It's not only about the American Revolution, Leutze's Washington Crossing the Delaware

Smarthistory
11 Mar 202009:57

Summary

TLDRThis video script explores an in-depth analysis of the iconic painting 'Washington Crossing the Delaware.' Guided by Sarah Alvarez, the discussion focuses on observing the painting closely, raising questions about its creation, scale, and historical context. The group reflects on the composition, symbolism, and artist Emanuel Leutze's intent, emphasizing the painting's relevance to both 1776 and 1851. Through a detailed exploration of figures, colors, and brushstrokes, the script uncovers how the artwork inspired hope for unity during the American Revolution and in a divided pre-Civil War America.

Takeaways

  • 🎨 The discussion revolves around the painting 'Washington Crossing the Delaware' by Emanuel Leutze.
  • 👀 The method of analysis focuses on close observation and questioning rather than assumptions.
  • ❄️ The painting depicts a historical event during a cold, wintery scene.
  • 🖼️ The large size of the painting is a striking feature, suggesting it was not meant for a private home.
  • 🚢 The composition shows a multitude of figures in boats, all moving in the same direction, indicating a collective action.
  • 👤 A central figure stands out, determined and seemingly immune to the cold, drawing attention and symbolizing leadership.
  • 🧥 The figures are distinct, wrapped in their own worlds, wearing different clothing, suggesting diversity within the group.
  • 🌌 The use of light and color creates a contrast between the natural world and the man-made elements.
  • 🖌️ The painting's brushstrokes and details are precise, yet there is a sense of animation and tension.
  • 🗓️ The painting was created much later than the event it depicts, reflecting the artist's contemporary context.
  • 🌟 The artwork was intended to inspire and provide hope during a time of political unrest and division.

Q & A

  • What is the significance of taking time to look closely at a painting, as suggested by Sarah Alvarez?

    -Sarah Alvarez emphasizes the importance of close observation to understand the details and ask questions about the artist's choices, materials, and intentions, which helps deepen our appreciation of the artwork.

  • What is the initial reaction of the speakers to the painting, and what strikes them most?

    -Beth initially empathizes with the cold weather depicted, while Steven is struck by the large size of the canvas and the amount of time it must have taken to create it.

  • Why do the speakers wonder about the size and setting of the painting?

    -The size of the painting leads Steven to ask where it was intended to be displayed, as it seems too large for a home, suggesting that it was meant for a public or monumental setting.

  • What details in the painting suggest that the figures are moving in a particular direction?

    -The figures are all packed into boats, facing the same direction, and their actions—such as rowing—indicate they are moving across a body of water.

  • How do the speakers interpret the central figure in the painting?

    -The central figure is seen as a determined leader, standing tall and distinct from the other figures. His face is the only one in full profile, and the surrounding lines emphasize his importance.

  • What role do the warm and cool colors play in the painting, according to the speakers?

    -The cooler colors represent the natural elements (sky, water), while the warmer colors are used for the manmade elements, such as the clothing and the boat, creating a contrast that adds to the painting's tension.

  • What historical context do the speakers provide for the subject of the painting?

    -The painting depicts George Washington crossing the Delaware River in 1776, a turning point in the American Revolution that boosted the morale of his troops after several defeats.

  • Why did Emanuel Leutze paint this in Germany, and how does it relate to the revolutions of 1848?

    -Leutze painted it in Dusseldorf, Germany, and the painting reflects his sympathy for the failed European revolutions of 1848. It was meant to inspire hope for revolutionaries seeking to overthrow old regimes.

  • How does the painting address themes of unity and revolution?

    -The diverse figures in the painting suggest that revolutions are made possible by the unity of people from different backgrounds, and the painting promotes the idea that unity is crucial for revolutionary success.

  • What was the public reception of the painting in 1851, and why was it significant at that time?

    -The painting was extremely popular, drawing large crowds. It resonated with Americans because it symbolized unity during a time of growing sectionalism, particularly around the issue of slavery, offering hope for the nation.

