Justin Trudeau's new bill SHUTS ME DOWN and makes your opinion ILLEGAL.
Summary
TLDRIn this video, the host discusses censorship issues surrounding Bill C63 and the Canadian government's restrictions on free speech, particularly regarding online content and political commentary. The host shares a personal experience of having a YouTube livestream demonetized for showing a parody clip, emphasizing the growing limitations on free expression. The video also highlights concerns about proposed legislation, such as criminalizing dissent on certain historical events like residential schools. The host calls for open discussion, urging viewers to reflect on the implications of such censorship in Canada’s democracy.
Takeaways
- 😀 The video introduces the 'Friday Night Fringe' live stream, where the host and his wife discuss politics, share memes, and engage with the community.
- 😄 A clip from a previous stream was demonetized by YouTube, which the host claims is a result of internet censorship, particularly involving a parody of Justin Trudeau.
- 😅 The host discusses Bill C63 and Justin Trudeau's efforts to limit free speech under the guise of protecting families and children from online harm.
- 😇 The host claims that censorship is becoming more prominent, citing his demonetized content as an example of how YouTube suppresses voices critical of the government.
- 🤔 The host criticizes how independent media, like Rebel News, is being marginalized and even denied journalistic accreditation and funding in Canada.
- 🙄 A portion of the video touches on a new Canadian law proposed by an NDP MP, which would criminalize denial or downplaying of the residential school system's harm, framing it as hate speech.
- 😲 The host expresses skepticism about some claims surrounding the unmarked graves of indigenous children, stating there is insufficient evidence, and warns against the potential consequences of silencing opposing views.
- 😡 The video raises concerns that censorship could be expanded beyond Indigenous issues, with broader implications for free speech in Canada.
- 😳 The host criticizes the government’s control over online content, linking this to the broader issue of Bill C63, which he claims is designed to stifle free expression on the internet.
- 😎 The video concludes with a call for the audience to engage in the conversation, participate in the weekly Friday live stream, and resist government overreach by supporting the channel.
Q & A
What is the main topic of the video discussed in the transcript?
-The main topic of the video revolves around censorship, specifically related to Bill C63 in Canada, internet censorship, and how it affects free speech. The creator also touches on demonetization issues on YouTube and the government's actions in controlling narratives.
What is Bill C63, according to the speaker?
-Bill C63 is described as a Canadian law proposed to limit free speech under the guise of protecting families and children from online harms. The speaker argues that it’s more about censorship and silencing voices critical of the government, specifically those critical of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
How does the speaker describe YouTube's censorship of their content?
-The speaker explains that YouTube demonetized their stream for showing a parody clip of Justin Trudeau, claiming it infringed on copyright due to featuring footage from Stephen Colbert's show. Despite the parody being protected under fair use, YouTube refused to lift the demonetization.
What example does the speaker give of parody content that was demonetized by YouTube?
-The speaker shares an example of a dubbed video featuring an altered interview of Justin Trudeau, in which Trudeau humorously claims Fidel Castro is his father and admits to liking blackface. This parody was flagged and demonetized by YouTube.
What concerns does the speaker raise about Bill C63 and freedom of speech?
-The speaker is concerned that Bill C63 will criminalize individuals for expressing opinions that disagree with the government. They fear that speaking against the official narrative on sensitive issues could lead to jail time, essentially eroding freedom of speech in Canada.
How does the speaker connect YouTube's actions to the broader topic of government censorship?
-The speaker suggests that YouTube’s demonetization of their content is part of a broader trend where the government, particularly Justin Trudeau’s administration, is using its influence to control narratives on platforms like YouTube by suppressing content critical of the government.
What are the speaker’s views on residential school denialism and the proposed amendment to criminalize it?
-The speaker questions the lack of proof regarding some claims about unmarked graves at residential schools, particularly referencing the Kamloops case. They believe that while residential schools were tragic, criminalizing dissenting opinions without concrete evidence sets a dangerous precedent for free speech.
What does the speaker say about the future impact of Bill C63 on content creators?
