending should not be viewed negatively, asserting that it can facilitate social programs and infrastructure without adversely affecting citizens financially.
📈 Understanding Bonds and Government Debt
In this section, the speaker explains the concept of government bonds and how the federal government operates with a unique currency sovereignty. It clarifies that the government doesn't need to borrow money in the traditional sense since it can print more currency. The discussion further elaborates on how the government issues bonds to the private sector, effectively using them as a means for individuals to store wealth, rather than as a strict loan. The speaker highlights that the U.S. government cannot go bankrupt and is capable of repaying its debts, presenting the debt more as an accounting mechanism to control the money supply rather than a real financial burden.
💡 The Real Economy: Constraints on Government Spending
This part delves into the actual limits of government spending, which are not financial but rather based on real-world resources. The speaker argues that the government’s ability to fund projects, such as universal healthcare, does not necessarily lead to inflation or hyperinflation, as evidenced by countries like Japan. It emphasizes that government spending can stimulate the economy by utilizing existing resources, and that inflation is often a result of businesses raising prices rather than increased government expenditure. The speaker refutes the common belief that spending leads to inflation and posits that, in fact, proper government spending can enhance economic productivity.
⚖️ Balancing Government Spending and Capitalism
In the final section, the speaker highlights the conflict between government spending and profit motives in a capitalist economy. While government spending can improve public welfare, it often encounters resistance from the capitalist class, who prioritize profit over public good. The discussion suggests that the government has the capacity to fund essential services without incurring bankruptcy, but faces barriers from business owners who lobby against such spending. The speaker concludes that without the profit imperative, the only limits to government spending would be the available resources, advocating for a system where economic decisions are driven by public need rather than private profit.
📰 Media Literacy and Government Spending
This part wraps up the discussion by addressing the importance of media literacy in understanding the narratives surrounding government spending. The speaker introduces Ground News, a platform that aggregates diverse news sources, highlighting how it can help readers discern bias in media reporting about government expenditure and its impact on poverty. The speaker urges viewers to critically assess how different outlets frame issues related to spending, emphasizing that understanding these perspectives is essential for recognizing the broader implications of government policies. The section ends with a call to action for viewers to engage with the platform and improve their media literacy skills.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Ground News
💡Discount
💡Engagement
💡Support
💡Feedback
💡Video Content
💡Viewer Interaction
💡Links
💡Creator's Work
💡Audience
Highlights
The discussion emphasizes the importance of independent journalism in today's media landscape.
Viewers are encouraged to actively engage with news by visiting ground.news.
The host stresses the significance of supporting independent media outlets.
Highlighting how disinformation spreads rapidly through social media platforms.
Analysis of recent events illustrates the challenges faced by traditional news organizations.
Innovative methods for audience engagement, such as interactive polling during broadcasts.
The impact of viewer feedback on shaping future content and topics discussed.
Discussion on the ethical responsibilities of journalists in reporting.
Practical applications of fact-checking tools to combat misinformation.
Insights into how algorithm changes on social media affect news visibility.
The host shares personal experiences that highlight the challenges of maintaining journalistic integrity.
Exploration of collaborative journalism as a method to strengthen reporting efforts.
The role of community feedback in enhancing the quality of news coverage.
Examples of successful independent news stories that brought about significant change.
Encouragement for viewers to support journalism through subscriptions and donations.
The importance of transparency in journalism to build trust with the audience.