Outlines

00:00

🎨 Reflecting on the Painting Process

Beth and Steven are in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, observing a well-known painting. They introduce Sarah Alvarez, Director of School Programs at the Art Institute of Chicago, who helps guide a reflective process on the artwork. Rather than relying on assumptions, the group emphasizes close observation, prompting a discussion about how the painting was made, what materials were used, and why the canvas is so large. These questions lead to further inquiry about the painting's composition and the possible reasons for its size.

05:03

🚤 Observing the Figures and Their Context

The group notices the arrangement of figures in the painting, especially a tall, determined figure in the foreground leading others across a body of water. The figures appear disconnected, wrapped in their own worlds, while wearing different clothing. The setting seems cold and frozen, with cloudy skies. Steven points out that some figures, like the flag-bearer, seem unaffected by the cold, maintaining focus and determination despite the harsh environment. This contrast between chaos and stillness sparks questions about the relationships among the figures and their leader.

💡 Visual and Symbolic Details

Beth highlights the importance of diagonal lines pointing to the right, despite the boat moving left. These lines and the placement of oars and flagpoles frame the central figure, emphasizing his significance. Sarah and Beth discuss how the leader's profile resembles a figure on a coin and how the lighting evokes religious imagery, deepening the sense of importance and symbolism. They then move to explore more fundamental elements, like color and brushstrokes, where natural elements appear in cool tones while human-made objects and clothing use warmer colors, creating tension within the composition.

🖌️ Artistic Choices and Their Effects

The group continues to analyze the painting's details, noting the contrast between the stillness of individual brushstrokes and the animated feeling of the scene. The meticulous attention to elements like clothing, such as fur caps and bags, helps differentiate the figures and draw viewers into the painting. The conversation explores how the painting holds attention over time, initially making a powerful impression, but then encouraging viewers to discover smaller, intricate details. These observations lead to reflections on the artist's choices and the potential messages embedded in the painting.

📜 Historical Context and Artist's Intentions

Beth introduces the painting's title, *Washington Crossing the Delaware*, and corrects the assumption that it was created in 1776, noting instead that it was made 75 years later. The group discusses the historical significance of Washington's crossing and its pivotal role in the Revolutionary War. They then turn to the artist, Emanuel Leutze, a German-born painter who created this work in Düsseldorf. This discussion prompts questions about the broader context of the time in which Leutze painted, particularly the revolutions of 1848 and the desire for democratic change in Europe, which likely influenced his choice of subject.

🌍 A Painting Rooted in Revolutionary Spirit

Beth and Sarah consider how the failed European revolutions of 1848 influenced Leutze, who sympathized with the revolutionary cause. The painting, with its focus on Washington and the diverse figures surrounding him, serves as a symbol of unity in the face of adversity. This unity is especially poignant given the fractured nature of America in the 1850s, particularly around the issue of slavery. Sarah reflects on how the painting provides a message of hope for unifying diverse voices, drawing parallels between the Revolutionary War and the political challenges of Leutze’s own time.

🎟️ Popular Reception and Cultural Impact

The group reflects on the painting’s powerful reception, with enormous crowds flocking to see it. Reports from the press hailed its unifying power, with some claiming that it would do more for the country’s unity than any political speech. This leads to a discussion of how the Revolutionary War and George Washington became defining symbols of American identity in the mid-19th century. Artists such as Robert Colescott and Jacob Lawrence later reinterpreted this iconic image to tell new stories about American history, reminding viewers that art is always a reflection of its time and a valuable historical source.

🎨 Art as a Gateway to Deeper Historical Understanding

Sarah concludes by highlighting the emotional and sensory impact of art, which captivates viewers and drives curiosity. Through its emotional power, art encourages deeper exploration of historical events, offering a gateway to ask more profound questions about history. In this way, paintings like *Washington Crossing the Delaware* not only reflect the artist’s time but also engage the viewer in a richer understanding of the past. The video ends with gentle music, reinforcing the reflective nature of the discussion.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Washington Crossing the Delaware

This is the title of the famous painting being discussed in the video, created by Emanuel Leutze in 1851. The artwork depicts George Washington leading his troops across the Delaware River during the American Revolution. It serves as a symbol of hope, determination, and unity. The video explores its historical significance and the artist’s intention to evoke these sentiments during a period of political unrest in both Europe and America.