-The speaker warns that Bill C63 could lead to further suppression of content creators, especially those who express views contrary to the government. They mention that creators could face legal consequences simply for sharing opinions or discussing controversial topics.
What additional example does the speaker provide to show government control over media narratives?
-The speaker points to Rebel News being denied government subsidies and journalistic recognition, stating that this is another example of the government controlling media by limiting the reach of outlets critical of the government.
What does the speaker encourage the audience to do in response to the censorship they describe?
-The speaker encourages viewers to subscribe, like, and comment on their videos to help push back against YouTube’s algorithm, which they believe suppresses content that challenges government narratives. They also urge viewers to join their live streams for open discussions on political issues.
Outlines
🎥 Introduction and Friday Night Stream Recap
The speaker welcomes viewers to their channel, referencing a recent Friday night live stream with their wife. The stream involved community interaction, funny clips, and discussions about politics. They encourage viewers to subscribe and join future live streams. The speaker briefly mentions Bill C63 and internet censorship, criticizing Justin Trudeau's efforts to limit free speech under the guise of protecting families from online harms.
📺 Parody Video and YouTube Censorship
The speaker recalls showing a parody video during the live stream, in which Justin Trudeau humorously admits to controversial claims, like Fidel Castro being his father and his fondness for blackface. The video, although a parody, was flagged by YouTube for copyright infringement. Despite filing an appeal, the video remained demonetized, which the speaker views as an example of growing censorship on the platform. They argue that the video was fair use and that YouTube’s actions reflect a broader suppression of content that criticizes Trudeau.
⚖️ The Impact of Bill C63 on Free Speech
The speaker transitions to discussing Bill C63 and its potential to suppress free speech. They express concern about how the Canadian government, led by Trudeau, is censoring independent media and stifling opinions that challenge the official narrative. They point out the demonetization and suppression of certain creators, alleging that YouTube, influenced by the government, is preventing content critical of Trudeau from reaching audiences.
📢 Residential School Denialism and the Criminalization of Dissent
The speaker critiques a new bill proposed by the NDP that would criminalize denialism regarding the residential school system in Canada. They highlight a tweet from Harrison Fauler, expressing opposition to the bill, which could classify opinions that deny or downplay the system's atrocities as hate speech. The speaker acknowledges the harm caused by residential schools but stresses the importance of proof when making serious claims. They suggest that criminalizing differing views on historical events sets a dangerous precedent for free speech.
🧑⚖️ Concerns About Expanding Censorship
The speaker emphasizes the broader implications of the proposed legislation, questioning where such censorship could lead beyond the issue of indigenous rights. They argue that allowing the government to criminalize differing opinions could extend to other areas, like criticism of Trudeau's policies, and recall past instances where the government used questionable science to justify its actions. The speaker highlights the potential dangers of limiting public discourse.
🛑 Slippery Slope of Limiting Free Speech
The speaker reflects on the slippery slope of government censorship, noting how virtue signaling and overprotective laws could expand to stifle dissent across multiple topics, not just indigenous issues. They reiterate the need for open debate, evidence, and the preservation of free speech, warning that such laws could target not only public opinions but also independent media and content creators.
