就活面接で失敗しない方法。採用試験の面接官は面接が下手クソ！内定を勝ち取るには対策本を読むのと、〇〇を受けまくれ

Summary

The video script discusses the challenges and inefficiencies of job interviews, suggesting that they often fail to accurately assess a candidate's abilities within a short time frame. The speaker, Ayato, criticizes the common practice of asking about a candidate's 'death motive' for a company, arguing that it's more about gauging research and understanding of the company rather than a genuine interest. The script also touches on the importance of internships as a better method for assessing potential employees and the value of preparation and practice in interviews. It concludes with the notion that interviewers are not necessarily experts in conducting interviews, but rather in their field of work, and encourages viewers to subscribe and share the channel.

Takeaways

• 🗣️ Most interviewers are not skilled at conducting interviews, making it difficult to accurately assess candidates' abilities.
• 🔄 The practice of interviews continues despite their ineffectiveness in truly evaluating a candidate's skills.
• 🤔 The primary purpose of asking for reasons for applying to a company is to see if the candidate has researched the company.
• 🚫 The specific reason for applying is not as crucial as candidates often think; it's more about demonstrating preparation.
• 📚 It's important to understand that interview questions are often about assessing general preparedness rather than deep knowledge.
• 🎯 Giving a well-researched, templated answer can be more effective in interviews than aiming for unique responses.
• 📝 Interviews are not as effective as practical work assessments like internships for evaluating a candidate's true abilities.
• 💡 Candidates should approach interviews as a practice in presentation, becoming more effective through repeated experiences.
• ❓ Asking insightful questions during an interview can significantly boost a candidate's evaluation.
• 📊 The only reliable measure of a student's capability during interviews is discussing their thesis or substantial projects.

Q & A

What is the main issue discussed in the script regarding job interviews?

The script discusses the inefficiency and redundancy of job interviews, stating that they often fail to accurately assess a candidate's abilities within a short time frame.

What is the speaker's opinion on the common practice of asking about a candidate's 'death motive' during interviews?

The speaker suggests that asking about a 'death motive' is not necessarily about the importance of the motive itself, but rather a way for interviewers to gauge if the candidate has researched the company and understands its business.

Why does the speaker believe that many interviewers are not good at conducting interviews?

The speaker believes that most interviewers lack the skills to effectively assess a candidate's abilities in a short period, such as 15 or 20 minutes, and that this leads to a repetitive and often futile process.

What does the speaker suggest as a more effective way to evaluate a candidate's abilities?

The speaker suggests that a more effective method would be to have candidates work in an internship-like setting for a period, such as half a year or a year, and then make hiring decisions based on their performance.

What is the speaker's view on the importance of preparing for job interviews?

The speaker believes that preparing for job interviews is crucial and recommends reading interview strategy books to avoid common pitfalls and to perform better.

How does the speaker feel about candidates who claim the company is their top choice without genuine interest?

The speaker expresses that while such claims might be pleasing to hear, they do not feel happy if they suspect the candidate is not being truthful.

What is the speaker's advice for candidates on how to stand out during an interview?

The speaker advises candidates to ask sharp and insightful questions during the interview, as this can demonstrate their ability to think critically and can lead to a higher evaluation.

Why does the speaker mention that having a good thesis can be useful for evaluating a candidate's abilities?

The speaker mentions that a good thesis can serve as a material that can be used to assess a candidate's abilities, as it reflects their research and analytical skills.

What does the speaker imply about the role of part-time jobs or club activities in assessing a candidate's abilities?

The speaker implies that while part-time jobs or club activities can provide some insight into a candidate's abilities, they may not be as relevant or useful as other forms of assessment, such as a thesis or internship.

What is the speaker's final recommendation for both interviewers and candidates?

The speaker's final recommendation is for interviewers to be more thoughtful in their approach and for candidates to be well-prepared, suggesting that both parties should aim for more meaningful and less formulaic interactions.