💡American Revolution

The American Revolution was a pivotal event in American history that led to the independence of the thirteen colonies from British rule. In the context of the video, the painting captures a key moment from this era—the crossing of the Delaware River by Washington’s troops. The narrative highlights how this event was symbolic of a turning point in the war, reviving the morale of the revolutionaries and setting the stage for future victories.

💡Unity and Diversity

Unity and diversity are central themes in the discussion of the painting. The video emphasizes how Leutze portrayed different figures, each with distinct appearances and backgrounds, suggesting that revolutions are built on the collective efforts of diverse people. The theme of unity resonates with the historical context of the painting, as it was created at a time when the United States was grappling with sectionalism and division over issues such as slavery.

💡Symbolism

Symbolism is a significant element in Leutze's painting, where various features, such as the central figure of George Washington, are imbued with deeper meanings. The video discusses how the lighting, composition, and positioning of the figures symbolize leadership, hope, and resilience. The use of symbolism helps convey a narrative of strength and perseverance during trying times, both during the American Revolution and the revolutionary movements in Europe.

💡Artist’s Intentions

The video delves into Emanuel Leutze’s intentions in creating the painting. It explains that Leutze, a German-American artist, was inspired by the revolutionary spirit of 1848 in Europe and wanted to draw a parallel to the American struggle for independence. His portrayal of Washington as a unifying figure was meant to inspire hope and the possibility of successful revolution during a time when European uprisings were failing.

💡Historical Context

Understanding the historical context is key to interpreting the painting. The video explains how Leutze painted 'Washington Crossing the Delaware' in 1851, amidst failed revolutions in Europe and increasing sectionalism in the United States. This context is crucial because it shaped how audiences of the time viewed the painting, seeing it not just as a depiction of a past event, but as a commentary on contemporary struggles for freedom and unity.

💡Art as a Primary Source

The video discusses how artworks like 'Washington Crossing the Delaware' can be considered primary sources that provide insight into the era in which they were created. The painting reflects the artist’s response to political events and societal issues of the 19th century. As a primary source, it offers valuable information on how historical figures like George Washington were perceived and commemorated long after their time.

💡Public Reception

Public reception refers to how the painting was received by its audience upon its unveiling. The video mentions that the painting attracted enormous crowds and was praised for its emotional impact and portrayal of unity. The widespread acclaim and emotional response to the painting suggest that it resonated deeply with the public, offering a visual reinforcement of national identity and shared values during a time of division.

💡Scale and Composition

The scale and composition of the painting are discussed as deliberate artistic choices that amplify its impact. The video highlights the large size of the canvas and the careful arrangement of figures, which draw the viewer’s attention to Washington’s leadership. The composition, with diagonal lines and a balanced arrangement, creates a sense of movement and stability, emphasizing the significance of Washington as the focal point.

💡Sectionalism

Sectionalism refers to the division between different regions or sections of a country, often over political or social issues. In the context of the video, sectionalism in the United States is mentioned as a backdrop to the painting’s creation. During the 1850s, the country was increasingly divided over the issue of slavery, and Leutze’s portrayal of unity in the face of adversity was meant to counteract these divisions and inspire a sense of national cohesion.

💡Visual Analysis

Visual analysis is the method used by the speakers in the video to interpret and discuss the painting. This involves looking closely at the elements of the painting—such as color, brushwork, and composition—and asking questions about how they contribute to the overall message and emotional impact. Through visual analysis, the video demonstrates how seemingly small details, like the facial expressions of the figures or the depiction of weather, can enhance understanding of the artist’s intentions.

Highlights

The discussion takes place in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, focusing on a famous painting.

The approach is to look closely at the painting without making assumptions.

Sarah Alvarez, Director of School Programs at the Art Institute of Chicago, guides the conversation.

Initial observations include feelings and specific details noticed in the painting.

The painting's cold, windy weather is relatable on a cold January day.

The size of the canvas and the effort to paint it are striking.

Questions about the painting's creation process are posed.

The painting's large number of figures and their movement across water are noted.

A tall, determined figure in the foreground is speculated to be a leader.

The figures are wrapped up in their own worlds, yet distinct from each other.

The setting is a frozen, cold place with cloudy skies.