📢 Final Thoughts and Call to Action
The speaker closes by encouraging viewers to leave comments and share their opinions on Bill C63 and the criminalization of dissent. They note that a conservative MP, Michelle Rempel Garner, is proposing an amendment to the bill to protect children without infringing on free speech. The speaker invites the audience to join future discussions in their live streams and to engage with their content by liking and subscribing, especially to counteract YouTube’s algorithm, which they believe suppresses their videos.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Bill C63
💡Censorship
💡Fair use
💡Parody
💡Justin Trudeau
💡Hate speech
💡Residential schools
💡Rebel News
💡Demonetization
💡Freedom of speech
Highlights
Introduction to The Fringe's Friday night live stream with Mrs. Fringe
Call to action for viewers to subscribe and enable notifications for live streams
Discussion on Bill C63 and internet censorship
Criticism of Justin Trudeau's attempt to limit speech on the internet
Humorous video involving Justin Trudeau was demonetized by YouTube
Explanation of parody as fair use and YouTube's response
Concerns about the implications of Bill C63 on free speech
Mentions of other outlets like True North and Rebel News facing censorship
The potential for jail time for expressing opinions the government disagrees with
NDP's bill on a National Day of Reconciliation and its implications for free speech
Critique of the lack of physical evidence to support certain claims about residential schools
Discussion on the potential slippery slope of government-enforced opinions
Concerns about the impact of government control on media and information
The importance of freedom of speech in a democratic society
Invitation for viewer engagement in the comments section
Reminder about the live streaming show 'Friday Night Fringe' and its schedule
Transcripts
oh
yeah what's going on ladies and
gentlemen welcome back to The Fringe if
you joined me here on the Channel with
my beautiful wife Mrs Fringe on Friday
for Friday night Fringe this past week
which if you haven't already you really
should be hitting that subscribe button
and your bell for notifications to join
us for every week on our Friday Night
live streams we showed some funny clips
in that stream we always use that time
to sit down and chat with the community
not just about things that have happened
in the past week with politics but we
have some laughs we talk about some
quirky fun things sometimes we show
memes sometimes we share different
materials that are kind of fun to give
everybody a light-hearted jab at what's
happening in our society now I won't be
playing the clip today but uh it ties
into what's happening with Bill
C63 and internet sensorship now we all
know that Justin Trudeau is trying to
limit everyone's speech when it comes to
the internet that he says it's to
protect families and children from
online harms when really it's about
Justin Trudeau not really enjoying
anybody making fun of him they don't
like when people talk against their
rhetoric I do have a video coming up to
prove that later on in this video but I
wanted to talk specifically about the
live stream because in that video I
showed a clip of an altered version of
the interview from when Justin trau
embarrassingly sat on Steven colar this
past week uh to which it was a a a
dubbed video of Trudeau saying that
Fidel Castro was his father that his
mother was with MC Jagger that you know
all the that he likes blackface like
that Canada hates him it was a really
funny video now again I won't be showing
that clip in here uh you can always go
back and watch it from Friday night's
live stream uh but but the reason I'm
bringing that up is because censorship
is Alive and Well YouTube actually
demonetized the stream and said that
this was a clip from Steven kar's actual
Show Now what's funny about that
is that parody is part of fair use there
is no ruling against using uh dubbed
audio to make fun of a political figure
now evidently I figured at this time hey
maybe this is a problem uh maybe their
algorithm automatically detected that
you know because there were images of Co
bear because the voice sounds like Co
bear because Justin Trudeau's there in
the voice sounds like Justin tau's voice
that perhaps they just mistakenly
thought that this was part of interview
with Steven coar and I was in fact
ripping off the show as the strike
against the
channel titled Steven kar's episode so
of course like any normal YouTuber I did
my due diligence I filed a uh request to
have that removed I stated my case that
hey this is a dubbed parody of the
interview there is no copyright
infringing material that we took from
this it was all in good fun it was part
of it was part of parody which is
covered by fair use um and where I say
censorship is alive and well is that
even after proving that YouTube still
shot down the video still demonetized it
and said nope uh we're not going to
allow that to fly you're you're still
taking copyright material from Steven
colar uh and dispersing it on the
internet
now what's funny about that is that
censorship has already began now I
really don't care if they demonetize a
live stream that's part of the nature of
the business and I put that video out
because I thought it was bloody
hilarious and I still think it's
hilarious but what's funny about C63 as
we get closer to the Amendments that are