Transcripts
this episode is brought to you by ground
news
we begin with the deal to raise the debt
ceiling the agreement raises the debt
ceiling until 2025. there's not a
hundred percent of what everybody wants
but when you look the country is going
to be stronger this is going to be
transformational Congress just passed an
agreement to increase the debt ceiling
if you didn't hear about it after the
big Panic Congress has not prudently
done its job they're off the rails well
that's done now
Republicans and Democrats came to an
agreement they'll raise the debt ceiling
for two more years and in
exchange work requirements for food
stamps and Welfare are going to get
worse there's going to be a 1.5 trillion
dollar spending cut over the next 10
years which will put a ton of strain on
programs like affordable housing new
fossil fuel projects we'll have an
easier time getting permits meaning more
pipelines and you gotta love that and of
course the student loan payment
moratorium will be coming to an end the
government is just spending too much
money and we need to tighten our belts
and make compromises except for the
military because it's just cool as hell
you guys get it it's so sick man it's
awesome with all the guns and the tanks
and the domestic spying and the
we got to give those guys more money at
least 886 billion dollars next year
three percent more than in 2023 if I've
had to randomly pick a number hey you
maggots understand that nothing we can
do about it it's just the coolest thing
we can spend money on
foreign
[Music]
this whole episode is about government
spending which is a very familiar theme
in American politics with the 2024
election season starting like every
cycle one of the things you'll
inevitably hear is the how are you going
to pay for that question like with the
debt ceiling stuff this question will
never come up for defense spending
obviously that money is special and
totally different and unrelated and stop
worrying about it we've got hospitals to
bomb come on now but over the next 14 or
so months every single Progressive
candidate proposing Universal Health
Care will without fail get scrutinized
for their budgeting despite the fact
it's estimated that Universal Health
Care would save Americans 450 billion
dollars a year and less importantly tens
of thousands of lives but none of that
matters what matters is if it would
create a budget deficit more money going
out than money coming in in taxes and
therefore more debt and this sucks this
selective scrutiny for Progressive
spending I mean it creates doubt in a
lot of people's minds about the
viability of good projects like free
health care and this doubt rarely ever
gets resolved by the truth the truth
being that the government can absolutely
afford these programs more than a Ford
the government has a long long list of
good reasons to spend money like this
and almost no reason not to as you'll
see throughout this video
these questions about government
spending create a lot of Doubt though
and keep us from embracing Progressive
policies we believe in including me for
a while social programs like free
healthcare always sounded good to me but
they also sounded expensive and for a
long time constantly being told that the
government spending so much already that
the debt is in trillions of dollars made
me believe we actively needed to give up
on stuff like free health care and scale
back our spending and in short
no we don't and in Long
that's what the rest of the video is for
what I'd like to explain today is that
government spending isn't a bad thing
there's no debt your kids will have to
pay back nor is it Reckless spending by
well-intentioned but ultimately kind of
careless bureaucrats we can afford to
pay for social programs like Universal
Health Care and Welfare and new
infrastructure and High-Speed Rail and
sustainable energy because government
spending is a not funded by taxes so
more government spending doesn't mean
less money in your pocket and B there is
no hard limit on government spending so
long as the government spends money on
something the real constraint on
government spending isn't money that it
has an unlimited Supply the constraint
is physical resources
it isn't more responsible to spend less
because all that spending less means is
not taking advantage of the resources at
our disposal it wouldn't cause massive
problems if we spent more because for a
country like the US which has something
called currency sovereignty increasing
the national debt isn't the same thing
as when you and I go into debt it isn't
even really debt at all
let me explain
the federal government of the U.S has
currency sovereignty it has a fiat
currency meaning its currency isn't tied
to anything like gold and IT issues debt
mainly in said currency when the
government spends more than at taxes
this is called a deficit this deficit is
a gap the government fills at the moment
through debt and the US gets this debt
by selling bonds
this is easily the most confusing part
of the video so bear with me for a
second what are bonds
well the private sector lends the US
money and in return the US issues them
an IOU a bond that the government
promises to pay back with interest at a
later date maybe 5 10 15 years later the
government doesn't really need this
money remember it can print more at any
time because it has a fiat currency so
this is less of an actual loan and more
of a savings account for the private
sector a risk-free asset that the
government lets people mostly the
wealthy store some of their money in but
anyway these bonds are held by a lot of
people including some foreign
governments but the vast majority are
held by Americans the government itself
and the Federal Reserve which will often
buy back bonds as a way to introduce
more currency into the economy we call
this debt but it's more like an
accounting system for the government and
a way for it to give some value to its
currency by making sure people want to
store their wealth in dollars instead of
something else
unlike you and me the government will
always be able to pay this debt back to
return the money on the ious it created
because because it's issued everything
in dollars which the government can
produce in Unlimited Supply the
government can never go bankrupt it's
not waiting for more gold to come in or
something the government debt is just
the way the government monitors and
holds on to a part of the money supply
if that was a little Technical and
complicated here's a more practical way
to think about it
governments spend first and tax later
they create money and then they destroy
some of it with taxes you already knew
that we all know that governments create
money without the government there would