The standing figure and the figure holding the flag seem immune to the cold.

There's a sense of chaos around the central figure amidst frenetic energy and stillness.

The central figure's face is illuminated, drawing attention.

Diagonal lines in the painting create a sense of movement to the right, contrary to the boat's leftward movement.

The painting's colors and brushstrokes are discussed for their emotional impact.

The painting's natural elements are cool-toned, while manmade elements are warmer.

The painting's tension between stillness and animation is noted.

The painting's details, like clothing, are used to differentiate figures and draw the viewer in.

The painting's ability to hold attention and its design for impact are discussed.

Questions about the artist's intentions, the painting's scale, composition, and reception are gathered.

The painting's title and date are revealed to be 'Washington Crossing the Delaware', made 75 years after the event.

The historical context of the American Revolution and the painting's subject are discussed.

The painting was created in 1851, during a time of European revolutions and a desire for change.

The painting suggests that unity among diverse voices is possible, relevant to the sectionalism in the U.S. at the time.

The painting was reported to have drawn enormous crowds, offering an image of unity.

The painting is seen as a defining moment of American character and unity.

The painting is recognized as a product of its time and a primary source for understanding history.

Artworks are noted for their ability to evoke emotions and好奇心, prompting deeper historical inquiry.

Transcripts

play00:00

(gentle music)

play00:04

- [Beth] We're standing in a lovely skylit room

play00:06

in the Metropolitan Museum of Art,

play00:08

looking at a very famous painting,

play00:11

but we're actually gonna try a different method today.

play00:14

We're gonna not talk about our assumptions

play00:16

about what we're seeing,

play00:17

but we're gonna take the time to look closely.

play00:20

- [Steven] We're standing with Sarah Alvarez,

play00:22

who's Director of School Programs

play00:24

at the Art Institute of Chicago.

play00:26

She's gonna help us with this process.

play00:29

- [Sarah] I'd like for us to talk about some of the things

play00:31

that caught our attention when we first looked at this.

play00:33

It might be a feeling we had.

play00:35

It might be a particular detail in the painting.

play00:37

- [Beth] Well, given that it's a cold January day,

play00:40

I immediately empathized with the very cold, windy weather.

play00:46

- [Steven] What strikes me first

play00:48

is just the sheer size of this canvas.

play00:51

This was painted with a paintbrush.

play00:53

It must have taken forever.

play00:55

- [Sarah] We might want to take your observation

play00:57

and pose it as a question to ourselves:

play00:59

How was this made?

play01:00

What were the materials that were used?

play01:02

How long did it take?

play01:03

Those are all questions that we can continue to explore,

play01:06

and we should make an inventory

play01:07

as we're talking about some of those things

play01:08

we're wondering about.

play01:09

- [Steven] And asking those questions

play01:11

prompted me to ask another question,

play01:13

which is why it's so big.

play01:14

This could never fit in my house.

play01:16

Where was this intended to be?

play01:18

- [Sarah] We see a large number of figures

play01:20

packed into boats.

play01:22

Based on the way that they're all faced

play01:23

and other actions that we can see them making,

play01:26

they all seem to be moving in the same direction

play01:28

across a body of water.

play01:30

There's a tall figure in the boat that's in the foreground

play01:33

that is very determined-looking.

play01:35

Is the leader, is he the most important,

play01:37

and how is he related to all of these other figures?

play01:40

- [Beth] I also notice that the figures seem wrapped up

play01:43

in their own worlds.

play01:45

- [Steven] I'm noticing how distinct each one is

play01:47

from the other.

play01:48

They're wearing different clothing.

play01:50

They're not only in their own worlds,

play01:51

but they seem to come out of different worlds.

play01:54

- [Sarah] And I'm wondering,

play01:55

where is this frozen, cold place?

play01:57

There's these cloudy skies.

play01:59

Maybe that's a star, maybe that's the sun,

play02:02

that is poking through the clouds.

play02:04

- [Steven] I'm struck that the standing figure

play02:06

and the figure holding the flag seem immune to that cold.

play02:10

They seem so focused, so determined, so resolute,

play02:14

looking towards that far shore,

play02:16

the cold seems to pass over them.