being made on C63 is that Justin Trudeau
is always saying well we're not trying
to censor online creators we've already
seen them censoring outfits like True
North like Rebel news from being found
in common Google search results we've
seen recently that Rebel news was denied
uh their credits for filing as a
journalist outfit uh they've been told
that they will not be getting any
government subsidies for uh journalistic
business practices they weren't being
recognized as a journalistic
institution uh and now we're starting to
see that people's free speech is being
taken away and it's going to be taken
away in fact if you say certain things
now that the government doesn't like
well you can be jailed you're going to
be jailed for having an opinion or
expressing your opinions now we've seen
already and the reason I brought up the
YouTube stream uh is because Justin
Trudeau has obviously we've already seen
millions of dollars being funneled out
to companies like Google who own YouTube
to be told hey if you're talking
negatively about Captain tampon uh we're
not going to boost those videos we're
not going to put them in our algorithm
and now we're getting to the point where
even if you haven't done anything wrong
if you haven't tripped over any lines
which again I've checked thoroughly with
other creators I've checked with other
uh people who work on the platform and
they've all said the same thing this is
fair use um that Google Now is starting
to say n we're just not going to allow
it because we just don't want too no
reasoning behind it they're just going
to demonetize they're going to shut it
down um and now the NDP who are in bed
with the Liberals tbling a bill about a
National Day of Reconciliation which is
coming up saying that if you don't agree
with
their statements their
rhetoric you can be charged with ha
speech you can go to jail in fact making
this video could essentially have me
landed with hate speech so it's far
beyond having a
demonetized we've got here Harrison
fauler tweeting out radical leftist NDP
MP just tabled a bill that would
criminalize so-called residential school
denialism if passed it would be illegal
in Canada to say that the residential
school system was not a genocide which
it was not this is totally insane now
again this is Harrison fauler opinion
now I will say that when you look at
what happened in residential schools
from children being taken from their
families being forced to speak English
languages the treatment that they got of
course I don't agree with a lot of that
um I'm I'm grateful for what's happened
with residential schools but essentially
what we're talking about here when it
comes to uh the Day of Reconciliation is
in fact it's often used to
highlight uh the supposed alleged and
I'm going to say alleged YouTube because
we haven't found any proof yet um
unmarked Graves of hundreds of
indigenous children
now the reason I bring that up we've
covered it to a great extent here on the
channel if somebody or some outfit wants
to provide me with some kind of physical
proof that they have found the remains
of abused children I will happily report
on that I will happily
agree that that portion of what is
discussed is a travesty but essentially
what you're seeing
here um and I'm referring to the
residential school in cam loops where
again they've done uh thermal scans of
the area they've found tree roots so far
there hasn't
been to my
knowledge Again YouTube to my knowledge
a single body found as of yet to share
the evidence of what the government is
virtue signaling um but essentially this
bill saying that if you don't agree with
that you can be charged with hate speech
you can um if you're going to deny it
that's a hate crime this all ties into
C63 coming to def fruition and
essentially being told here that even if
you share a different view or opinion
than the
government you're a criminal let's take
a listen to the absurdity of what's
being proposed in the House of Commons M
gazan seconded by Mout moves for leave
to introduce a bill entitled an act to
amend the criminal code promotion of
hatred against indigenous peoples this
motion is deemed adopted The Honorable
member from Winnipeg Mr Speaker speaker
today I Rise to table an act to amend
the criminal code promotion of hatred
against indigenous peoples if pass this
bill would add to the criminal code the
offense of willfully promoting hatred
against indigenous peoples by condoning
denying justifying or downplaying the
harm caused by the residential school
system in Canada calling irrefutable
historical facts into question a
genocidal project that was recognized as
as such unanimously in the house so I
just want to pause on that because again
it's saying that if you have a different
opinion if you feel that their statement
of events is in any way misconstrued or
that again like me you just want some
form of proof of what they're
saying it's a hate speech now she's
saying that the house unanimously stood
behind that um that the house identified
that what happened was a travesty and
again there were certain things that
went on in residential schools that
again I I um I don't support that I
condemn however when talking about
certain aspects of residential
schools I think that if you're going to
State those claims if you're going to
make those claims you should have proof
behind it and this has nothing to do
with indigenous people the reason this