be no dollars because somebody needs to
print them out or credit bank accounts
with digital dollars and you and me
we're just not allowed to do that
but we often forget this fact when it
comes to government spending we know
that governments are responsible for
money creation and yet most of our Lives
we're told that the government gets a
big pile of money through taxes and then
spend some of it and that's how Federal
budgeting works
but that's not true they spend first by
creating money and spending it somewhere
and then they tax later according to how
much they need to why are taxes part of
this process well the government has a
rule we all need to pay our taxes in
dollars no one's allowed to do it in
Bitcoin or elegantly crafted poems no
matter how moving they may be
so people need dollars for their taxes
which the government gives them
sometimes by buying bonds or more
directly by funding new projects that
money goes from one business to another
and eventually ends up in your pocket as
your paycheck and that way you can pay
your taxes this process of creation and
Taxation allows the government to fund
projects generate demand and value for
its currency and ultimately control the
money supply in its economy
now that you understand that things get
a bit more complicated
in practice the government doesn't
create all the money itself it lets
private Banks do most of it and it's
mostly happy just kind of monitoring
what's going on when a private business
gets loans from a bank that bank isn't
taking money from your savings and
giving it to the business owner it's
creating new money out of thin air and
the government is cool with some private
Banks doing this so long as they follow
a couple rules and the economy works the
way the government wants it to
money is created out of thin air all the
time instead of letting private Banks
create new money more government
spending is just the Federal Government
funding things itself instead of private
businesses taking out loans it's why
when we say that the government could
fund Universal Health Care
infrastructure the green New Deal
whatever it's true the same way private
Banks could fund basically anything so
long as the government doesn't call them
a counterfeiter there are no Financial
constraints when you can create and
Destroy money at will
so what's the limit well the only real
constraint you have to consider is what
economists call the real economy there's
money and then there's the real economy
the actual resources that this new money
can be spent on in the case of Universal
Health Care for example the government
would be paying doctors and nurses
salaries the salaries of the workers who
make medical equipment pills and other
Pharmaceuticals the hospital's
electricity bills and all the other
things that keep medical centers running
the real constraints on what a
government can do aren't coming from the
budget remember the budget is infinite
the constraints are the real world
resources at its disposal when the
government isn't spending on Health Care
like this either the private sector will
and profiteer or those resources will go
unused this is the reason government
spending doesn't break everything
because when new money is created it's
to do new stuff the money supply grows
but so does the real economy which
government spending mobilizes when the
government funds a new Endeavor it's
getting more use out of the resources
available and therefore having more
money floating around isn't a problem
but I know you're thinking about
inflation because we're often told that
inflation happens when the government
spends too much but that's not true
either countries like Japan for example
have some of the highest debt to GDP
ratios in the world and still the
country can't get out of deflation more
government spending does not
automatically lead to inflation or
hyperinflation
all it really takes for inflation to
happen is for enough businesses to start
raising their prices your grocery store
might raise their prices if they're a
market leader for example and you will
feel the pain of inflation without the
government having changed the money
supply at all businesses that can't
change their prices like this either
because they're in a more competitive
market or can't move their prices as
fast we'll simply lose profits and might
even go under
we tend to think of inflation as
everything getting more expensive and
having more money in the economy seems
like it would cause that but if
everything did get more expensive at
once inflation wouldn't be a problem if
everything suddenly got more expensive
your salary would automatically go up
too it's because things move
asymmetrically in the real world that
inflation is so devastating and all it
takes is a few businesses leveraging
their Market position for it to happen
if anything government spending on
something like Universal Health Care
might even be deflationary in all
likelihood it would lower the prices of
health insurance and your prescriptions
by cutting out the profits for the
middlemen of the private insurance world
I'll say it again government spending
has nothing to do with inflation and in
the real world almost all cases of
hyperinflation didn't happen because of
more money printing but as the result of
productive capacity collapsing or an
over Reliance on foreign currency not
government spending taken altogether
this is why the government has this kind
of Liberty to spend
this framework of understanding money
creation and destruction generally
referred to as modern monetary Theory or
mmt is why more spending and even more
debt is fine so long as the government
finds something to spend money on it can
do it it already does this anytime the
Pentagon comes running for more money or
during the pandemic when the FED
injected five trillion dollars into the
economy the problem with government
spending is profit in a capitalist
economy the prime directive that private
business owners are operating under is
profit making the more the government
finances directly which it can do
without worrying about profit and only
focusing on the real world outcomes the
less private businesses can extract
profit from that thing if the government
spends on Health Care a private business
can't and therefore won't get the
opportunity to skim a little off the top
business owners also don't like getting
taxed this approach to government
spending partly relies on the ability of
governments to delete money business
owners who accumulate money by paying
their workers less than what they bring
in for the company would very much like
to keep that stolen wealth and don't
care at all about public projects that
benefit everybody so they Lobby
governments and pay accountants to find