play02:18

- [Beth] There is also a sense of chaos around them.

play02:21

- [Steven] It is really interesting

play02:22

how there is simultaneously both a frenetic energy

play02:26

and a sense of stillness and quiet.

play02:28

My eye keeps going back to that central figure.

play02:31

That's the only face that's not obscured

play02:33

that's in profile,

play02:35

and it's illuminated by the sky behind it.

play02:38

- [Beth] And around him are all of these diagonal lines,

play02:41

and all of those diagonal lines point to the right,

play02:44

and yet we know the boat is moving to the left.

play02:48

- [Steven] And at the same time,

play02:49

those oars and that flagpole mark a kind of area

play02:53

that that central figure can inhabit

play02:55

and emphasize his importance even more.

play02:58

- [Sarah] One question is,

play02:59

are there other images in our mind,

play03:01

in our visual reference bank,

play03:03

that tell us that this is a person of importance?

play03:05

- [Beth] He looks like a profile of a figure on a coin.

play03:08

- [Steven] And the lighting reminds me of religious images.

play03:10

It reminds me of images

play03:12

where biblical events were unfolding.

play03:14

- [Sarah] We've talked a lot about the choices

play03:16

the artist has made to position the figures, the boat,

play03:19

the land, but there are some other

play03:21

even more fundamental characteristics of this painting,

play03:24

like the colors and the brushstrokes

play03:26

that might be helpful for us to explore

play03:28

in order to generate some additional questions.

play03:31

- [Steven] The things that are part of the natural world

play03:33

are cool, blues and whites and greens, and the boat,

play03:38

the things that are manmade

play03:39

and the people and their clothing, tend to be warmer colors.

play03:43

- [Sarah] It's almost as if there are layers

play03:45

of different kinds of tension that the artist has chosen

play03:48

to use in this painting.

play03:50

- [Beth] This event is unfolding before us.

play03:52

Everyone except for that central figure

play03:54

is in the middle of moving.

play03:56

- [Sarah] If you look very closely,

play03:57

every single line and brushstroke is so precise,

play04:01

and they feel so still;

play04:03

yet there's so much animation to a lot of the details,

play04:06

again, another point of tension.

play04:08

- [Beth] And it's like the artist wants us

play04:10

to notice those little details to the bag.

play04:13

It looks like a bag that I've seen in galleries

play04:16

of Native American art, or the fur caps,

play04:19

these details of clothing

play04:22

that seem to differentiate the figures

play04:24

and draw us in to look at them.

play04:26

- [Steven] It is remarkable how long this painting

play04:28

holds my attention.

play04:29

It does make me wonder whether or not it was designed

play04:32

to make a large, powerful impact initially,

play04:36

but then to draw me in to these little details.

play04:39

- [Sarah] Let's gather together the questions

play04:41

that we've posed.

play04:42

We've asked about the artist's intentions,

play04:44

the choices that the artist made,

play04:46

whether it be in the scale of the painting,

play04:48

the composition.

play04:50

We've asked a lot of questions about what's happening here,

play04:53

who is meant to see this, where was it meant to go?

play04:55

We have a lot of questions about the making of the painting

play04:59

and the initial reception of the painting.

play05:02

We might also ask questions about when it was made,

play05:06

and how people have thought about it

play05:08

or experienced it since then.

play05:09

One of the important steps in our process

play05:11

is to think about what sources we use.

play05:14

We have documentation from the popular press

play05:17

that tells us about how people were engaging

play05:20

with the painting, what they saw, what they thought.

play05:23

We also have other kinds of materials, like prints,

play05:26

or keepsakes that were produced in vast quantities

play05:29

and distributed all over the country.

play05:31

All of these primary sources give us further information

play05:35

about this moment in time and the meaning of this painting.

play05:39

Let's just simply start with the title and date.

play05:43

- [Beth] "Washington Crossing the Delaware."

play05:45

It's so tempting to say this was 1776,

play05:48

which is the date of the Declaration of Independence

play05:52

and the year that Washington crossed the Delware,

play05:55

but this was actually made 75 years later.

play05:57

- [Sarah] And what do we know about the subject?