is a slippery slope is because you have
an indigenous
MP who
coming out and saying you're going to
agree with what we say or else it's a
hate crime where does it end outside of
indigenous where does it end for if you
don't agree with Justin Trudeau it's a
hate crime uh you think back to the
pandemic when they talked about science
when they talked about we have experts
who um are are Towing the line for us
that are saying that everything is
irrefutable and all these years later we
find that certain things in fact were
not irrefutable at all they were just
merely people lining their pockets being
told again to tow a line and convey a
message so if this is adopted out of
virtue signaling out of saying well you
know we want to look after the
indigenous we want to make sure we don't
offend anybody we don't want to be
racist where does this kind of ability
to push for these kinds of
criminal attributes will say and in
terms of Canadian citizens being allowed
to have an opinion to voice their
opinions to again require a discussion
and proof of what's being stated before
they approve of or deny what took place
somewhere survivors and their families
deserve to heal from this
intergenerational tragedy and be free
from violent hate and we cannot allow
their safety and well-being to be put
further at risk all parliamentarians
must stand firm against all forms of
damaging hate speech including the not
the the denial of the tragedy of the
residential schools in Canada and at a
time of increasing residential school
denialism including from some
parliamentarians survivors their
families and communities need protection
and a platform to share our history in
honor of orange shirt day I extend this
gift to you on behalf of me and all of
my colleagues may you find Justice and
healing in the protection
of your stories thank you very
much so again I don't want to downplay
anybody's personal experiences or say
that uh anybody is wrong for the things
that have happened in their families um
for those who do suffer any kind of
Injustice of course you want them to
feel uh as though justice has been
served however the government coming out
and saying that anyone who has a
difference in opinion is a criminal is a
very slippery slope again this has
nothing to do with indigenous this has
to do with where this can be extended
into day-to-day life and of course with
the government we've always seen that if
you give an inch they take a mile when
we talk about the online harms act when
we talk about censoring videos when we
talk about shutting down content
creators when we talk about shutting
down Independent Media that isn't funded
by the government and shield paid
prostitutes what does this mean for how
you absorb your information what does
this mean for how you get your news what
does this mean for stating your opinion
in a country that's supposed to have the
protection of freedom of speech let me
know what you guys think Down Below in
the comments do you agree with this do
you agree uh with the criminality that's
going on do you agree with uh Bill
C63 um do you think that again things
are going to get better now it is worth
noting before we quit the video that
Michelle rmle Garnier of the
conservatives has said that she's going
to propose an amendment to Bill C63 and
that she does agree with certain aspects
of it in terms of protecting children
that again without the requirement of a
digital ID that uh people can
essentially protect their kids online if
that in fact is the worry but what we're
talking about here the the barbaric
nature of how Bill C63 has been
constructed is essentially to silence
people on the internet when the
government doesn't like what you're
saying let me know what you guys think
Down Below in the the comments if it's
your first time here I hope this video
has earned your subscription make sure
to leave a thumbs up or a comment down
below if you enjoyed this video again
when we talk about these things on the
channel they always get pushed down
YouTube again once doesn't like pushing
it out because that's their job uh but
it does help us get a little bit above
that algorithm so if you enjoyed the
content leave a thumbs up and a Content
comment down below if you're hitting
that subscribe button also make sure to
click on your bell for notifications and
join me once again live here on the
channel each and every Friday night for
Friday night Fringe our live streaming
show where we're going to go over
everything that happened in the previous
week in politics everything coming up in
the week ahead as well as some back and
forth with our community especially ones
that get us banned and shut down on
YouTube those are always the fun ones uh
it all goes down here on the channel
every Friday at 6 P p.m. Pacific 800
p.m. Central and I look forward to
seeing each and every one of you there
this upcoming Friday I hope you guys
enjoy this video and have a great rest
of your day I'll catch you on the next
one
浏览更多相关视频
Zuckerberg Admits He Censored, Plans To Censor Even More
What are the limits of free speech? | Big Think
Will They Arrest Me For Saying This?
MUSK CONFIRMS WHITNEY WEBB'S WARNINGS! THIS IS OUT OF HAND! (BLACKROCK DOLLARIZING BITCOIN)
Fake News von oben und Journalisten als Spitzel für den Staat - Weltwoche Daily DE, 26.01.2024
Kamala: "F*** The 4A Too!" | Military Red Flag Laws | Feds Buy 100s Of Switches
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)