Responding to YOUR Comments - Amazfit T-Rex 3 vs Garmin Fenix 8 (might delete)

Chase the Summit

9 Sept 202408:31

Summary

TLDRIn this video, Dave from 'Chase the Summit' addresses negative comments and accusations received after posting his reviews of the Amazfit T-Rex 3 and its comparison to the Garmin Fenix 8. He explains the review process on YouTube, emphasizing his ethical approach, independence from brand influence, and commitment to providing unbiased content. Dave highlights his frustration with personal attacks and defends his credibility, while encouraging constructive feedback from viewers. He also reflects on the human side of content creation, reminding viewers that creators are vulnerable to hurtful comments.

Takeaways

😀 The video is a response to recent negative comments received on reviews of the Amazfit T-Rex 3 and Garmin Phoenix 8 watches.
😡 Dave expresses frustration and surprise over the amount of hate, accusations, and personal attacks in the comments.
🛑 He clarifies that he doesn't get paid by brands like Garmin or Amazfit and strives to maintain objectivity and credibility in his reviews.
🕒 The review process often involves receiving products early under embargo agreements, but his final opinion is entirely his own.
📑 Dave takes viewer feedback seriously when creating content, often using it as inspiration for future videos, like the T-Rex 3 and Phoenix 8 comparison.
📝 He shares that he keeps a list of video ideas in apps like Google Keep and Apple Notes, many of which come from viewer comments.
🤔 Despite the criticism, he stands by his positive review of the Amazfit T-Rex 3, stating it's great for its price range ($279).
💵 He emphasizes that the Garmin Phoenix 8 has more features, which accounts for its much higher price, but encourages viewers to decide based on their own budget.
🧠 Dave feels hurt by the accusations and negative comments but reminds viewers that YouTube creators are human and can be affected by harsh feedback.
👍 He concludes by thanking his supportive viewers and encouraging those who don't trust his content to unsubscribe and avoid further engagement.

Q & A

What is the primary reason for Dave making this video?
-Dave made this video to address the negative comments and accusations he received after posting his recent reviews of the Amazfit T-Rex 3 and a comparison with the Garmin Phoenix 8.
What kind of comments did Dave receive that prompted this response?
-Dave received accusations of being biased, being paid by brands, and undermining his credibility. He also received negative and personal comments, such as people questioning his ethics and credibility.
How long has Dave been creating content on YouTube?
-Dave has been creating content on YouTube for three years.
What does Dave say about how brands work with reviewers like him?
-Dave explains that brands typically reach out to reviewers to offer their products ahead of release so reviewers can test and review them before launch. This process includes respecting an embargo, where the reviewer agrees not to release content before a specified date and time.
Does Dave accept payment from brands for positive reviews?
-No, Dave emphasizes that he has no affiliation with brands like Amazfit or Garmin, and he does not take money from them. Brands may provide him with early devices for review, but they do not pay him or influence his opinions.
How does Dave ensure the credibility of his reviews?
-Dave strives to keep his reviews unbiased and critical. He aims to provide genuine opinions on products, as he values his credibility and wants to create content that his viewers can trust.
What motivated Dave to create the comparison between the Amazfit T-Rex 3 and the Garmin Phoenix 8?
-Dave created the comparison video based on feedback from his viewers. He noticed a high volume of comments asking for a comparison between the two watches, which led him to create the side-by-side review.
How does Dave respond to claims that he changed his opinion on the Amazfit T-Rex 3?
-Dave clarifies that he has not changed his opinion on the Amazfit T-Rex 3. He still stands by his positive review of the watch, but also emphasizes that the Garmin Phoenix 8 has its own advantages, which is why it is priced higher.
How does Dave generate content ideas for his YouTube channel?
-Dave keeps a running list of content ideas in Google Keep and Apple Notes. Many of these ideas come from viewer comments and feedback, which he takes seriously when deciding on future videos.
What does Dave encourage viewers to do if they question his credibility or don’t enjoy his content?
-Dave encourages viewers who don't enjoy his content or question his credibility to unsubscribe from his channel and hide it from their YouTube accounts.