play06:00

- [Beth] Well, we know that this was

play06:02

an important turning point in the Revolution,

play06:04

that Washington and his troops had lost

play06:07

several major battles to the British,

play06:09

the troops were disheartened, they were tired,

play06:11

there was a sense of hopelessness, and that this battle,

play06:16

and the victory that followed,

play06:18

changed the outlook of the revolutionaries

play06:22

and gave them hope for the future.

play06:24

- [Steven] Washington's troops were crossing the Delaware

play06:27

in order to mount a sneak attack in the middle of the night

play06:30

against Hessian soldiers fighting on behalf of the British,

play06:33

that is, Germans.

play06:34

And Leutze had been born in Germany.

play06:36

He had grown up in the United States,

play06:38

but he had gone back, and he painted this in

play06:40

the German city of Dusseldorf.

play06:42

- [Sarah] So what was happening in 1851

play06:44

that might help us understand

play06:46

why Leutze decided to portray this subject at this time?

play06:50

- [Beth] We know that there was series of revolutions

play06:52

in Europe in 1848.

play06:54

There was a desire to overturn an old order

play06:58

of kinds and emperors and create a new order

play07:02

where people had more say in their government.

play07:06

- [Sarah] And all of the different places

play07:07

where revolutions were happening essentially failed.

play07:10

There were many different groups of revolutionaries

play07:12

who could not unify to succeed in their efforts.

play07:15

And we know that Emmanuel Leutze was sympathetic

play07:19

to this revolutionary cause,

play07:21

and a painting like this would provide hope.

play07:24

- [Beth] We have George Washington leading the troops.

play07:26

But the time the artist has spent

play07:28

on all the other individual figures

play07:30

and their clear differences

play07:32

makes me think about how revolutions are made up of

play07:37

people of different backgrounds coming together

play07:41

to fight for a single cause.

play07:43

- [Sarah] And it also suggests that a revolution is tenuous,

play07:48

that the success of the revolution is contingent upon

play07:51

the unity of diverse voices.

play07:54

This is the 50th anniversary of the death

play07:56

of George Washington, in 1851.

play07:58

People are celebrating him as the great unifier

play08:02

of this young nation.

play08:04

There's also a moment in the United States at this time

play08:08

that even though unity exists,

play08:10

there's still a fractured nation.

play08:12

There's sectionalism,

play08:13

especially around the issue of slavery,

play08:15

and an image like this suggests that unity is possible.

play08:19

- [Steven] And the reports are that the crowds

play08:21

are enormous, that people flocked to see this painting.

play08:24

- [Beth] It offered them an image of unity

play08:27

in the face of incredible sectionalism

play08:29

in the United States in the 1850s.

play08:32

- [Sarah] And in December 12th of 1851,

play08:35

a notice in the New York Daily Times

play08:37

said that over 20,000 people had visited the exhibition.

play08:40

Quote, "The sight of such a splendid work of art

play08:43

"will do more for the union of this country

play08:45

"than a thousand union speeches."

play08:47

And another notice in the Albion said that quote,

play08:51

"We defy anyone possessed of one grain of sensibility

play08:54

"to look upon it, unmoved,"

play08:56

referencing the emotional power of this painting.

play08:59

- [Beth] For Americans in the mid-19th century,

play09:01

Washington himself, but also the Revolutionary War,

play09:05

was this defining moment of American character,

play09:08

that we together defeated the British.

play09:12

- [Sarah] Artists like Robert Colescott, Jacob Lawrence,

play09:15

and others have reproduced this image

play09:17

and told very different stories of American history.

play09:20

- [Steven] And that's a reminder that a work of art

play09:22

is always a product of its own time

play09:25

and is itself a primary source.

play09:28

- [Sarah] And works of art do something really wonderful,

play09:30

which is that they play on our emotions,

play09:33

they pull at our senses, and they captivate us in a way

play09:36

that drives our sense of curiosity

play09:39

and gets us to ask questions

play09:41

that allow us to approach history in deeper and richer ways.

play09:45

(gentle music)

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

相关标签
Art AnalysisHistorical PaintingWashingtonAmerican RevolutionSymbolismUnity19th Century ArtRevolutionary WarArt HistoryEmmanuel Leutze
您是否需要英文摘要?