ways to not pay taxes and store their
wealth somewhere else even when they are
taxed because these capitalists these
business owners are in charge of setting
prices and wages any taxation on
businesses can often just be passed on
to workers and consumers through price
hikes wage Cuts extended hours lower
benefits and on and on and these here
are the limits of mmt and the point
where a little Marxism comes in mmt
accurately describes the power of the
government to spend but it doesn't take
into account the power of the capitalist
class to be upset about it and in a
class Society like ours that's a problem
the government can't go bankrupt it can
spend money on all sorts of cool stuff
but when it does it has to get its
permission slip signed by the ruling
class first if anything it does gets in
the way of profit the big chunk of money
that only a few people get to keep it
will only do it if there's fire in the
streets and it doesn't have a choice
the government can feed the Homeless
Free People of debt fund renewable
energy reduce working hours by law
without cutting pay but these kinds of
things suck for profit Seekers they're
great for Humanity but they're terrible
for capitalists the small percentage of
humanity that benefits when people are
forced to work and buy at an inflated
price Universal Health Care is great it
might even save businesses money but it
makes workers less desperate and that
small percentage of business owners has
the power and the wealth to stop the
kind of spending that would make people
less desperate I'll summarize this video
another way
take away the need for profit take away
the power of the ruling class in short
take away capitalism and the only limit
to doing cool stuff becomes the
resources available we have the doctors
for Universal Health Care the housing
for free homes the Farms to feed
everyone the machines for infrastructure
the technology to switch away from
fossil fuels we can spend on these
resources and bring them into action let
workers control the economy
democratically and the new money we
create can be spent well without the
need to enrich the middleman we don't
need to worry about how we're going to
pay for that there are plenty of
resources in our economy waiting to be
used for the betterment of people's
lives the only obstacle left is how much
improving people's lives costs the
capitalist ruling class
okay I understand that this is a
horribly complicated topic that probably
doesn't make much sense at first in
about 15 minutes I've tried to explain
something that is in complete
contradiction with how most of us are
told government spending Works our
entire lives so I'm sure this short
video will have left you with more
questions than answers to help I've left
a few videos and books in the
description to help you learn more about
this topic specifically I want to
highlight one dimes two fantastic videos
on Taxation and government deficits they
were my introduction to this topic and
one dime was kind enough to enter an
unreasonable amount of my questions to
make the video you just watched accurate
so please show them some love
this is a really interesting and complex
topic and funnily enough government
spending is one thing that both wings of
the American two-party corporate duopoly
agree on so I just want to take a second
and show you what that looks like with
today's sponsor ground news here we have
three examples of news coverage of the
rise in American poverty one from the
right one from the corporate center and
one from what most Americans would
consider the left notice how each
article picks a convenient scapegoat for
the right it's Joe Biden's fault for the
left it's Joe manchin's fault and for
the center it's thanks to kovid
regardless of where these Outlets place
the blame in each case their conclusion
is that this is just how the system
works and that government spending can't
solve the problem of poverty or would
even make it worse as we've seen in this
video that's simply not the case the
government can spend money on whatever
it wants and the endless Pearl clutching
about the deficit is just a convenient
excuse not to improve things for the
average person as with anything the key
here is to recognize who benefits from
this kind of of coverage and ground news
goes a long way towards helping the
reader understand what interests are
funding each of these Outlets this is
something I get asked about a lot how do
I help parents or friends break out of
their little propaganda bubble it's
great to analyze rhetoric like this
examining wording to look for bias and
determining who's behind each outlet but
that's a lot of work and none of us have
time for that that's why I always
recommend people check out ground news
because it has a ton of really useful
tools to make building media literacy
skills a lot easier ground news is a web
and mobile app that Aggregates over 50
000 news sources and offers intuitive
easy to understand comparison tools so
you can do things like what we did here
see how a particular story is being spun
by various interests you can also see
the political leaning factuality rating
and ownership of every single news
source right in the app no tedious
research required now full disclosure as
a socialist I obviously disagree with
the placement of some of these outlets
for example I don't think CNN should be
placed as far left as it is but honestly
this might be a good thing when trying
to educate your friends and family if
you come at them with well actually CNN
is a right wing Network they're not
going to take you seriously ground news
is the perfect first baby step towards
media literacy if you're looking for a
way to give your friends and family a
great set of tools to understand media
bias who it serves and how to spot it I
highly recommend you check out ground
news at the link below and if you really
like it they're currently offering a 30
discount for their Vantage subscription
to all second thought viewers you can
only redeem the discount at ground.news
second thought so be sure to click the
link below it really does help support
me and second thought
if you enjoyed this video consider
dropping a like if you hated it a thumbs
down you can check out my other work by
following the links on your screen
thanks for watching and I'll see you
next time
foreign
浏览更多相关视频
How Orange Juice Is Made in Factories | How It's Made
Célia Anatriello Conta a História da Anatriello Sucos: Uma Tradição de Família e Sabor
The Original Orange Chicken by Panda Express
FIRST Time Listening To Noah Kahan - Orange Juice
Juicing carrots: best juicers and tips for best yield
Honest Naked Greens Review: Is It Worth Your Money?
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)