Outlines

00:00

🎥 Addressing Criticism and Negative Comments

In this introduction, Dave from Chase the Summit explains that he is making a different kind of video to address negative and hateful comments from his recent reviews of the Amazfit T-Rex 3 and Garmin Phoenix 8. Despite being experienced with online criticism, he's shocked by the recent accusations about his credibility and ethics. Dave clarifies that this video is not about the products themselves but a response to the allegations that have been bothering him deeply. He emphasizes his commitment to unbiased reviews and how negative feedback about his character is what truly affects him.

05:02

🛠️ Ethics and the Review Process

Dave outlines how the review process works for YouTubers like himself, including receiving products early under embargo agreements. Brands provide products ahead of launch for reviewers to create content, but this does not guarantee a positive review. He stresses that maintaining his credibility is key, and although he has relationships with brands like Garmin and Amazfit, they do not influence his opinions. Dave explains that honesty and authenticity guide his reviews, and he wants to be a role model for his children, ensuring that his work reflects his integrity.

💡 Content Ideation and Viewer Input

Dave describes how he generates ideas for his videos. He keeps a running list of potential topics based on feedback from his audience, using platforms like Google Keep. He takes viewer requests seriously, and the recent comparison between the Amazfit T-Rex 3 and Garmin Phoenix 8 was created based on hundreds of comments asking for this content. He explains how this feedback loop from viewers informs the direction of his videos and how he tries to provide relevant content for his audience.

😡 Dealing with Hurtful Comments

Dave addresses the criticism he received after posting the comparison video between the Phoenix 8 and Amazfit T-Rex 3. Some viewers accused him of being biased or 'paid off' by Garmin, questioning his credibility. Dave reads out some of the harsh comments, expressing disbelief at the level of distrust. He reassures viewers that he has no affiliation with either brand and that he stands by his reviews, defending the integrity of his process. He makes it clear that he aims to provide facts and that viewers should make their own purchasing decisions based on the information.

⌚ Clarifying His Position on the Watches

Dave stands firm on his positive review of the Amazfit T-Rex 3, stating that it is a great value for its price range but objectively different from the much more expensive Garmin Phoenix 8. He reiterates that while the Phoenix 8 offers more features, it does not justify its steep price point for everyone. He advises viewers to make purchasing decisions based on their budget and needs. Dave hopes that his reviews provide enough clarity to help people decide between the two watches, highlighting the fact that there are many options in the market.

🙌 Thanking Supporters and Final Thoughts

As the video concludes, Dave acknowledges his loyal viewers and thanks them for their continued support and positive comments. He also advises anyone questioning his credibility to simply unsubscribe rather than continue watching his content. He opens up about the emotional toll of reading negative comments and emphasizes that creators on YouTube are human too, with feelings that can be hurt. Finally, he encourages viewers to support content creators they appreciate by engaging with their videos through likes and comments. Dave wraps up by expressing his hope that this video cleared up misunderstandings and apologizes for its length.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Amazfit T-Rex 3

The Amazfit T-Rex 3 is a sports watch mentioned in the video. It is a device that the video creator, Dave, reviewed positively due to its features and price point. The watch is highlighted as a more affordable alternative to higher-end sports watches, and it becomes a central point of discussion in the video as viewers request a comparison with another watch, the Garmin Phoenix 8.

💡Garmin Phoenix 8

The Garmin Phoenix 8 is another sports watch that Dave compares to the Amazfit T-Rex 3 in a follow-up video. It is priced significantly higher than the Amazfit T-Rex 3 and is noted for having more advanced features. The comparison between these two watches is a focal point of viewer interest and the video's content.

💡Ethics

Ethics in the context of the video refers to the moral principles that guide Dave's conduct, particularly in his role as a reviewer. He addresses concerns about potential bias or being paid off by brands, emphasizing his commitment to honest and unbiased reviews despite receiving products from manufacturers before their public release.

💡Embargo

An embargo is a restriction on the release of information to the public until a certain date. In tech reviewing, embargoes are common; brands provide reviewers with products under the agreement that they won't publish reviews until the launch date. Dave explains this process to clarify how he gets early access to products and reassure viewers of his independence.

💡In-depth reviews

In-depth reviews are comprehensive evaluations of products that Dave creates for his channel. He discusses how he strives to be unbiased and critical in these reviews to maintain credibility with his audience. The Amazfit T-Rex 3 review is an example, where he details the watch's features and performance.

💡Side-by-side comparison

A side-by-side comparison is a method of evaluating two products by analyzing their features and specifications concurrently. Dave creates such a comparison video in response to viewer requests to understand how the Amazfit T-Rex 3 and the Garmin Phoenix 8 differ, despite the significant price difference.

💡Viewer feedback

Viewer feedback is the comments and reactions from the audience that influence the content Dave creates. He mentions reading comments and using them to generate content ideas, such as the comparison video between the two watches, showing how viewer engagement shapes the direction of his channel.

💡Credibility

Credibility in the video refers to the trustworthiness and reliability of Dave's reviews. He defends his credibility against accusations of bias, emphasizing that his reviews are based on his honest opinions and are not influenced by brand payments or other external factors.

💡Vulnerability

Vulnerability is the emotional exposure Dave experiences when facing negative comments and accusations. He discusses the impact such feedback has on him personally, highlighting that despite his experience, negative comments can still affect him and other content creators.

💡Ideation process

The ideation process is how Dave comes up with content ideas for his videos. He mentions using Google Keep and Apple Notes to jot down ideas, many of which stem from viewer feedback. This process shows his methodical approach to creating content that resonates with his audience.

💡Unsubscribe

Unsubscribe is an action viewers can take if they no longer wish to follow Dave's channel. He directly addresses viewers who question his credibility, suggesting they unsubscribe if they do not find his content valuable, indicating his commitment to providing value to those who choose to follow his work.

Highlights

Dave addresses the rise in negative comments on his recent reviews of the Amazfit T-Rex 3 and its comparison with the Garmin Phoenix 8.

He explains that he's been doing YouTube for 3 years and has developed thick skin, but accusations questioning his ethics have particularly bothered him.

Dave clarifies that he's not discussing the watches in this video but instead addressing concerns about his content creation process and credibility.

He explains how embargoes work for product reviewers, highlighting that brands provide products ahead of launch but have no influence over the final review.

Dave emphasizes that while he does receive products from brands like Garmin and Amazfit, his reviews are unbiased, as he values his credibility.

He notes that he incorporates his opinions in reviews because he believes they add value, alongside providing factual, objective information.

Dave reveals his content ideation process, stating that he keeps a rolling list of ideas and often bases content on viewer feedback.

The side-by-side comparison of the Amazfit T-Rex 3 and Garmin Phoenix 8 was based on over 100 viewer comments asking for it.

He points out that while the Garmin Phoenix 8 is significantly more expensive than the Amazfit T-Rex 3, his review comparison was objective and based on the facts.

Dave expresses confusion over some comments accusing him of being biased towards Garmin, asking whether these are real people or bots.

He strongly denies any affiliation with Garmin or Amazfit, explaining that brands do not pay him, nor do they have any control over his content.

Dave reiterates that he stands by his positive review of the Amazfit T-Rex 3, praising it as a great watch for its price point.

He explains that while the Garmin Phoenix 8 has more features, its high price point doesn’t mean everyone should buy it; there are great alternatives at lower prices.

Dave encourages viewers who question his credibility to unsubscribe and stop watching his content if they don't trust him.

In conclusion, he thanks his supportive viewers and emphasizes the importance of recognizing that YouTubers are human beings with feelings.